Ms. Williams

Person
Mentions
180
Relationships
22
Events
41
Documents
86

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
22 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Professional
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
organization The Court
Professional subordinate
6
2
View
person Unnamed speaker
Professional
6
1
View
person Members of the jury
Professional support staff
6
1
View
person Jury
Professional
6
2
View
organization The Court
Subordinate staff
6
2
View
person Jury
Administrative support
6
2
View
person Elisa New
Professional academic
6
2
View
organization The Court
Professional procedural
5
1
View
person Jury/Attendees
Professional
5
1
View
organization The Court
Professional court staff judicial support
5
1
View
organization The Court
Professional judicial
5
1
View
organization U.S. MARSHAL
Professional procedural
5
1
View
person Alternates
Supervisory
5
1
View
person Elisa New
Professional solicitation
5
1
View
person Members of the jury
Logistical
5
1
View
person Unnamed Speaker (Judge/Court Official)
Professional
5
1
View
person Jury Members
Administrative liaison
5
1
View
person Visoski
Court escort
5
1
View
person Judge
Professional supervisory
5
1
View
organization The Court
Professional judicial support
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A 45-minute filming session Location of Ms. Williams' c... View
N/A Jury instruction A speaker, likely a judge, is instructing the jury before a holiday break. They are told to retur... Courtroom (implied) View
N/A N/A Jury Impanelment and Swearing In Courtroom View
N/A N/A Swearing in of the U.S. Marshal Courtroom View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberations and Court Response to Note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Impaneling and swearing in of the jury Courtroom View
2025-11-18 N/A Charging conference Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding The court prepares for and begins the closing argument phase of a trial. The jury is brought in a... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion between the judge and counsel regarding a note from the jury and the schedule for fu... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion in court about the logistical handling of trial exhibits and transcripts for the jury. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A judge discusses the ongoing schedule for jury deliberations in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Attorneys argue over the admissibility of a question regarding a witness's motive. The judge sust... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Swearing-in The U.S. Marshal was sworn in by Ms. Williams to safeguard the jury's deliberations. courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding The court calls for a ten-minute recess during the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi. A logistical ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A portion of a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where a closing argument is made and the judge give... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion between Mr. Everdell and the Court about the procedure for handling a sensitive exhi... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court hearing A procedural discussion took place regarding marking an exhibit, providing materials to a witness... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion in court regarding jury matters, including a response from the jurors, a confirmatio... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion in court about the scheduling of witnesses before bringing in the jury. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Trial proceeding A judge provides instructions to the jury regarding their conduct, decision-making process based ... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A discussion was held regarding the handling of an exhibit containing full names. It was decided ... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Trial A criminal case trial during which a judge is giving instructions to the jury. Courthouse View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A prosecutor (Ms. Moe) makes a closing argument to the jury in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, af... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A procedural discussion in court before continuing the cross-examination of a witness named Aless... Courtroom in the Southern D... View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding The court begins the opening statements phase of a trial, with Ms. Pomerantz delivering the openi... Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00016921.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Judge (The Court) informs the jury that the evidence portion of the trial has concluded. The Judge sets the schedule for the following Monday, starting early at 9:00 a.m. for closing arguments and jury instructions, with a potential extension until 6:00 p.m. to finish in one day.

Court transcript / trial proceedings
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016912.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and several attorneys (Ms. Sternheim, Ms. Comey, and Mr. Everdell) about the day's trial schedule. The judge discusses the need to potentially keep the jury until 5:30 or 6:00 PM and shows consideration for jurors' potential childcare responsibilities. After the scheduling is discussed, the jury is brought in, and the judge allows Mr. Everdell to proceed.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016840.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the resumption of the direct examination of witness Dr. Dubin by attorney Mr. Pagliuca after the jury is brought in. During this segment, Exhibit 662-RR (identified as a redacted version of Exhibit 662) is offered by the defense and admitted into evidence without objection from the government (Ms. Moe).

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016657.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the cross-examination of an individual named Loftus. The transcript captures a brief procedural exchange where an unnamed speaker offers to explain their reasons at a sidebar, the judge reviews an item numbered '1511', and a request is made to 'Ms. Williams' to erase a background.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016635.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between two attorneys, Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Sternheim, over the admissibility of a question for a witness. The judge sustains an objection on '401 ground', limiting the line of questioning. The transcript concludes with the court preparing to bring in the jury and call witnesses Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Williams to testify.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00016513.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Everdell, and the judge. The conversation focuses on whether to mark an exhibit for identification and the provision of a large volume of paper documents to an upcoming witness. The discussion concludes with the judge deciding to bring in the jury and Mr. Everdell confirming he will call the first witness.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013031.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the beginning of a court session where the direct examination of witness Kimberly Meder is continued by Ms. Comey, who is representing the Government. The examination picks up from the previous day, referencing 'Government Exhibit 1101'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017353.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, and the Court regarding the trial schedule, particularly concerning holiday plans and the jury's commitment through January 15th. The Judge decides to proceed with the trial every day, overriding preferences for a break, due to the significant concern that a participant testing positive for COVID-19 would cause a substantial quarantine delay, which is deemed a greater risk to the trial's progress.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017348.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the Judge addressing the jury regarding the schedule for deliberations, stating they will proceed every day until a verdict is reached. The Judge instructs jurors to contact Ms. Williams regarding any substantial hardships due to the schedule.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017347.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details instructions from THE COURT to the jury regarding their deliberation schedule and adherence to COVID-19 protocols. The court grants the jury's request to end deliberations at 5:00 p.m. today and resume at 9:00 a.m. tomorrow, maintaining a general schedule of 9:00 a.m. to at least 6:00 p.m. It emphasizes strict mask-wearing (KN95/N95), social distancing, and offers transportation assistance via Ms. Williams.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017330.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about the jury deliberation schedule. The judge sets a default end time of 6 p.m., while allowing for hardship exceptions, and overrules an objection from an attorney, Ms. Menninger, who was concerned that certain language might pressure the jury.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017328.jpg

This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys (MS. MOE and MR. EVERDELL) regarding a note received from the jury. The judge directs the attorneys to review jury instruction number 21. Ms. Moe, representing the government, states that it is within the court's discretion to set the deliberation schedule and agrees that the jury should be advised to expect an extended session the next day.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017309.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT), and two attorneys (Mr. Everdell and Ms. Moe). They are discussing how to respond to a note from the jury, which requested a transcript of 'Matt's' testimony and a definition of 'enticement'. The judge decides to send the transcript and directs the jury to specific page and line numbers in the jury instructions for the definition.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017303.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. A speaker, presumably the judge, instructs a jury of twelve before a holiday break to avoid all media and communication about the case and to contact Ms. Williams with any concerns. The jury is told to return on the following Monday to resume their deliberations.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017301.jpg

This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a judge's management of jury proceedings. The judge notes the jury's desire to adhere to their plans for the next day, confirms that a limiting instruction regarding 'Annie's testimony' was correctly provided, and sets a 4:25 PM dismissal time. Counsel, Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim, confirm they have no further matters to discuss before the jury is brought in.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017296.jpg

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge and attorneys after the jury has been dismissed, focusing on procedural matters such as the government's review of transcripts and the defense's readiness to proceed. The judge also outlines instructions for contacting the alternate jurors to inform them that deliberations are ongoing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017295.jpg

This document is a court transcript in which a judge gives instructions to the jury. The judge addresses the jury's schedule, the procedure for beginning deliberations, a potential deliberation date of December 23rd, and reminds them of the courthouse mask policy and the strict rule against discussing the case outside of formal deliberation.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017294.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar or open court discussion during jury deliberations where the Judge addresses a question from the jury, confirms the schedule for dismissal at 5:00 PM, and arranges lunch for the following day. The Judge also notes a directive from the Chief Judge requiring masks to be worn in the jury room due to a COVID-19 variant.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017280.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during jury deliberations. The jury sent notes requesting testimony transcripts for witnesses Jane, Annie, and Carolyn, as well as an FBI deposition (3505-005) related to Carolyn. Counsel (Ms. Comey and Ms. Sternheim) discuss preparing these documents with necessary redactions.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017277.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the end of a trial day during the jury deliberation phase, where the judge acknowledges a note from the jury to leave at 5:30 PM and provides strict instructions not to discuss the case or consume outside information. The judge instructs the jury to resume deliberations the following morning at 9:00 AM once all 12 jurors are present.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017275.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the final moments of the trial before jury deliberations began, including the dismissal of alternate jurors, the swearing-in of a U.S. Marshal to safeguard deliberations, and the official start of deliberations at 4:49 p.m. Ms. Williams is identified as a court official managing logistics for the jurors and exhibits.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017273.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and several attorneys (Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Pagliuca, Mr. Everdell) about the procedures for jury deliberations. The judge outlines the schedule, including a 9:00 a.m. start time, and clarifies that exhibits will be provided automatically to the jury. The discussion also covers the roles of court staff like the deputy and marshal in managing the jury process.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00017272.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a sidebar conversation on August 10, 2022. The judge discusses with counsel the procedures for alternate jurors, deciding they can be on-call due to the pandemic, rather than remaining at the courthouse. The judge also confirms the specific numbers of the five alternate jurors with the agreement of all counsel present.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013889.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge (The Court) and two attorneys, Ms. Sternheim and Mr. Everdell. The conversation focuses on whether to mark an exhibit for identification and clarifies that Mr. Everdell will be calling the first witness. The court then prepares to bring in the jury to proceed with the trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00013600.jpg

A page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed August 10, 2022. The prosecutor (Ms. Moe) argues that specific evidence is relevant to prove a female subject was an adult in the 2000s and therefore could not have been an 'underage girl' personal assistant at that time, rebutting a defense photograph. The Court agrees the rebuttal is relevant and allows it, before moving to a sidebar to discuss jury instructions.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
3
Total
4

Deliberation Status

From: Ms. Williams
To: Alternate Jurors

Instruction to inform alternates that deliberations are ongoing and rules still apply.

Call
N/A

Invitation to Poetry in America

From: Elisa New
To: Ms. Williams

Formal invitation to appear on the show to discuss Sharon Olds' poem 'The Language of the Brag', noting the content would be used for the show and a Harvard Medical School online course.

Letter
2018-11-25

Invitation to appear on Poetry in America

From: Elisa New
To: Ms. Williams

Invitation to discuss a Sharon Olds poem comparing athletic prowess to childbirth for a TV series and medical course.

Letter
2018-11-25

Invitation to Poetry in America

From: Elisa New
To: Ms. Williams

Invitation to appear on the show 'Poetry in America' to discuss Sharon Olds' poem 'The Language of the Brag'.

Letter
2018-11-25

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity