ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
USA
|
Professional judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Department of Justice
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Metropolitan Detention center
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Warden for MDC
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judge litigant |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial judge defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States District Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States attorney
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
All listed attorneys
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Parties in the case (Ms. Maxwell, government)
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Defendant judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Judicial authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Judicial authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. | United States Courthouse at... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Proposed meeting | Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal judgment | A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Imposition of Judgment | N/A | View |
EFTA00022327.pdf
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) dated November 3, 2021, addressed to Counsel regarding the case 'US v. Maxwell' (20cr330). The email serves to transmit two attached orders issued by Judge Nathan that were scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00022091.pdf
This Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York addresses multiple pretrial motions filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies most of the motions, including those seeking dismissal based on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay, but grants the motion to sever the perjury counts for a separate trial.
EFTA00022027.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 5, 2021. The Government requests that the Court order the defendant to provide notice of all Rule 17(c) subpoenas (specifically referencing one to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and to share any materials obtained with the Government. The letter argues against ex parte subpoenas for discovery purposes, citing the need to protect victim privacy (specifically mentioning a request for a victim's diary) and prevent 'fishing expeditions.'
EFTA00021937.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger) dated July 27, 2020. The prosecution requests a 'meet and confer' to discuss a protective order, specifically challenging the defense's desire to name victims in public filings rather than using pseudonyms. The email also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
EFTA00021902.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, denying his request to use discovery materials from her criminal case in a separate civil lawsuit. The Government argues that the materials are related to an ongoing grand jury investigation and are subject to a Protective Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, which explicitly restricts their use to the criminal defense only. The letter suggests that if Pagliuca seeks these records for civil litigation, he must utilize FOIA or a Touhy request.
EFTA00021870.pdf
This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330). The judge denies the defense's motion to prohibit the government and witness counsel from making extrajudicial statements, stating that existing local rules are sufficient, but warns that the court will enforce strict compliance to ensure a fair trial.
EFTA00021776.pdf
This document contains an email chain discussing the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, followed by the official press release from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The press release details the charges against Maxwell, including conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors and perjury, and outlines the allegations of grooming and abuse spanning from 1994 to 1997. It also includes statements from Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, FBI Assistant Director William F. Sweeney Jr., and NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea regarding the arrest.
EFTA00021773.pdf
This document is an email chain forwarding an official press release from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated July 2, 2020. It announces the arrest and unsealing of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell for her role in conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse minors between 1994 and 1997, as well as perjury charges related to 2016 depositions. The release details the grooming methods used, including financial enticements and normalization of abuse, and includes quotes from high-ranking officials at the SDNY, FBI, and NYPD.
EFTA00021729.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated January 15, 2021, communicating a court order to an unidentified recipient (likely prison officials). The email contains the text of a Memo Endorsement signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, which orders the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell access to her laptop on weekends and holidays for reviewing discovery materials.
EFTA00021015.pdf
This document is a letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's detention at the MDC. Sternheim argues that Maxwell requires access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review millions of pages of discovery materials because the standard prison computers are technically inadequate, slow, and prone to crashing. The letter also alleges mistreatment of Maxwell by MDC guards, including psychological and physical abuse, and highlights that Maxwell is isolated with no human contact other than guards.
EFTA00020393.pdf
This document is a court order filed on July 9, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It schedules an arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, to be held remotely due to COVID-19, and provides dial-in information for the public and press. It also outlines procedures for alleged victims to be heard and sets restrictions on recording the proceedings.
EFTA00020307.pdf
This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated May 3, 2021. The order grants Maxwell's request for a continuance of the trial date from July 2021 to Fall 2021 due to the filing of a superseding indictment (S2) which added new charges, extended the conspiracy timeframe to 2004, and identified a fourth minor victim. The judge cited the need for the defense to review new discovery and the ongoing logistical challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic as reasons for the delay.
EFTA00020295.pdf
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on April 26, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a schedule for pretrial disclosures and motions, including deadlines for expert witnesses, victim disclosures, and filings related to the S2 indictment. It sets a presumed trial commencement date of July 12, 2021, pending resolution of a defense request for a continuance.
EFTA00020261.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court granted Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking-related counts to ensure a fair trial.
EFTA00019645.pdf
This document is an email thread from September 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *US v. Maxwell* (20 Cr. 330). The correspondence involves the submission and receipt of letters and memo endorsements that are to be filed *ex parte* and under seal, specifically referencing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1). Juan Ruiz Toro, a law clerk, communicates on behalf of Judge Nathan.
EFTA00019404.pdf
An email dated November 22, 2021, from the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP (representing Ghislaine Maxwell) to Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers. The email submits a letter regarding proposed limiting instructions related to a Court Opinion and Order from November 19, 2021, noting that the submission is temporarily under seal.
EFTA00019056.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 1, 2021, addressed to defense counsel (Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Everdell) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves to distribute an attached Order issued by the Judge which was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00018881.pdf
This document is a letter dated November 3, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter submits the parties' joint request to charge and proposed verdict sheet, noting that a redacted version is being docketed publicly to protect third-party privacy interests, while unredacted versions are submitted to the Court. It also mentions the submission of 'Exhibit A' under seal, a document from another case relevant to a defense comment.
EFTA00018844.pdf
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 5, 2021. The order concerns trial logistics, specifically establishing that jury selection will end by November 19 and opening statements will begin November 29. The Judge orders both parties to submit a joint letter by October 12, 2021, estimating the length of the trial to determine if proceedings will extend past the Christmas holiday.
EFTA00018572.pdf
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell requests the Court to order the government to disclose the identities of three alleged victims referenced in the indictment to allow for effective investigation of allegations from 25 years ago. Additionally, the defense requests that Maxwell be moved to the general population at the MDC and given increased computer access to review discovery, arguing her current isolation and surveillance are punitive reactions to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in BOP custody.
EFTA00018562.pdf
Memorandum Opinion & Order in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330) dated July 30, 2020. Judge Alison J. Nathan ruled on a dispute regarding a protective order, siding with the Government to restrict Maxwell from publicly referencing alleged victims/witnesses who haven't spoken on the record in this specific case, and denying Maxwell's request to restrict witnesses from using discovery materials for other purposes.
EFTA00018515.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team arguing against the government's motion for detention and requesting release on bail. The defense argues that the COVID-19 pandemic poses a severe health risk and impedes defense preparation, and asserts that Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing her presence in the U.S. since Epstein's arrest. They propose a $5 million bond secured by UK property and strict conditions including home confinement and GPS monitoring.
EFTA00018373.pdf
Defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim requests Judge Nathan to release the names of 600 potential jurors to attorneys only, prior to voir dire, to facilitate background research and ensure a fair trial. The letter cites precedent involving juror misconduct (US v. Parse) and a recent order from the Charlottesville 'Unite the Right' civil case (Sines v. Kessler) where juror names were released to counsel despite high publicity and security concerns. The document includes the cited order from the Western District of Virginia as Exhibit A.
EFTA00018236.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 5, 2021. The Government objects to the defense's use of Rule 17(c) subpoenas, specifically one directed at law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) seeking a victim's original diary, characterizing it as an improper 'fishing expedition' for discovery. The Government requests that the Court require the defense to provide notice of all future subpoenas and to share any materials obtained with the prosecution.
EFTA00018028.pdf
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 30, 2021. The order grants the Government's motion to require defense lawyer David Markus to comply with Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements, following an op-ed he published about the case. The judge ruled that although Markus had not formally appeared in the specific trial proceedings, his role as appellate counsel and public association with the defense made him subject to the rule.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity