Ms. Williams
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed speaker
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Members of the jury
|
Professional support staff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Subordinate staff |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jury
|
Administrative support |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Elisa New
|
Professional academic |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional procedural |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury/Attendees
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional court staff judicial support |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. MARSHAL
|
Professional procedural |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alternates
|
Supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elisa New
|
Professional solicitation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Members of the jury
|
Logistical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (Judge/Court Official)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury Members
|
Administrative liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Court escort |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Professional supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional judicial support |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | 45-minute filming session | Location of Ms. Williams' c... | View |
| N/A | Jury instruction | A speaker, likely a judge, is instructing the jury before a holiday break. They are told to retur... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Impanelment and Swearing In | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Swearing in of the U.S. Marshal | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Deliberations and Court Response to Note | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Impaneling and swearing in of the jury | Courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The court prepares for and begins the closing argument phase of a trial. The jury is brought in a... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion between the judge and counsel regarding a note from the jury and the schedule for fu... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion in court about the logistical handling of trial exhibits and transcripts for the jury. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A judge discusses the ongoing schedule for jury deliberations in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Attorneys argue over the admissibility of a question regarding a witness's motive. The judge sust... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Swearing-in | The U.S. Marshal was sworn in by Ms. Williams to safeguard the jury's deliberations. | courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The court calls for a ten-minute recess during the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi. A logistical ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A portion of a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where a closing argument is made and the judge give... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court about the procedure for handling a sensitive exhi... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A procedural discussion took place regarding marking an exhibit, providing materials to a witness... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion in court regarding jury matters, including a response from the jurors, a confirmatio... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion in court about the scheduling of witnesses before bringing in the jury. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Trial proceeding | A judge provides instructions to the jury regarding their conduct, decision-making process based ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion was held regarding the handling of an exhibit containing full names. It was decided ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Trial | A criminal case trial during which a judge is giving instructions to the jury. | Courthouse | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A prosecutor (Ms. Moe) makes a closing argument to the jury in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, af... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A procedural discussion in court before continuing the cross-examination of a witness named Aless... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The court begins the opening statements phase of a trial, with Ms. Pomerantz delivering the openi... | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014738.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the judge, Ms. Moe, and Ms. Sternheim about the schedule for ongoing jury deliberations, including over the New Year's holiday. The parties agree on the schedule and the specific language of the instructions to be given to the jury, ensuring jurors know how to report hardships and are not pressured to reach a verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00014737.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text details a discussion between Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Judge regarding the jury's deliberation schedule over the New Year holidays (Jan 1 and 2). The Judge insists on a strict schedule to minimize the risk of trial delays caused by potential COVID-19 quarantine requirements.
DOJ-OGR-00014730.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which the judge addresses the jury. The judge confirms the jury's requested deliberation schedule to end at 5 p.m. and resume the next morning, while also outlining future scheduling. The judge strongly reminds the jury of strict COVID-19 protocols, including mandatory KN95/N95 masking and social distancing, due to the omicron variant.
DOJ-OGR-00014729.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. A judge instructs the involved parties, including Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Moe, that jury deliberations will continue daily until a verdict is reached and asks them to remain available. The judge also provides a protocol for addressing scheduling hardships through a Ms. Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00014714.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing instructions from "THE COURT" to the jury. The Court dismisses the jury for the day, advises them to continue taking health precautions, and outlines the schedule for resuming deliberations the following day, suggesting they plan to deliberate until at least 6 p.m. The Court also designates Ms. Williams as a contact for any hardships regarding the deliberation schedule, emphasizing that the jury should take all the time they need.
DOJ-OGR-00014712.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and attorneys about the schedule for jury deliberations. The judge sets a default end time of 6 p.m., with an exception for jurors who report a hardship to a Ms. Williams. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects to the judge's phrasing for the jury instructions, fearing it could pressure the jury, but the judge overrules the objection, citing prior use of the same language without issue.
DOJ-OGR-00014710.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Judge, Prosecutor Ms. Moe, and Defense Attorney Mr. Everdell are discussing a response to a note received from the jury. The Judge decides to refer the jury back to Instruction Number 21 on page 28. Additionally, the parties discuss extending the schedule for jury deliberations for the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00014692.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a discussion regarding the legal definition of the word "entice" and a procedural matter of marking a note as a court exhibit. Additionally, defense attorney Ms. Sternheim raises a concern that Ms. Maxwell was provided an N95 mask but restricted to wearing it only in the courtroom, to which the Judge clarifies the rule applies to the whole courthouse.
DOJ-OGR-00014691.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts a discussion between the Judge (The Court), Defense (Mr. Everdell), and Prosecution (Ms. Moe) regarding a response to a jury note during deliberations. The court is preparing to send the jury a transcript of testimony from a witness named 'Matt' and is clarifying jury instructions regarding the definition of 'enticement' found on pages 21 and 33 of the charge.
DOJ-OGR-00014684.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court transcript (Document 771) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures the judge instructing the jury ('the 12 of you') to avoid media and communications about the case during a recess for a holiday. The judge also instructs jurors to contact Ms. Williams regarding COVID or other concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00014682.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding jury deliberations, specifically addressing a jury note declining an offer because they had plans, and confirming that a 'limiting instruction' was included with the transcript of witness 'Annie's' testimony provided to the jury. The court prepares to dismiss the jury for the day at 4:25 PM.
DOJ-OGR-00014676.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge expresses frustration to Ms. Comey (Government) about a three-hour delay in providing requested transcripts to the jury. The Judge also instructs court staff (Ms. Williams) to contact alternate jurors to inform them that deliberations are ongoing.
DOJ-OGR-00014675.jpg
This page is a transcript from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Court is addressing the jury regarding scheduling, specifically acknowledging a note about dismissing at 5 p.m. and offering the option to deliberate on Thursday, December 23rd. The Judge also reiterates strict instructions regarding the presence of all 12 jurors for deliberations, COVID-19 mask protocols in the courthouse, and the prohibition of discussing the case outside the deliberation room.
DOJ-OGR-00014674.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Court, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding responses to jury notes, dismissal times during deliberations, lunch orders for the jury, and strict COVID-19 mask protocols mandated by the Chief Judge.
DOJ-OGR-00014660.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the judge and counsel while the jury is not present. The conversation centers on two notes from the jury requesting testimony transcripts for individuals named Jane, Annie, and Carolyn, as well as an FBI deposition of Carolyn. The counsel confirms they are finalizing redactions before sending the documents to the jury via court staff.
DOJ-OGR-00014656.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge is dismissing the jury for the day, instructing them to have no communication about the case with anyone and to resume deliberations at 9:00 a.m. the following morning. The judge also mentions a Ms. Williams will handle their lunch orders.
DOJ-OGR-00014654.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a judge's final instructions to a jury before they begin deliberations. The judge dismisses the alternate jurors and outlines the procedures for the 12 deliberating jurors, including how to communicate with the court, before officially sending them to deliberate at 4:49 p.m.
DOJ-OGR-00014653.jpg
This document is page 253 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The text records the court instructing the jury to begin deliberations and identifying five alternate jurors (numbers 125, 149, 151, 152, and 170). The Judge provides strict instructions to the alternates to refrain from discussing the case or consuming media until they are either recalled by Ms. Williams or released.
DOJ-OGR-00014652.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. In it, the judge (THE COURT) outlines the logistical procedures for jury deliberations to the involved parties (Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Pagliuca, Mr. Everdell). The discussion covers the daily schedule for deliberations, the materials the jury will be given (instructions, verdict form, exhibits), and the roles of court staff in managing the process.
DOJ-OGR-00014651.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) recording a sidebar conference between the Judge and legal counsel (Moe, Menninger, Sternheim, Pagliuca). The discussion focuses on instructions for alternate jurors (specifically identifying jurors 125, 149, 151, 152, and 170), confirming they should remain 'on call' rather than stay in the building due to pandemic concerns, and setting parameters for evening deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00011767.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between Mr. Everdell and the Court about handling a sensitive exhibit. They agree that because the exhibit contains the full names of real people, it must be sealed from the public, with different formats (electronic and paper) provided to specific parties like the witness, Ms. Williams, and the government.
DOJ-OGR-00011764.jpg
This document is page 99 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The page captures the end of a session where the judge is dismissing the jury or attendees for the day, emphasizing the importance of following instructions and noting that Ms. Williams will escort them out. The header indicates the witness during this session was Visoski (likely pilot David Visoski) on direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00011763.jpg
This document is page 98 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the end of a trial day where witness Visoski briefly mentions a personal assistant named Kimberly before the Judge interrupts proceedings at 4:59 PM. The remainder of the page consists of the Judge instructing the jury on the daily schedule (9:30 AM start) and the holiday sitting schedule for late December.
DOJ-OGR-00017355.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, the judge confirms the jury's deliberation schedule, which includes holidays, and reads a note from the jury requesting the transcripts of expert witness Elizabeth Loftus. Counsel then raises an issue regarding the transcript of Cimberly Espinosa.
DOJ-OGR-00017346.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. A judge (The Court) instructs the parties that jury deliberations will proceed every day of the week until a verdict is reached. The judge advises that any juror facing a hardship should notify Ms. Williams, and then asks Ms. Williams to bring the jurors out.
Deliberation Status
Instruction to inform alternates that deliberations are ongoing and rules still apply.
Invitation to appear on Poetry in America
Invitation to discuss a Sharon Olds poem comparing athletic prowess to childbirth for a TV series and medical course.
Invitation to Poetry in America
Invitation to appear on the show 'Poetry in America' to discuss Sharon Olds' poem 'The Language of the Brag'.
Invitation to Poetry in America
Formal invitation to appear on the show to discuss Sharon Olds' poem 'The Language of the Brag', noting the content would be used for the show and a Harvard Medical School online course.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity