Justice Department
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-01 | N/A | US Justice Department ordered CGTN and Xinhua to register as agents of a foreign power. | United States | View |
EFTA00035437.pdf
This document is an email chain between Pervaiz Shallwani, a Senior Editor at The Daily Beast, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (Office of Public Affairs). The correspondence begins on July 25, 2019, regarding reports of Epstein's initial injury/suicide attempt, which the BOP confirms took place at MCC New York rather than a hospital. The thread resumes on August 10-11, 2019, following Epstein's death, with Shallwani pressing for details on why Epstein was removed from suicide watch, why he had no cellmate, and why 30-minute checks were allegedly not performed.
EFTA00027666.pdf
This document is an Opinion and Order from a U.S. District Court case related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details the history of Epstein's sexual abuse of minor girls, including Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, from 1999 to 2007 in Palm Beach, Florida, and internationally. The document outlines the investigation by the PBPD and FBI, and the subsequent discussions and negotiations between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein's legal team from 2006 to 2007, including efforts to secure a plea agreement and manage press coverage.
EFTA00021202.pdf
This June 26, 2019 edition of The Daily 202 newsletter highlights Robert Mueller's upcoming congressional testimony regarding his report on Russian interference and potential obstruction of justice. It also covers significant national news including the humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border, tensions with Iran, the 2020 Democratic primary debates, and various political developments involving the Trump administration. The document provides analysis, key quotes, and links to further reading on these topics.
EFTA00021168.pdf
This document is an email dated August 4, 2020, containing a digest of press clippings labeled 'SDNY Press Clippings'. The content focuses on news headlines involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump, and other legal and political matters relevant to the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The email recipients and sender are redacted.
EFTA00013549.pdf
This email from a prosecutor (implied by the West Palm Beach address and context) updates a colleague on the Epstein case. It details a grand jury presentation where a juror expressed relief that the case wasn't being 'whitewashed,' mentions Epstein's lawyers harassing victims via civil suits, reports a victim's recent suicide attempt, and expresses frustration with delays while victims suffer.
EFTA00009550.pdf
This document is a transcript from a Federal Grand Jury session dated May 8, 2007, concerning 'Operation Leap Year'. It details the sworn testimony of an FBI agent involved in the investigation, discussing attempts to interview and subpoena an individual (referred to as Miss [REDACTED]) who frequented Jeffrey Epstein's house. The testimony reveals that Mr. Epstein paid for the attorney (Jim Eisenberg) representing this individual, who only agreed to an interview after being granted 6001 immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00017903.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a forensic psychologist, who testifies about their professional background, explaining that they provide independent evaluations for both prosecution/plaintiff and defense sides. Dr. Rocchio confirms holding psychology licenses in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00022057.jpg
A printout of a Government Executive article dated November 19, 2019, filed as a court document. The article details testimony by BOP Director Hawk Sawyer regarding staffing shortages ('augmentation') and the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein suicide, including the indictment of two guards for falsifying records. Sawyer agrees with Senator Ted Cruz that the event was a 'black eye' for the agency but defends the majority of the staff.
DOJ-OGR-00021997.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on January 27, 2020, by Montell Figgins, the attorney for Michael Thomas (a prison guard charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death). Figgins states his intent to file a motion for dismissal based on selective prosecution and argues that the defense needs more time and access to Inspector General reports to prepare for trial, noting the government took over 90 days to investigate the incident. The letter is copied to prosecutors and counsel for the co-defendant, Noel.
DOJ-OGR-00021682.jpg
This legal document is a filing that refutes claims made by Maxwell regarding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing argues that Maxwell's assertion of senior-level Justice Department approval for the NPA is a mischaracterization of the record, stating that any review by offices like the Deputy Attorney General's occurred only after the NPA was signed and in response to Epstein's actions, and did not constitute an approval of the agreement itself.
DOJ-OGR-00021308.jpg
This legal document details communications from May 2008 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, where his defense team, including Starr and Whitley, petitioned the Deputy Attorney General for a review. They argued the federal prosecution was unwarranted, irregular, and politically motivated due to Epstein's "close personal association" with former President Bill Clinton. In response, a Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General instructed the U.S. Attorney's Office to postpone a June 2, 2008 plea deadline pending the completion of this high-level review.
DOJ-OGR-00010699.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that two victims, Sarah and Elizabeth, have the right to speak at the sentencing of the defendant, Maxwell. The argument is based on both the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the court's broad discretionary power to hear from victims when determining a sentence. The document emphasizes the importance of victim statements for their own healing and as a source of information for the court.
DOJ-OGR-00009940.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a juror named Conrad. The questioning reveals that Conrad was aware of her husband's extensive criminal history but deliberately concealed it during jury selection (voir dire) to secure a place on the jury. The transcript explores her motivations and her understanding of her civic duty in light of her actions.
DOJ-OGR-00003310.jpg
This document page details the legal maneuvering in May 2008 regarding the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how Epstein's lawyers (Starr and Whitley) petitioned the Deputy Attorney General to review the case, arguing that federal involvement was unwarranted and politically motivated due to Epstein's 'close ties' to former President Bill Clinton. The page also notes that the USAO, under instruction from the Deputy AG's office, postponed a June 2 deadline for Epstein's plea agreement to allow for this high-level review.
DOJ-OGR-00005196.jpg
This document is a legal argument from a court filing, dated October 12, 2021. The author contends that certain federal statutes, like 18 USC § 3299 and § 3509, intentionally exclude child pornography and exploitation from the definition of sexual abuse, a fact the Justice Department has allegedly always known. The argument is supported by citing 1990 legislative history (VCAA) to claim that Congress intended these laws to apply specifically to federal enclaves.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019848.jpg
This document appears to be the final page of a ProPublica article written by Jesse Eisinger discussing former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara. The text critiques Bharara's record, comparing him to Robert Morgenthau, noting that his office ceded certain financial crisis investigations to the main Justice Department, and suggesting that voters scrutinize the 'list of possible targets he never pursued.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019813.jpg
This document is page 325 of a book containing endnotes for Chapters 22 ('The Chinese Puzzle') and 23 ('A Single Point of Failure'). It lists citations for information regarding Edward Snowden, cyber security breaches (OPM), Chinese intelligence, and Russian relations, referencing various news articles and reports from 1999 to 2015. The footer indicates the file was part of a House Oversight Committee production ('HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019813') and includes a filename starting with 'Epst_', suggesting it was included in the Epstein investigation discovery materials, though the text itself does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019799.jpg
This document contains page 311 of the endnotes from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer). The text provides citations for Chapters 6 ('Hacktivist') and 7 ('String Puller'), detailing sources related to Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, the Tor network, and the Silk Road. While the footer filename includes 'Epst' (referring to the author Edward Jay Epstein) and 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', the content focuses on national security leaks and cyber-surveillance, referencing interactions between Snowden and journalists like Glenn Greenwald and Runa Sandvik.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019721.jpg
This document is page 233 from a book (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the file name and ISBN 9780451494566 corresponding to 'How America Lost Its Secrets') titled 'The Russians Are Coming' or similar. It discusses the NSA's capabilities in cracking Tor networks, specifically referencing the capture of Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht and Edward Snowden's activities in Hawaii. The text also highlights the SVR's (Russian intelligence) interest in infiltrating the NSA, potentially through a disgruntled contractor like Snowden.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019558.jpg
This document is page 70 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the filename 'Epst_...'). It details the coordination between Edward Snowden, Laura Poitras, and Barton Gellman regarding the leak of NSA documents. It describes Poitras using anti-surveillance tradecraft to meet Gellman in NYC to offer him the story for The Washington Post. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031430.jpg
This document is a printout of a news article (likely from the Miami Herald) discussing legal maneuvers to reopen the criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and throw out his 2008 plea agreement. It covers the involvement of victims' attorneys requesting a review by a new jurisdiction (Pak's office), a DOJ probe into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta's conduct during the original case, and an upcoming hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents requested by the Miami Herald. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031415.jpg
A printout of a Washington Post article dated February 6, 2019, reporting that the Justice Department has opened an internal investigation into potential 'professional misconduct' by attorneys who handled Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. The investigation was revealed in a letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd to Senator Ben Sasse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031408.jpg
This document, seemingly a printout of a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, details the reassignment of the Epstein case to U.S. Attorney Byung J. Pak following a ruling by Judge Kenneth Marra. The article highlights the findings of the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation, noting that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta broke the law by concealing a plea deal from victims, granting Epstein and accomplices immunity despite a ready 53-page federal indictment. It describes how prosecutors misled victims into believing an FBI investigation was ongoing when it had been secretly closed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031400.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article by Emily Michot regarding the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It details Judge Marra's ruling that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by misleading victims and sealing the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta. The text highlights that Epstein worked with others to procure minors and that victims' attorneys are petitioning the DOJ to reopen the investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031397.jpg
This document describes the controversy surrounding Alexander Acosta's handling of the Epstein case, noting that a 53-page indictment was shelved in favor of a lenient 2008 plea deal. It details a newly announced investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the matter and includes a statement from Senator Sasse emphasizing the need for justice for the victims.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity