Trove
Sign In Sign Up

ALISON J. NATHAN

Person
Mentions
2353
Relationships
101
Events
478
Documents
1160
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
101 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
54 Very Strong
90
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
24 Very Strong
33
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial
21 Very Strong
66
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Defendant judge
19 Very Strong
19
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
40
View
organization The government
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
46
View
person the defendant
Judicial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person defendant
Judicial
9 Strong
5
View
person Paula Speer
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
organization U.S. government
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Prosecutor judge
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial authority
7
3
View
person MAXWELL
Judicial
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judicial assignment
7
3
View
person Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Legal representative
7
3
View
person United States Government
Professional
7
3
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Judge defendant
7
3
View
person the defendant
Judge defendant
6
2
View
person Juror 50
None
6
2
View
organization The government
Legal representative
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Court proceeding Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. United States Courthouse at... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing hearing The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Proposed meeting Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal case Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
N/A Legal proceeding A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Sentencing A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. United States District Cour... View
N/A Court proceeding The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... courthouse View
N/A Legal proceeding The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. United States Courthouse, 4... View
N/A Legal proceeding Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... United States District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Legal proceeding The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... United States District Cour... View
N/A Court hearing A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. courtroom View
2025-11-18 N/A Charging conference Courtroom View
2022-08-22 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-08-10 Court filing Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. SDNY Court View
2022-06-29 N/A Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. Southern District of New York View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal judgment A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 Legal proceeding Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... United States District Cour... View
2022-06-29 N/A Imposition of Judgment N/A View

EFTA00018016.pdf

Court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell denying the defendant's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to personally answer questions regarding confinement conditions. The order mandates the Government to provide written status updates every 60 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials, counsel, and the frequency of searches.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00017832.pdf

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's requests for early disclosure of witness names and court intervention in her confinement conditions. The Government argues the requests are premature given the trial is 11 months away and discovery has just begun, noting they have already produced over 165,000 pages of evidence. The letter also defends the Bureau of Prisons' protocols for Maxwell, stating her monitoring is appropriate for a high-profile inmate facing significant prison time and confirming she has been granted extensive daily access to review discovery materials.

Government legal correspondence / letter in opposition
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00017823.pdf

This document is a letter motion dated November 25, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense requests an in camera conference and permission to file a renewed bail motion under seal to protect the identities of family and friends acting as sureties, citing severe harassment and death threats (including social media examples). The letter mentions a financial report by Macalvins Limited. Judge Nathan endorsed the letter on the same day, stating she saw no basis for sealing the letter itself and ordered the defense to justify the sealing request by December 2, 2020.

Legal correspondence / letter motion
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00017821.pdf

This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, to Judge Alison Nathan, dated November 24, 2020. It details complaints about Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC, including harsh quarantine measures after COVID-19 exposure, lack of basic hygiene items like soap and a toothbrush, deletion of legal emails, and sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks every 15 minutes. The letter concludes with a request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez, followed by a court order from Judge Nathan requiring the parties to meet and confer on the matter.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00017805.pdf

The U.S. Government (SDNY) opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to use materials obtained through criminal discovery in her separate civil cases. The Government argues that these materials, which relate to grand jury subpoenas and ex parte applications, are sealed to protect an ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirators. The prosecution asserts that the criminal protective order explicitly prohibits the use of discovery for any purpose other than the defense of the criminal action.

Legal letter (government filing)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016944.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 18-19, 2021, regarding the filing of Motions in Limine in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). Defense attorney Nicole Simmons submits the motions to Judge Nathan's chambers on behalf of Jeffrey Pagliuca. Subsequent internal emails among USANYS staff discuss accessing the files, revealing an internal DOJ file path labeled 'USvEpstein-2018R01618'.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016726.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (20cr330). Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim provides a list of attendees, including legal counsel and Maxwell's family members (Ian, Kevin, Pandora, Philip, Isabel, Christine), for an October 21 teleconference and a November 1 in-person pretrial conference. The email responds to a request from Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers regarding logistics, COVID-19 protocols, and speaking rules for the upcoming hearings.

Email correspondence / legal logistics
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016725.pdf

This document is a Court Order filed on October 15, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge acknowledges receipt of a letter from the Defendant regarding issues with legal mail delivery at the MDC and orders the Government to respond by 5:00 p.m. that same day.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016720.pdf

This document is a letter from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison Nathan dated October 14, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests confirmation that the deadline for filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding alleged victims' sexual behavior) is November 15, 2021. The letter argues that recent massive discovery disclosures (over 8,000 pages of 3500 material) and notices regarding Rule 404(b) witnesses received just three days prior require additional time for review, especially given Maxwell's incarceration.

Legal letter / court filing
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016714.pdf

This document contains an email chain from October 2021 regarding the US v. Maxwell trial. The correspondence involves the submission of a joint proposed juror questionnaire and voir dire, discussions regarding the sealing of these documents, and the production of Jencks Act material by the Government to the defense. Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers clarifies the rules for sealing documents on the electronic docket (ECF) and requests a copy of the Jencks Act materials.

Email thread / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016588.pdf

This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 1, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email informs counsel of an attached court order and schedules a discussion for the following day to determine if there is a basis to seal the order.

Email / court correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016537.pdf

This document is a formal letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 23, 2020, written by a close confidant (name redacted) of Ghislaine Maxwell in support of her bail application. The author attests to Maxwell's character, honesty, and kindness, noting their close relationship and the fact that Maxwell has hosted the author's children without incident. Significantly, the author offers to co-sign a bond for US$3,500,000, stating that this sum represents their 'entirety of realisable family wealth' to ensure Maxwell's appearance in court.

Legal correspondence / character reference letter
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016513.pdf

Court Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 14, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a sealed letter regarding victim attendance at the trial and outlines COVID-19 protocols for public access, including overflow rooms. It designates Wendy Olson (Victim Witness Unit) to coordinate access for alleged victims and Joseph Pecorino (District Executive's Office) to coordinate access for the defendant's family.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016497.pdf

This document is an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, issued on November 23, 2021. It attaches the draft preliminary instructions to be given to the sworn jury, which outline the trial process, the roles of the judge and jury, the definition of evidence, rules of conduct for jurors, and specific courtroom protocols including those related to COVID-19. The order also invites the parties to suggest edits to these instructions by a specified date.

Court order and draft jury instructions
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016485.pdf

This document is a Protective Order filed on November 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that materials produced from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund be treated as 'Confidential Information' or 'Highly Confidential' to protect the privacy of individuals and prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity.

Legal document (protective order)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016484.pdf

This document is an email thread from November 24, 2021, related to the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It involves correspondence between the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan and legal counsel (including Brian Burns, Patrick Smith, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger) regarding the issuance of protective orders. An Assistant United States Attorney subsequently follows up with counsel to coordinate the transfer of materials via file sharing or thumb drive.

Email thread / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016470.pdf

An email correspondence dated November 24, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to counsel involved in the US v. Maxwell case (20cr330). The email serves to distribute two attached orders regarding protective orders and subpoenas. Recipients include attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger, as well as representatives from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).

Email / court correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016302.pdf

An email dated September 4, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email submits agreed-upon proposed redactions to defense letters dated August 24, 2020, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Legal counsel Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Mark S. Cohen are copied.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016265.pdf

This document is an email dated October 31, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel (including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) and prosecutors (USANYS) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email serves to transmit an attached Order issued by Judge Nathan that was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016247.pdf

This document is a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, distinguishing between standard, 'Confidential', and 'Highly Confidential' information (which includes sexualized imagery), and limiting access to the Defendant, Defense Counsel, and specific authorized persons. The order specifically mandates that highly confidential materials containing sexualized images must not be copied or possessed by the defendant outside the presence of counsel.

Protective order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015859.pdf

This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to subpoena Boies Schiller Flexner LLP for three items: the complete teenage diary of Minor Victim-2, a pair of boots allegedly gifted by Epstein and Maxwell, and original photographs. The court ruled that the request for the full diary was a fishing expedition primarily for impeachment (which is not allowed under Rule 17(c) at this stage), and that the requests for the boots and photos were moot because the government agreed to make them available for inspection.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014896.pdf

This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330), dated November 28, 2021. The order grants the Government's request to file a letter motion under seal to protect the privacy of anticipated witnesses regarding cross-examination limitations. It also orders the Defendant to respond to the motion by 2:00 p.m. on the same day.

Court order
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014710.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding *U.S. v. Maxwell*. Defense attorneys Bobbi Sternheim and Nicole Simmons communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers about submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the response was submitted under temporary seal and that the government and moving parties were subsequently served after redactions were handled.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014699.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014697.pdf

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 22, 2021. The government requests permission to file a reply brief supporting their motion to prevent Dr. Ryan Hall from testifying in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, citing issues regarding hearsay exceptions and relevance.

Legal correspondence / letter motion
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
1
Total
5

Response Deadline

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: the government

Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.

Order
2021-10-15
Communication Source

Order on Redactions

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties

Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.

Order
2021-02-04
Communication Source

Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Parties in the case

A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.

Court order
2020-12-07
Communication Source

Endorsement on Letter Motion

From: ALISON J. NATHAN
To: Defendant (Maxwell)

The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.

Court order
2020-11-25
Communication Source

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

From: Defense counsel (implied)
To: ALISON J. NATHAN

Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.

Letter
2020-08-17
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search