Belohlavek
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sloman
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DETECTIVE RECAREY
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Indirect professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
juvenile victim
|
Spoke with counsel for |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Marie Villafaña
|
Cooperative inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated via email |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's plea hearing in state court. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal decision | The State Attorney's Office decided to present the Epstein case to a grand jury. | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recusal | Assistant State Attorney Krischer was recused from the Epstein case due to a conflict of interest... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | An Assistant State Attorney was recused from the case due to a conflict of interest, and Belohlav... | State Attorney's Office | View |
| N/A | N/A | Belohlavek spoke with victim's counsel who agreed with plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court asked Belohlavek about juvenile victim's parents/guardian agreement with plea. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Detective Recarey requests arrest warrants for Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Wendy Dobbs; request de... | Palm Beach | View |
| 2008-06-30 | Court hearing | Epstein entered guilty pleas in Palm Beach County court to charges of solicitation of prostitutio... | Palm Beach County court | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Jeffrey Epstein. | Palm Beach County Courthouse | View |
| 2008-06-30 | Court hearing | Jeffrey Epstein appeared in state court and entered a guilty plea to charges of procuring a perso... | West Palm Beach | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Sentencing Date | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2007-11-16 | Meeting | Case agents met with Belohlavek and Krischer of the State Attorney's Office to discuss opposing E... | N/A | View |
| 2007-11-01 | N/A | Belohlavek requested USAO notify victims | Unknown | View |
| 2007-10-29 | Legal proceeding update | Assistant State Attorney Belohlavek informed Sloman that a state judge scheduled Epstein’s plea a... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-21 | Legal action / communication | Villafaña emailed Acosta about impending charges against Mr. Epstein, the review of the charging ... | West Palm Beach (implied), ... | View |
| 2007-09-20 | N/A | Villafaña emailed Assistant State Attorney Belohlavek regarding the status of the federal plea ag... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-12 | N/A | Meeting where 'miscommunication' occurred regarding registrability of solicitation of a minor | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-12 | N/A | Meeting between defense and prosecution | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-12 | N/A | Joint meeting with Krischer / Belohlavek re state plea provision of NPA | Unknown | View |
| 2007-09-12 | Meeting | A meeting to discuss the draft Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on p... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00003316.jpg
This document details the conflicting communications and actions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's work release following his June 30, 2008 plea. It reveals that while federal prosecutors (USAO) and Epstein's own attorney indicated he would not get work release, a Palm Beach Sheriff's Office official stated he was eligible, and he was ultimately placed in the program without the USAO's knowledge. The document also highlights Epstein's false statements to the court about his employment at the non-existent "Florida Science Foundation."
DOJ-OGR-00003303.jpg
This document details events in early January 2008 concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case, starting with the postponement of a plea hearing due to issues with the state charge. It describes a meeting where defense attorney Sanchez alleged a media leak by the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) and pushed for a lenient plea deal, followed by a phone call where Epstein's full legal team reiterated their desire for a 'watered-down resolution'. Amid these negotiations, USAO personnel expressed concern about delays and initiated a full internal review of the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00003284.jpg
This document details the intense plea negotiations over the weekend of September 22-23, 2007, specifically focusing on the defense team's (Sanchez, Lefkowitz) attempts to avoid sex offender registration for Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argued there was a 'misunderstanding' at a prior meeting and that registration would preclude Epstein from serving his time in a federal camp, which was their primary goal for his safety. The document also includes a footnote indicating State Attorney Krischer faced pressure from Police Chief Reiter regarding the case.
DOJ-OGR-00003281.jpg
This document, part of a legal case filed in 2021, details communications and negotiations from September 2007 concerning a potential plea deal for Mr. Epstein. It highlights discussions among various legal professionals regarding charges, sexual offender registration, and the scope of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). A key aspect is the USAO's agreement, as part of a draft NPA, not to criminally charge Epstein's female assistants, employees of his corporate entity, and 'potential co-conspirators' in an ongoing federal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00003267.jpg
This legal document details recollections from a meeting on September 12, 2007, concerning Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Participants, including prosecutors like Lourie and Villafaña and others like Krischer and Belohlavek, discussed the terms of Epstein's plea, specifically whether he would serve an 18-month sentence in a county jail versus a state prison, and which charges he would plead to. The document highlights disagreements and differing memories among the participants regarding the decisions made and the authority to make them.
DOJ-OGR-00003217.jpg
This legal document details the aggressive legal tactics employed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, including attorney Alan Dershowitz threatening a prosecutor to destroy witnesses. It also outlines the State Attorney's Office's rationale for taking the case to a grand jury, citing the complexity of the case and the problematic possibility that Epstein's minor victims could have been prosecuted for prostitution under the existing state law.
DOJ-OGR-00033126.jpg
This document is page 138 of an index for a legal or official transcript, produced by the firm Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'Assessment' to 'case', along with the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The footer contains the transcription company's address in West Palm Beach, FL, and a Department of Justice (DOJ) document control number.
DOJ-OGR-00023194.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing a timeline of meetings between the USAO (including Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (including Dershowitz, Starr, and Lefkowitz). It covers the period from February 2007 to January 2008, categorizing meetings as 'Pre-NPA' and 'Post-NPA'. The table logs specific participants and topics, including the presentation of the NPA term sheet, discussions of investigation improprieties, and the negotiation of state plea provisions.
DOJ-OGR-00023132.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea following the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes legal maneuvering by Epstein's defense team, including Kenneth Starr calling senior DOJ official Alice Fisher, and disagreements between the USAO and defense regarding the timeline for the plea entry, which was eventually set for January 4, 2008. The document also highlights internal communications regarding Epstein's failure to use 'best efforts' to comply with the NPA timeline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017973.jpg
This document is a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit (Case 1:19-cv-03377) describing Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 work release conditions. It details how Epstein paid Palm Beach Sheriff's deputies to monitor him while he spent up to 12 hours a day at his office, where he met with male and female visitors behind closed doors without deputy supervision. The article notes that visitor logs from this time were kept in a safe but no longer exist, and highlights how deputies began referring to him as a 'client' rather than an 'inmate'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010517.jpg
This document contains pages 176-177 of a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the friction between Palm Beach Police (Detective Recarey) and the State Attorney's office (Barry Krischer/ASA Belohlavek) regarding the issuance of arrest warrants for Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Wendy Dobbs. It also describes aggressive surveillance tactics used against a victim's father by a private investigator, and a specific incident where TV newscaster Tim Malloy used a helicopter to film Epstein at the airport, causing Epstein to flee back onto his plane.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021748.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke in 2019 (based on copyright), containing the text of a news article or report reviewing the 2008 sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the courtroom exchange where prosecutor Belohlavek misled Judge Pucillo about victim notification and agreement with the plea deal. It also references Alex Acosta's defense of the deal, the Labor Department's statement, and attorney Bradley Edwards' assertion that prosecutor Villafaña was directed by superiors to keep victims uninformed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021738.jpg
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke (likely in 2019) containing the text of a news article reviewing the 2008 plea deal of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the failure to inform victims about the plea agreement, citing court transcripts between Judge Pucillo and prosecutor Belohlavek, and includes comments from victim attorney Bradley Edwards suggesting prosecutors were directed by superiors to settle. The document includes Indyke's signature block with contact details redacted and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
Arrest Warrants
Recarey requested warrants for Epstein, Kellen, and Dobbs. Belohlavek declined.
Federal victims participation in state plea hearing
Belohlavek stated federal victims not part of the state case couldn't simply appear; coordination and investigation would be required.
Handling of the Epstein case
Belohlavek told OPR that her office took the allegations seriously, viewing it as an organized scheme, but noted she was limited by state statutes on what she could charge.
Housing Costs
Questioning why taxpayers are paying for 18 months of housing instead of DOC.
Sentencing Hearing
Questions regarding the number of victims and their agreement with the plea terms.
No Subject
Questioning regarding the number of victims and their agreement with the plea terms.
Plea hearing postponement
Confirmed plea hearing postponed because facts did not fit proposed state charge
No Subject
Agents asked if State Attorney would oppose work release; Belohlavek was noncommittal.
Victim Notification
Requested that the USAO notify victims about the state plea hearing.
N/A
Informed Sloman that state judge scheduled plea/sentence for early Jan 2008.
Update on plea negotiations
Informed that the deadline is Monday evening, things don't look promising because defense changed plea from solicitation of minors to forcing adults (non-registrable).
Plea Agreement Status
Villafaña informed Belohlavek about the Monday evening deadline for a signed agreement and arraignment, noting that the agreement was unlikely due to changes in the plea from solicitation of minors for prostitution (registrable) to forcing adults into prostitution (non-registrable).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity