Justice Department
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-01 | N/A | US Justice Department ordered CGTN and Xinhua to register as agents of a foreign power. | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023106.jpg
This document is page 5 of an interview (likely from The Litigation Daily) with high-profile defense attorney Reid Weingarten, dated September 8, 2015. Weingarten discusses his defense of Mike Espy, his close personal friendship with former AG Eric Holder, and their joint work establishing the 'See Forever Foundation' to assist juvenile offenders. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp, indicating it was included in materials produced to Congress, likely relevant due to Weingarten's role as Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney during the 2008 plea deal negotiations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023103.jpg
This document is page 2 of 5 from an interview with white-collar defense attorney Reid Weingarten. He discusses his criteria for accepting or declining clients, the issue of conflicts of interest in law firms, and his assessment of various federal prosecutor offices, specifically highlighting the Southern District of New York as the most formidable.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023008.jpg
This document is a timeline, likely from a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, detailing the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein between May 2008 and July 2009. It covers his guilty plea to state solicitation charges, his 18-month sentencing, the subsequent work release program where he spent 12 hours a day at his office, and his early release in 2009. The text also highlights the Miami Herald's investigative work ('Perversion of Justice') in exposing the deal and the lack of notification provided to victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011935.jpg
This document is a printout of a Gawker article discussing potential new federal child trafficking charges against Jeffrey Epstein shortly after his release from jail on state solicitation charges. The article cites reporting from The Daily Beast's Conchita Sarnoff and mentions that Epstein's associate, Jean Luc Brunel of MC2 modeling agency, is also under investigation regarding models allegedly enlisted for Epstein's private jet. The text also references Epstein's friendship with Bill Clinton and details regarding his previous plea deal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015271.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from a narrative or memoir included in House Oversight files. It recounts interactions with conspiracy researcher Michael Ruppert regarding his alleged CIA connections and drug smuggling refusal. It also details a television taping for 'The Conspiracy Zone' where Ann Coulter replaced Ben Stein as a guest, referencing her controversial comments on religion and foreign policy made on 'The Big Idea' and in the 'National Review Online' following 9/11.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015095.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or narrative account (likely attributed to Richard Nixon) produced as part of a House Oversight discovery (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015095). The text details the narrator's introduction to Howard Hughes via Herman Perry and Murray Chotiner. It describes Hughes asserting dominance over Nixon's political future ('I own the ocean') and mentions the narrator's distrust of the Justice Department stemming from the 1948 Alger Hiss case. While the user prompt references Epstein, the content of this specific page is historically focused on Nixon and Hughes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024704.jpg
This document is page 68 of a Cannabis Investment Report published by Ackrell Capital in December 2017. It features a diagram illustrating federal laws impacting the cannabis industry, categorized into Drug/Food Regulation, Banking/Finance, and Intellectual Property. The text specifically defines the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970 and notes its enforcement by the DEA. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024641.jpg
This document is page 5 of an executive summary from a 2017 report by Ackrell Capital, LLC regarding the cannabis industry. It features a text summary and a circular infographic detailing federal laws and policies impacting the industry, categorized into Drug and Food Regulation, Banking and Finance, and Intellectual Property. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024641' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029173.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript or article (indicated by 'MORE TK') discussing the conflict between Robert Mueller and Donald Trump. It analyzes the legal strategy of a potential indictment, the clash between the Justice Department and the White House, and speculates on how the Supreme Court and the 'November election' might influence the outcome. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029166.jpg
This document, stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', appears to be a narrative report or draft analysis discussing the Mueller investigation into President Trump. It details the potential 'proposed indictment' regarding obstruction of justice, focusing on the firings of James Comey and Andrew McCabe. The text analyzes Rod Rosenstein's complex position, having justified Comey's firing while overseeing the investigation, and notes that the case relies heavily on public events and tweets rather than new evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029077.jpg
A transcript page featuring a speaker identified as 'Bannon' (likely Steve Bannon) discussing the 2008 financial crisis and its aftermath. He criticizes the bailouts as a transfer of wealth from working-class taxpayers to 'crony capitalists' and executives who should have been held criminally accountable. He links this economic disparity and the lack of legal repercussions for banking executives to a 'populist revolt' in England and Middle America.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029075.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a Q&A session featuring Steve Bannon. Bannon discusses the 2008 financial crisis, the lack of accountability for bank executives, and how this fueled the Tea Party movement. A questioner named Mario Fantini asks Bannon about how to counteract the rise of the 'Identitarians' (a neo-nativist movement) in Europe. The page concludes with a pull quote noting that despite Congressional recommendations, no bank executives were indicted following the crisis.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029056.jpg
This document is a transcript of a statement by 'Bannon' (likely Steve Bannon) designated with a House Oversight Committee footer. Bannon criticizes the 2008 financial bailouts as a betrayal of Judeo-Christian responsibility and a burden placed on the working class to save 'crony capitalists' and elites. He alleges that despite Congressional recommendations to indict 35 executives, the Justice Department and politicians (referred to as 'stooges') failed to prosecute due to systemic corruption involving law firms, accounting firms, and investment banks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029035.jpg
This document appears to be a transcript page from a House Oversight Committee file, featuring a monologue by Steve Bannon. Bannon criticizes the 2008 financial bailouts, arguing they burdened middle-class taxpayers while benefiting 'crony capitalists,' executives, and shareholders who faced no accountability. He claims Congress recommended criminal indictments for 35 executives to the Justice Department, but no action was taken due to systemic corruption involving law firms, banks, and politicians.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029033.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a transcript (labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029033) featuring a Q&A session with 'Bannon' (likely Steve Bannon). Bannon discusses the 2008 financial crisis as the catalyst for the Tea Party movement and argues for banking reform. A questioner named Mario Fantini asks Bannon about counteracting the rise of the 'Identitarian' neo-nativist movement in Europe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025354.jpg
This document is page 2 of a letter dated May 19, 2008, addressed to the Honorable Mark Filip from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. The letter argues against federal prosecution, citing a review by CEOS (Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section) initiated by Mr. Acosta which found that while prosecution wasn't impossible, it relied on a 'novel application' of federal law. The authors allege that the USAO in Miami is engaging in misconduct, specifically by commingling criminal law with a civil remedy intended to profit specific lawyers, and request a senior-level review by the Justice Department.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029966.jpg
This document appears to be a news article or report excerpt contained within House Oversight files (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029966). It details a series of hearings and meetings in Washington involving federal regulators (FinCEN, DOJ, Secret Service) and Bitcoin advocates (Murck, Andresen). The text highlights how advocates successfully shifted the regulatory narrative from criminal concerns (Silk Road, money laundering) to the economic importance of innovation, gaining support from key figures like Jennifer Shasky Calvery and activist 'Allen'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029965.jpg
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, appears to be a news report or briefing regarding a 2013 Senate inquiry into Bitcoin regulation. It details testimony given by 'Allen' (likely Ernie Allen of the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children) and Jerry Brito to the Senate Homeland Security Committee, discussing the balance between regulating illicit use and fostering the digital economy. The text outlines the committee's research process, including interviews with experts and letters sent to federal agencies like the DHS and DOJ.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029770.jpg
This document details various aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's legal troubles and social connections, including allegations of molestation and sex trafficking, the leniency of his previous sentence, and the ongoing Justice Department investigation. It highlights his use of private jets for alleged illicit trips and lists prominent individuals who were reportedly passengers on his aircraft, questioning whether his wealth and connections helped him evade justice. The document also mentions his completion of a house arrest sentence and recent settlements with victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025656.jpg
A SmartBrief newsletter dated May 15, 2017, reporting on the search for a new FBI Director following the firing of James Comey. It notes that Attorney General Jeff Sessions interviewed candidates including Adam Lee, Michael Garcia, and Alice Fisher. The document also includes a poll asking readers for their opinion on whether the firing was proper, legal but badly handled, or an obstruction of justice. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025644.jpg
This document is a 'SmartBrief' news digest dated May 15, 2017, focusing on the aftermath of President Trump firing FBI Director James Comey. It details Attorney General Jeff Sessions' search for a replacement, listing potential candidates like Adam Lee, Michael Garcia, and Alice Fisher. It also includes a poll asking readers for their opinion on whether the firing was proper or an obstruction of justice. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014062.jpg
This document page, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp, is an excerpt from a legal analysis (likely a law review article) criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the OLC incorrectly concluded that victims' rights do not apply before an indictment is filed, contradicting the legislative intent of Senator Jon Kyl, a primary sponsor of the Act. The text highlights that even the OLC acknowledged their interpretation might contradict 'good practice' regarding pre-charging plea discussions, a critical legal issue relevant to the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement controversy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014060.jpg
This document is page 81 of a legal article or report (dated 2014) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA). It argues against the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation that victim rights only attach after judicial proceedings begin, asserting that protections should exist during the investigation phase ('suspected offender'). The document specifically critiques the OLC's definition of the word 'case.' It is part of a larger document dump related to the House Oversight Committee's investigation (likely regarding the handling of the Epstein case by the DOJ).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014045.jpg
This document is a page from a legal text or law review article (authored by 'Cassell et al.') included in House Oversight records. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), detailing the legislative intent to ensure victims are treated with fairness, dignity, and privacy, and to make them independent participants in the criminal justice process. The text cites U.S. Code and Congressional Records, specifically quoting Senators Feinstein and Kyl regarding the systemic neglect of victims prior to the Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014038.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2014 law review article titled 'Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations?' published in The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards (a prominent attorney for Epstein victims), Paul Cassell, and Nathanael Mitchell, the article argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply during the investigation phase, contrary to a DOJ memorandum. The text alludes to a 'notorious federal sex abuse case' (referencing the Epstein case) where victims were deprived of rights before charges were filed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity