Commonwealth
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Criminal trial | Cosby's criminal trial where D.A. Castor's successors used Cosby's prior sworn inculpatory testim... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second jury trial of Bill Cosby | Pennsylvania Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004835.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) that references the Bill Cosby case as legal precedent. It details the testimony of former DA Bruce Castor regarding his 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby, arguing that this was done to strip Cosby of Fifth Amendment privileges and aid the victim (Constand) in a civil suit. The text highlights a 2015 email from Castor to DA Risa Vetri Ferman asserting that he had bound the Commonwealth against future state prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00004832.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated July 2, 2021, detailing the history of Bill Cosby's case. It reproduces a trial court's summary of testimony from a 2016 habeas corpus hearing, focusing on former District Attorney Bruce L. Castor, Jr.'s 2005 decision-making process. The text recounts Castor's testimony about his investigation into Andrea Constand's allegations, including his rationale for assigning specific detectives and his assessment of the case's weaknesses, such as the delayed reporting and inconsistencies in statements.
DOJ-OGR-00004831.jpg
This document is a filing from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text specifically discusses the legal history of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*, detailing how a former District Attorney (Castor) issued a non-prosecution declaration to force Bill Cosby to testify in a civil suit without Fifth Amendment protection. It describes how subsequent District Attorneys (Ferman and Steele) reopened the case and charged Cosby, leading to a habeas corpus petition based on the alleged non-prosecution agreement—a legal precedent likely being cited by Maxwell's defense regarding her own non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004830.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically referencing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion regarding Bill Cosby ([J-100-2020]). It details former D.A. Bruce Castor's explanation to D.A. Ferman regarding his 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby; Castor explains this was a strategic move to strip Cosby of his 5th Amendment protections, thereby forcing him to testify in a civil suit filed by Andrea Constand. This document was likely filed by Maxwell's defense to establish legal precedent regarding the binding nature of Non-Prosecution Agreements (NPAs).
DOJ-OGR-00004829.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) that references the Bill Cosby case as legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements. It contains an email from former D.A. Bruce Castor to D.A. Risa Ferman dated September 23, 2015. In the email, Castor explains that in 2005 he intentionally promised not to prosecute Cosby criminally to strip him of Fifth Amendment protections, thereby forcing him to testify in a civil deposition for the benefit of the victim, Andrea Constand.
DOJ-OGR-00004824.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), appearing to cite the precedent of the Bill Cosby case (Commonwealth v. Cosby). The text details former D.A. Bruce Castor's legal strategy to issue a non-prosecution statement for Bill Cosby specifically to prevent him from invoking the Fifth Amendment in a civil suit filed by Andrea Constand. It includes the text of a press release announcing the conclusion of the investigation into the January 2004 allegations.
DOJ-OGR-00004815.jpg
This legal document details the procedural history of a case involving Mr. Cosby, focusing on a District Attorney's initial decision to decline criminal prosecution in exchange for Cosby's testimony in a civil action. It explains how Cosby's subsequent incriminating statements were later used against him by the D.A.'s successors in a criminal trial, leading to an allowance of appeal regarding the enforceability of the original agreement. The document also provides background on Constad, the alleged victim, and his connection to Cosby through employment at Temple University.
DOJ-OGR-00004814.jpg
This document is a page from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion (Commonwealth v. Cosby) written by Justice Wecht, decided on June 30, 2021. While the text concerns the prosecution of Bill Cosby and District Attorney Bruce Castor's 2005 decision not to prosecute due to lack of evidence, the header indicates this document was filed as an exhibit (Document 310-1) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which is the federal criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Cosby case was likely cited in the Maxwell proceedings as a legal precedent regarding the validity of non-prosecution agreements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016550.jpg
This document is page 41 of a 42-page legal text, specifically from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), containing footnotes 226 through 238. The text references various legal studies, statutes, and articles concerning prosecutorial discretion, domestic violence laws, political influence on sentencing, and the independence of prosecutors in the US and abroad (Australia, Ireland, Canada). The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020643.jpg
This document appears to be page 184 (Appendix 2) of a House Oversight Committee report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020643). The content discusses UK-China relations, focusing on Chinese influence operations, human rights violations in Hong Kong, and academic interference at institutions like Cambridge University. While part of a larger production that may contain Epstein materials, this specific page focuses entirely on geopolitical and academic integrity issues involving China and the UK, with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014989.jpg
This document is page 18 of a 'Global Equity Volatility Insights' report published by Bank of America Merrill Lynch on June 20, 2017. It analyzes financial market trends in Asia, detailing index movements in Hong Kong, China, Korea, India, Japan, and Australia, alongside central bank actions by the Fed, PBOC, and BoJ. While the document content is purely financial analysis, the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014989' indicates it was obtained during a congressional investigation, likely related to the House Oversight Committee's inquiry into financial institutions holding records related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024187.jpg
This document is an itinerary page dated September 20, 2012, detailing the schedule for a delegation (specifically mentioning 'Maldivian Delegates') in New York City during the UN General Assembly. The schedule includes meetings with high-profile UN officials such as the Secretary-General, Michelle Bachelet (UN-Women), and Anthony Lake (UNICEF), as well as diplomatic meetings with representatives from the UK and Canada. The document lists specific attendees for each meeting, including the President, First Lady, various ministers, and staff members like 'Aliny' and 'Di', and bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024183.jpg
This document is a travel itinerary for Maldivian President Waheed and Madam Ilham for late September 2012, specifically during the UN General Assembly in New York. It details meetings with the CMAG, United Nations officials, and a Commonwealth reception, as well as flight details on Emirates and American Airlines. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation, indicated by the Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024181.jpg
This document is a detailed daily itinerary for the President of the Maldives and their delegation for Wednesday, September 26, 2012, in New York City, likely during the UN General Assembly. The schedule includes bilateral meetings with officials from Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, and the Commonwealth, as well as attendance at receptions hosted by South Africa, Luxembourg, and Cyprus. It originates from a US House Oversight Committee investigation (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024181).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020995.jpg
This document outlines possible solutions for restructuring Medicare & Medicaid, focusing on economic factors. Part 1 discusses cost-sharing mechanisms like co-pays and co-insurance, analyzing their impact on consumer behavior and incentives. Part 2 details reimbursement reform options such as bundled payments, global payment systems, pay-for-performance, and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), emphasizing a shift from quantity to quality of care.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity