Ms. Maxwell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
68 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Client |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Client |
12
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
55 | |
|
person
Judge Preska
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Defendant victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Financial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-17 | Trial | A jury instruction (No. 48) was filed, limiting how the jury can consider 'Similar Act Evidence' ... | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Filing of Jury Instruction No. 8 regarding Reasonable Doubt in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Court (implied) | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Alleged recruitment, enticing, harboring, transporting, providing, or obtaining a person for comm... | Unspecified in this page | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Court filing | This document (549-1) was filed in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Filing of Court Document 562 (Jury Instructions) | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Filing of Document 562 (Jury Instructions) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Court proceeding | The Court outlines its ruling on the scope of cross-examination, permitting the defense to questi... | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal proceeding | Filing of Document 562, which contains jury instructions for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. This specifi... | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Filing of Jury Instruction No. 26 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal proceeding | Filing of jury instructions in the criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. This specific instruction, No... | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-15 | N/A | Submission of legal arguments regarding witness testimony | Court | View |
| 2021-12-13 | Legal motion | Ms. Maxwell's legal team requests permission from the Court to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and... | Court | View |
| 2021-12-10 | N/A | Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion regarding jury ... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-12-08 | Court proceeding | A legal argument is being made regarding the admissibility of Exhibit 52 in a trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-08 | Testimony | Ms. Maxwell is questioned about her knowledge of a document, its creation, its storage on her com... | Court proceeding | View |
| 2021-12-03 | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's side submitted a letter regarding Attorney Glassman's testimony. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-03 | Court proceeding | Counsel for Ms. Maxwell stated that she does not object to the exterior photographs of the apartm... | Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-16 | N/A | Delivery of hard drive to MDC | MDC (Metropolitan Detention... | View |
| 2021-11-15 | Legal filing deadline | Proposed deadline for Ms. Maxwell to file her Rule 412 motion. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-29 | N/A | Filing of Document 385 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-10-18 | N/A | Date the legal document was signed/dated. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-10-14 | Delivery to inmate | Ms. Maxwell finally received the hard drive late in the morning. | MDC | View |
| 2021-10-14 | N/A | Ms. Maxwell received her hard drive (missing some .pdf disclosures). | MDC | View |
| 2021-07-12 | N/A | Scheduled trial date mentioned in arguments. | Court | View |
EFTA00032686.pdf
An email dated April 9, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding a new discovery production. The prosecution offers to send the files via FTP to the lawyers and notes that a CD with PDF-converted files (originally Excel) will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell to review.
EFTA00025508.pdf
This document is a series of emails from October 2020 concerning discovery production in the 'US v. Maxwell' case. The correspondence details the delivery and pickup of hard drives, the sending of Ms. Maxwell's drive to the MDC, and the scheduling of a prison visit for Ms. Maxwell to review a secure laptop. The emails involve legal teams from the Southern District of New York, Cohen Gresser, and HMFLAW, discussing logistical arrangements for evidence exchange and client access.
EFTA00025147.pdf
This document is an email dated October 28, 2021, from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers in the Southern District of New York. It serves as a transmittal for the filing of 'Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support of Her Motions in Limine' in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). The email was sent at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca.
EFTA00023478.pdf
This document is an email dated October 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves as a transmittal notice for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The prosecutor notes that digital files are being sent via USAfx and a physical CD is being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell.
EFTA00023049.pdf
This document is a 'List of Particulars' (Exhibit A), likely filed by the defense for Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains 29 specific requests demanding the government provide precise dates, locations, and details regarding allegations of sexual abuse, grooming, and interstate travel involving three minor victims between 1994 and 1997. It also requests specifics regarding perjury allegations related to depositions in 2016.
EFTA00019470.pdf
An email dated July 13, 2020, from a U.S. Pretrial Services Officer in the Southern District of New York regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The email attaches a bail report (filename: 6653181._Maxwell,_Ghislaine.pdf) and notes that Maxwell is scheduled for a remote appearance the following day. It includes strict confidentiality warnings citing Local Rule 57.1 and Title 18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1).
EFTA00015185.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell and others) dated October 8, 2021. The email serves as notification for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and discusses logistical arrangements for providing digital evidence to Ms. Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00010159.pdf
This document is an email dated November 16, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to notify the defense of an additional discovery production, including testifying and non-testifying witness materials, sent via USAfx. It also notes that a hard drive provided by the defense will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell's use.
DOJ-OGR-00000086.tif
This document is a legal conclusion affirming the District Court's judgment of conviction for Ms. Maxwell on June 29, 2022. It details five key holdings, including that Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with USAO-SDFL did not prevent Maxwell's prosecution by USAOSDNY, and that the District Court's sentence for Maxwell was procedurally reasonable. The document emphasizes the gravity of Maxwell's offense and the significant harm she inflicted.
DOJ-OGR-00022841.tif
This document is an excerpt from a transcript or deposition, featuring a conversation between Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion centers on the public perception of Jeffrey Epstein, allegations of him sexually assaulting numerous women (both juveniles and adults), and his preference for younger women, with Blanche stating his belief that younger women were abused by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00022697.tif
This document is a transcript of testimony or a proffer involving Ghislaine Maxwell, where she discusses her limited relationship with Harvey Weinstein, denying a close friendship, and her lack of knowledge regarding a social connection between Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein. She also denies any involvement of Epstein in her family's business and clarifies that her family generally disliked Epstein, though her mother got along with him.
DOJ-OGR-00022397.tif
This document is a page from a legal transcript, likely a deposition or court proceeding, where the speakers are discussing legal procedures concerning witness testimony and cross-examination. It includes a reference to a past meeting in July 2025 between Ms. Wax and Ms. Maxwell, and a current discussion involving Todd Blanche, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a Mr. Markus regarding a recent meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00008842.tif
This document is a legal correspondence or motion from Matthew A. Leish, an attorney for Daily News, L.P., requesting the unsealing of documents related to Ms. Maxwell's effort to obtain a new trial. It cites several legal precedents regarding public access to court documents, particularly in post-conviction proceedings and cases involving juror misconduct, arguing for transparency due to the strong presumption of openness and the public interest.
DOJ-OGR-00018341.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a judge instructs a jury about an upcoming witness's testimony. The judge clarifies that because the witness was over the age of consent, her alleged sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein was not illegal under the indictment, and she is not considered a victim in this case. The jury is strictly forbidden from using this testimony to convict the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, or to infer anything about the character or criminal propensity of either Epstein or Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018230.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion about legal strategy and evidence presentation. The defense counsel, Mr. Everdell, confirms to the court their request to not give a specific jury instruction regarding a photo of a minor, to avoid highlighting it. Subsequently, Ms. Comey informs the court that the parties have agreed to redact a portion of a video (Government Exhibit 296), which shows Detective Recarey reading a search warrant, before it is played for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00018229.jpg
This document is a court transcript from an afternoon session on August 10, 2022, where the jury is not present. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, withdraws a request for a limiting instruction, arguing it would be counterproductive. At the court's request, another attorney, Ms. Comey, reads the proposed instructions into the record, which were intended to guide the jury on how to interpret video and photo evidence concerning Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018204.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies that they never observed anyone being hurt or forced to participate in massages and that no one ever complained of such. The witness also confirms that Ms. Maxwell was a skilled and artistic photographer with professional equipment.
DOJ-OGR-00018200.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies about his role working for Mr. Epstein, stating he was a driver and was not allowed in the room when Epstein conversed with guests. He confirms driving Ms. Maxwell to massage places and being at The Breakers to find a professional masseuse for Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018196.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Alessi regarding his time working for Mr. Epstein. The questioner probes Alessi about keeping secrets from Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine) concerning other women, which Alessi denies, stating Epstein never shared his personal life with him. Alessi confirms his employment ended in late 2002 and recalls meeting Virginia Roberts around 2001 or 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00018195.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi. Alessi testifies that his employer, Mr. Epstein, instructed him on multiple occasions to remove pictures of Ms. Maxwell from a house before other women were present. Alessi characterizes these instructions not as a secret, but as a 'mandate' he was required to follow as an employee.
DOJ-OGR-00018194.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about his prior testimony regarding contacting people at various clubs like The Breakers and Mar-a-Lago. The questioning then shifts to his knowledge of Mr. Epstein's visits to a Palm Beach house, specifically whether Epstein came without Ms. Maxwell or brought other women to the residence.
DOJ-OGR-00018193.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies that his job was to make phone calls to arrange appointments for Mr. Epstein based on direct instructions from Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, or office secretaries, and that he never sought out massage therapists on his own. He also confirms that most of the massage therapists came from spas or clubs.
DOJ-OGR-00018184.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning centers on establishing the date of a summer day when the witness was waiting for Ms. Maxwell. The witness's testimony shows significant uncertainty about the year, with their recollection shifting from 2001 to 2000 (a year they associate with working for 'Jeffrey' and meeting 'Virginia') and then to 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00018181.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on Alessi confirming observing Ms. Maxwell engaging in conversation with Virginia Roberts after Maxwell received a 'treatment.' There is a brief legal dispute where Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca misreading a line from a prior deposition, which Pagliuca then corrects.
DOJ-OGR-00018180.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi, who is being questioned about his prior testimony regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning focuses on an event where Alessi drove Maxwell to Mar-a-Lago, allegedly for 'some form of treatment,' and waited outside for approximately one hour.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Government/Victims | $0.00 | Restitution (Government is not seeking restitut... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Unspecified | $0.00 | Sale of 69 Stanhope Mews and purchase of Kinner... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $23,000,000.00 | Transfer of funds confirmed by bank statements. | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court/Government | $0.00 | Discussion regarding a court-imposed fine and M... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | the government | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine; amount not spec... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Attorney Escrow A... | $0.00 | Funds for legal services presently held in atto... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Proposed bond (amount not specified on this pag... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Escrow | $0.00 | Money currently held in escrow for legal fees. | View |
| 2020-12-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Reported assets in support of bail application. | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A (Reporting) | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Ms. Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Assets reported in support of bail application. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Deal closed for leasehold property. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Closing of the deal for property sale. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Contracts exchanged for leasehold property. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Exchange of contracts for property sale. | View |
Non-legal personal matters
Her non-legal phone calls are monitored in real time, and information from them was used by staff to confront her about a personal matter (the death of someone close to her).
Upcoming flight information
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
CorrLinks emails
Ms. Maxwell's CorrLinks emails were allegedly erased by guards.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Legal Emails
Legal emails prematurely deleted by MDC in violation of policy.
Missed Call
Telephoned / Please Call
Discovery Disc
Federal Express envelope containing an unreadable discovery disc.
Upcoming flight information
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Status/Indictment
Maxwell stayed in contact with the government, allegedly to stave off indictment, but did not provide whereabouts.
Video conference
Session reduced by 90 minutes; severe audio/video technical issues impacting confidentiality and visibility.
Legal Defense
Meetings behind closed doors, visible but not audible to staff.
Discovery Disc
Federal Express envelope containing an unreadable discovery disc, delayed by two weeks.
Defense Preparation
Reference to Maxwell's need to communicate freely with counsel to prepare for defense.
Discovery in Giuffre v. Maxwell
Two depositions designated confidential.
Phone Message
Telephoned. (No specific message text written)
Needs/requests
Communication via beeper if she needed something
General communication
Communication via cell phones
Pretrial motions
Request for a legal call to confer with counsel regarding pretrial motions was denied.
Location tracking
Government located Maxwell by tracking her primary phone.
Legal Defense
Facilitated on-going communication.
Rules and Regulations
Guards were the sole source of information; Maxwell was instructed not to speak to them lest she face disciplinary sanction.
Discovery relevant to motions
Ms. Maxwell asked the government for documents relevant to these motions, but was denied.
In-person legal conference
Four-hour legal conference marked by restrictions on water, earbuds, and privacy.
Video conference
Monitor repositioned further away, impacting document review.
Legal consultation
Guards are described as feverishly writing while observing Ms. Maxwell during videoconferencing with her counsel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity