Palm Beach
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00014422.jpg
This document is a page from the government's summation (by Ms. Moe) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details the grooming and abuse of a victim referred to as 'Jane,' beginning when she was an 8th grader in 1994 at a summer camp and continuing in Palm Beach. The text describes Maxwell acting as an 'older sister figure' to facilitate abuse and Epstein using scholarship offers as a cover story for Jane's mother before physically abusing Jane in a pool house.
DOJ-OGR-00014412.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Moe. She characterizes the relationship between Maxwell and Epstein as a sexual partnership, which afforded Maxwell a luxury lifestyle traveling between Epstein's many properties. To establish Maxwell's authority, Ms. Moe references the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former house manager, who stated Maxwell took control of the household immediately upon her arrival.
DOJ-OGR-00033220.jpg
This is a handwritten note from "Jack" (likely attorney Jack A. Goldberger) to "Barry" on the law firm's letterhead. Jack provides the phone number for an individual named Acosta and asks Barry to find out what Acosta says, because Jay Lefkowitz needs to call Acosta to finalize an unspecified matter. The note also mentions an enclosed document described as "fun reading on your Defendnt".
DOJ-OGR-00033191.jpg
This document is a letter from a citizen (signing as 'A Concerned Patriot' with email johngoes15@yahoo.com) to Lanna Belohlavek, criticizing the lenient plea deal and sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. The writer references Conchitta Sarnoff's reporting in the Daily Beast and accuses the judicial system of corruption and favoring the wealthy, contrasting Epstein's treatment with a hypothetical 'Tyrone from Dade County.' A sticky note attached to the document shows an internal staff query asking if a response should be issued, with the handwritten instruction 'NO'.
DOJ-OGR-00033098.jpg
This document is page 110 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about serious allegations, including whether a firefighter named Brett is in a relationship with a minor and whether the witness has lied about their sister's alleged drug habit. The witness denies the accusations while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions as argumentative.
DOJ-OGR-00017579.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness identified as 'Jane.' Jane discusses the psychological impact of her past trauma, stating it ruined her self-worth and ability to trust. She testifies that she moved from Palm Beach to New York City at age 17 and that Jeffrey Epstein paid for her tuition at the Professional Children's School for her senior year of high school.
DOJ-OGR-00017574.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct testimony of a witness named "Jane." Jane testifies that she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager and that an individual named Maxwell was present for these abuses on more than two occasions. She describes how these incidents would often begin as casual social gatherings at Epstein's house in Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00017558.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript involving the direct examination of a witness identified as 'Jane.' Jane testifies that at age 15, she traveled on a private jet with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell but had to return to Palm Beach on a commercial flight for school. She describes an incident where she lacked identification to board the commercial flight, but Maxwell intervened by calling someone to ensure she could board. Jane also testifies that Maxwell handled travel arrangements at Epstein's request starting when Jane was 14.
DOJ-OGR-00017550.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring the direct examination of a witness named 'Jane'. Jane testifies that between the ages of 14 and 16 (referencing March 2001), she traveled approximately ten times with Epstein and Maxwell to Palm Beach, New York City, and Santa Fe, primarily via Epstein's private plane. She states that these trips were arranged by Epstein's office and that she stayed at Epstein's house during these travels.
DOJ-OGR-00017541.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct testimony of a witness named 'Jane'. Jane recounts an incident involving herself, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell at Epstein's house in Palm Beach, which she states occurred shortly after a 'first incident'. She describes being led to Epstein's bedroom where Epstein and Maxwell engaged in sexual acts with each other before involving her in unwanted sexual contact.
DOJ-OGR-00017540.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Jane provides testimony under direct examination. She describes being led by a man (contextually Epstein) to a pool house where he sexually assaulted her by masturbating on her. Jane explains her reaction was to freeze in fear and that she did not tell anyone because she was terrified and ashamed, but confirms she continued spending time with Maxwell and Epstein in Palm Beach after the incident.
DOJ-OGR-00017529.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Jane. She testifies that in 1994, upon returning to Palm Beach from summer camp, her family had lost their home and was living in a friend's pool house where she shared a bed with her mother. She further testifies that shortly after starting eighth grade, she was contacted by two people she had met at summer camp.
DOJ-OGR-00017488.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of Mr. Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski confirms he installed home theater equipment in Jeffrey Epstein's residences, including the one at 358 El Brillo Way in Palm Beach. He also recalls a time when that residence was being renovated, likely in the mid-1990s, forcing Epstein to move to a temporary rental, but does not recall installing equipment in the rental property.
DOJ-OGR-00017484.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski (likely Larry Visoski). The testimony establishes that Visoski began working for the subject (Epstein) in 1991 and utilized his mechanics background to install high-end audio/video equipment at all of the subject's properties, including New York, Palm Beach, Zorro Ranch, and 'the island.' The witness confirms the subject lived on 69th Street in New York in 1991.
DOJ-OGR-00017478.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness confirms that Epstein purchased three cars (a Land Rover, Mercedes Benz, and Jaguar), registered them in Visoski's name, and kept them at his Palm Beach residence. Visoski acknowledges that the cars were Epstein's property, although Visoski and others at the residence were permitted to use them.
DOJ-OGR-00017470.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski, who worked for Epstein, describes their lodging arrangements, stating they stayed at their own home near Palm Beach but were provided with a corporate apartment at 301 East 66th Street in New York, a building owned by Epstein. Visoski confirms that their partner and copilot, Dave Rogers, also stayed at the same New York location.
DOJ-OGR-00017453.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness is questioned about an encounter with a woman named Jane on a plane in Palm Beach. Visoski recalls meeting Jane in the cockpit and seeing her stand between the pilot seats, but cannot swear that she actually flew on the plane and has a generally vague memory of the event, which they contrast with how clearly they could recall someone like President Clinton.
DOJ-OGR-00011713.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. She describes the relationship between Ghislaine and Epstein, stating it evolved from friendship to an employer-employee dynamic where Ghislaine managed his extensive real estate portfolio. The statement also outlines Epstein's lifestyle, including his various properties in Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the Virgin Islands, and foreshadows testimony about their separate travels and Epstein's relationships with other women.
DOJ-OGR-00011704.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecution outlines its case against an unnamed defendant, alleging their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in the abuse of underage victims. The statement details the evidence to be presented, including testimony from victims' relatives, Epstein's pilots and staff, and law enforcement who searched Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences, to establish the defendant's role and efforts to create a 'culture of silence'.
DOJ-OGR-00011698.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case, filed on August 10, 2022. Pomerantz alleges that an unnamed female defendant knowingly assisted Epstein in luring young girls by providing a 'cover of respectability.' The statement introduces the case of 'Jane,' who was 14 when she met the pair in 1994 and was subsequently invited to Epstein's Palm Beach home under the false pretense of mentorship and scholarships.
DOJ-OGR-00011528.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, details a judge's decision to overrule objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The judge cites trial testimony from witnesses named Annie, Jane, Virginia, and Carolyn as evidence supporting the characterization that Maxwell and Epstein isolated minor girls and developed a multi-level recruitment scheme. The scheme allegedly began with Maxwell recruiting Virginia, who then recruited Carolyn, who in turn recruited others.
DOJ-OGR-00005731.jpg
This legal filing from October 2021 discusses the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting a conflict between the Palm Beach Police (led by Chief Reiter) and state prosecutors regarding the leniency of the prosecution. It notes that while police believed they had probable cause to charge Epstein and two redacted individuals, Ghislaine Maxwell was not named in charging documents. The document also raises serious issues regarding the chain of custody of evidence, stating that Detective Recarey is dead and that the FBI allegedly received empty evidence packages.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019470.jpg
This document is a DailyMail article excerpt included in House Oversight evidence (ID 019470). It details Virginia Roberts Giuffre's account of a trip to the Caribbean where Ghislaine Maxwell piloted a helicopter to pick up Bill Clinton. The text highlights Epstein's claim that Clinton 'owed him favours' and describes a dinner involving Clinton, Epstein, Maxwell, and young women flown in from New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019386.jpg
An FBI FD-350 form archiving a July 30, 2006, article from the Palm Beach Post titled 'Billionaire faces charge of solicitation of minors.' The article details the unsealing of an indictment against Jeffrey Epstein for felony solicitation of prostitution, his release on a $3,000 bond, and his attorney Jack Goldberger's defense claiming Epstein did not know the girls were minors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019382.jpg
A newspaper clipping from the Palm Beach Post detailing the defense strategy of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys, Goldberger and Roy Black. The defense accuses the Palm Beach Police Department, led by Chief Michael Reiter, of distorting the case in the media and giving a 'childish performance.' The article highlights conflicts between the Police Chief and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the handling of the grand jury and the credibility of the accusers, whom the defense explicitly calls 'liars' with histories of drug abuse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity