David Oscar Markus
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
21
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
she (unnamed client)
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Leah S. Saffian
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TODD BLANCHE
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Melissa Madrigal
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Leah S. Saffian
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Petitioner
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Represented by |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel defense team |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
MARKUS/MOSS PLLC
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Petitioner
|
Counsel for |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court order | The court granted the motion for David Oscar Markus to be admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Court filing | A legal document was filed arguing that the government's motion to unseal grand jury materials sh... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-28 | N/A | Filing of Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari | Supreme Court of the United... | View |
| 2025-07-28 | N/A | Submission of a legal document (petition for certiorari) | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-25 | N/A | Continuation of the proffer meeting. | Office of the United States... | View |
| 2025-07-24 | N/A | Proffer meeting between Ghislaine Maxwell, her attorney, and the Deputy Attorney General. | Office of the United States... | View |
| 2025-07-22 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by David Oscar Markus | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-22 | Court order | The court granted the motion of David Oscar Markus for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice, allowi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-21 | Notarization | The affidavit signed by David Oscar Markus was notarized. | State of Florida | View |
| 2025-07-21 | Legal filing | David Oscar Markus filed an affidavit in support of a motion to appear pro hac vice in the case o... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-21 | Legal filing | A Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice for David Oscar Markus was filed with the court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-05-09 | N/A | Service of Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of ... | New York, NY (Affidavit exe... | View |
| 2025-04-10 | N/A | Submission of a legal document, likely a petition for certiorari. | N/A | View |
| 2025-03-03 | N/A | Scheduled start of trial US v. Diego Sanudo Sanchez Chocron | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2025-01-15 | N/A | A copy of the Petitioner's Application for Extension of Time to File Certiorari Petition was serv... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2025-01-14 | N/A | Counsel retained (Note: Document likely contains typo saying 2024, context suggests 2025) | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-30 | N/A | Deadline for David Oscar Markus to respond to the court order. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-07-12 | Court filing | Letter filed by David Oscar Markus arguing that a government request should be denied. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2021-06-30 | N/A | The Government filed a letter directed at David Oscar Markus. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-05-17 | Legal filing | A document was e-filed in Case 21-770, as certified by David Oscar Markus. | N/A | View |
| 2021-05-17 | N/A | Submission of legal filing requesting a hearing on confinement conditions | District Court | View |
| 2021-05-17 | Legal filing | Filing of 'Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell’s Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release' in the case No. 21-... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-05-17 | N/A | e-filing of legal documents | N/A | View |
| 2021-05-17 | N/A | Filing of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell’s Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2021-05-17 | Legal filing | Filing of a 'Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release' on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015054.jpg
This is a legal letter dated July 22, 2025, from defense attorneys David Oscar Markus and Melissa Madrigal to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests permission to review grand jury transcripts that the government is seeking to unseal, noting that they have not previously seen them in their entirety. The letter states that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has no objection to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00015052.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for case 1:20-CR-00330-PAE (USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC is formally entering his appearance as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, certifying that he is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice. The document is dated July 22, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00015051.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 22, 2025, in the case of United States vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorney David Oscar Markus of Florida to be admitted Pro Hac Vice. This allows Markus to officially act as legal counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.
DOJ-OGR-00015045.jpg
This is a proposed court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of U.S. vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorney David Oscar Markus of Florida to be admitted 'pro hac vice', allowing him to serve as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.
DOJ-OGR-00015044.jpg
This is a Certificate of Good Standing issued by the Supreme Court of Florida on July 21, 2025. The document, certified by Clerk John A. Tomasino, attests that attorney David Oscar Markus was admitted to practice law in Florida on October 3, 1997, and is currently in good standing.
DOJ-OGR-00015043.jpg
This document is a sworn affidavit from attorney David Oscar Markus, dated July 21, 2025, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Markus attests under penalty of perjury that he is an attorney in good standing with the Florida bar, has no felony convictions, and has no history of professional disciplinary action. The affidavit supports his motion to appear 'pro hac vice' (for this particular case) as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00001422.jpg
This document is an appendix from a legal filing in Case 21-770, dated May 17, 2021. It lists several court orders and filings from April and May 2021 related to Ghislaine Maxwell's detention conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The document is respectfully submitted and signed by her attorneys, Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus.
DOJ-OGR-00001421.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to her Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release filed on May 17, 2021, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It lists the case numbers (21-770 & 21-58) and identifies her legal counsel, Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001421.
DOJ-OGR-00001419.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Case 21-770) dated May 17, 2021. Attorneys Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus serve as counsel requesting the district court to conduct a hearing regarding the conditions of their client's confinement. The document lists the contact information and bar numbers for both attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00001408.jpg
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release, filed on May 17, 2021, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case Nos. 21-770 & 21-58). It lists the legal parties involved—the United States of America as Appellee and Maxwell as Appellant—and identifies her legal representation as Leah S. Saffian and David Oscar Markus.
DOJ-OGR-00001387.jpg
This legal document, dated April 19, 2021, consists of a Certificate of Compliance and a Certificate of Service signed by David Oscar Markus for Case 21-770. Markus certifies that the associated petition meets the court's rules for word count (2600 words) and typeface, and that the document was e-filed on that date.
DOJ-OGR-00001386.jpg
This document is the concluding page of a legal filing from April 19, 2021, submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus of the law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC. The filing argues that a female client's case should be remanded to the trial court for a hearing because her conditions of confinement are making it impossible to prepare for trial. The document provides the law firm's contact information in Miami, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00001373.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing dated April 19, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It is a reply brief submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus on behalf of appellant Ghislaine Maxwell in support of her motion for pretrial release. The document references the lower court case in the Southern District of New York (20-CR-330).
DOJ-OGR-00001371.jpg
This document is a certificate of service from a legal case, dated April 15, 2021. Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP certifies that he served a 'Notice of Motion and Affirmation' via First Class Mail to attorney David Oscar Markus and to Ghislaine Maxwell, who was incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The document confirms the legal representation of Ghislaine Maxwell by Cohen & Gresser LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00001368.jpg
This legal document is an affirmation filed on April 15, 2021, by attorney Christian R. Everdell of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. Everdell is seeking to be relieved as counsel for the defendant-appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in her case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The affirmation notes that Maxwell has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, who filed a notice of appearance on April 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00001367.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 15, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP is requesting to withdraw as counsel of record for Ghislaine Maxwell because she has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, for her appeal. The motion is unopposed by the United States, represented by AUSA Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001314.jpg
This legal document, dated April 5, 2021, is a notice of appearance filed by attorney David Oscar Markus of the firm Markus/Moss PLLC. He is formally entering his appearance as the lead counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770/21-58). The document confirms the attorney's contact information and certifies his admission to practice before the court.
DOJ-OGR-00000944.jpg
This document is the signature page and certificate of service for a legal filing submitted by attorney David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC on April 1, 2021. It references a separate case, United States v. Dashawn Robertson (District of New Mexico), likely as a citation or appendix item. The page bears a DOJ-OGR bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00000942.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It is an appendix to a motion for pretrial release for the appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in her appeal against the United States of America. The filing was prepared by attorney David Oscar Markus of the law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
DOJ-OGR-00000941.jpg
This document is the final page (page 31 of 31) of a legal filing, specifically containing the Certificate of Compliance and Certificate of Service. It certifies that the associated petition meets Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure regarding word count (5,185 words) and formatting. It is signed by attorney David Oscar Markus and dated April 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000912.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically 'Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for Pretrial Release', submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. The motion is part of an appeal from a case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in the matter of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing was made by attorney David Oscar Markus of the Miami-based law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
DOJ-OGR-00000908.jpg
This legal document is a Notice of Appearance filed on April 1, 2021, by attorney David Oscar Markus of the firm Markus/Moss PLLC. He is formally notifying the court that he will be serving as additional counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770/21-58), acting as co-counsel alongside Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00000840.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The appeal challenges a court order from March 22, 2021, which denied her 'Third Motion for Release on Bail'. The document identifies Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, and the prosecuting Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000241.jpg
This document is a contact sheet related to case number 24-1073 for Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the contact information for two attorneys: Sara Kropf of Kropf Moseley Schmitt PLLC in Washington, D.C., and David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC in Miami, FL. The document indicates it was transmitted via email.
Notice of Appearance for Ghislaine Maxwell
This document is a formal notice filed with the court by attorney David Oscar Markus to state that he is now representing Ghislaine Maxwell as additional counsel in case 21-770/21-58.
RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Confirmation that the Government opposes the motion for bail and intends to file a response.
Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Informing the AUSA of intent to file motion for bail in the Second Circuit and requesting confirmation of government opposition.
RE: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Acknowledging Markus as appellate counsel; noting that referenced docket entries are mostly unredacted or available via other defense counsel; referencing Protective Order ECF No. 36.
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Introduction as counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal; request for unredacted documents (docket entries 4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169).
U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Introductory email stating Markus has been engaged to represent Maxwell in her appeal from the denial of her third bail application. Requests access to unredacted docket entries (4, 18, 22, 97, 100, 103, 106, 159, 160, 165, 171, 169). Offers to enter protective order.
Re: U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Acknowledges Markus as counsel. Notes most referenced entries do not appear redacted. Directs Markus to obtain materials from defense counsel (copied on email). Notes case is governed by protective order ECF No. 36.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity