| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Blaine
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Giuffre
|
Witness corroborator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged victim trafficker |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. [REDACTED]
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Colleen Mullen
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim witness |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
sender
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Alan Ross
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Plaintiff's counsel
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
alex
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Gail E. Ferguson
|
Professional regulatory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Pilot]
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Daniel Rose
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex [Government Official]
|
Subject of investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Joe
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ray
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Deceased Partner
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Agent [REDACTED]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Academic |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted (Deceased Partner)
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Blaine met Ms. [Redacted] through mutual friends. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Brief visit to Epstein's Palm Beach residence | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| N/A | N/A | Stay at Epstein's Paris Apartment | Paris, France | View |
| N/A | N/A | Depositions/Testimony of alleged victims | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. [Redacted] provided information to New York Post journalist. | New York Post (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Abuse of Ms. [Redacted] by Jeffrey Epstein | Townhome in New York and Ca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged abuse of Ms. [Redacted] by Jeffrey Epstein. | New York Townhome and Virgi... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement Opt-out Period | N/A | View |
| 2021-09-28 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding subpoena compliance. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-03-17 | N/A | Third call from Ms. [Redacted] insistent on information. | Phone | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Follow-up call from Ms. [Redacted]. | Phone | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Initial call received by AUSA from a woman identifying as an Epstein victim. | Desk line (Phone) | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Assistant U.S. Attorney received a call from a woman identifying as a former victim of Jeffrey Ep... | Phone call (Desk line) | View |
| 2020-03-09 | N/A | SDNY AUSA requests a meeting with Ms. [Redacted]. | New York (implied jurisdict... | View |
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Meeting between Sigrid McCawley, her client (Ms. [Redacted]), and the Assistant U.S. Attorney. | New York (SDNY Building imp... | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Proposed meeting between SDNY and Ms. [Redacted] | New York | View |
| 2020-01-20 | N/A | Proposed deadline for interview with client (Jeffrey Pop requested dates before this time). | Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates... | View |
| 2019-12-04 | N/A | Submission of a complaint referenced in the emails. | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-26 | N/A | Proposed meeting between Ms. [Redacted] and prosecutors. | New York | View |
| 2019-08-19 | N/A | Witness Ms. [Redacted] formally refuses to be interviewed by the FBI. | Phone / Mobile | View |
| 2019-08-16 | N/A | Initial contact established with potential witness Ms. [Redacted]. | Phone / Mobile | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Video of Jeffrey Epstein sent to victim's YouTube account. | Online (YouTube) | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Agent served Ms. [Redacted] with a grand jury subpoena. | Florida (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Ms. [Redacted] served with a grand jury subpoena by an Agent. | Unknown (likely Florida bas... | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Grand Jury Subpoena Service | Unknown (likely Florida giv... | View |
An email from an attorney at Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC regarding a client ('Ms. [Redacted]') who was served with a grand jury subpoena on July 6, 2019, likely in connection with the Epstein investigation (arrest occurred same day). The sender explains they are the 'inventory attorney' for a deceased partner who originally represented the client and is seeking to coordinate with the email recipient regarding the matter.
This document is an email chain from August 2019 detailing the FBI's attempt, via UK Metropolitan Police, to interview a female witness (DOB May 1973) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. While initially willing to cooperate on August 16th, the witness retracted her offer on August 19th following Epstein's death, citing fears for her safety and concerns that her name would appear on Twitter. The document includes a background check on the witness revealing no criminal trace, though a 2013 report of 'suspicious circumstances' exists in police databases.
This document is page 21 of 23 from a legal filing (Document 256) in Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR (Doe v. Deutsche Bank), filed on November 2, 2023. It argues that an objector, Ms. [REDACTED], failed to credibly allege conflicts of interest regarding the Claims Administrator and notes she did not opt out of the settlement despite receiving notice. The image appears to be a screenshot of the PDF being viewed within a ProtonMail browser interface.
Internal correspondence from a Unit Manager at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York to a supervisor ('Boss'). The manager confirms finding a specific inmate's file, noting that a colleague (Ms. [Redacted]) had ensured it was complete. The message states the inmate was housed on '5 North' for one night and includes an attached 'Notice of Separation'.
This document is an email forwarding a letter written to Jeffrey Epstein while he was incarcerated at MCC New York in July 2019. The sender, an academic claiming credentials from Oxford and Harvard, proposes a 'quid pro quo' arrangement: if Epstein donates $5 million to Morgan State University or funds the sender personally, the sender promises to publicly defend Epstein, generate positive media coverage, and help him avoid a conviction 'like Bill Cosby.' The sender leverages their academic standing and potential position at Oxford as a means to rehabilitate Epstein's public image.
This document is an email thread from July 6-9, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. An attorney named 'Joe' from the Miami firm Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento contacts an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) because a female client (name redacted) was served with a grand jury subpoena on July 6. The client was previously represented by Joe's deceased partner, Alan Ross. The emails coordinate a phone call between the defense attorney and the prosecutor for the following Tuesday.
This document is a series of email chains between attorney Michael Bachner and government prosecutors (including one named Alex) regarding an 'Attorney Proffer' for a client referred to as Ms. [Redacted]. The correspondence, dating from February to June 2020, discusses the logistics of scheduling interviews, which were complicated by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Key details emerging from the proffer discussions include the client admitting to visiting Epstein's New York and Palm Beach properties, as well as staying at Epstein's Paris apartment with her husband on one occasion. No flight logs or aircraft data are contained in this document.
This is a legal declaration filed in the SDNY case Jane Doe v. Darren Indyke. A pilot who worked for Epstein starting in 1991 provides testimony regarding his flight logs from 1994-1997. The pilot confirms two specific flights (Nov 11, 1996, and May 9, 1997) involving a specific female passenger (name redacted) traveling between West Palm Beach, Teterboro, and Santa Fe, noting that he used generic descriptions like 'Baby' or 'Nanny' when names were unknown.
An email chain from July 2019 in which an attorney from the Miami firm Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento contacts an unknown individual regarding a client. The client, who had been represented by the sender's deceased partner, was served with a grand jury subpoena by a federal agent in connection with the Epstein case earlier that day. The sender requests a call to get up to speed on the matter.
An email chain from early 2021 involving SDNY officials discussing phone calls from a woman identifying herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The woman stated she was a former client of a specific attorney (name redacted) who had previously claimed to represent nine victims but stopped communicating with prosecutors. The officials plan to coordinate with the FBI regarding the caller.
This document is an internal email chain from November 2019 forwarding claims of Jeffrey Epstein victims to the FBI. The primary claim involves a 17-year-old female from Calderitas, Mexico, alleged to have been abused at Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. A secondary, potentially unrelated note within the chain mentions a call from a mother in New Mexico regarding sex trafficking.
This document is an email chain from November 2019 requesting information be forwarded to the FBI. The original email is from a self-described close friend of a 17-year-old female and her guardian in Calderitas, Mexico. The sender alleges that the young woman was abused by Jeffrey Epstein at his properties in New York and the Virgin Islands and is seeking to register a claim against his estate.
This document contains an email chain from July 2019 between an attorney at the Miami firm Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns a client formerly represented by the firm's late partner, Alan Ross, who was recently served with a grand jury subpoena related to the Epstein investigation. The attorneys coordinate to schedule a phone call for the following Tuesday to discuss the matter.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 in which Jeffrey Epstein's brother (acting as next of kin) requests specific evidence regarding Jeffrey's death from government officials. The brother requests the same information previously released to the New York Times, as well as video footage from outside the SHU on August 9, 2019, lists of inmates on the tier, and identities of staff present when the body was moved. Internal government emails discuss that the requested video is in the custody of the FBI and USAO after being seized from the BOP.
An email chain from October 2021 involving a request from Jeffrey Epstein's brother (implied to be Mark Epstein) seeking all records previously released to the New York Times regarding the Epstein case. A government official responds, instructing him to file a formal FOIA request with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), noting that their Civil Division does not handle such requests directly. The top email discusses forwarding this request internally as the recipient is no longer on the case.
This document is an email chain from May 2019 between Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence coordinates an interview/meeting with a female client (Ms. [Redacted]) regarding the SDNY investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor notes that upcoming meetings will cover 'difficult topics,' specifically 'Giglio subjects' and a review of Epstein's conduct with the client.
This document is an email chain from May 2019 between Alex Conlon (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the SDNY regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The emails discuss scheduling an interview with a redacted female witness ('Ms. [Redacted]') to discuss 'difficult topics,' including 'Giglio subjects' and Epstein's specific conduct with her. The correspondence also touches on the witness contacting other individuals the SDNY is interested in speaking with.
This document is an email dated July 11, 2019, sent by a witness (represented by attorney Robert Lewis) to law enforcement officials regarding the SDNY investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The sender warns officials not to grant Epstein bail, citing his apartment in Paris and wealthy friends who could facilitate his escape. The sender describes Epstein's relationship with their 'former employer' as family-like, noting Epstein is the godfather to the employer's children (who call him uncle 'F') and that the parties exchange favors including money and use of private planes.
This document is a chain of emails from March 9-10, 2020, between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) from the Southern District of New York. The AUSA is seeking to interview a woman (name redacted) regarding an investigation. Scarola indicates that his own attempts to contact the woman have been ignored and provides her phone number to the AUSA, stating he has no objection to them contacting her directly.
An email thread from August 13, 2019 (three days after Epstein's death) discussing the logistics of interviewing victims. Attorney Colleen Mullen coordinates a meeting for a client with prosecutors in New York and requests travel arrangements. A responding official discusses the procedural difficulties of using government funds to bring witnesses to SDNY now that the indictment is no longer 'open' in the same pre-trial capacity, suggesting investigators may need to travel to the witnesses instead.
This document contains an email chain from February 2020 between Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Epstein investigation.' The correspondence coordinates a meeting scheduled for March 4, 2020, in New York between the prosecutors, McCawley, and a female client/witness (name redacted). One participant notes they will miss the meeting due to a conflict in White Plains.
This document is an email dated February 24, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorney Sigrid McCawley. The prosecutor is following up on a phone call to schedule an in-person meeting in New York with McCawley and her client, referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted],' regarding the Epstein investigation.
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between a Miami-based defense attorney from Ross Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The discussion concerns a grand jury subpoena served on a 'Ms. [Redacted]' by an agent on July 6, 2019. The defense attorney explains that his deceased former partner previously represented the client, and he is stepping in as the 'inventory attorney' to assist her.
This document is a chain of emails from January 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for a client referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted]' (likely a key Epstein associate given the context and date). The correspondence reveals urgent negotiations regarding 'proffers' and potential charges, with prosecutors stating that 'offenses can be charged now' but offering the defense a chance to present to the U.S. Attorney before a final decision. The emails specifically demand information regarding the client's recollection of observing Jeffrey Epstein in sexual activity, nude circumstances, or massages with other women/girls.
This document is an email chain from February and March 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are scheduling an in-person interview/meeting for McCawley's client, referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted]', to take place on March 4, 2020, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrews Plaza, New York. The subject line references the 'Epstein investigation'.
Emails where she mentions Dershowitz but does not allege trafficking or sex.
Notification regarding the settlement and opportunity to opt out.
Discussing testimony of a defense character witness who allegedly recruited the victim.
Requesting a call regarding compliance with a subpoena served on the recipient's office in connection with an upcoming criminal trial in SDNY.
Looking for follow-up; no substantive discussion.
Call to desk line identifying self as victim and former client of attorney.
Identified as victim and former client of Mr. [Redacted]; discussed attorney contact and NYPD contact.
Good afternoon, Ms. [Redacted] Please see annexed for your information.
Please see annexed for your information.
Sending attached correspondence from Clara Moran and a link/password to 'NMAG files'.
Email providing digital access (via link and password) and notice of physical delivery (CD via mail) of correspondence from Chief Deputy AG Clara Moran regarding the Epstein investigation.
Forwarding correspondence from Chief Deputy AG Clara Moran regarding the investigation. Includes a link to 'NMAG files', a password ('7e4DzyfvYC'), and notes a CD is coming via U.S. Mail.
Claims regarding 'the Russians', Anonymous, CIA hacking, and threats to release evidence against Clintons and Trump.
On February 14, 2006, at 12:06 pm, the investigator received a call back from Ms. [REDACTED] on voicemail, who left her number for a return call.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity