| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-07-01 | N/A | Secession of South Sudan | Sudan | View |
Legal correspondence from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Gardephe regarding the case Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Plaintiff Teresa Helm's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) due to the recent termination of Epstein's criminal case (August 2019) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel based on Epstein's intimidation and manipulation tactics. The letter also argues that challenges to punitive damages are premature at this stage of litigation.
This document is a daily intelligence news brief sent from a Senior Intelligence Specialist at the SDNY Terrorism & International Narcotics Unit on January 22, 2021. It covers various global and domestic security topics, including the retirement of the FBI Deputy Director, the arrest of a US soldier plotting with ISIS, fallout from the Jan 6 Capitol siege, terrorism in Indonesia and Somalia, and labor union ties to drug trafficking. A specific Epstein-related item notes that a Ghislaine Maxwell hearing was illegally streamed by QAnon followers.
This document details Jeffrey's philanthropic activities, highlighting his significant contributions to educational and civic organizations. He supported scholars at risk globally, sponsored awards for women economists, and funded Rwandan students' education in the US. Jeffrey also donated to various wellness and civic organizations in New York City and the Virgin Islands, including the Robin Hood Foundation and Antilles School.
This document is a page from a news clipping (Hurriyet) titled 'Why Golda Meir was right' by Burak Bekdil, dated August 23, 2011. The author criticizes Turkish Prime Minister Erdoğan's anti-Israel rhetoric by contrasting it with the high casualty numbers in various intra-Muslim conflicts (Syria, Turkey-PKK, Iran-Iraq, etc.). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was included in a production for a US Congressional investigation, though the text itself does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 22 of a Westlaw printout of a 2005 court opinion titled 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details legal standards for civil liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), and civil RICO statutes (Section 1962), specifically defining 'material support' for terrorism. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production (possibly related to the Epstein investigation given the context of the request), this specific page discusses 9/11 litigation and does not explicitly name Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.
This page from a legal opinion (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) addresses motions to dismiss in the Ashton and Burnett cases involving terrorism allegations. The court dismisses claims against Al Baraka and Mr. Kamel due to insufficient factual allegations, denies NCB's motion to dismiss without prejudice pending discovery on immunity and jurisdiction, and allows limited jurisdictional discovery regarding the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG).
This document is page 834 from a Federal Supplement (349 F. Supp. 2d) concerning 9/11-related litigation (Ashton and Burnett complaints). It details the court's decision to grant Saudi American Bank's motion to dismiss claims that it provided material support to al Qaeda. It also introduces allegations against Arab Bank regarding its financial support for terrorist organizations, including al Qaeda and Hamas, and its alleged role in facilitating the September 11 attacks. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
This document is page 815 of a court opinion (In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) from the S.D.N.Y. dated 2005. It details allegations that Prince Mohamed, as CEO of DMI (Dar al-Maal al-Islami Trust), provided financial support and banking services to al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through institutions like Faisal Islamic Bank and Al Shamal Islamic Bank. The text discusses jurisdiction arguments and lists specific terrorist events (1993 WTC bombing, 1998 embassy bombings, 9/11) as part of a common scheme. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
This document details the covert "shadow war" between Israel and Iran, highlighting Israeli operations to disrupt arms supplies and Iran's nuclear program. It specifically discusses the suspicious death of Iranian scientist Ardeshir Hosseinpour, the structure of Mossad units like Caesarea and Kidon, and the recruitment of Iranian national Majid Fashi for espionage.
This page from China Daily, dated May 14, 2017, features three articles discussing the Belt and Road Initiative. The articles cover the potential for a "Belt and Sea Lane" partnership with Latin America, the reflection of Xi Jinping's political philosophy in the initiative, and the importance of environmental sustainability and green growth within the projects.
This document is page 39 of a legal brief or court opinion (Westlaw) regarding 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It discusses the legal liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and Alien Tort Statute (ATS) for defendants who provided financial and material support to al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, specifically noting funding provided in Sudan in the early 1990s. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023399', suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation, likely related to financial institutions involved in terrorist financing.
This document is a page from a 2012 Westlaw legal opinion regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001). It details legal arguments concerning the liability of entities including DMI Trust, Dallah al Baraka, and individual Saleh Abdullah Kamel for providing material support to al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden in the 1990s. The text discusses pleading standards under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and criticizes a lower court for applying an incorrect standard regarding the causal connection between 1990s support and the 2001 attacks. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
This document is page 35 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) related to 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001', bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It details allegations against Saudi financial institutions, including Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and DMI Trust, regarding their financing of Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other terrorist groups through complex networks of charities and investments. The text specifically highlights a $50 million capital injection by Osama bin Laden into Al Shamal Bank and names various Saudi royals and businessmen as knowingly supporting terrorism. While labeled as Epstein-related in the prompt, the text itself focuses exclusively on 9/11 litigation and terror financing.
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) related to the 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' litigation. It discusses the liability of financial institutions, specifically Al Rajhi Bank and Dubai Islamic Bank, for allegedly knowingly providing financial services to Al-Qaeda. The text details how various charities (al Haramain, WAMY, MWL, IIRO, SJRC, BIFs) served as fundraising fronts for Al-Qaeda and links them to specific historical terrorist attacks prior to 9/11. While stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', the document text itself focuses exclusively on terrorist financing and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details allegations against DMI Trust and its subsidiaries (Faisal Islamic Bank, Faisal Finance, Tadamon Bank) for knowingly facilitating financial support for Al Qaeda, the National Islamic Front in Sudan, and various terrorist operatives including Wa’el Julaidan and Yasin Al Kadi. The text argues that the District Court failed to draw reasonable inferences regarding the defendants' knowledge of their support for terrorism, citing specific financial relationships and public knowledge of Al Qaeda's intent to wage war on the U.S.
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It details allegations against financial institutions Dallah al Baraka, ABID Corp, and DMI Trust (and individual Kamel) regarding their long-term financial support of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, dating back to the early 1980s. The text describes money laundering, the maintenance of bank accounts for terrorist front organizations, and the facilitation of funds transfers to operatives in Europe and Sudan. The document bears a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023390).
This document is a page from a 2012 legal filing titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' obtained from House Oversight records. It details the financial support network of al-Qaeda, specifically focusing on 'The Golden Chain' list of donors, which includes prominent figures such as Khalid bin Mahfouz, Suleiman al Rajhi, and the half-brothers of Osama bin Laden (Bakr, Tariq, Yeslam, and Omar). The text outlines how these individuals allegedly used charities (IIRO, SAAR, Muwafaq) and corporate entities (Saudi Binladin Group) to funnel millions of dollars to al-Qaeda operations.
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation, specifically detailing the financial infrastructure of al-Qaeda. It describes the interconnections between Osama bin Laden, various financial institutions (Al Shamal, Faisal Islamic Bank, Tadamon, Al Rajhi Bank), and individuals designated as terrorists or sponsors. It notably discusses the discovery of the 'Golden Chain' document in Bosnia, which identified major financial benefactors of al-Qaeda.
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) retrieved from Westlaw, bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the financial infrastructure supporting al-Qaeda, specifically implicating financial institutions such as Al Shamal, FIBS, Al Rajhi Bank, and National Commercial Bank (NCB) in knowingly providing services and funneling money to the terrorist organization. The text cites testimony confirming that high-ranking banking officials had direct ties to Osama bin Laden and that the banks used charity fronts to channel funds for 'financial jihad.' Note: While labeled as an Epstein-related document request, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell; it focuses entirely on 9/11 terrorist financing litigation.
This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation, discussing allegations against various individuals and charities (such as Al Haramain and Muwafaq Foundation) for supporting al-Qaeda. It details designations of individuals as Specially Designated Global Terrorists and outlines how certain financial institutions, particularly Islamic banks, allegedly facilitated the transfer of resources to al-Qaeda.
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) produced during a House Oversight investigation (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023378). It details how al-Qaeda utilized a network of ostensible charities, such as the Muslim World League and the International Islamic Relief Organization, to finance operations, launder money, and provide logistical support for terrorism. The text lists specific defendants (Charity Officials) alleged to have knowingly orchestrated this support using their positions within these organizations.
This document is a page from a legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) detailing the origins of al-Qaeda. It describes how Osama bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam established the organization from the infrastructure of the Afghan jihad, utilizing a financial network known as the 'Golden Chain' comprised of various Islamic charities. The text also outlines specific fatwas issued by Bin Laden between 1992 and 1998 declaring war on the United States. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the content on this specific page relates entirely to terrorism financing and history, with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document appears to be an email fragment, likely sent by Jeffrey Epstein (indicated by 'JEE' and 'jeevacation@gmail.com'), discussing Donald Trump's financial history with Deutsche Bank and a real estate transaction with Dmitry Rybolovlev. The text draws a parallel between the death of a Russian diplomat (via a Washington Post link) and the death of Joe Recarey in June 2018, questioning if they share the 'same m.o.' The document originates from a House Oversight production.
This document is a personal reflection from an unnamed former President, possibly Bill Clinton, detailing aspects of his life and presidency. He discusses his health, the irony of his sexual appetite's impact on his political career, his involvement in the execution of a mentally retarded prisoner, and his shame regarding various policies including gay rights, internet protection for children, medical marijuana, urine tests for driver's licenses, and bombing campaigns in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Sudan.
This document appears to be page 11 of a geopolitical analysis or policy paper, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text discusses the fragility of borders in the Middle East, specifically referencing the potential fragmentation of states like Yemen and Iraq following the precedent of South Sudan's secession. The author argues that borders created by European colonial powers are not sacred and that self-determination, including breaking away to form new countries, should be an acceptable option if it reflects the will of the people.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity