Palm Beach
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00022385.jpg
This document is a handwritten list of names and contact information related to Jeffrey E. Epstein. It includes associates like Ghislaine Maxwell, employees such as chefs and a driver, and notable figures like Ehud Barak and David Copperfield. The notes also identify individuals as potential witnesses, detailing alleged illicit activities such as scouting young models and interacting with underage girls.
DOJ-OGR-00013941.jpg
This document is a page from the court testimony of a witness named Espinosa (Direct Examination). Espinosa clarifies the distinction between Epstein's assistant (an unnamed female) and Ghislaine Maxwell's assistant (Espinosa herself). The testimony confirms that during the 2000s, Ghislaine traveled with Epstein to his properties, including Palm Beach, but also made independent trips to Miami which Espinosa booked.
DOJ-OGR-00013832.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains defense arguments asserting that Ghislaine Maxwell did not 'entice' a victim known as 'Jane' to travel for illegal purposes, arguing that return trips to Palm Beach do not constitute enticement to commit crimes in New York. The defense emphasizes testimony stating that Jeffrey Epstein's office typically handled travel arrangements, with Maxwell only occasionally assisting.
DOJ-OGR-00013513.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on establishing a timeline for Mr. Epstein's living arrangements in the mid-1990s, specifically his use of a rental property in Palm Beach around 1994-1995 during renovations on his El Brillo Way home, and his purchase of a residence in New Mexico during the same period.
DOJ-OGR-00013507.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Rodgers is being cross-examined about their knowledge of Eva Dubin's appearance during a pregnancy. The questioning then shifts to identifying a specific flight, number 878, from Teterboro to Palm Beach on August 18, 1996, using a flight log entered as Government Exhibit 662R.
DOJ-OGR-00013491.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, likely a pilot. It confirms flight log details, specifically a flight on March 31, 2001 (Flight 1480) from Santa Fe to Palm Beach carrying Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Virginia Roberts, 'Jane', Henry Drecky, scientist Marvin Minsky, and chef Adam Perry Lang.
DOJ-OGR-00013490.jpg
This document is a court transcript (page 212 of 262) from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers in the US v. Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony confirms details of a specific flight log entry (Flight 1105) dated May 3, 1998, traveling from Palm Beach to Teterboro. The witness confirms the identities of the passengers, including Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, her assistant Emmy Taylor, the Dubin family (Glenn, Eva, and their children), and Gwendolyn Beck.
DOJ-OGR-00013486.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony reviews a specific flight log entry for Flight 916 on November 11, 1996, traveling from Palm Beach to Teterboro. The questioning confirms the passengers included Jeffrey Epstein (JE), Sophie Biddle (identified as a professional masseuse), Jeff Shantz and family, Eva, a child, a nanny, Russ, and a person referred to by 'Jane's true first name'.
DOJ-OGR-00013416.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or trial transcript. It discusses a flight on May 9th, 1997, from Teterboro, New Jersey, to Santa Fe, New Mexico, and questions whether Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jane were passengers on that flight.
DOJ-OGR-00013415.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Rodgers testifies about a flight on November 15, 1996. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were passengers on this flight from Teterboro, New Jersey, to Columbus, Ohio. The testimony also identifies Juan Alessi as Jeffrey Epstein's house manager in Palm Beach for approximately 12 years.
DOJ-OGR-00013342.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, containing the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. The witness testifies about their employment in approximately 2003 at the Palm Beach residence of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Hesse states they were hired by Maxwell to perform maintenance and care for the home when the owners were absent.
DOJ-OGR-00013336.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures the cross-examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn denies having any conversations with his ex-partner, Carolyn, about Jeffrey Epstein or his testimony. A new line of questioning begins by Mr. Pagliuca, focusing on whether Shawn recalls visiting a house in Palm Beach in 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00013323.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies about accompanying a woman named Carolyn to Jeffrey Epstein's house on multiple occasions, where she would go inside for over an hour and emerge with hundred dollar bills. Shawn also recounts his single, brief meeting with Jeffrey Epstein in the driveway of the house.
DOJ-OGR-00013319.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies about accompanying individuals named Virginia and Carolyn to Jeffrey Epstein's home in Palm Beach. The witness describes the house as originally pink and later white, notes that Virginia and Carolyn went inside for over an hour, and states they returned carrying hundred dollar bills.
DOJ-OGR-00013318.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Shawn is under direct examination by Ms. Comey regarding the location of Jeffrey Epstein's house on El Brillo Way and the socioeconomic difference between Palm Beach and West Palm Beach. The witness describes living with a woman named Carolyn in West Palm Beach and rarely visiting Palm Beach due to a lack of money.
DOJ-OGR-00013317.jpg
This document is page 39 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies that Virginia [Giuffre] recruited a woman named Carolyn to give massages to 'Jeffrey' [Epstein] in Palm Beach for 'a couple hundred dollars.' Shawn confirms accompanying Carolyn, Tony, and Virginia to Epstein's house for this purpose.
DOJ-OGR-00010438.jpg
This legal document, page 21 of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell should not receive an aggravating role enhancement because she did not supervise other criminal participants. It specifically refutes the idea that she supervised Sarah Kellen, presenting testimony from Cimberly Espinosa that Kellen was hired by Epstein to replace Maxwell's duties, not to work under her. The document also states that other employees, like pilots Larry Visoski and David Rodgers, had no knowledge of any criminal conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00010427.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes the testimony of a witness named Carolyn regarding her interactions with Epstein. The document argues that Carolyn's memory is unreliable and contradictory, pointing to inconsistencies in her timeline of events, particularly concerning her visits to Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2004 after giving birth to her son. Evidence from message pads is cited to corroborate a timeline that conflicts with parts of her testimony, thereby attempting to discredit her as a witness.
DOJ-OGR-00010410.jpg
This document is page 44 of a court order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 29 motion and motion to vacate convictions. The court rejects arguments regarding prejudice due to deceased witnesses (including Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Joseph Recarey) and pre-indictment delay. The text references evidence GX-424, an email chain showing Maxwell worked closely with an individual named Markham to create a household manual.
DOJ-OGR-00010393.jpg
This page details the Government's evidence regarding the Defendant (Maxwell) and Epstein's criminal scheme, focusing on the testimony of a victim named Jane. It describes how Jane was groomed and trafficked across state lines, including trips to New York, Florida, and New Mexico, for sexual activity with Epstein, facilitated by the Defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00010384.jpg
This document is page 18 of a court ruling (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on April 29, 2022, upholding the guilty verdict against the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) for Counts Four and Six. The text details testimony from a victim, 'Jane,' describing how she was sexually abused by Epstein starting at age 14 in Palm Beach and transported to New York via private and commercial flights arranged by the Defendant. It highlights a specific incident where the Defendant intervened to help a 15-year-old Jane board a flight without ID and notes the Defendant's presence during sexual abuse incidents in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00010286.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Document 647) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. The text argues that 'Count Five' (related to Florida/Carolyn) is multiplicitous because it is a subset of the broader 'Count Three,' citing the lack of independent conspiracy. It references testimony from victims Jane, Kate, and Annie Farmer regarding sexual abuse at Epstein's properties in New Mexico, London, the US Virgin Islands, and Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00010284.jpg
This legal document argues that the government's charges related to sex trafficking constitute a single, decade-long conspiracy rather than separate offenses. The author points to the similarity in conduct between victims Carolyn (2000s) and Jane (1990s), the overlap of participants like Sarah Kellen, and the consistent location of the Palm Beach residence to support the claim of a single scheme involving Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. The document contends that the government only separated the charges due to a legal technicality regarding the enactment date of a sex trafficking statute.
DOJ-OGR-00009611.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the sufficiency of evidence to uphold a defendant's conviction on multiple counts. It details the defendant's role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation, specifically by making travel arrangements for a victim named Jane and recruiting another victim, Virginia. The document cites trial testimony and legal precedents to assert that a rational jury could and did find the defendant guilty.
DOJ-OGR-00009578.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a jury note submitted during Ms. Maxwell's trial was ambiguous. The defense claimed the note referred to a specific 1997 flight to New Mexico, but this document contends the jury could have been referencing other flights or asking a different question entirely. The document concludes that the defendant's interpretation is 'mere conjecture' and supports the court's decision to reject the defense's arguments on this point.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity