Richard M. Berman
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Judicial |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Judge defendant |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Defendant judge |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul A. Engelmayer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bruce A. Green
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Grady MacPhee
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JAY CLAYTON
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Fernich
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lamine N'Diaye
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Litigant judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lamine N’Diaye
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Judicial judge defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lamine N'Diaye
|
Professional judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Fernich
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Anonymous victim of Epstein
|
Petitioner judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional defendant judge |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Correspondence regarding an inquiry by Judge Berman and the subsequent response by the MCC Warden... | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Letter sent from Warden N'Diaye to Judge Berman | New York | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Distribution of a letter from Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (19 cr 4... | New York (implied by USANYS... | View |
| 2019-08-12 | Inquiry | Judge Berman made an inquiry about the scope of investigations into incidents involving Jeffrey E... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Warden Lamine N'Diaye responded to an inquiry/letter from Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the J... | Metropolitan Correctional C... | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Letter sent regarding investigations | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-08-12 | Inquiry | Judge Richard M. Berman made an inquiry to the Warden of MCC. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-31 | Court conference | A conference is scheduled for Wednesday, which is two days after the document's date of Monday, J... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-07-31 | Court conference | A court conference was held in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-07-29 | N/A | Order issued by Judge Berman | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-07-29 | Legal filing | Document 41, an ORDER, was filed in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-07-25 | Legal filing | A court order in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB was filed. The order was signed by Judge Richard M. Berma... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-25 | N/A | Filing of Protective Order (Document 37-1) | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-25 | N/A | Filing of Document 37-1 in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB | Court (SDNY inferred from c... | View |
| 2019-07-25 | Legal filing | A Protective Order was filed in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-07-25 | N/A | Protective Order filed and signed by Judge Richard M. Berman. | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-07-18 | N/A | Bail Decision Hearing | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Court conference | The letter mentions a 'next conference' scheduled for this date. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Court ruling | The Government's motion for remand (detention) was granted, and the Defense motion for pretrial r... | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Legal ruling | A 'Decision & Order Remanding Defendant' was entered in the action against Jeffrey Epstein. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-17 | Legal filing | Reid Weingarten filed a letter (Document 25) with the court, attaching documents related to Jeffr... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-17 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed a letter with the court regarding Jeffrey Epstein's foreign passport. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Court order | Judge Richard M. Berman granted the government's application to exclude speedy trial time. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | Legal proceeding | The court granted the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted Pro Hac Vice to serve... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Filing of supplemental bail request letter. | SDNY | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000438.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman on July 16, 2019. The text argues for Epstein's release on bail, stating that despite intense media scrutiny (specifically mentioning The Miami Herald) and public outcry following November 2018 reports about his previous plea deal, Epstein traveled extensively but always returned to the United States, proving he is not a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00000437.jpg
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing addressed to Hon. Richard M. Berman. It argues two points on behalf of Epstein: first, that certain individuals were not cooperating witnesses but rather long-time friends and employees who invoked the Fifth Amendment in prior civil proceedings, and second, that an expired Austrian passport acquired by Epstein in the 1980s was for personal protection during travel and there is no evidence it was ever used.
DOJ-OGR-00000436.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing dated July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The author refutes the judge's suggestion that sex offender recidivism rates increase after 15 years, citing two studies that conclude the opposite. The document also mentions a New Mexico detective, Deborah Anaya, and speculation by a third-party counsel, Mr. Boies, regarding alleged payments in late 2018.
DOJ-OGR-00000435.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 16, 2019, argues for specific release conditions for a defendant named Epstein. It highlights that Epstein's brother, Mark, is prepared to co-sign a release bond with his net worth exceeding $100 million to ensure Epstein's appearance in court. The document also clarifies that in August 2010, the New Mexico Public Safety Department advised Epstein he was not required to register there based on his 2008 Florida conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00000434.jpg
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing on behalf of Mr. Epstein addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The filing argues that Epstein's finances are too complex to meet the court's 5pm deadline for a financial statement, citing his detention as an impediment. It proposes that the court accept the initial disclosure and, as a condition for granting bail, order a comprehensive forensic accounting of his finances to be conducted by Joel Podgor of the firm Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00000433.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, dated July 16, 2019. The author argues that denying bail to a defendant based on their wealth is unconstitutional, violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments by thwarting the presumption of innocence and due process. The document cites several federal court cases as precedent to support the claim that suitable conditions for release can be found even in presumption cases.
DOJ-OGR-00000432.jpg
This legal document, part of a filing to Judge Richard M. Berman, argues against the government's position that Jeffrey Epstein's wealth creates an 'irrebuttable presumption' that he is a flight risk and should be denied release. The filing contends that this amounts to a 'per se rule' that is contrary to law. It cites government arguments from other court records which detail Epstein's financial sophistication, international ties, and ability to transfer assets and earn millions abroad as reasons why no bail conditions could be effective.
DOJ-OGR-00000431.jpg
This is a legal letter dated July 16, 2019, from attorney Marc Fernich to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case of US v. Epstein. The letter serves to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail by countering the government's arguments for detention made in court the previous day. Fernich argues that the government's position relies on a remand presumption connected to 18 USC § 1591, which Epstein's defense contends does not apply to the core conduct at issue.
DOJ-OGR-00000387.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a conference held on July 8, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein, with Judge Richard M. Berman presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other officials present, including an FBI agent, an NYPD officer, and two probation officers.
DOJ-OGR-00000386.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg of Boston, MA, to be admitted Pro Hac Vice, allowing him to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000385.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case *United States v. Jeffrey Epstein*. The prosecution requests the exclusion of speedy trial time for the period of July 15-18, 2019, noting that Epstein's defense counsel consents to the request. The document is endorsed by Judge Berman, who granted the application on July 16, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00000384.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter formally requests the exclusion of speedy trial time in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein for the period between July 15 and July 18, 2019. The filing notes that Epstein's defense counsel, Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, have been consulted and consent to the request.
DOJ-OGR-00000366.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Richard M. Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order directs the Clerk of Court to docket unspecified enclosed documents that were discussed during Epstein's bail hearing held on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00000364.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted "Pro Hac Vice," allowing him to practice in this specific case as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000360.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, issued by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants attorney Martin G. Weinberg's motion for admission *pro hac vice*. This allows Weinberg, a member of the Massachusetts bar, to officially act as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in this specific criminal case.
DOJ-OGR-00000352.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (Page 10) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated July 8, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The Government argues that the defendant should be denied bail because he poses an 'extraordinarily real' flight risk due to his vast wealth, private planes, and foreign contacts, and is a danger to the community due to his alleged abuse of dozens of underage girls and history of witness tampering. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey on behalf of US Attorney Geoffrey Berman.
DOJ-OGR-00000342.jpg
This document is the final page (14) of a government filing dated July 12, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, arguing against bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The text provides legal precedents establishing that sex trafficking laws (Section 1591) apply to consumers/buyers, not just suppliers, refuting the defense's legal arguments. The conclusion explicitly requests pretrial detention based on Epstein's wealth, flight risk, possession of lewd photos of minors, and history of witness interference.
DOJ-OGR-00000341.jpg
This page from a government filing (July 12, 2019) argues before Judge Berman that a previous plea agreement in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) does not bind other districts or the broader 'United States' government. It further asserts that the defendant (Epstein) was the 'leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise' rather than a mere consumer, highlighting his role in recruiting, funding, and organizing the scheme across two states.
DOJ-OGR-00000340.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made with the defendant (Epstein) in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) does not prevent his current prosecution in the Southern District of New York. The prosecution asserts that the language of the NPA explicitly limits its scope to the SDFL and does not cover the alleged conduct or victims in New York. The filing cites specific text from the NPA and legal precedent from the Second Circuit to support its position that one U.S. Attorney's office agreement does not bind another.
DOJ-OGR-00000339.jpg
This document is a legal filing arguing that Jeffrey Epstein poses a danger of obstructing justice. It cites past incidents of intimidation, including a private investigator driving a victim's parent off the road and threats that those who hurt Epstein 'will be dealt with.' It further highlights suspicious financial activity in late 2018, specifically wire transfers totaling $350,000 to possible co-conspirators immediately following the publication of investigative articles by the Miami Herald.
DOJ-OGR-00000338.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a prosecution filing arguing against granting bail to a defendant. The prosecution asserts that the defendant's wealth should not permit him to create a private, guard-monitored home confinement, citing legal precedent. It further argues the defendant poses an ongoing danger to the community, referencing a prior conviction for a sex crime with a minor and the discovery of a large collection of sexually suggestive photographs of underage females at his residence.
DOJ-OGR-00000337.jpg
This legal document, page 9 of a court filing, argues against a defendant's proposal to hire private security guards as an alternative to pretrial detention. It cites numerous legal precedents from the Second Circuit and other district courts to assert that such arrangements create a conflict of interest, magnify flight risks, and foster unequal treatment based on wealth, which is contrary to the principles of the Bail Reform Act. The document highlights past cases where wealthy defendants on private security details violated the terms of their release.
DOJ-OGR-00000336.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 12, 2019, is a memorandum arguing against a defendant's proposal for bail involving home confinement, electronic monitoring, and a private security force. The prosecution contends that these measures are insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court, citing numerous legal precedents that question the security, fairness, and practicality of such "private jail" arrangements. The document asserts that a private security firm cannot replicate the controlled environment of a federal facility and that allowing wealthy defendants to fund their own detention is legally problematic.
DOJ-OGR-00000335.jpg
This document is page 7 of a government filing opposing Jeffrey Epstein's release on bail, dated July 12, 2019. The prosecution argues that the proposed co-signers (Epstein's brother and a friend, Mr. Mitchell) are insufficient because Epstein could easily financially compensate them for any losses incurred if he fled. Additionally, the government asserts that Epstein's offer to sign a waiver of extradition is legally unenforceable and provides no guarantee that he would return to face justice.
DOJ-OGR-00000333.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Government filing to Judge Richard Berman arguing for the detention of Jeffrey Epstein (the defendant). It highlights his extreme flight risk due to his sophisticated financial network, international residences (Paris, USVI), and recent travel history (over 20 international flights since 2018). The document also notes that since the indictment was unsealed, more victims have come forward and search warrants executed at his Manhattan home yielded a significant volume of nude photographs of young women and girls.
Regarding an opinion piece and the August 27, 2019 hearing
Judge Berman criticizes an opinion piece written by the recipient, stating it may have been construed as an effort to chill the rights of Ms. Giuffre and Mr. Boies to speak at a hearing.
Victim Impact Statement
Statement regarding the impact of sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein 19 cr 490
please thank the Warden for his prompt response to my letter.
Inquiry regarding scope of investigations
Referenced inquiry asking if investigations cover the July 23 incident.
Whether investigations referenced in an August 10, 2019 l...
Judge Berman inquired whether the ongoing investigations into the August 10 incident would also cover the earlier July 23 incident.
Re: Jeffrey Epstein 19 cr 490
Asking to thank the Warden for his prompt response to the Judge's letter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity