Trove
Sign In Sign Up

ALISON J. NATHAN

Person
Mentions
2353
Relationships
101
Events
478
Documents
1160
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
101 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
54 Very Strong
90
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
24 Very Strong
33
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
21 Very Strong
66
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
19 Very Strong
19
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
40
View
organization The government
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
46
View
person the defendant
Judicial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person defendant
Judicial
9 Strong
5
View
person Paula Speer
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization U.S. government
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Prosecutor judge
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial authority
7
3
View
person MAXWELL
Judicial
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial assignment
7
3
View
person Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Legal representative
7
3
View
person United States Government
Professional
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
7
3
View
person the defendant
Judge defendant
6
2
View
person Juror 50
None
6
2
View
organization The government
Legal representative
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court proceeding Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. United States Courthouse at... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing hearing The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Proposed meeting Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal case Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal proceeding A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. United States District Cour... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... courthouse View
N/A Legal proceeding The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. United States Courthouse, 4... View
N/A Legal proceeding Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... United States District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... United States District Cour... View
N/A Court hearing A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. courtroom View
2025-11-18 N/A Charging conference Courtroom View
2022-08-22 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-08-10 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-06-29 N/A Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. Southern District of New York View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal judgment A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 N/A Imposition of Judgment N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00002818.jpg

This legal filing argues against a subpoena issued by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) to BSF, claiming the requested documents are either procurable from the government or are items (boots and photographs) better produced at trial if relevant. The document specifically mentions photographs connecting the Defendant, Virginia Giuffre, and Prince Andrew at a London townhome, as well as items related to Annie and Maria Farmer.

Legal filing (letter motion/response)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002778.jpg

This is the final page (page 12) of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan denies Maxwell's third motion for release on bail and sets a deadline of March 24, 2021, for the parties to propose redactions for the reply brief.

Court order / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002767.jpg

This document is the first page of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury, and summarizes the procedural history of her previous bail denials due to flight risk. The order sets up a discussion regarding Maxwell's third motion for release on bail, filed in February 2021.

Court order (legal filing)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002729.jpg

A letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan disputing the government's characterization of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The letter details excessive searches, lack of access to discovery materials, and argues that the strict surveillance is a reaction to BOP negligence regarding Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020149.jpg

This legal document is a court order signed by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 28, 2020. The order explicitly denies Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail. The decision references a precedent from the 2018 case of United States v. Raniere.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020128.jpg

This is a Court Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines the charges against Maxwell (sex trafficking of minors and perjury) and addresses her renewed motion for release on bail pending trial. The judge reiterates the court's previous conclusion from July 2020 that Maxwell poses a clear flight risk and indicates that new arguments presented only solidify this view.

Court opinion and order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020097.jpg

This document is a letter dated December 15, 2020, from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. In the statement, submitted via her attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, Farmer strongly opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail, detailing her personal experience of being sexually abused by Maxwell as a child. Farmer characterizes Maxwell as a manipulative psychopath and a significant flight risk who lacks remorse for her role in procuring girls for Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017363.jpg

This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated November 30, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus others). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

Court transcript (title page)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005392.jpg

This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 28, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules an in-person pretrial conference for November 1, 2021, and details the logistical arrangements, including the location, access for victims and family, and COVID-19 protocols for public viewing in designated overflow courtrooms. The order explicitly prohibits the use of electronic devices in the overflow rooms.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005389.jpg

This document is a letter dated October 27, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding sexual behavior evidence) under seal. It also outlines the defense's plan to serve redacted copies of this motion to the counsel of the specific alleged victims whose behavior is discussed in the motion.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005388.jpg

This is the second and final page of a legal document (Document 376) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 27, 2021. The document was signed in New York, New York by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan. A Bates number in the footer suggests it is part of a Department of Justice document production.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005387.jpg

This document is a Court Order filed on October 27, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses logistics regarding jury questionnaires and voir dire, scheduling the release of juror names to counsel for November 16 and anticipating opening statements to begin on November 29 following peremptory strikes.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005385.jpg

A legal letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's request to finalize jury selection on November 19, preferring November 29 to account for potential COVID-19 exposure and biases arising during the Thanksgiving holiday break. The document highlights procedural disagreements between the defense and the government regarding trial scheduling.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005383.jpg

This document is a legal letter dated October 26, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense accepts the Court's draft preliminary remarks for jurors but strongly objects to the government's request to delay providing the names of prospective jurors until the start of oral voir dire on November 16, 2021. Sternheim argues that the Court previously determined names would be provided with questionnaires and requests the Court deny the government's attempt to delay disclosure.

Legal correspondence (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005380.jpg

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 26, 2021. The Government accepts the Court's proposed remarks for jury selection but seeks clarification on when the specific names of prospective jurors will be revealed to the legal parties. The Government requests confirmation that juror names will be withheld from the parties until November 16, 2021, the start of oral voir dire, to maintain juror anonymity in open court.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005379.jpg

This document is a letter motion filed by Christian Everdell, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, requesting a one-week extension (until November 3, 2021) to file the joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet. The letter explains that the delay is needed due to other pressing deadlines and states that the government consents to the request. Judge Alison J. Nathan signed and ordered the approval of this request on October 26, 2021.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005378.jpg

This document is a legal letter dated October 25, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca informs the court that the defense has filed an Omnibus Response to the Government's Motions in Limine under seal to allow time to review for necessary redactions, with a public filing and justification letter to follow by October 29, 2021.

Legal correspondence / court filing letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005377.jpg

This document is a letter motion filed on October 25, 2021, by defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests a one-week extension (to November 3, 2021) to file the joint proposed jury charge and verdict sheet, citing conflicting deadlines including Rule 412 briefing. The government has consented to this extension request.

Legal correspondence (letter motion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005376.jpg

This is the second and final page of a court document (Document 368) filed on October 25, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains the date, location, and signature of United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan.

Legal court document (signature page)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005375.jpg

This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan sets deadlines for omnibus response briefs (due Oct 25) and reply briefs (due Oct 27) regarding motions in limine. The order also mandates that by October 29, 2021, the parties must file public versions of these briefs with proposed redactions and submit a joint letter justifying those redactions based on Second Circuit legal standards.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005332.jpg

This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire asks potential jurors to disclose any personal acquaintance or dealings with key individuals involved in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, the prosecution team, the defense team, and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The purpose is to identify potential biases that could prevent a juror from being fair and impartial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005295.jpg

This document is page 19 of a juror questionnaire for a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It asks potential jurors to disclose any personal connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) and their respective law firms. It also asks about any connections to the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, or her staff, to assess potential bias for jury selection.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002889.jpg

This is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a legal document filed on April 5, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document is submitted by attorney Laura A. Menninger to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It references a date of April 19, 2021, and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002889.

Legal filing / court document signature page
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002884.jpg

A legal letter dated March 31, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense objects to a second superseding indictment filed by the government, characterizing it as 'tactical gamesmanship' that expands the conspiracy timeline (1994-2004) and adds charges based on old evidence against Jeffrey Epstein. Sternheim expresses concern over Maxwell's health and ability to stand trial, notes the government's refusal to provide accuser names, and requests a conference to discuss moving the July 12th trial date.

Legal correspondence / letter to judge
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002883.jpg

This legal document, dated March 22, 2021, is a submission by Sigrid S. McCawley arguing against a defendant's motion to subpoena evidence from a third party, BSF. The document contends that the requested materials—including communications, a Grand Jury subpoena, cowboy boots, and photographs involving individuals like Annie Farmer, Virginia Giuffre, and Jeffrey Epstein—are either obtainable from the government or not relevant enough to require pre-trial production. The author concludes that the defendant's motion should be denied.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
1
Total
5

Response Deadline

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: the government

Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.

Order
2021-10-15
Communication Source

Order on Redactions

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties

Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.

Order
2021-02-04
Communication Source

Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties in the case

A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.

Court order
2020-12-07
Communication Source

Endorsement on Letter Motion

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Defendant (Maxwell)

The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.

Court order
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search