Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Richard M. Berman

Person
Mentions
381
Relationships
41
Events
78
Documents
189
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
41 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Judicial
19 Very Strong
16
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Judge defendant
16 Very Strong
12
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Defendant judge
7
3
View
person Geoffrey S. Berman
Professional
7
2
View
person Paul A. Engelmayer
Professional
6
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Bruce A. Green
Professional
6
1
View
person Martin G. Weinberg
Professional
6
2
View
person Geoffrey S. Berman
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Grady MacPhee
Professional
6
2
View
person JAY CLAYTON
Professional
5
1
View
person Marc Fernich
Professional
5
1
View
person Lamine N'Diaye
Professional
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Litigant judge
5
1
View
person Lamine N’Diaye
Professional
5
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Judicial judge defendant
5
1
View
person Lamine N'Diaye
Professional judicial
5
1
View
person Marc Fernich
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Anonymous victim of Epstein
Petitioner judge
5
1
View
person REID WEINGARTEN
Professional
5
1
View
person GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
Professional
5
1
View
person epstein
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Mr. Epstein
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Epstein
Professional defendant judge
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2025-08-05 Legal filing A memo was filed and endorsed regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein an... U.S. District Court for the... View
2025-08-05 N/A Filing of Document 73 and endorsement by Judge Berman. Southern District of New York View
2025-08-05 N/A Submission of letter regarding CVRA rights and unsealing of grand jury materials. New York, NY View
2025-08-05 N/A Filing of Memo Endorsed regarding CVRA implications on unsealing grand jury materials. Southern District of New York View
2025-08-04 Legal filing An endorsed memo from an anonymous victim was filed with the court in the case of USA vs. Epstein. United States District Cour... View
2025-08-04 N/A Memo Endorsement / Filing of letter SDNY View
2025-08-04 N/A Memo Endorsement by Judge Berman ordering the letter to be docketed and filed. Southern District of New York View
2025-08-04 N/A Memo Endorsement Southern District of New York View
2025-07-25 N/A Court Order issued regarding submission procedures Southern District of New York View
2025-07-25 Court order Judge Richard M. Berman issued an order directing the Government on how to submit documents to hi... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-07-25 N/A Court denies MSW Media, Inc.'s motion to intervene New York, New York View
2021-11-01 N/A Court Conference Court View
2020-05-05 N/A Sentencing hearing of Terrance Morgan where Judge Berman criticized BOP conditions. New York (via video/audio c... View
2019-09-03 Court hearing A court hearing where attorney Teri Gibbs read victim impact statements into the record for the c... Courtroom (implied) View
2019-08-29 Court order Judge Richard M. Berman officially ordered the dismissal of the case against Jeffrey Epstein. New York, New York View
2019-08-29 N/A Order of Nolle Prosequi electronically filed, dismissing the indictment. New York View
2019-08-27 N/A Judge Richard Berman hand-writes 'Application respectfully denied' on the motion. SDNY Court View
2019-08-27 N/A Brief hearing regarding the nolle prosequi order proposed by the US Attorney following Epstein's ... Courtroom 17B, SDNY View
2019-08-27 N/A Scheduled Hearing Courtroom 110, Thurgood Mar... View
2019-08-27 Hearing A court hearing in the case of United States v. Epstein, where the court commented on an article ... U.S. District Court for the... View
2019-08-27 N/A Motion to Intervene filed by David Golden and subsequently denied by Judge Richard Berman. USDC SDNY View
2019-08-27 N/A Court hearing held, transcript of which is incorporated by reference in the order. New York View
2019-08-27 N/A Hearing regarding the nolle prosequi order following Epstein's death, where victims were invited ... Daniel Patrick Moynihan Uni... View
2019-08-21 N/A Order filed and signed New York, New York View
2019-08-19 Legal filing A recommendation and direction to file an order of nolle prosequi against defendant Jeffrey Epste... Southern District of New York View

DOJ-OGR-00000773.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing in the case regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490), dated August 5, 2025. It argues for strict adherence to grand jury secrecy rules (Rule 6(e)) to protect the privacy of victims, many of whom were minors at the time of abuse. The filing outlines specific requested relief, including requiring the government to confer with victims' counsel, conducting judicial in camera reviews of materials, and allowing victims' counsel to review proposed redactions prior to any public release to prevent re-identification.

Legal filing / court motion (page 3)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000772.jpg

This legal document is a filing by counsel for victims of Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the government has violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The filing contends the government sought to unseal grand jury materials without properly conferring with or notifying the victims, repeating past misconduct. The counsel expresses concern about the adequacy of redactions and urges the court to adopt a protocol to protect the victims' rights to fairness, privacy, and dignity before any materials are released.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000771.jpg

A legal letter dated August 5, 2025 (Document 73), from the Edwards Henderson law firm to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. The firm, representing numerous Epstein survivors, writes to address the DOJ's request to unseal grand jury materials, urging the court to protect victims' rights and privacy under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA). The document is 'Memo Endorsed' and signed by Judge Berman.

Legal correspondence / memo endorsed order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000766.jpg

This is a memo dated August 5, 2025, from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to federal judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. The firm, writing on behalf of victim Annie Farmer, responds to a notice about the potential unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The memo strongly criticizes the U.S. Government for not pursuing further criminal investigations, despite admitting there were over a thousand victims, calling this inaction a 'cowardly abdication' of its duties.

Legal document (memo endorsed)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000765.jpg

A legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP (representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein) to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter states that the Epstein Estate takes no position regarding the Government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts, provided that victim identities are protected via redaction.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000764.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding motions to unseal grand jury transcripts. The government discusses legal precedents for maintaining grand jury secrecy and updates the court on its progress in notifying victims, particularly those related to the 'Maxwell and Epstein matters'. The government commits to continuing its efforts to contact all relevant victims and to protect the interests of all third parties involved.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000763.jpg

This document is page 3 of a government filing dated August 4, 2025, addressed to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding the Epstein and Maxwell cases. It details specific dates the grand juries met for both cases (2019 for Epstein, 2020-2021 for Maxwell) and discusses the submission of grand jury exhibits and transcripts under seal. The government argues that the 'nolle prosequi' (dismissal due to death) in the Epstein case does not prevent the court from disclosing sealed grand jury minutes.

Legal correspondence / court filing (government letter to judges)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000762.jpg

This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer, filed on August 5, 2025. The Government responds to a court order demanding information about the potential unsealing of grand jury materials from the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The Government acknowledges the public's strong right of access to trial exhibits, noting that exhibits from the Maxwell trial were already made public, but requests an extension until August 8, 2025, to provide its final position on unsealing the grand jury exhibits.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000761.jpg

This is a letter dated August 4, 2025, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. The Government is responding to the Court's July 31, 2025 order, which required it to provide specific information about grand jury materials in the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the history of motions to unseal these materials and lists the specific information the Court has requested, such as presentation dates, exhibits, and the Government's position on unsealing them.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000759.jpg

This document is a letter filed on August 4, 2025, from an anonymous victim in the U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein case to Judge Richard Berman. The author criticizes the DOJ's handling of the 'Epstein Files,' accuses the government of using victims as political pawns, and demands full transparency regarding the wealthy 'friends' associated with Epstein.

Letter to judge (memo endorsed)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000757.jpg

An anonymous victim of Epstein writes a memo to Judge Richard M. Berman, expressing profound distrust in the DOJ and FBI, whom the author believes are protecting powerful individuals involved with Epstein. The author questions the official cause of Epstein's death and argues that the public release of the 'Epstein Files' is harming victims. The memo concludes with a formal request for a third-party review of all documents to ensure that no victims' identities are revealed.

Legal document (endorsed memo to a judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000745.jpg

This is a court order from U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 CR. 490). The order, dated July 25, 2025, instructs the Government to deliver all submissions directly to the judge's chambers. Physical submissions must be in a sealed container marked for the attention of Grady MacPhee, and electronic submissions must be sent to his court email address.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000741.jpg

This is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated July 25, 2025, presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The order denies a motion to intervene submitted via letter by MSW Media, Inc., citing legal precedents including United States v. Aref and United States v. Saipov, though the court notes it will consider the views expressed in the letter.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000728.jpg

This is page 2 of a legal document filed on September 4, 2019, in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Epstein). Judge Richard M. Berman addresses an unnamed recipient regarding an opinion piece they wrote, criticizing it for potentially discouraging Ms. Giuffre and her attorney David Boies from speaking at an August 27, 2019 hearing. The document copies attorneys Maurene Comey, Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, and David Boies.

Legal correspondence / court order (page 2 of 2)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000726.jpg

Fordham law professor Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Richard M. Berman to correct a misunderstanding from an August 27, 2019, hearing in the case *United States v. Epstein*. Green clarifies that, contrary to the court's apparent understanding, he has never served as counsel for Epstein or his estate. He explains that his only involvement in a related matter was serving as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate defamation case, a role that concluded in June 2019 and did not involve representation or advocacy.

Letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000703.jpg

This document is a victim impact statement from 'Jane Doe 7' filed on September 3, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The victim describes being unknowingly recruited by an agent and subsequently sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein at his New York City mansion. She details the severe psychological aftermath, including becoming a recluse, suffering from shame and guilt, and struggling with suicidal thoughts.

Court transcript / victim impact statement
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000702.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Teri Gibbs appears on behalf of attorney Lisa Bloom to read victim impact statements into the record, including a powerful statement from "Jane Doe 6" addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The statement describes the lasting harm caused by Epstein and asserts the author's identity as a survivor, not a victim.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000638.jpg

This legal document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 29, 2019, which formally dismisses the criminal case against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, follows a recommendation and directive from the U.S. Attorney's office to file a nolle prosequi. The judge's order also references a hearing held on August 27, 2019, and the Crime Victims' Rights Act.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000633.jpg

This document is a 'Motion to Intervene' filed by David A. Golden (alias Jeremy Thundercloud) in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein on August 27, 2019. Golden argued that Epstein's case shared common issues of law (fraud and conspiracy) with a separate False Claims Act complaint Golden filed in Western Washington in 2018. Judge Richard M. Berman hand-wrote 'Application respectfully denied' on the motion and signed it the same day.

Court filing (motion to intervene) with judicial order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000632.jpg

This is a court order filed on August 26, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Judge Richard M. Berman orders that the hearing scheduled for the following day, August 27, 2019, will take place in Courtroom 110 at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse. Note: This date is after Epstein's death (August 10, 2019), suggesting this was a procedural hearing regarding the dismissal of the indictment or related matters.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000630.jpg

A court order issued by Judge Richard M. Berman on August 21, 2019, scheduling a hearing for August 27, 2019, regarding the dismissal (*nolle prosequi*) of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death. The order explicitly states that victims and their counsel will be given the opportunity to be heard at this proceeding, citing the public's informational interest in the process.

Court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000626.jpg

In a letter dated August 12, 2019, Lamine N'Diaye, the Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), responds to an inquiry from Judge Richard M. Berman. The Warden confirms that the ongoing FBI and OIG investigations into the August 10, 2019 incident involving inmate Jeffrey Epstein will also encompass a prior incident that occurred on July 23, 2019. Due to the active investigations, the Warden states he is unable to release any information about the internal investigation that had already been completed regarding the July incident.

Letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000623.jpg

This letter, dated August 10, 2019, is a formal notification from the Warden's Office at the Metropolitan Correctional Center to Chief Judge Colleen McMahon and Judge Richard M. Berman. It reports the death of inmate Jeffrey Epstein, who was found unresponsive in his cell that morning from an apparent suicide and later pronounced dead at a local hospital. The letter states that investigations by the FBI and the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General are underway.

Letter
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000612.jpg

This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 6, 2019. It pertains to a conference held on July 31, 2019, in the criminal case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The document lists the presiding judge, Hon. Richard M. Berman, and the attorneys appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000611.jpg

This is a court order from Judge Richard M. Berman in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 29, 2019, in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein. The order directs the prosecution and defense counsel to meet before a conference scheduled for that Wednesday to create a mutually agreed-upon schedule for the remainder of the case, including discovery, motions, and the trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
5
As Recipient
1
Total
6

Regarding an opinion piece and the August 27, 2019 hearing

From: Richard M. Berman
To: Unspecified Recipient ...

Judge Berman criticizes an opinion piece written by the recipient, stating it may have been construed as an effort to chill the rights of Ms. Giuffre and Mr. Boies to speak at a hearing.

Letter
2019-09-04
Communication Source

Victim Impact Statement

From: Jane Doe 7
To: Richard M. Berman

Statement regarding the impact of sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein.

Statement
2019-09-03
Communication Source

Re: Jeffrey Epstein 19 cr 490

From: Richard M. Berman
To: [Redacted] (NYSD Courts)

Asking to thank the Warden for his prompt response to the Judge's letter.

Email
2019-08-12
Communication Source

Re: Jeffrey Epstein 19 cr 490

From: Richard M. Berman
To: [REDACTED]

please thank the Warden for his prompt response to my letter.

Email
2019-08-12
Communication Source

Inquiry regarding scope of investigations

From: Richard M. Berman
To: Lamine N'Diaye

Referenced inquiry asking if investigations cover the July 23 incident.

Inquiry
2019-08-12
Communication Source

Whether investigations referenced in an August 10, 2019 l...

From: Richard M. Berman
To: Lamine N’Diaye

Judge Berman inquired whether the ongoing investigations into the August 10 incident would also cover the earlier July 23 incident.

Inquiry
2019-08-12
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search