Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Jane Doe 17

Person
Mentions
70
Relationships
12
Events
15
Documents
35
Also known as:
Doe 17
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
12 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Darren K. Indyke
Legal representative
4
4
View
person Andrew S. Buzin
Client
3
3
View
person Alan Goldfarb
Client
3
3
View
person David H. Brodie
Client
2
2
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Litigation
2
2
View
person Katlyn Doe
Litigation parallel
1
1
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Legal representative
1
1
View
person David H. Brodie
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Laura J. Starr
Client
1
1
View
person Laura J. Starr
Legal representative
1
1
View
organization Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
Litigation plaintiff vs defendant
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim perpetrator
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-07-30 N/A Filing of Notice of Motion to Proceed Anonymously United States District Cour... View
2020-07-11 N/A Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 submitted her claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Epstein Victims’ Compensati... View
2020-03-06 N/A Court Order filed relieving Andrew S. Buzin as counsel for Jane Doe 17 New York, New York View
2020-03-06 N/A Court Order issued relieving Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for Jane Doe 17. New York, New York View
2020-01-13 N/A Deadline for plaintiff to file an amended complaint or opposition to motion to dismiss. United States District Cour... View
2019-12-12 N/A Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order regarding Plaintiff's anonymity US District Court SDNY View
2019-11-14 N/A Case referred to Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial purposes. Southern District of New York View
2019-11-08 N/A Filing of Motion to Proceed Anonymously on Behalf of Jane Doe 17 US District Court SDNY View
2019-11-08 N/A Court Order (ECF #25) granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Anonymously. New York, NY View
2019-11-08 N/A Plaintiff filed Motion to Proceed Anonymously (ECF #24). New York, NY View
2019-11-08 N/A Proposed order filed granting Plaintiff Jane Doe 17's motion to proceed anonymously. United States District Cour... View
2019-10-22 N/A Summons issued and filed. Southern District of New York View
2019-10-18 N/A Filing of Document 5 (Civil Cover Sheet) in Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF. SDNY Court View
2019-10-17 N/A Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF SDNY (Manhattan) View
2010-12-06 N/A Court Order Granted Fort Lauderdale, Florida View

018.pdf

This is an Appearance of Counsel form filed on October 28, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Laura J. Starr is entering her appearance to represent 'All plaintiffs' (specifically Jane Doe 17) in the case against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.

Court document (appearance of counsel)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

016.pdf

This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York filed on October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted the motion for attorney David H. Brodie to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of the plaintiff.

Court order
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

015.pdf

This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated October 25, 2019, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer signed the order granting attorney Alan Goldfarb's motion to appear *pro hac vice* on behalf of the plaintiff.

Court order
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

010.pdf

This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 24, 2019, in the Southern District of New York by attorney Andrew S. Buzin. The motion seeks the admission of Florida attorney Laura J. Starr *pro hac vice* to represent the Plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The filing includes Starr's declaration, a certificate of good standing from the Florida Supreme Court, and a proposed order. Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz stated that the Defendants do not oppose the motion.

Legal motion (unopposed motion to admit counsel pro hac vice), declaration, and certificate of good standing
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

009.pdf

This is an unopposed motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by Andrew S. Buzin to admit Laura J. Starr pro hac vice as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document includes a declaration by Laura J. Starr confirming her good standing with the Florida Bar and lack of disciplinary history, a certificate of service, and a certificate of good standing from the Florida Bar.

Legal motion (unopposed motion to admit counsel pro hac vice)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

007.pdf

This document is a formal Summons in a Civil Action filed on October 22, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (represented by Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) and numerous associated corporate entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Laurel Inc, NES LLC, etc.). The summons instructs the defendants to respond within 21 days to avoid a default judgment and lists the plaintiff's legal representation.

Summons in a civil action (ao 440)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

005.pdf

This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on October 18, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit initiated by 'Jane Doe 17' against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities. The cause of action is listed as Battery under 18 U.S.C. sections 1591-1595 (statutes relating to sex trafficking and forced labor). The document identifies Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as the personal representatives of the estate and lists several shell companies (like JEGE, Inc. and NES, LLC) as defendants whose addresses were unknown at the time of filing.

Civil cover sheet (form js 44c/sdny) - federal court filing
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

002.pdf

This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) filed on October 17, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Jane Doe 17 (a resident of Florida), is suing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn) and various associated corporate entities for Battery under federal statutes including 18 USC 1591 (Sex Trafficking). The document lists numerous corporate defendants associated with Epstein (e.g., JEGE Inc., NES LLC) for which the plaintiff's attorney was unable to locate addresses.

Civil cover sheet (form js 44c/sdny)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

070.pdf

A court order dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman of the Southern District of New York. The order directs the docketing of stays in multiple lawsuits against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al. to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are required to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.

Court order
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

051.pdf

A court order from the Southern District of New York dated September 4, 2020, signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order lists numerous civil cases brought by victims (many under pseudonyms like Jane Doe, Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe) against Indyke (Epstein's estate executor) and other entities. The order acknowledges a stay in proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and mandates monthly status reports starting October 1, 2020.

Court order
2025-12-26
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1

Discharge of Counsel

From: Jane Doe 17
To: Buzin Law P.C.

Client indicating desire to discharge firm as counsel.

Correspondence
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search