| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe Number One
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alicia Valle
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Referral |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Institutional friction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's counsel
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Professional interagency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Two Guards
|
Subject of deferred prosecution agreement agreed to interviews |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Governmental administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutorial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial collusive plea deal |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Governmental organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Informant collaborator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to plead guilty in Florida state court to soliciting minors for prostitution and s... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interviews of two guards with U.S. Attorney's Office and DOJ-OIG as part of an ongoing OIG invest... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attorneys approached U.S. Attorney's Office to resolve federal investigation. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement granting immunity | Federal Court/DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | U.S. Attorney's Office agreed not to charge Epstein with federal crimes and not to bring criminal... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of non-prosecution agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office officially identified 36 women as victims. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-05 | N/A | Transfer of discovery production | U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Government Discovery Production 7 | USAfx (Digital Upload) | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Discovery Production 7 | SDNY (via Email/USAfx) | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation into the conduct of the defendant and other possible co-conspirators of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein death / suicide attempt | Federal Prison / Hospital | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Bail submission due date (referred to as 'due Friday' relative to the email date of Thursday, Jul... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | District Judge in Miami issues opinion finding victims' rights were violated in the Epstein case ... | Miami | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Epstein charged in SDNY; Epstein death at MCC; dismissal of case against Epstein. | SDNY / MCC | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | A victim met with the U.S. Attorney's Office. | Unknown | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. was arrested by federal agents. His chief of staff, Kim Blackett, was als... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. and his chief of staff, Kim Blackett, were arrested by FBI agents. A fede... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2011-09-01 | N/A | Judge Kenneth Marra rules that U.S. Attorney's Office should have notified victims. | Federal Court | View |
| 2010-08-01 | N/A | Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's activities involving molestation of underage girls. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Narrator received victim notification letter regarding Rothstein case. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-07-10 | N/A | Final list of thirty-two victims provided to Mr. Goldberger via certified mail. | N/A | View |
Attorney Jeffrey Herman sends a cease and desist letter to Assistant U.S. Attorney Ms. Villafaña on September 16, 2008. Herman alleges that the U.S. Attorney's office sent letters to sexual assault victims on September 2, 2008, that violated Florida Bar rules by soliciting clients for another attorney, Mr. Josefsberg, and providing misleading information about waiving damage claims against Jeffrey Epstein. Herman demands the U.S. Attorney stop contacting his clients directly and correct the misleading statements sent to unrepresented victims.
This document is an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office dated September 19, 2008. Michele Dargan, a reporter for the Palm Beach Daily News, contacted the office asking why they decided not to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein federally despite the plea agreement terms. The internal response reveals that the Assistant U.S. Attorney on the case refused to speak to the reporter, and the press officer ultimately gave a 'no comment' response.
An internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated October 16, 2008. The subject is 'Immunity' and it contains attachments related to a response to quash subpoenas and a surreply, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving Epstein's immunity deal.
This document is an email thread from July 2008 forwarding previous correspondence from November 2007. An Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) forwards a 'Victim Notification Letter' to Alex Acosta, noting that this letter—originally sent to defense attorney Jay Lefkowitz—was 'objected to by the defense' and is being referenced in a draft declaration. The document highlights the legal friction regarding victim notification procedures in the Epstein case.
This document is an email chain from June 3, 2008, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The correspondence concerns the transmission of a letter regarding Jeffrey Epstein ('Epstein ltr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf'), likely directed to or concerning the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. The participants discuss sending a hard copy of the document 'with fancy tabs' via FedEx.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney dated July 1, 2008, regarding the filing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement in the Epstein case. The prosecutor highlights that Epstein made 'misstatements' to the court regarding his employment at the 'Florida Science Foundation,' noting that the entity was only recently incorporated, operated out of attorney Jack Goldberger's office with no physical presence, and that Epstein had not been in the county to work there 'every day' as claimed. The prosecutor leaves it to the recipient's discretion whether to inform the Court of these lies.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer, Jack Goldberger, dated July 7, 2008. The email discusses an oversight in a list of identified victims, noting that a Special Agent pointed out a missing minor victim. The prosecutor asks to provide a revised list and requests a signed notification by the following day to proceed with victim distribution.
An email dated June 27, 2008, from an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach to attorneys Jack Goldberger and Roy Black. The email serves as a cover letter for an attached 'Notice of Non-Compliance' (file: 080627_Goldberger_Black_notification_ltr.pdf). The sender's contact details and email addresses are redacted.
An email dated June 26, 2008, from a redacted sender (likely a federal prosecutor) to Epstein's defense attorneys Roy Black and Jack Goldberger. The sender invokes a clause in the deferred prosecution agreement requiring Epstein's team to share any proposed agreements made with the State Attorney's Office with the U.S. Attorney's Office. The sender also requests the schedule for Epstein's change of plea.
This document contains an email chain between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office dated October 29, 2008. An Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach inquires about how to handle a letter requesting the 'entire file' on Epstein, noting the letter did not reference FOIA. The responder advises construing the request as a FOIA request and mentions a delay in their own correspondence due to military leave.
This document is an email chain from June 2008 involving Jack Goldberger, an Assistant U.S. Attorney, and other legal counsel (Roy and Jay Lefkowitz). The key content is a notification that the Deputy Attorney General determined federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was appropriate. Epstein was given a deadline of June 30, 2008, to comply with a plea agreement that required him to plead guilty, be sentenced, and surrender for imprisonment.
This document is an email chain from June 2008 involving Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, and government officials (including a 'Marie' and references to Jeff Sloman and Jay Lefkowitz). The correspondence forwards a critical notification stating that the Deputy Attorney General determined federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was appropriate. It sets a strict deadline of June 30, 2008, for Epstein to comply with a plea agreement, enter a guilty plea, and surrender for imprisonment.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding Bob Josefsberg, dated August 25, 2008. The sender notes that an unidentified male has not heard back from 'Epstein's folks' and plans to draft a letter regarding a 'victim list' to raise the issue again.
This document is a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Deputy Attorney General arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in circa 2008. The defense argues that Epstein's conduct amounts to state-level solicitation of prostitution rather than federal sex trafficking or sex tourism, citing recent Supreme Court decisions to advocate for a narrow interpretation of federal statutes. The text asserts that Epstein did not target minors, did not use interstate commerce to lure victims, and that any underage women lied about their age.
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney dated February 1, 2008, discussing a development in the civil lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. The email reports that the mother of a minor victim ('[Redacted]') has filed a motion to intervene and stay the proceedings until the victim turns 18, claiming the victim has been estranged from her father (who presumably filed the suit) since Thanksgiving and did not consent to the lawsuit.
An email dated December 11, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta regarding the distribution of victim notification letters in the Epstein case. The sender reports calling a victim's attorney to ask where to send the letter; significantly, the sender notes that this attorney is paid for by Epstein. The attorney requested the letter be sent to him and attempted to inquire about its contents, which the sender refused to disclose.
An email dated September 11, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) to Gerald Lefcourt regarding a 'Revised Agreement re Epstein'. The sender attaches the '070911_Epstein_Non-Prosecution_Agreement.pdf' and notes that the revision was requested by Mr. Acosta but the operative terms remain unchanged.
An April 7, 2008 email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta regarding a Palm Beach Post article about Jeffrey Epstein's state case. The sender notes Epstein's lawyer's claim of harsh treatment due to wealth and urgently requests a response from 'DC' to prepare for a presentation on the 15th.
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney dated December 18, 2007, informing recipients that boxes containing evidence and correspondence related to the 'negotiation of the agreement' (likely the Epstein plea deal/NPA) have been sent via the mailroom.
An email dated December 10, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) to Lanna Belohlavek. The subject is Jeffrey Epstein. The sender apologizes for a delay and informs Lanna that a redacted individual will confer with her regarding facts she requested.
This document is an email dated December 10, 2007, sent by an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta (USAFLS). The email calls attention to a New York Magazine article about Jeffrey Epstein and provides the URL. The sender's identity and contact details are redacted, though their office address in West Palm Beach is visible.
This document is an email chain from December 2007 between Assistant U.S. Attorneys and colleagues discussing the finalization of paperwork for the Jeffrey Epstein case. The emails discuss a 'plea conference,' identifying a 'factual basis' for the 'procuring statute,' and setting a date for December 21. Notably, one Assistant U.S. Attorney expresses that they find the situation 'very demoralizing' while discussing information requests involving the FBI.
This document is an email chain from December 2007 involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys in West Palm Beach discussing the finalization of paperwork for Jeffrey Epstein's plea conference. The correspondents discuss drafting a factual basis for the 'procuring statute' that is 'short and sweet with no names,' with a date set for December 21. One prosecutor expresses frustration, stating they find the situation regarding information requests 'very demoralizing.'
This document is an email dated November 13, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the Epstein case. The sender is drafting a response to a letter from 'Jay' (likely Jay Lefkowitz) and is inquiring whether 'Judge Davis' has selected a lawyer, asking for the name to be included in the response.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity