Trove
Sign In Sign Up

ALISON J. NATHAN

Person
Mentions
2353
Relationships
101
Events
478
Documents
1160
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
101 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
54 Very Strong
90
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
24 Very Strong
33
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
21 Very Strong
66
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
19 Very Strong
19
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
40
View
organization The government
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
46
View
person the defendant
Judicial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person defendant
Judicial
9 Strong
5
View
person Paula Speer
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization U.S. government
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Prosecutor judge
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial authority
7
3
View
person MAXWELL
Judicial
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial assignment
7
3
View
person Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Legal representative
7
3
View
person United States Government
Professional
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
7
3
View
person the defendant
Judge defendant
6
2
View
person Juror 50
None
6
2
View
organization The government
Legal representative
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-12-21 N/A Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan SDNY Court View
2021-12-21 Jury trial Jury trial proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-20 N/A Transcript of Proceedings held before Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court View
2021-12-19 Legal proceeding Filing of a verdict sheet for the criminal case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Ca... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-19 Court order A judge signed a "SO ORDERED" letter regarding the handling of evidence in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2021-12-19 N/A Filing of Document 558 Southern District of New York View
2021-12-18 Legal proceeding Drafting of a verdict sheet for the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-17 Legal proceeding A draft verdict sheet was created for the criminal case United States of America v. Ghislaine Max... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-17 N/A Filing of the Court Order New York, New York View
2021-12-16 Court ruling The Court denied the Government's motion to preclude remaining witnesses. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-16 Court filing Document 551 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan. New York, New York View
2021-12-16 N/A Jury Trial proceedings in US v. Ghislaine Maxwell New York, N.Y. View
2021-12-15 Legal filing Defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca submitted a letter in response to the government's motion to... United States District Cour... View
2021-12-15 Filing of a court document Document 548 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. New York, New York View
2021-12-15 N/A Memorandum Opinion & Order denying Defense motion for anonymous witnesses. SDNY Court View
2021-12-14 N/A Court Order regarding anticipated witnesses. SDNY Court View
2021-12-14 Court filing Document 542 was electronically filed with the court. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-14 Court order The Government was ordered to submit a response to the Defense's letter by 10:00 p.m. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-14 Court order The Defense was ordered to provide a copy of its anticipated witness order to the Court by 12:00 ... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-12 Legal filing Defense counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a letter with the court regarding witness logistics and ... United States District Court View
2021-12-09 N/A Jury Trial proceedings held Court (before Judge Alison ... View
2021-12-09 Court ruling The Court, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan, overrules the Defense's objections to the adm... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-09 Legal correspondence The Government submitted a letter to Judge Nathan proposing a limiting instruction for Government... New York, New York View
2021-12-09 N/A Filing of Document 534 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Southern District of New York View
2021-12-09 N/A Jury Trial Proceedings SDNY Court View

DOJ-OGR-00002877.jpg

This legal document is a letter from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 22, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. BSF objects to a subpoena issued by Maxwell's defense, arguing it is overly broad and lacks clarity on which victims require notice, while clarifying that the firm represents victims Annie Farmer (Minor Victim-2) and Virginia Giuffre. The firm states its intention to notify all Epstein victims it represents about the subpoena out of an abundance of caution.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002760.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated March 15, 2021, from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter outlines the plan for submitting several reply memoranda, explaining that those containing confidential information will be redacted for the public docket. To facilitate this, the attorney will first submit both unredacted (under seal) and redacted versions to the Court and the government via email for review before any public filing.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020325.jpg

This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on May 17, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney David Oscar Markus, on behalf of his client Ghislaine Maxwell, is submitting a 'Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release' or alternatively requesting a remand for an evidentiary hearing. The motion is opposed by the U.S. government, represented by AUSA Lara Pomerantz.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00020316.jpg

A legal letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter refutes the government's claims about Maxwell's detention conditions, arguing they are overly restrictive and punitive. It details unsanitary conditions at the MDC, specifically a recent incident involving a severe sewage stench, overflowing toilets from the floor above, and plumbing issues in Maxwell's isolation cell.

Legal correspondence / letter to judge
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002913.jpg

This document is a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated April 9, 2021, regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that the timing of a superseding indictment (S2) was based on new evidence—specifically involving 'Minor Victim-4'—rather than improper motives, and opposes any delay to the trial scheduled for July 2021. The letter also asserts that the new charges reinforce the Court's previous decisions to deny bail to Maxwell.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002907.jpg

This is a letter dated April 7, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter strongly objects to the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's pretrial detention at the MDC, describing them as a form of "'pay-it-forward' punishment." It details a recent incident involving a pervasive sewage stench in her unit and argues that the government's portrayal of her confinement as superior is inaccurate and misses the point of her overly restrictive and unwarranted detention.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002901.jpg

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. It states that Maxwell receives 13 hours of discovery review time daily (more than any other inmate) with access to both a laptop and desktop. A footnote addresses complaints about missing emails, clarifying that an MDC investigation found Maxwell deleted them herself or archived them, rather than staff deleting them.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002874.jpg

This is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 29, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government seeks to clarify a previous statement from October 2020 where it claimed no involvement by its prosecution team in an earlier 'Florida Investigation'. The letter now states that new information suggests the FBI's New York Office may have participated in that Florida investigation between 2005 and 2010, and the government is reviewing files to determine the extent of the interaction.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002873.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order directs the involved parties to meet by April 1, 2021, to either provide specific justification for proposed redactions or to inform the court that they are withdrawing their request for redactions.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002867.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated March 29, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves to notify the court that a Grand Jury has returned a superseding indictment against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government outlines its intent to explain the differences between the new and prior indictments and address the impact on discovery and pending motions, while also stating it does not intend to seek further indictments if the trial proceeds as scheduled on July 12, 2021.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002820.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated March 26, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, who is presiding over the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution informs the court of a recent ruling in a separate case, U.S. v. Schulte, where Judge Crotty denied a motion to dismiss the indictment that was 'virtually identical' to one filed by Maxwell. The government argues that this precedent supports their position that Maxwell's motion should also be denied.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002819.jpg

This is a legal letter dated March 26, 2021, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The letter informs the court that BSF, representing victims, has conferred with the defendant's counsel and agreed to redact a small piece of information from a recent filing out of caution. BSF states it will remove these redactions if the court orders it to do so.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002811.jpg

This document is the second page of a legal filing (Document 182-4) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains a standard admonition regarding attorney conduct under Local Rules and provides a signature block for the Honorable Alison J. Nathan, United States District Judge. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp.

Legal document (court filing/order signature page)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002802.jpg

This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by David Oscar Markus, is appealing the court's March 22, 2021 'Order on Third Motion for Release on Bail' to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The document confirms Maxwell's status as committed (incarcerated) and lists the Assistant U.S. Attorneys prosecuting the case.

Criminal notice of appeal - form a
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002801.jpg

This document is the final signature page (page 3 of 3) of a court order filed on March 24, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan signed the order, which instructs counsel to confer regarding redactions for briefings and specifies formatting requirements for filings.

Court order / legal filing signature page
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002762.jpg

This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, filed on March 18, 2021. The order addresses disputes between the Government and the Defendant regarding requests to redact and seal information in pre-trial motions. The Court outlines the three-part legal test from the Second Circuit it will use to rule on these requests, balancing the presumption of public access against factors like judicial efficiency and privacy interests.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002759.jpg

A legal cover letter dated March 15, 2021, from attorneys Cohen and Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter lists ten reply memoranda being filed on behalf of their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. These filings relate to motions to dismiss indictments, suppress evidence (involving a redacted subpoena target), sever counts, and request a bill of particulars.

Legal correspondence / court filing cover letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002745.jpg

This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on March 1, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP requests Judge Alison J. Nathan extend the deadline for the defendant's reply to March 15, 2021. The document also notes that the trial is scheduled to begin on July 12, 2021.

Legal correspondence / court filing (page 2 of 2)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002727.jpg

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 4, 2021, providing a status update on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government reports that Maxwell receives 13 hours of discovery review time daily (more than any other inmate), has access to both desktop and laptop computers, and maintains regular video-teleconference contact with her attorneys despite the suspension of in-person visits due to COVID-19.

Legal correspondence / government letter to court
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005277.jpg

This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 22, 2021, in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order announces the attachment of the court's draft jury questionnaire and voir dire, noting that it includes changes from a proceeding on the previous day. It also mentions an additional question has been proposed due to the District's COVID-19 protocols.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005274.jpg

A court order filed on October 22, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330). The document outlines procedures for jury selection, including the administration of screening questionnaires in early November and the anonymization of jurors using assigned numbers. It mandates that the prosecution and defense confer to categorize prospective jurors into four lists regarding their eligibility for voir dire or excusal.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005268.jpg

A court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 20, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order sets the agenda for a telephone conference scheduled for the following day to discuss jury selection logistics and an unopposed request to seal the joint proposed juror questionnaire. The Judge also notes that the Court's draft questionnaire will be emailed to the parties immediately for discussion during the conference.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005267.jpg

This is the second and final page of a legal document (Document 360) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 19, 2021. The document was signed in New York, New York by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan. A Department of Justice Bates number is present at the bottom of the page.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005266.jpg

This is a court order filed on October 19, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules a telephone conference for October 21, 2021, to discuss jury selection, providing public dial-in numbers while noting a separate line for involved parties (counsel, defendant, victims, family). It also explicitly warns against recording or rebroadcasting the proceedings.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005264.jpg

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government is submitting motions *in limine* under seal, requesting redactions to protect the privacy of victims and third parties, and specifically requesting that 'Section X' remain redacted until the conclusion of the trial.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
1
Total
5

Response Deadline

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: the government

Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.

Order
2021-10-15
Communication Source

Order on Redactions

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties

Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.

Order
2021-02-04
Communication Source

Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties in the case

A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.

Court order
2020-12-07
Communication Source

Endorsement on Letter Motion

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Defendant (Maxwell)

The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.

Court order
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search