Justice Department
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-01 | N/A | US Justice Department ordered CGTN and Xinhua to register as agents of a foreign power. | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031396.jpg
This document is a printout of a Washington Post article dated February 6, 2019, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The article reports that the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility opened an investigation into whether attorneys committed misconduct during the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's earlier sex abuse case. This investigation was disclosed in a letter from Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd to Senator Ben Sasse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022016.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' (marked as House Oversight evidence) detailing the aggressive legal defense mounted by Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a 'year-long assault' on prosecutors by an 'army of legal superstars' including Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, noting that the defense investigated prosecutors' families to find grounds for disqualification. It chronicles the negotiations leading up to the June 30, 2008 guilty plea, where the prosecution insisted on two years imprisonment and sex offender registration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016534.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016530.jpg
This page from the Minnesota Law Review discusses the legal concept of "dual sovereignty" and the Double Jeopardy Clause, specifically focusing on federal oversight of state prosecution decisions. It highlights the Department of Justice's policy of reviewing state enforcement practices in areas like civil rights violations and notes the upcoming Supreme Court case United States v. Gamble. The footnotes provide comparative legal analysis regarding victim rights to review non-prosecution decisions in Scotland, England, France, and Ireland.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016522.jpg
This page from a law review article discusses the historical evolution of public versus private prosecution in the United States compared to England. It notes that while private prosecution has largely vanished in the U.S. in favor of public prosecutors, some states like Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire retain vestiges of it. The footnotes provide legal citations regarding victims' rights statutes and case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026605.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 24, 2014, in which former White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler forwards an Associated Press article to Jeffrey Epstein (via jeevacation@gmail.com). The article, written by Nedra Pickler, details Ruemmler's decision to withdraw her name from consideration as U.S. Attorney General to replace Eric Holder, citing concerns over a difficult confirmation process. Ruemmler marks the email to Epstein as 'High' importance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026496.jpg
This document is an email or correspondence from Andrew Grossman (Partner) sharing the text of an opinion piece published on June 23, 2018, by Mr. Rivkin and Ms. Foley. The text criticizes the 'Crossfire' (Crossfire Hurricane) investigation into Donald Trump's campaign, arguing it was politically motivated and citing Harry Reid's October 30 letter to James Comey as evidence of perceived bias. The authors argue that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation should be paused due to due process concerns. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026492.jpg
This document is an opinion article by David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley, dated June 22, 2018, discussing the legal implications of alleged anti-Trump bias within the FBI on Robert Mueller's investigation. It cites Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report, highlighting specific instances of bias by FBI officials like Peter Strzok and the handling of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation versus the Clinton email probe. The document bears a House Oversight footer, indicating it is part of a congressional discovery batch.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026480.jpg
This document, stamped with a House Oversight footer, argues against the legitimacy of the 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the Trump campaign. It contends that the investigation violated Justice Department norms regarding election-year impartiality and asserts there was no evidence of collusion when the probe began. The text contrasts the scrutiny of the Trump campaign with the activities of the Clinton campaign (funding the Steele dossier) and the Podesta Group's ties to Russian entities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020815.jpg
This document is an email chain from May 2018 in which Steve Bannon forwards a Wall Street Journal news digest to Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeevacation'). The original email was sent by Alexandra Preate. The content includes headlines about Tesla, The Weinstein Company bankruptcy, and GOP lawmakers meeting with the Justice Department.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020556.jpg
This document appears to be page 97 of a larger report, labeled 'Section 6' and bearing a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp. It discusses US policy strategies to counter PRC (Chinese) influence operations in media. Key recommendations include enforcing Foreign Agent Registration compliance for state-run outlets like CGTN and Xinhua, supporting independent Chinese-language media via grants (Fulbright), and demanding visa reciprocity for American journalists working in China. The document does not contain specific references to Jeffrey Epstein or flight logs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017730.jpg
This page from a legal document argues that prosecutors are best situated to notify crime victims of proceedings due to their working relationship and the victims' lack of familiarity with the legal system. It references the 2000 Attorney General Guidelines requiring notification of specific events and provides extensive footnotes citing state statutes that follow this approach.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017687.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely submitted as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims should have independent access to presentence reports and criticizes the Advisory Committee's view that prosecutors should control the flow of information to victims. The document bears the name of David Schoen, a known attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting this legal argument was used to advocate for victims' rights or, paradoxically, was part of the defense's legal research files regarding CVRA interpretations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017640.jpg
This document is Page 5 of 78 from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article detailing the legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights amendment between 1996 and 1999. It outlines the efforts of Senators Kyl and Feinstein to pass a constitutional amendment ensuring rights for crime victims, noting failures in the 104th and 105th Congresses despite support from the Justice Department and President Clinton. The document bears the name of David Schoen (Epstein's attorney) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017625.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (likely submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee) citing a law review article (104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology). It presents a legal argument regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victims' rights should 'attach' during the investigative phase before formal charges are filed. It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) opposition to this view and cites the case *United States v. Rubin* (2008) to define the logical limits of when these rights begin.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal text (likely a law review article or legal memorandum by David Schoen) produced to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memo, arguing that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before criminal charges are filed to prevent 'secondary victimization.' The text specifically cites the 'Epstein case' (Does v. United States, S.D. Fla. 2011) as a legal precedent where the court ruled that the CVRA contemplates pre-charge application.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017618.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology) submitted to the House Oversight Committee, likely by attorney David Schoen. It presents a legal argument criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) memorandum for interpreting the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) too narrowly, specifically arguing that victim rights should extend to the pre-charging phase. The text cites various statutes (VRRA) and case law to support the claim that victims have rights to protection and conference with the government before formal charges are filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017608.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or journal article submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legislative history and intent of the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 (CVRA), contrasting it with the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act. It highlights the Congressional goal to ensure victims are treated with fairness, dignity, and are active participants in the legal system, citing various Senators and legal precedents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017604.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2014 legal article published in the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards (a key attorney for Epstein victims). The article argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply during criminal investigations before charges are filed, explicitly referencing a 'notorious federal sex abuse case' (the Epstein case) where victims were deprived of rights due to the DOJ's narrow interpretation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name David Schoen, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017197.jpg
This document is a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) produced in the House Oversight investigation. It details Dershowitz's legal defense of actor Harry Reems regarding the film 'Deep Throat,' noting the eventual dismissal of the case by the Justice Department. It also recounts a separate incident at Harvard involving the Quincy House Film Society showing the same film to raise funds for a screen damaged during a showing of 'Animal House,' which drew protests from female students.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010549.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 208-209), included as an exhibit in a House Oversight report. It details the aggressive legal strategy employed by Jeffrey Epstein's 'army' of high-profile attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr) against the prosecution, including investigating prosecutors' families to find grounds for disqualification. The text confirms that despite these efforts, Epstein pled guilty on June 30, 2008, to state charges requiring 18 months imprisonment and sex offender registration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010548.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' (submitted as evidence to House Oversight), narrating the perspective of the U.S. Attorney (likely Alexander Acosta) regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the aggressive tactics used by Epstein's high-profile legal team ('Dream Team'), which included investigating prosecutors' families to find grounds for disqualification. The text outlines the plea negotiations in Fall 2007 and Epstein's eventual guilty plea on June 30, 2008, to state charges involving 18 months (referenced as 'two years' in offer) of imprisonment and sex offender registration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010547.jpg
This document consists of pages 206 and 207 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped by the House Oversight Committee. It details the conflict between Palm Beach Police and the State Attorney in 2006 regarding the charges against Jeffrey Epstein for soliciting underage females. The text explains how the State Attorney reduced charges to avoid jail time, prompting local police to request a federal investigation, and notes a 2007 meeting between federal prosecutors and Epstein's lawyer, Roy Black.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023127.jpg
This document is a clipping of a news article regarding Jeffrey Sloman's defense of the non-prosecution agreement offered to Jeffrey Epstein. Sloman, formerly second-in-command to Alexander Acosta, claims in a Miami Herald opinion piece that the decision was made due to legal impediments and terrified victims, and argues that current criticism of Acosta is politically motivated. The document notes the Justice Department's opening of an investigation into misconduct following the 'Perversion of Justice' series.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023125.jpg
This document is a newspaper clipping from February 2019 detailing former prosecutor Jeffrey Sloman's public defense of Alexander Acosta regarding the lenient 2008 plea deal given to Jeffrey Epstein. Sloman attributes the deal to 'legal impediments' and terrified victims, rather than corruption or pressure from Epstein's high-profile lawyers. The article notes the reopening of a DOJ investigation into the case following the Miami Herald's 'Perversion of Justice' series.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity