ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
54
Very Strong
|
90 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
24
Very Strong
|
33 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
21
Very Strong
|
66 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
46 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judicial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judicial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Paula Speer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor judge |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial authority |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial assignment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judge defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. | United States Courthouse at... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Proposed meeting | Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal judgment | A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Imposition of Judgment | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019784.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, extensions granted for discovery deadlines, and disputes regarding the timing of evidence disclosure. Significant attention is paid to Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, with Judge Nathan ordering the parties to confer with Warden Heriberto Tellez regarding the defendant's concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00019783.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet page from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It details procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also lists a series of letters between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a Brady disclosure order signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019781.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from July 30, 2020, to August 18, 2020. It details legal arguments regarding a protective order for discovery materials, specifically concerning witness privacy and the defense's ability to reference individuals. The log tracks the filing of motions, affidavits, and responses by defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the government (Rossmiller), as well as orders issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019780.jpg
This is a court docket log from the Ghislaine Maxwell case covering July 27-30, 2020. It details the dispute and subsequent ruling on a Protective Order where Maxwell sought to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken to the media about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict the public identification of victims and witnesses to protect their privacy and safety.
DOJ-OGR-00019779.jpg
This document is a court docket from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the denial of her bail, and the setting of a trial date for July 2021. The docket also records various motions and orders concerning legal representation, discovery schedules, and rules of conduct for the parties involved.
DOJ-OGR-00019778.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8-13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment, notices of appearance for Maxwell's attorneys, and memoranda regarding her detention. A significant order from Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules Maxwell's remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, and outlines procedures for public and media access during the COVID-19 pandemic.
DOJ-OGR-00019776.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from July 2020 chronicling the unsealing of the indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, her arrest in New Hampshire, and the assignment of Judge Alison J. Nathan to the case. It details the procedural motions to detain the defendant and the scheduling of her initial arraignment via remote video conference due to COVID-19 protocols at the Metropolitan Detention Center. Correspondence between prosecution attorneys (Rossmiller, Comey, Moe) and defense counsel (Cohen) regarding scheduling is also logged.
DOJ-OGR-00019773.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet for the case of USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her extensive legal team, including five attorneys from various law firms in New York and Denver. The case was assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019768.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Maxwell's third motion for bail and issuing an order regarding the defense's attempt to subpoena a law firm representing alleged victims. Maxwell subsequently filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the bail denial.
DOJ-OGR-00019767.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from Case 21-58, dated March 24, 2021, detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It chronicles filings from late February to mid-March 2021, including Maxwell's third motion for bond, the government's opposition, and various procedural motions and letters. A key event is a March 18, 2021 order by Judge Alison J. Nathan ruling on disputes over the redaction and sealing of sensitive documents, denying the government's request to fully seal an exhibit and ordering the parties to confer on redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00019766.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from a legal case, detailing a series of court filings in February 2021 related to Ghislaine Maxwell. On February 4, 2021, Maxwell's defense team filed numerous motions to suppress evidence and dismiss various charges from the superseding indictment. The log also records subsequent sealed filings and letters to Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning Maxwell's pretrial confinement conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019764.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the granting of laptop access for discovery review, a subsequent request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate that order, and the filing of multiple motions by Maxwell's defense team to dismiss charges or separate trials. It also records the transmission of appeal records to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019763.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court docket sheet (Case 21-58) outlining proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between late December 2020 and January 2021. Key events include Judge Alison Nathan denying Maxwell's renewed motion for bail on the grounds that she remains a flight risk, the listing of specific federal charges against her (sex trafficking and perjury), and the subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal by the defense. The document also records procedural motions regarding extensions of time and the sealing of specific documents.
DOJ-OGR-00019762.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering entries from December 18 to December 28, 2020. It details the legal proceedings surrounding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, including the Government's opposition, Maxwell's reply, and Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders approving specific redactions to protect third-party privacy. The page concludes with an entry on December 28, 2020, where the Court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail.
DOJ-OGR-00019760.jpg
This document contains a court docket log from December 4-8, 2020, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries detail procedural disputes over sealing documents, a schedule for a renewed bail motion, and significant back-and-forth regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC Brooklyn. Judge Nathan denied a request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez personally but ordered the government to provide written updates every 60 days concerning Maxwell's access to legal materials and the frequency of searches conducted on her.
DOJ-OGR-00019759.jpg
This document is a court docket log from December 2020 regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records correspondence between the US Government (AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and requests to seal certain documents. Key events include the Judge ordering MDC counsel to submit information, denying a request for an in-camera conference, approving redactions to protect privacy interests, and ordering the parties to schedule a renewed bail motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019758.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings, including discovery deadline extensions, an affidavit from AUSA Maurene Comey, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Notably, it includes orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically ordering parties to confer regarding Warden Heriberto Tellez addressing her concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00019757.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-58 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It logs the transmission of appeal records to the USCA, the placement of several sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim for the defense. The docket details a series of legal correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a judge's order regarding Brady disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00019756.jpg
This page from a court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell lists legal filings and orders between August 20 and September 8, 2020. Key entries include memoranda and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions regarding victim disclosure and prison conditions, as well as a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019755.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58). It details legal maneuvers regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders between July and August 2020, including a ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a defense request deemed 'unprecedented' and 'too broad' regarding witness privacy. The docket lists filings by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition by Assistant US Attorney Alex Rossmiller.
DOJ-OGR-00019754.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) criminal proceedings, specifically covering July 27-30, 2020. It details the legal arguments and subsequent court order regarding a 'Protective Order' governing confidential materials. Judge Alison Nathan ruled against Maxwell's request to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken publicly, citing a need to protect witness privacy and the integrity of the criminal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00019753.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from July 2020 detailing legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell, including her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty and was denied bail. It records the appearance of her legal team (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the scheduling of her trial for July 2021, and the judge's orders regarding extrajudicial statements and the rejection of letters from non-parties. The document also lists various filings related to protective orders and discovery deadlines.
DOJ-OGR-00019752.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 7 of 24) from July 2020 regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details procedural events including the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear (Pro Hac Vice), and a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the logistics for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The document also lists the appearances of attorneys Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell for the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00019750.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-58 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from June 29, 2020, to July 7, 2020. It tracks the unsealing of the indictment, the assignment of the case to Judge Alison J. Nathan, the motion to detain the defendant, and the scheduling of the initial appearance and arraignment amidst COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00019747.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. The document identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant, Judge Alison J. Nathan as the presiding judge, and lists the five attorneys representing Maxwell. It also provides the contact information and law firm affiliations for each attorney.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity