ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
54
Very Strong
|
90 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
24
Very Strong
|
33 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
21
Very Strong
|
66 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
46 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judicial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judicial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Paula Speer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor judge |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial authority |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial assignment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judge defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. | United States Courthouse at... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Proposed meeting | Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal judgment | A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Imposition of Judgment | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019746.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by David Oscar Markus, is appealing the 'Order on Third Motion for Release on Bail' entered on March 22, 2021. The document lists the legal counsel for both the defense and the prosecution (Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz) and notes that Maxwell's bail disposition is 'Committed'.
DOJ-OGR-00019734.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. Key events include the denial of a renewed motion for release on bail, subsequent letter motions regarding extensions of time, and the filing of a Notice of Appeal by the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00019733.jpg
This document is a docket summary from a legal case involving defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 12, 2021. It details a series of court filings and orders from December 2020 concerning Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and the redaction of related documents. The court applies a three-part test from the Second Circuit case *Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga* to approve proposed redactions from both the defense and the government, ultimately culminating in a December 28, 2020 order denying Maxwell's motion for release on bail.
DOJ-OGR-00019732.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for a renewed bail application to protect the privacy interests of third parties, notices of transcript filings, and the entry of appearance by attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government. The document also lists the filing of a Memorandum of Law in support of bail accompanied by numerous exhibits (A through X).
DOJ-OGR-00019731.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from January 2021, detailing a series of legal filings in Ghislaine Maxwell's case from early December 2020. The entries include letters from Maxwell's legal team to Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning briefing schedules, sealing requests, a renewed motion for bail, and her conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The document also includes court orders setting deadlines for legal briefs and denying Maxwell's request to summon the prison warden, instead ordering the government to provide regular written updates on her status.
DOJ-OGR-00019730.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet covering December 1-3, 2020, detailing proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the filing of government letters regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement and sealing requests, as well as Judge Alison Nathan's orders requiring MDC counsel to report on confinement and denying a defense request for an in-camera conference regarding a bail motion. The judge permits redacted filings to protect the privacy interests of individuals referenced in the defense's letters.
DOJ-OGR-00019729.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) detailing filings between November 6, 2020, and December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan extending discovery deadlines, and specific orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, including a directive involving Warden Heriberto Tellez. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Sternheim) regarding discovery materials and detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019728.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It details the transmission of appeal notices, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim, and a series of letters between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding disclosure delays and investigative files. The log concludes with Judge Nathan issuing an order confirming the government's Brady disclosure obligations pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act.
DOJ-OGR-00019725.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet and memorandum opinion from July 2020 regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the legal dispute over a protective order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly name alleged victims and witnesses. Judge Alison J. Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict Maxwell from referencing alleged victims, citing the need to protect their privacy and safety despite previous public statements.
DOJ-OGR-00019724.jpg
This document is a court docket from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include her arraignment on July 14, where she pleaded not guilty, was denied bail, and remanded into custody. The docket also records subsequent orders and motions concerning discovery deadlines, a defense motion to limit extrajudicial statements (which was denied), and proposed protective orders.
DOJ-OGR-00019723.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8 to July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear on Maxwell's behalf, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The order specifies how the public, press, victims, and legal counsel can access the proceedings via teleconference and limited in-person viewing.
DOJ-OGR-00019721.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell from late June to early July 2020. It lists events such as the unsealing of the indictment, assignment of the judge, motions to detain, and scheduling orders for arraignment and bail hearings, including specific instructions for remote proceedings due to COVID-19.
DOJ-OGR-00019718.jpg
This document is page 3 of a U.S. District Court criminal docket sheet for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Maxwell), filed on June 29, 2020, and assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details the defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell (also listed as Sealed Defendant 1), specifically listing five attorneys from three different law firms (Cohen & Gresser, Haddon Morgan and Foreman, and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim) along with their contact information. The document carries a Bates stamp of DOJ-OGR-00019718.
DOJ-OGR-00019714.jpg
This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 28, 2020, denying a defendant's application for release. The Court reaffirms its initial decision, concluding the defendant is a flight risk and that no conditions can ensure her appearance at future proceedings, thus warranting continued pre-trial detention. The order also instructs the parties to submit a joint letter regarding potential redactions by December 30, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00019711.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell between late December 2020 and January 12, 2021. It records Judge Nathan's denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail on the grounds that she remains a flight risk, the filing of sealed documents, and the subsequent denial of a request to extend the time to file an appeal. The log concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal and the transmission of the case to the US Court of Appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019709.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from a legal case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 12, 2021. It logs court activities from December 10 to December 18, 2020, including the filing of a conference transcript, orders regarding Maxwell's renewed application for bail, and the court's decision to allow redactions based on established legal tests. The entries also note the filing of a letter and memorandum by Maxwell's counsel and a notice of appearance by an attorney for the USA.
DOJ-OGR-00019707.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 1-3, 2020, detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes letters from the prosecution regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement and sealing requests, as well as orders from Judge Alison Nathan denying an in camera conference but allowing specific redactions to protect the privacy interests of individuals referenced in defense letters. The Judge also orders MDC legal counsel to submit information regarding confinement conditions and sets the stage for a renewed bail motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019706.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Page 13 of 19) for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings including letters from the prosecution (USA) and defense regarding discovery deadlines, conditions of confinement at the MDC, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Key events include Judge Nathan setting new deadlines for motions and discovery, and ordering parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019705.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It records procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also details a back-and-forth correspondence between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding the delay of disclosure of materials and the review of investigative files, culminating in a Rule 5(f) order by Judge Nathan confirming Brady disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00019702.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries between July 27 and July 30, 2020, regarding *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. Key entries include a dispute over the terms of a Protective Order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly reference alleged victims who have previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memorandum Opinion & Order siding with the Government to restrict Maxwell from publicly referencing these victims/witnesses to protect their privacy and safety.
DOJ-OGR-00019701.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the denial of her bail, and the setting of a trial date. The document also records various orders and motions filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning discovery deadlines, extrajudicial statements, and a proposed protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00019700.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 21-58, detailing legal proceedings related to Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions and notices for attorney appearances on behalf of Maxwell, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, specifies how the public, press, and involved parties can access the hearing via teleconference and limited in-person viewing due to COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00019695.jpg
This document is a criminal docket sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. It identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal representation, including five attorneys from various law firms. The case is assigned to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019694.jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on January 11, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 1:20-CR-00330). Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP, is appealing the 'Order Denying Defendant's Renewed Motion for Release on Bail' which was entered on December 28, 2020. The document indicates Maxwell's bail disposition is 'Committed' (incarcerated) and lists Maurene Comey as the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00019689.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a court order dated November 9, 2020, regarding Case 20-3061. The court denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate her appeal with 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' and dismissed her appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The text largely focuses on legal precedents regarding the 'final judgment rule' and the strict limitations on interlocutory appeals in criminal cases.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity