Belohlavek
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DETECTIVE RECAREY
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Indirect professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
juvenile victim
|
Spoke with counsel for |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Marie Villafaña
|
Cooperative inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated via email |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea hearing in state court. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal decision | The State Attorney's Office decided to present the Epstein case to a grand jury. | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recusal | Assistant State Attorney Krischer was recused from the Epstein case due to a conflict of interest... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | An Assistant State Attorney was recused from the case due to a conflict of interest, and Belohlav... | State Attorney's Office | View |
| N/A | N/A | Belohlavek spoke with victim's counsel who agreed with plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court asked Belohlavek about juvenile victim's parents/guardian agreement with plea. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Detective Recarey requests arrest warrants for Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Wendy Dobbs; request de... | Palm Beach | View |
| 2008-06-30 | Court hearing | Epstein entered guilty pleas in Palm Beach County court to charges of solicitation of prostitutio... | Palm Beach County court | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Jeffrey Epstein. | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
| 2008-06-30 | Court hearing | Jeffrey Epstein appeared in state court and entered a guilty plea to charges of procuring a perso... | West Palm Beach | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Sentencing Date | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2007-11-16 | Meeting | Case agents met with Belohlavek and Krischer of the State Attorney's Office to discuss opposing E... | N/A | View |
| 2007-11-01 | N/A | Belohlavek requested USAO notify victims | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-29 | Legal proceeding update | Assistant State Attorney Belohlavek informed Sloman that a state judge scheduled Epstein’s plea a... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-21 | Legal action / communication | Villafaña emailed Acosta about impending charges against Mr. Epstein, the review of the charging ... | West Palm Beach (implied), ... | View |
| 2007-09-20 | N/A | Villafaña emailed Assistant State Attorney Belohlavek regarding the status of the federal plea ag... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-12 | N/A | Meeting where 'miscommunication' occurred regarding registrability of solicitation of a minor | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-12 | N/A | Meeting between defense and prosecution | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-12 | N/A | Joint meeting with Krischer / Belohlavek re state plea provision of NPA | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-12 | Meeting | A meeting to discuss the draft Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on p... | N/A | View |
008.pdf
These are court documents from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, dated June 30, 2008 (with an amended version dated July 1, 2008). The documents record Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea to the charge of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution (Case No. 2008CF009381AXX). The court adjudicated him guilty and sentenced him to 18 months in the Palm Beach County Jail (PBCJ), followed by 12 months of Community Control I. Special conditions handwritten on the order require a DNA swab and mandate that Epstein register as a sexual offender within 48 hours of his release.
DOJ-OGR-00023120.tif
This document details communications and events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's potential plea deal and sex offender registration in September 2007. It highlights objections from Sanchez and Lefkowitz to the registration requirement, citing a 'misunderstanding' at a prior meeting where prosecutors Krischer and Belohlavek initially stated the offense was not registrable. The document shows efforts by Epstein's defense to avoid registration and secure an 18-month federal camp sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00023115.tif
This document details ongoing negotiations and disagreements surrounding a federal plea agreement for Mr. Epstein in September 2007. It highlights the involvement of Assistant State Attorney Villafaña, who communicated with Belohlavek and sent revised agreements to Lefkowitz, and Acosta, who provided feedback on the USAO's 'hybrid' plea agreement to Lourie, emphasizing the trial team's support is crucial. A key point of contention was the change in offense description from solicitation of minors to forcing adults into prostitution, which made the agreement unacceptable to Villafaña.
DOJ-OGR-00023306.tif
This document, an excerpt from a legal report, discusses the handling of victim notification in the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically focusing on the roles of Sloman, Villafaña, and PBPD Chief Reiter, and the subsequent review of prosecutor Acosta's actions by OPR. It analyzes whether federal victim notification laws (CVRA/VRRA) applied to state court proceedings and concludes that Acosta's deferral of victim notification to the State Attorney's Office did not constitute professional misconduct. Legal citations and quotes from individuals involved are provided to support the analysis.
DOJ-OGR-00023273.tif
This document details events surrounding Epstein's state plea, focusing on victim notification failures and the actions of various legal and investigative parties. It highlights Villafaña's efforts to identify victims and contact their attorneys, and statements from victims (Wild, Jane Doe #2) expressing their lack of awareness regarding the plea's implications for their cases. The document also notes discrepancies in the State Attorney's Office's communication about the case closure and Epstein's sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00023271.tif
This document excerpt details discussions and concerns surrounding victim notification and the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case. Key figures like Sloman, Villafaña, and Acosta provided accounts to OPR regarding the federal plea process, communication between federal and state authorities, and the challenges of victim identification and notification, including a potential $150,000 payment for victims. The text also highlights discrepancies in victim counts and the impact of Epstein's defense team on inter-agency communications.
DOJ-OGR-00030368.jpg
This document is a Florida Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet for Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated June 30, 2008, prepared by 'Belohlavek' of the State Attorney's Office in Palm Beach County. It details two specific offenses: a primary offense of 'Procuring Person Under 18 for Prostitution' (F.S. 794.03) and an additional offense of 'Felony Solicitation of Prostitution' (F.S. 796.07(2)(f)), resulting in a subtotal of 57.7 sentencing points. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and indicates it was part of a 2017 public records request.
DOJ-OGR-00030649.jpg
This is a 'Request for Warrant' form filed by Detective Joe Recarey of the Palm Beach Police Department on May 1, 2006, against defendant Haley Robson (DOB 04-09-1986). The document indicates the victim was acquainted with the defendant and lists case number 05-368 (3). Handwritten notes on the filing checklist confirm that the Witness/Evidence List, Criminal History, and Property Receipt were 'Previously Given to ASA Belohlavek.'
DOJ-OGR-00030628.jpg
This document is a 'Request for Warrant' from the Palm Beach Police Department for defendant Jeffrey Epstein, dated May 1, 2006. The form, completed by Lead Officer Det. Joe Recaery, indicates that the victim was acquainted with Epstein and lists several attached case documents (arrest form, affidavits, etc.) that were delivered to the State Attorney's Office, with some items having been previously given to ASA Belohlavek.
DOJ-OGR-00021472.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report detailing the failure of the USAO (specifically Acosta, Villafaña, and Sloman) to coordinate with the State Attorney's Office regarding victim notification for Jeffrey Epstein's June 2008 plea hearing. It reveals that despite a draft letter in December 2007 intended to provide a list of victims to the state, no evidence exists that the letter was sent, leaving state prosecutors (Krischer and Belohlavek) unaware of the federal identified victims. A footnote highlights that Epstein's attorneys explicitly asked the USAO not to inform victims of their rights under state charges.
DOJ-OGR-00021471.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report criticizing Alexander Acosta for 'poor judgment' during the Jeffrey Epstein case. Specifically, it details how Acosta failed to ensure victims identified in the federal investigation were notified of the state plea hearing, erroneously deferring this responsibility to the State Attorney without communicating that decision or providing the necessary victim information. The report highlights that while not legally required to notify victims of a state hearing, Acosta should have recognized the logistical failures that would result from a lack of coordination.
DOJ-OGR-00021469.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report detailing the decision-making process behind the failure to notify victims of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 state plea hearing. It highlights a December 19, 2007 letter where US Attorney Acosta deferred notification responsibility to the State Attorney, citing jurisdiction issues. The text reveals internal conflicts and justifications, including fear that victim notification might cause the plea deal (NPA) to fall apart or lead to victim impeachment.
DOJ-OGR-00021436.jpg
This document describes the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea in a Florida state court on June 30, 2008, at which no victims were present. It details how federal prosecutors, including Villafaña, Sloman, and Acosta, deliberately withheld written victim notifications until after the plea, based on a prior agreement. The text also notes that while subpoenas were issued to some victims, the State's efforts to ensure their participation or notification before the hearing were minimal or ineffective.
DOJ-OGR-00021435.jpg
This document contains a page from a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the USAO (specifically Acosta, Sloman, and Villafaña). It details the prosecutors' justifications for not notifying victims about the non-prosecution agreement and plea deal, citing a belief that the state would handle notification and a fear that the restitution payments ($150,000) would be used by Epstein's defense to impeach victim witnesses. The text highlights a lack of coordination between federal and state prosecutors regarding victim lists and the specific terms of the plea hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00021419.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the conflict and confusion regarding victim notification in the Epstein case. It highlights discrepancies between USAO officials (Sloman, Acosta) and DOJ Criminal Division (Mandelker) regarding who decided to defer victim notification to state authorities. It also includes excerpts from Epstein's lawyer, Lefkowitz, aggressively arguing that federal victims had no standing in the state case and should not be contacted by the FBI or informed of 'fictitious rights.'
DOJ-OGR-00021412.jpg
This legal document details the federal handling of victim notification in the Jeffrey Epstein case in late 2007, specifically around his state plea hearing. It reveals that federal officials, including Villafaña, did not inform new victims of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) because they believed Epstein would still be federally charged. The document also outlines the coordination and communication challenges between the U.S. Attorney's Office and the State Attorney's Office regarding who was responsible for notifying victims for the state court proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00021356.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing a chronology of meetings between the US Attorney's Office (USAO) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It includes a table listing specific dates between February 2007 and January 2008, participants from both sides (including Acosta, Dershowitz, Starr, and Black), and the purpose of each meeting, such as discussing investigation improprieties, the NPA term sheet, and state plea provisions. The text specifically notes Alex Acosta's limited attendance at pre-NPA meetings and mentions a breakfast meeting between Acosta and defense attorney Jay Lefkowitz.
DOJ-OGR-00021314.jpg
This document details the conflict between federal prosecutors (USAO) and local officials regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release. It reveals that Epstein and his lawyer, Jack Goldberger, misled the court about Epstein's employment at the 'Florida Science Foundation,' a shell entity created in November 2007 using Goldberger's office address, despite Epstein claiming in court it had existed for 15 years. The Palm Beach Sheriff's Office placed Epstein on work release in October 2008 without notifying the USAO, contradicting previous assurances.
DOJ-OGR-00021311.jpg
This document details Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea in a Palm Beach County state court on June 30, 2008. It outlines last-minute negotiations and changes to his plea agreement regarding the wording of his sentence and clarifies the detention facility. The document also includes the specific criminal charges read in court and a colloquy where the prosecutor, Ms. Belohlavek, confirmed to the judge that there were 'several' victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021301.jpg
This DOJ OPR report excerpt details the breakdown of plea negotiations in early January 2008. Epstein's defense team (Sanchez, Starr, Lefkowitz) pressed US Attorney Acosta and Sloman for a 'watered-down resolution' that involved no jail time and no sex offender registration, threatening 'ugliness in DC' regarding alleged leaks. Prosecutor Villafaña prepared contingency plans to restart the investigation, including interviewing victims in New York and abroad, while Criminal Division Chief Robert Senior conducted a full review of the evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00021294.jpg
This legal document details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea in late 2007, caused by a new strategy from his legal team to appeal to senior Department of Justice officials to invalidate the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It chronicles communications between the USAO, the State Attorney's Office, and Epstein's attorneys, including Kenneth Starr and Jack Goldberger, regarding scheduling conflicts and Epstein's compliance with the agreement. Ultimately, these efforts delayed the plea hearing by months, with a final date set for January 4, 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00021279.jpg
This legal document details plea negotiations in the case against Mr. Epstein on and around September 21, 2007. It reveals intense back-and-forth communication between prosecutors (Acosta, Villafaña, Lourie) and defense attorneys (Lefkowitz, Sanchez) over critical terms, including whether Epstein would have to register as a sex offender and the scope of a non-prosecution agreement for his alleged co-conspirators. The document highlights internal prosecution strategies and their dismissive view of some members of Epstein's legal team.
DOJ-OGR-00021277.jpg
This document outlines the internal and external communications of the US Attorney's Office regarding Jeffrey Epstein's plea negotiations on September 20, 2007. It details U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta's refusal to sign the plea agreement personally, insisting the trial team sign it, and his refusal to alter standard charging language. The text also highlights a critical dispute where Epstein's defense attempted to change the charge from solicitation of minors (registrable) to forcing adults into prostitution (non-registrable), which the prosecution rejected.
DOJ-OGR-00021266.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the internal confusion and negotiations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal in September 2007. It highlights the lack of clarity on why Epstein's sentence was reduced from 24 to 18 months, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafaña admitting the reduction happened 'somehow' during the 'flip flop' between state and federal charges. The document also documents Acosta's delegation of negotiation authority and communications between the USAO and Epstein's lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz.
DOJ-OGR-00021215.jpg
This legal document details the aggressive tactics used by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, including a threat by attorney Alan Dershowitz to 'destroy' witnesses. It also explains the Florida State Attorney's Office's decision to present the case to a grand jury, citing a conflict of interest involving prosecutor Krischer's husband and Epstein's lawyer, Jack Goldberger, as well as the complexities of the case and the victim-witnesses.
Arrest Warrants
Recarey requested warrants for Epstein, Kellen, and Dobbs. Belohlavek declined.
Federal victims participation in state plea hearing
Belohlavek stated federal victims not part of the state case couldn't simply appear; coordination and investigation would be required.
Handling of the Epstein case
Belohlavek told OPR that her office took the allegations seriously, viewing it as an organized scheme, but noted she was limited by state statutes on what she could charge.
Housing Costs
Questioning why taxpayers are paying for 18 months of housing instead of DOC.
Sentencing Hearing
Questions regarding the number of victims and their agreement with the plea terms.
No Subject
Questioning regarding the number of victims and their agreement with the plea terms.
Plea hearing postponement
Confirmed plea hearing postponed because facts did not fit proposed state charge
No Subject
Agents asked if State Attorney would oppose work release; Belohlavek was noncommittal.
Victim Notification
Requested that the USAO notify victims about the state plea hearing.
N/A
Informed Sloman that state judge scheduled plea/sentence for early Jan 2008.
Update on plea negotiations
Informed that the deadline is Monday evening, things don't look promising because defense changed plea from solicitation of minors to forcing adults (non-registrable).
Plea Agreement Status
Villafaña informed Belohlavek about the Monday evening deadline for a signed agreement and arraignment, noting that the agreement was unlikely due to changes in the plea from solicitation of minors for prostitution (registrable) to forcing adults into prostitution (non-registrable).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity