| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
This text, likely from a memoir or legal account, defends a controversial prosecution decision regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The author argues that the plea deal was the best possible outcome given the evidence and victim reluctance at the time, ensuring jail time and sex offender registration rather than risking a failed trial. The passage also criticizes the defense's tactics, including personal investigations into prosecutors, while acknowledging frustrations with Epstein's treatment in state custody.
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 204-205), marked as a House Oversight exhibit. It details the preferential and 'highly irregular' treatment Jeffrey Epstein received while incarcerated at the Stockade between 2008 and 2009, contrasting it with other inmates like John Goodman. The text highlights US Attorney Alexander Acosta's admission that the state custody arrangement undermined the purpose of the jail sentence, and notes that taxpayers subsidized Epstein's stay.
This document is page A24 of 46 from a financial disclosure report (OGE Form 278e) filed by Donald J. Trump. It lists the corporate structure, ownership percentages, and managing roles for various business entities, including Trump Florida Management, Trump Golf (Coco Beach), Trump Home Marks, Trump Ice, and Trump International Development. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016764' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional record.
This document is page A9 of 46 from Donald J. Trump's OGE Form 278e financial disclosure. It details the ownership structures and holding percentages for various business entities, including 'Flights Inc,' 'Helicopter Air Services Inc,' and 'Golf Recreation Scotland Limited.' The document carries a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016749,' indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
This document is page A4 of 46 from a financial disclosure form (OGE Form 278e) filed by Donald J. Trump. It details the corporate structure and ownership percentages of various entities, including DJT Holdings LLC, aerospace companies, and entrepreneur initiatives. The document specifically notes the dissolution of DJ Aerospace (Bermuda) Limited on July 2, 2018, and establishes the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust as a primary owner of several listed entities.
This document is page 41 of a 42-page legal text, specifically from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), containing footnotes 226 through 238. The text references various legal studies, statutes, and articles concerning prosecutorial discretion, domestic violence laws, political influence on sentencing, and the independence of prosecutors in the US and abroad (Australia, Ireland, Canada). The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
This page from a law review article discusses the historical evolution of public versus private prosecution in the United States compared to England. It notes that while private prosecution has largely vanished in the U.S. in favor of public prosecutors, some states like Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire retain vestiges of it. The footnotes provide legal citations regarding victims' rights statutes and case law.
This document is page 10 of a legal motion filed by 'The Post' (a media organization) in a New York court. The motion requests the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex-offender registration (SORA) proceedings, with victim names redacted. It details procedural history, including the withdrawal of a previous motion from December 21 to resolve disputes over notifying Florida prosecutors, and notes the Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Friedman Agnifilo's stance on the unsealing.
This document is page 9 of a legal filing outlining a dispute between 'The Post' and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office regarding the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights that while Epstein's counsel took 'no position' on the unsealing, the DA's office reversed its initial stance of 'not opposing' the motion and subsequently opposed it, arguing that the Post failed to notify prosecutors in Florida. The document includes a footnote disputing the legal necessity of notifying Florida prosecutors.
This document discusses the legal proceedings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on the Manhattan District Attorney's shift in position regarding his sex offender adjudication and the sealing of appeal briefs. It highlights the public controversy and media interest in the perceived lenient handling of Epstein's prosecution in both Florida and New York.
This document, likely from a House Oversight investigation, details a January 2011 hearing where Justice Ruth Pickholz designated Jeffrey Epstein a level three sex offender, rejecting arguments from ADA Gaffney who sought a lower designation. The judge expressed shock at the Manhattan DA's leniency, noting she had never seen prosecutors make such a 'downward argument' in such a troubling case. The document also notes that Epstein's subsequent appeal was denied, with the court affirming the designation based on reliable proof of criminal conduct.
This document is the Table of Contents for a legal brief filed by 'The Post' (likely a newspaper). The brief argues for the unsealing of appellate briefings related to Jeffrey Epstein's case in the First Department. It outlines sections discussing Epstein's sex crime conviction, media interest in the lenient handling of his case by NY and FL prosecutors, and the legal arguments for public access.
This document is a news article from Politico dated December 31, 2014, reporting on a new court filing in which a woman identified as Jane Doe #3, an alleged sex slave of Jeffrey Epstein, accused prominent friends of Epstein, including Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jean Luc Brunel, of participating in debauchery. The article details Epstein's prior conviction and plea deal, and states that the new filing seeks to allow Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending victims' rights case against federal prosecutors.
This document contains a series of four charts comparing polling or sentiment data for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Presidential Debates. The data covers four states (California, Texas, North Carolina, and Florida) and tracks percentage points across the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd debates. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document is page 54 of a report (likely from the House Oversight Committee, given the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT') containing endnotes/references numbered 6 through 21. The citations focus heavily on Chinese political influence in American higher education, specifically regarding Confucius Institutes, the 'Hanban,' and interference on U.S. campuses. While the document is part of a larger dataset often associated with investigations, this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is the final page (8 of 8) of a technical report prepared by HSA Engineers & Scientists regarding water quality standards. The report compares water monitoring data from 2006-2008 against November 2008 sampling, concluding that the water delivered to 'the Town' by 'the City' meets Florida Administrative Code standards (F.A.C.), despite occasional chlorine spikes. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
A presentation slide from a larger House Oversight document dump (likely related to the Town of Palm Beach records) detailing a 'Draft Year Round Irrigation Rule' by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The document outlines legal definitions for reclaimed water usage and warns 'The Town' that unless they use reclaimed water, they are subject to stricter irrigation conservation rules, even if using Floridan aquifer or seawater sources. While part of the Epstein-related Oversight files, this specific page concerns municipal water infrastructure and legal compliance.
This document is a presentation slide (page 14) from Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs, authored by Francis J. Kelly. It outlines a schedule of United States primary elections/caucuses spanning from January 18th to March 22nd (likely referencing the 2016 election cycle based on the 'Super Tuesday' date of March 1st). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation involving Deutsche Bank.
This document is a court filing containing a Miami Herald article that investigates irregularities in Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender registration in Florida. It highlights a suspicious registration entry on November 14, 2018, which coincided exactly with a media inquiry, and features quotes from officials deflecting responsibility. The article also touches on the broader legal challenges led by victims like Courtney Wild and Virginia Roberts against the leniency shown to Epstein.
This document is a court filing containing a Miami Herald article that details the 2008 sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights collusion between prosecutors and Epstein's defense to minimize the judge's awareness of other crimes and co-conspirators, specifically citing a 2007 email from federal prosecutor A. Marie Villafaña. It also notes that victims' attorney Spencer Kuvin was present by chance but was unaware the hearing would dispose of his client's case without their notification.
This document is an excerpt from a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, primarily from Virginia Roberts' affidavit. It covers alleged sexual encounters, denials from those accused, legal actions including defamation lawsuits and settlements, and a brief mention of Epstein's sentencing hearing. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the allegations and the legal aftermath.
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) filed on April 16, 2019. It details the formation of the non-profit 'Victims Refuse Silence' by Roberts (Virginia Giuffre) in 2014 to help trafficking survivors. It alleges that Alan Dershowitz, acting as both attorney and co-conspirator for Jeffrey Epstein, made false and defamatory statements to maliciously discredit Roberts and silence her allegations of sexual abuse.
This document is page 8 of a civil complaint filed on April 16, 2019, involving Plaintiff Roberts (Giuffre) and Defendant Alan Dershowitz. It outlines factual allegations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise, stating that Roberts was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein while under 18 and abused between 2000 and 2002 at various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. The document also lists residential addresses for both Dershowitz and Epstein in New York City.
This document is page 3 of a civil complaint filed on April 16, 2019. It alleges that Alan Dershowitz was not only Jeffrey Epstein's attorney and friend but also a co-conspirator and participant in sex trafficking who abused the Plaintiff. It details how Dershowitz helped negotiate a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in Florida while keeping victims, including 'Roberts,' in the dark, and later attacked the credibility of Epstein's accusers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity