Lefkowitz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Starr
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Adversarial negotiating |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional opposing counsel |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Starr
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeevacation@gmail.com
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafana
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional negotiating parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional prosecutor defense counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Meeting participants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Oosterbaan
|
Opposing counsel negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Oosterbaan
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-12-07 | N/A | Starr and Lefkowitz submitted 'independent ethics opinions' to Acosta. | N/A | View |
| 2007-12-07 | N/A | Starr and Lefkowitz send 'ethics opinions' to Acosta complaining about federal investigation and ... | N/A | View |
| 2007-12-05 | Communication | Starr and Lefkowitz sent a letter to Acosta reaffirming the NPA. | N/A | View |
| 2007-11-30 | Communication | Acosta replied to Lefkowitz's letter and also sent a letter to Starr setting a deadline for holdi... | N/A | View |
| 2007-11-29 | Communication | Lefkowitz sent a letter to Acosta objecting to the draft notification letter. | N/A | View |
| 2007-11-28 | N/A | Sloman instructs Villafaña to provide Lefkowitz with draft victim notification letter. | N/A | View |
| 2007-11-28 | Communication | Villafaña provided Lefkowitz with the draft victim notification letter at Sloman's instruction. | N/A | View |
| 2007-11-21 | Meeting | Lefkowitz informed Acosta and Sloman that Starr had placed a call to Fisher. | N/A | View |
| 2007-11-21 | N/A | Unscheduled Meeting: Defense discussion of victims’ attorney representative procedure | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-23 | Legal communication | Lefkowitz sent a letter describing three specific concessions he claimed Acosta made during the b... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-23 | Communication | Lefkowitz sent Acosta a letter stating that Epstein expected to enter a guilty plea in state court. | state court | View |
| 2007-10-23 | Meeting | A breakfast meeting to discuss the Epstein case and NPA. | Miami | View |
| 2007-10-12 | Meeting | Acosta has breakfast meeting with Lefkowitz. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-12 | Meeting | A breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz where assurances regarding the Epstein case were... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-12 | Meeting | A breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz that drew criticism. Lefkowitz later claimed Aco... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz. | Marriott hotel, West Palm B... | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Negotiations for NPA addendum language, including selection of attorney representative and reimbu... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz, followed by Acosta communicating with Sloman. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Meeting: Defense discussion of NPA terms and likely appeal to Department | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-12 | Negotiation | Ongoing negotiations via email and phone calls regarding the language of the NPA addendum. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Acosta and Defense Attorney Lefkowitz Meet for Breakfast | Marriott hotel in West Palm... | View |
| 2007-10-10 | Communication | Lefkowitz sent Acosta a letter arguing against direct contact with victims by federal agents. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-10 | N/A | Lefkowitz sent a six-page letter to Acosta expressing disagreements with Villafaña regarding the ... | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-05 | Communication | Defense attorney Lefkowitz sent Villafaña a letter responding to the USAO’s special master proposal. | N/A | View |
| 2007-10-01 | N/A | Negotiations on NPA Addendum | USAO / Remote | View |
EFTA00014175.pdf
An Assistant U.S. Attorney emails colleagues to report rumors that Epstein is falsely claiming cooperation in the Bernie Madoff case to secure a reduced sentence from the State Attorney's Office. The email also flags a suspicious court docket change removing 'Special Conditions' from Epstein's sentence and discusses the potential to investigate new allegations involving New York victims, noting interest from Madoff prosecutors in using evidence against Epstein.
EFTA00014143.pdf
This document is an internal email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated August 25, 2008. The email circulates a draft letter addressed to defense attorneys Lefkowitz and Black (likely Jay Lefkowitz and Roy Black, who represented Epstein) for review and changes. The attachment is titled '080826 [Redacted] Ltr to Lefkowitz and Black.wpd'.
EFTA00013754.pdf
This document contains a November 2007 email thread involving the US Attorney's Office (Alex Acosta cc'd) discussing the logistics of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing. Key topics include the strategic scheduling of the plea/sentencing on December 16th to 'reduce media frenzy,' the legal nuances of his 'sexual predator' designation, and the loophole allowing the Sheriff's Office (rather than State Corrections) to grant him work release. The emails also detail coordination with Epstein's lawyers (Lefkowitz and Goldberger) regarding victim notification and potential conflicts of interest.
EFTA00013632.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2007 between likely government prosecutors or officials discussing the Jeffrey Epstein case. The conversation covers the selection of a 'Special Master' (discussing candidates 'Bert' and 'Mr. Ocariz'), communications with Epstein's defense attorney 'Jay' (Lefkowitz) and the firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails also detail a request for a 'de novo review' of evidence for a proposed indictment, specifically asking for FBI '302s' and state Grand Jury transcripts.
EFTA00013543.pdf
This document is a chain of internal emails from December 2007, likely among prosecutors, discussing strategy in the Epstein case. Key topics include a request for a 'de novo review' of evidence (including FBI 302s and Grand Jury transcripts) following correspondence from Epstein's defense firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails also discuss the selection process for a 'Special Master' or similar role, debating candidates named Bert and Mr. Ocariz, and mention drafting a letter to Jay Lefkowitz.
EFTA00013537.pdf
An email chain between prosecutors or DOJ officials dated December 11, 2007. The correspondence discusses a 'de novo review' of evidence for a proposed indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, triggered by correspondence from the law firm Kirkland & Ellis. The emails mention gathering FBI 302 reports, State Grand Jury transcripts, and audio/video tapes of interviews, as well as a draft letter to 'Jay' (likely Jay Lefkowitz).
EFTA00013527.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated November 13, 2007. The email discusses a 'Revised Epstein Letter' and includes an attachment named '071113_Sloman_Ltr_to_Lefkowitz_v2.wpd,' suggesting correspondence between a government official (Sloman) and defense counsel (Lefkowitz). The sender notes a change regarding the 'naming of counsel.'
DOJ-OGR-00000182.tif
This document excerpt details ongoing plea agreement negotiations on September 19, 2007, between Villafaña and Lefkowitz, with Villafaña setting a firm deadline for conclusion. It also describes Lourie's review of a plea agreement draft and his concerns regarding provisions for suspending investigation and legal process by the USAO.
DOJ-OGR-00023203.tif
This document is an excerpt from an OPR report analyzing the conduct of prosecutor Villafaña during the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It concludes that Villafaña consistently advocated for Epstein's prosecution and victims' interests, despite a public narrative suggesting collusion with defense counsel. The report details Villafaña's efforts to protect victims' anonymity, expand the case scope, and draft victim notification letters, while refuting claims that she was 'soft on Epstein' based on witness statements and email context.
DOJ-OGR-00023190.tif
This document details ethical considerations and actions taken by various individuals involved in the Epstein case, particularly focusing on potential conflicts of interest for USAO staff. It highlights discussions and decisions made by Menchel, Sloman, Lourie, and Acosta regarding their relationships with Epstein's attorneys and their professional responsibilities. The document also mentions Acosta's recusal from the case due to potential employment with Kirkland & Ellis and a separate consultation regarding a possible professorship at Harvard while Dershowitz represented Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00023148.tif
This document details events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing from June 2008 to June 2009, including communications between various officials regarding the handling of his case and concerns about the terms of his plea agreement. It highlights discrepancies and objections raised by Villafaña regarding Epstein's proposed custody arrangements, suggesting a potential violation of the agreement's spirit.
DOJ-OGR-00023144.tif
This document details a March 12, 2008 meeting involving Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Starr, Lefkowitz, Weinberg) and Department of Justice representatives (Oosterbaan, Mandelker, CEOS Deputy Chief) concerning the Epstein case. It outlines concerns raised by the defense regarding USAO actions, including communication issues with state authorities and a purported relationship between USAO official Sloman and a law firm representing victims. The document also mentions Sloman's prior work in private practice specializing in sexual abuse claims.
DOJ-OGR-00023138.tif
This document details efforts by Acosta to revise the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with language concerning monetary damages for victims of Jeffrey Epstein, which was ultimately rejected by the defense. It highlights disagreements and frustrations between prosecutors and defense counsel regarding the interpretation and implementation of the Section 2255 provision, particularly concerning victim notification and Epstein's alleged delays in his guilty plea.
DOJ-OGR-00023137.tif
This document details interactions between Jeffrey Epstein's defense team and the USAO in late 2007, focusing on submissions, a key meeting in Miami on December 14, 2007, and the defense's threat to pursue a Department of Justice review. The discussions revolved around defense complaints, a proposed revised indictment, and a new argument by Epstein's attorneys regarding the applicability of the state charge he agreed to plead guilty to. The document also highlights the USAO's internal review processes and Acosta's communication with Assistant Attorney General Fisher regarding the case.
DOJ-OGR-00023136.tif
This document details the efforts of Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in December 2007 to challenge the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the federal investigation. It describes how defense counsel Starr and Lefkowitz sent letters and 'ethics opinions' to Acosta, criticizing the investigation and accusing an individual named Villafaña of improper conduct and federal overreaching, while Epstein reaffirmed his acceptance of the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00023135.tif
This document excerpt details concerns raised by Acosta regarding the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case, specifically about challenges to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the defense team's tactics. Acosta's letter expresses frustration over the lack of finality and issues being appealed to Department Headquarters, while also setting a deadline of December 7, 2007, for a decision on the Agreement. It also describes Acosta's discussions with OPR and a subsequent response to Acosta from Starr and Lefkowitz.
DOJ-OGR-00023131.tif
This document details communications and events surrounding a legal agreement, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights disagreements over gag order provisions, the selection of a special master, and concerns raised by USAO representative Villafaña regarding the selection of a private attorney and defense attacks. The document mentions the signing of an NPA addendum by Epstein and his attorneys on October 29, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00023129.tif
This document details negotiations and communications surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) addendum in late 2007. It highlights disagreements and strategies among prosecutors (Acosta, Sloman, Villafaña, Lourie) and defense counsel (Lefkowitz), including the postponement of Epstein's plea and concerns about Epstein's alleged attempts to discredit victims and influence the legal process. The text also includes Acosta's perspective on not dictating to the state attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00023127.tif
This document details discussions and events surrounding the settlement process for victims related to Epstein. It highlights disagreements between Lefkowitz and Villafaña regarding victim communication and legal procedures, and records meetings and email exchanges between Acosta, Sloman, and Lefkowitz concerning an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and a breakfast meeting in West Palm Beach in October 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00023124.tif
This document details aspects of an agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein, including his guilty plea timeline, immunity for co-conspirators, and conditions for federal investigation suspension. It also mentions a concern expressed via email by Lefkowitz to Lourie about media leaks prejudicing Epstein and a New York Post report on Epstein's plea deal from October 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00023122.tif
This document details the finalization and signing of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) on September 24, 2007. It highlights the edits made by Acosta, including changes to Epstein's plea and sentencing requirements, and communications between various parties like Villafaña, Lourie, and Lefkowitz regarding the agreement's language and confidentiality. The document also notes the USAO's duty to redact protected information before disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00023120.tif
This document details communications and events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's potential plea deal and sex offender registration in September 2007. It highlights objections from Sanchez and Lefkowitz to the registration requirement, citing a 'misunderstanding' at a prior meeting where prosecutors Krischer and Belohlavek initially stated the offense was not registrable. The document shows efforts by Epstein's defense to avoid registration and secure an 18-month federal camp sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00023118.tif
This document details negotiations and internal communications surrounding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein, focusing on the involvement of Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, and Lourie. Key points include Villafaña's revised NPA which proposed a 30-month sentence for Epstein and included non-prosecution for co-conspirators, and a dispute with Lourie over the inclusion of an immigration waiver for Epstein's foreign national assistants. The document also touches on the USAO's general stance on immigration issues and the reluctance to charge Epstein's accomplices.
DOJ-OGR-00023116.tif
This document excerpt details the breakdown of negotiations for a federal plea agreement for Epstein by September 20, 2007, shifting focus to a state-only resolution to which the defense wanted to avoid sexual offender registration. It describes communications between Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, Lourie, and Krischer regarding proposed plea terms, sentencing, and deadlines, highlighting Villafaña's firm stance against further delays and Epstein's apparent goal to avoid sexual offender registration.
DOJ-OGR-00023115.tif
This document details ongoing negotiations and disagreements surrounding a federal plea agreement for Mr. Epstein in September 2007. It highlights the involvement of Assistant State Attorney Villafaña, who communicated with Belohlavek and sent revised agreements to Lefkowitz, and Acosta, who provided feedback on the USAO's 'hybrid' plea agreement to Lourie, emphasizing the trial team's support is crucial. A key point of contention was the change in offense description from solicitation of minors to forcing adults into prostitution, which made the agreement unacceptable to Villafaña.
No Subject
Discussion about the draft addendum, leading to agreement on its terms.
No Subject
Transmittal email for revised NPA, stated "we have not and don't plan to ask immigration" proceedings to be initiated.
No Subject
Acosta's reply about being happy to talk but wanting [M]arie on the call to avoid undermining staff during negotiations and allowing interlocutory appeals.
Response to allegations of misconduct
Villafaña responded to Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically addressing 'false' allegations that the government had made.
Reiterating concerns with § 2255 provision
Lefkowitz sent a second letter to Acosta, asserting the § 2255 provision was 'inherently flawed and becoming truly unmanageable'.
USAO's concern about Epstein's delays
Lefkowitz sent a follow-up letter to Acosta asserting that Epstein was intentionally delaying plea entry and that defense counsel was making efforts to resolve issues.
Non-prosecution language
Villafaña's email continued to include language referring to the four named assistants and unnamed employees.
Addendum Revision
Sloman emailed Lefkowitz a revision to the Addendum language.
Draft Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) details and USAO fl...
Lefkowitz emailed Villafaña about a draft NPA with a 20-month jail sentence and 10 months of community control, questioning USAO flexibility on the § 2255 procedure, contrasting it with 18 months jail and 12 months community control.
N/A
Asking that USAO try to keep the NPA from becoming public.
Addendum revision
Sent a revision to the Addendum language.
Plea Postponement
Request to postpone plea from Oct 26 to Nov 20 due to scheduling conflict.
Unknown
Refusing private 'interlocutory' appeals without staff present.
Revised NPA
Sent revised NPA; stated they don't plan to ask for immigration proceedings.
Plea options
Conveyed two options Lourie suggested: original proposal with 18-month sentence or state charges plus two federal obstruction charges.
Resolving open issues
Reference to a 4:30 call.
Plea negotiations
Lefkowitz attempted to reach Acosta, who then directed Villafaña to return the call.
Revised Draft Victim Notification Letter
Forwarded a revised draft victim notification letter for comment, detailing the completion of the federal investigation and the terms of Epstein's state plea deal.
No Subject
Villafaña’s publicly released emails to Lefkowitz, which drew criticism.
Plea options for Epstein
Villafaña sent a lengthy email to Lefkowitz conveying two plea options suggested by Lourie, involving state and federal charges with different sentence lengths, and also mentioned her willingness to seek approval from Acosta for another federal plea option.
Meeting to resolve outstanding issues
Villafaña offered to have a face-to-face meeting 'off campus' at a 'neutral' location to finalize the NPA negotiations.
Rejection of proposal for Epstein's plea
Lefkowitz questioned Acosta about the rejection of their proposed plea deal for Epstein, outlining the terms and asking why they were not satisfactory.
NPA Addendum Revision
Following a call from Acosta, Sloman emailed a revision of the Addendum language to Lefkowitz.
Request to postpone Epstein's guilty plea
Lefkowitz emailed Acosta seeking to postpone Epstein's guilty plea from October 26, 2007, to November 20, 2007, citing a scheduling conflict.
Agreement to postpone guilty plea
After getting input from Acosta, Sloman emailed Lefkowitz and agreed to the postponement of the guilty plea.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity