| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
54
Very Strong
|
90 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
24
Very Strong
|
33 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
21
Very Strong
|
66 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
46 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judicial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judicial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Paula Speer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor judge |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial authority |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial assignment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judge defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. | United States Courthouse at... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Proposed meeting | Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal judgment | A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Imposition of Judgment | N/A | View |
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the Judge's Chambers (presumably Judge Alison J. Nathan given the case number US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)). Dated November 12, 2021, the email submits an unredacted copy of a Government letter motion (Docket No. 455) and a version with proposed redactions regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The sender's name and contact information are redacted.
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan (NYSD) to defense counsel (Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger) and prosecutors (USANYS) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email serves to notify counsel of an attached order issued by the Judge that is scheduled to be filed on the docket the next morning.
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 11, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email informs counsel that the judge has granted additional time for supplemental briefing and refers to an attached order.
Court order filed on April 19, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell scheduled for April 23, 2021. The document outlines logistical details including COVID-19 protocols (masks, temperature checks), public access via overflow rooms and teleconference, and prohibitions on recording. It also sets deadlines for the Government and Defense to notify the court regarding the attendance of victims and the defendant's family members.
This document is an email chain from April 21, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence details the attendance plans for victims and their counsel at an upcoming arraignment, specifically noting that Victim-2 will attend by phone while her attorneys, David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, will attend in person. It also confirms that four attorneys will appear on behalf of the Government.
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 23, 2020. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the defense's motion to prohibit the government from making extrajudicial statements, stating that existing local rules are sufficient, but warns counsel that the court will enforce strict compliance to safeguard the defendant's right to a fair trial.
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, defining categories for 'Confidential' and 'Highly Confidential' information, with the latter specifically including sexualized images. The order mandates that such materials be kept secure, reviewed only in the presence of counsel (or via BOP systems), and strictly prohibits the dissemination of victim identities or posting discovery materials on the internet.
A Protective Order issued on November 24, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order mandates that materials produced from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund be treated as 'Confidential Information' or 'Highly Confidential' to protect privacy and prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity.
This document is an Opinion & Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by District Judge ALISON J. NATHAN, pertaining to the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-cr-330 (AJN)). It details the initial six-count indictment from June 2020, subsequent S1 and S2 superseding indictments charging Maxwell with various offenses related to facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, conspiracy, and perjury, and notes the trial is set for July 12, 2021, and that Maxwell filed pretrial motions.
This document is a court judgment dated June 29, 2022, sentencing a defendant as per pages 2 through 8 of the judgment under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. It notes that counts 7 and 8 and underlying indictments were dismissed, and the defendant was found not guilty on count 2. The document also lists additional counts of conviction for transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity (18 USC 2423.F, offense ended 12/31/1997, count 4) and sex trafficking of an individual under eighteen (18 USC 1591.F, offense ended 7/30/2004, count 6), and requires the defendant to notify the U.S. attorney of changes in personal information or economic circumstances until all financial obligations are paid.
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 6, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number (20 CR 330), the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense. The document also notes other individuals present, including representatives from the FBI and NYPD.
This document is the cover page of the official court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 3, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the legal teams for both the prosecution (led by Damian Williams) and the defense (including Haddon Morgan and Foreman attorneys), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 CR 330 (AJN). The proceedings took place on December 2, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
This document is the first page of a court record for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the appearances for the trial held on December 1, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, listing the presiding judge, legal teams for both the prosecution and defense, and other law enforcement and paralegal personnel present.
This document is a photograph presented as Government Exhibit 325 in a legal case (S2 20 Cr. 330), identified with a U.S. Department of Justice number. The image depicts Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein sitting closely together with a dog in an outdoor, grassy setting. The photograph serves as evidence illustrating the personal relationship between Maxwell and Epstein.
This document is a photograph marked as Government Exhibit 286-R for the case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The image depicts an interior wall with a collection of framed photographs, five of which have been redacted with black boxes, alongside a closet containing hanging white shirts.
This document is the title page of a court transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman).
This document is Page 3 of a legal opinion (likely from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction. It lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant). The text, authored by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, summarizes Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy related to minors, as well as her sentencing of concurrent prison terms.
This legal document is a court opinion regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for conspiracy, transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity, and sex trafficking. Maxwell's appeal raised five issues, including whether Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement barred her prosecution and other procedural matters. The court found no errors in the District Court's handling of the case and affirmed the judgment of conviction.
This document is a draft verdict sheet from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated December 17, 2021, for the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The sheet outlines three counts for the jury to render a verdict on: Conspiracy to Entice an Individual, Enticement of an Individual (Jane), and Conspiracy to Transport a Minor, all related to traveling for illegal sexual activity. The case is presided over by the Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
This document is a court order filed on December 17, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order attaches a draft jury charge and verdict sheet and instructs counsel to be prepared to provide suggestions for changes at a charging conference scheduled for the following day, December 18, 2021.
This document is page 3 of a court filing, so-ordered by a judge on December 19, 2021. In it, the Government outlines agreements with the defense regarding redactions for trial exhibits and requests the court's permission to submit certain exhibits into evidence and release others to the public before the jury begins deliberations. The filing details specific exhibit numbers and the rationale for their handling, such as protecting the privacy of third parties.
A letter filed on December 19, 2021, by the parties in the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell case to Judge Alison J. Nathan proposing logistics for public access to closing argument visuals. Judge Nathan endorsed the letter with a handwritten order approving the proposal, requiring redacted versions of closing argument slides to be made public within two hours of the arguments' completion to protect witness anonymity.
This is a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 19, 2021. The letter concerns the ongoing trial of Ghislaine Maxwell and states that the prosecution ("The Government") and Maxwell's defense team have mutually agreed to allow a specific list of government exhibits, which were admitted during the trial, to be released to the public.
This is a letter filed on December 19, 2021, from the parties (Prosecution and Defense) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter proposes a method for providing public access to closing argument materials, specifically suggesting that public versions of slides be released after the trial day concludes, ensuring sealed materials remain protected. The document emphasizes balancing public interest with the protection of victims and the efficiency of the trial.
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity