| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Client
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Anonymous Client
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
the client
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Client (Victim/Witness)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Anonymous Client
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Client
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Interview meeting in London with the client, Greenfield, US lawyer friend, and SDNY team. | London, UK | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview/Meeting between SDNY/FBI and Jill Greenfield's client | London, UK (Likely) | View |
| 2020-10-14 | N/A | Proposed interview dates in London confirmed by Jill Greenfield. | Fieldfisher Offices, London | View |
| 2020-07-20 | N/A | WebEx discussion between SDNY and Fieldfisher attorneys. | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2020-03-19 | N/A | Proposed interview meeting in London between SDNY and Jill Greenfield's client (Cancelled due to ... | London, UK | View |
| 2020-03-19 | N/A | Proposed meeting in London (likely cancelled due to COVID travel restrictions). | London | View |
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | Phone call between Jill Greenfield and SDNY (referenced in email). | Phone | View |
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | Phone call between Jill Greenfield and SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the investigation. | Phone Call | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Coordination regarding a potential interview with a victim in London. | Correspondence (Email) | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Initial outreach by Jill Greenfield to US authorities regarding a victim interview. | View | |
| 0014-10-01 | N/A | Planned interview of a witness/victim by US SDNY Prosecutors and FBI agents at Fieldfisher office... | London, UK | View |
This document is an email chain from January 28, 2020, between Jill Greenfield, a partner at the law firm Fieldfisher, and a redacted Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. Greenfield represents a client who is a victim of sexual assault that occurred in the UK and asserts the client's right to anonymity under UK law while arranging a potential interview. The Detective copies FBI agent Amanda Young and SDNY prosecutors Alison Moe and Alexander Rossmiller on the correspondence.
This document is an email chain from January 28 to February 1, 2020, between Jill Greenfield (Partner at Fieldfisher in London) and a redacted Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. Greenfield is representing a client who is a victim of sexual assault in the UK and is asserting her client's right to anonymity under UK statute while coordinating a potential interview with US authorities. The thread includes FBI agent Amanda N. Young and USANYS prosecutor Alison Moe in the correspondence to schedule a call regarding the Epstein investigation.
This document is an email chain from January and February 2020 between Jill Greenfield (a partner at Fieldfisher law firm) and a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. Greenfield represents a client who is a victim of sexual assault that occurred in the UK and is asserting her right to anonymity under UK statute. The correspondence concerns setting up a phone call to discuss the parameters of a potential interview with the client in London, with US prosecutors (SDNY) copied on the exchange.
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Jill Greenfield, a UK partner at Fieldfisher LLP. The correspondence concerns the SDNY's request to interview Greenfield's client, who is believed to be a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails discuss interview logistics, including anonymity, the voluntary nature of the discussion, the composition of the interview team (prosecutors and FBI agents), and the creation of FBI Form 302 reports.
This document is an email header dated October 5, 2020, regarding 'Epstein'. The subject line includes a document reference code 'FFW-DOCS.FID6003375', which typically indicates a file in a law firm's document management system (likely Fieldfisher, given the 'FFW' prefix and the presence of Jill Greenfield, a partner at that firm, in the CC line). The email was blind copied to 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
This document is an email chain from September and October 2020 between SDNY prosecutors/FBI agents and UK solicitor Jill Greenfield. They are coordinating an in-person interview in London with Greenfield's client regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence details logistical hurdles including COVID-19 testing, UK quarantine waivers, the composition of the US interview team (SDNY and FBI), and mandatory notification to the Metropolitan Police.
This document contains the metadata and header information for an email sent on October 6, 2020. The email was sent to Jill Greenfield with the subject line 'RE: Epstein [FFW-DOCS.FID6003375]'. The sender and other recipients (Cc/Bcc) have been redacted. The document appears to be part of a legal file discovery, indicated by the Bates number EFTA00028128.
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between Jill Greenfield, a partner at the UK law firm Fieldfisher, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are negotiating the terms for an interview with Greenfield's client, a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell and potential victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence covers logistics, the client's request for anonymity, the presence of a US lawyer friend, and the U.S. government's assurance that the client is considered a witness/victim rather than a suspect. The U.S. Attorney explains the FBI interview process (Form 302) and offers to travel to London for the meeting.
This document is a chain of emails between Jill Greenfield (Partner at Fieldfisher law firm in London) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from September to October 2020, coordinates logistics for a US investigative team (including two AUSAs and two FBI agents) to travel to London to interview Greenfield's client. Key topics include obtaining travel authorization during the COVID-19 pandemic, securing quarantine waivers from the UK government, COVID-19 testing protocols, and the requirement to notify the London Metropolitan Police via the US Embassy.
This document is a printout of email metadata dated October 6, 2020, sent to Jill Greenfield. The subject line references 'Epstein' and a document ID 'FFW-DOCS.FID6003375', suggesting it is part of legal correspondence or discovery (likely involving the law firm Fieldfisher) taking place after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The sender and other recipients are redacted.
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and Jill Greenfield, a UK lawyer. They are negotiating the terms of an interview for Greenfield's client, a potential witness/victim in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation who may have worked for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence covers logistics, the client's non-suspect status, anonymity concerns, and the presence of a support person (a US lawyer friend) during the proposed London interview.
This document is an email chain from February to July 2020 between SDNY prosecutors and UK solicitor Jill Greenfield regarding the potential interview of a witness/victim residing in the UK. The witness, a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell, alleges she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein in London and has reported this to the Met Police. The correspondence details the negotiation of interview conditions, including anonymity, the presence of a support person, and the voluntary nature of the questioning, but the planned March 2020 meeting in London was ultimately cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions.
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between Jill Greenfield of the law firm Fieldfisher and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of a call and the preparation for an interview with a client of Greenfield's who is a potential witness/victim in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The SDNY attorney provides a specific list of seven question categories to guide Greenfield's discussion with her client, covering topics such as the client's background, recruitment, employment duties, travel, specific instances of sexual abuse by Epstein or Maxwell, knowledge of other underage victims, and any contact from the accused during federal investigations.
This document contains a series of emails between February and July 2020 involving Jill Greenfield (Fieldfisher) and Assistant US Attorneys from the Southern District of New York regarding the potential interview of a witness/victim in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses the logistics of meeting in London versus the US, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel, and specific legal conditions such as anonymity, the presence of support persons, and the scope of questioning. Crucially, it reveals the client was employed by Ghislaine Maxwell and has filed a complaint with the Met Police regarding sexual assault by Epstein in London.
Noting potential COVID travel restrictions; requesting attorney proffer.
Proposing meeting on March 19th in London.
Providing cell phone number for contact.
Addressing conditions: happy to meet client, discussing presence of US lawyer friend (cannot pay for friend's travel, but can pay for client's travel to US).
Agreeing to morning introduction/afternoon interview format. Discussing the request for the friend's presence; stating they cannot pay for the friend's travel but can pay for the client to come to the US.
Stating client is willing to help under conditions: Morning introductory meeting, afternoon questioning, and a US lawyer friend must be present.
Agreeing to interview format (intro then questions); discussing presence of friend/lawyer; offer to pay travel to US.
Outlining client conditions: morning intro meeting, afternoon questions, US lawyer friend present.
Jill confirms client is willing to help but requests a morning meeting for introductions, afternoon for questions, and for a US lawyer friend to be flown to London to attend.
Confirming receipt of information, stating it is helpful, and noting she has gone back to her client.
Acknowledging receipt of Jill's previous email.
Detailed email outlining interview process: voluntary nature, comfort of witness, typically 2 prosecutors and 2 officers present, majority female team, focus on employment scope rather than graphic details initially. Offers to come to UK.
Reassuring that the interview is voluntary, can be stopped at any time, and explaining the team composition (usually 2 prosecutors, 2 FBI).
Detailed explanation of interview protocols: voluntary nature, team composition (prosecutors/officers), willingness to travel to UK or host in US, and topics of interest (employment, Maxwell).
Detailed explanation of interview process: voluntary, guided by comfort level, team composition (2 prosecutors, 2 agents, majority female).
Inquiry regarding who would be in the room during the interview, access to notes, and anonymity concerns in US vs UK.
Explains who is in the room (prosecutors + FBI), note-taking process (FBI Form 302), and anonymity policies (names not disclosed publicly).
Answering questions on attendees (prosecutors + FBI), notes (FBI Form 302), and anonymity policies.
Asking who will be in the room, who has access to notes, and concerns about anonymity in the US vs UK.
Jill asks who will be in the room, who has access to notes, and expresses concern about anonymity in US vs UK.
Clarifying who will be in the room (2 prosecutors, 2 law enforcement); explaining FBI Form 302 process; discussing anonymity.
Answering questions about anonymity (names not publicly disclosed) and notes (taken by FBI, form 302 created, not widely shared).
Addressing logistics: attendees (prosecutors + FBI), notes (FBI Form 302), and anonymity policies.
Initial follow-up to a phone call. Confirming client is not a target/suspect. Seeking to learn narrative of interactions with Epstein and Maxwell.
Memorializing views that client is a victim, not a suspect. Interested in general narrative of interactions with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell (whom she worked for).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity