Page 65 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi by Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on confirming details of a 'major renovation' at a Palm Beach property, including work on bathrooms, floors, guestroom molding, and masonry. The dialogue also establishes that architects from New York would fly down to Palm Beach to supervise the work.
This page is a transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The questioning focuses on 'Exhibit 52,' a book containing names and arrows; the defense establishes that Alessi did not add the arrows and lacks personal knowledge regarding the document's creation, chain of custody over the last 19 years, or potential alteration (photocopying/reassembling) originating from Palm Beach. Ms. Comey objects to the final question regarding the hypothetical manipulation of the book.
This document is a transcript of a court testimony from August 10, 2022, featuring a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies about books at a Palm Beach location associated with a Mr. Epstein, stating they were not tasked with preserving them. The witness confirms that it was standard practice to destroy old books and throw them in the garbage whenever a new version was created.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The questioner attempts to determine the origin of a piece of evidence, "Exhibit 52," and its accompanying Post-It notes, suggesting locations such as New York, Palm Beach, and California. Alessi consistently denies having any personal knowledge about where the exhibit or the notes were created or came from.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about a book, which he identifies as a later, thinner version of a previous one, and notes that his name, which was listed in connection with a house in Palm Beach, is absent. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning but is overruled by the court before the proceedings turn to a sealed government exhibit.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of witness Alessi) filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The witness identifies a physical exhibit as matching the cover, binding, and layout of directories used while working for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically noting the book contained 'many, many, many, many names' and entries for massages in Palm Beach. The witness clarifies that while the exhibit matches the original books, the font in the exhibit is smaller and the original books were thicker.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies that he worked as a driver for Mr. Epstein and, on multiple occasions, drove a woman named Virginia from her home in Royal Palm Beach to Epstein's home in Palm Beach. He also states he drove Virginia, Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and others to a plane, witnessing them board, and estimates he first met Virginia around 2001.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, Ms. Drescher. She is questioned about a young woman named Virginia who frequently visited Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home while he and Ms. Maxwell were present. Ms. Drescher testifies that Virginia appeared to be 14 or 15 years old and that she was sometimes told to pick Virginia up.
This document is a court transcript page from a direct examination of a witness named Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. Alessi describes seeing Ms. Maxwell and Ms. Roberts with a young, blonde girl in a uniform at a spa, and later seeing the same girl at a house in Palm Beach where Alessi introduced her to Ms. Maxwell.
This court transcript details the testimony of a witness, identified as a driver named Alessi. The witness states that on approximately two occasions, he saw a person named 'Jane' with luggage at Mr. Epstein's house in Palm Beach. He further testifies to driving Jane, Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and others to the airport and witnessing Jane board their plane.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about Ms. Maxwell's dog, a Yorkie named Max, recalling that Ms. Maxwell arrived in Palm Beach with the dog around 1991. The witness confirms Ms. Maxwell still had the dog when they left Mr. Epstein's employment in 2002 and describes how the dog always traveled with Ms. Maxwell but was terrified of flying.
This document is page 132 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Alessi (likely Juan Alessi). The witness describes receiving a degrading, 30-page booklet of checklists and rules from Ghislaine Maxwell around 2001 or 2002 concerning the cleaning and management of Epstein's properties, including Palm Beach. Alessi notes that the workload described was excessive ('enough work for ten people') and contrary to what they were hired to do.
This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi (likely Juan Alessi) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness describes the layout of Epstein's Palm Beach property, specifically a structure and a wall he nicknamed the 'Berlin Wall' which obstructed the view from the staff quarters to the main house. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding a question about where Ms. Maxwell slept, citing a lack of specific dates.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi. The witness confirms that Government Exhibit 297 is an accurate layout of the second floor of Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Following this testimony and with no objection, the court admits the exhibit into evidence.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a witness, Alessi, describes working for Mr. Epstein at his Palm Beach residence. Alessi testifies that Epstein visited almost every weekend and holiday, often with only a few hours' notice, requiring 'extensive' and 'hectic' preparations. The witness details tasks such as cleaning, shopping, and maintaining cars to the standard of a 'five-star hotel'.
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi regarding their employment at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach property. The witness describes the property's structures, including a staff house built around 1999-2000, and states that both Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell gave them instructions about their job responsibilities.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of Mr. Alessi) filed on August 10, 2022. Mr. Alessi testifies about his work history, stating he moved to Florida in early 1994, worked as a maintenance man for a wealthy family in Palm Beach, was briefly self-employed, and then began working for Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on a visit Jane and her mother made to Epstein's house in Palm Beach, confirming they were the only people there for tea by the pool. The witness states she does not recall if Ghislaine Maxwell was present and is also questioned about a conversation she had with the government in October 2021.
This document is a partial transcript of a cross-examination from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger questions a witness named Jane about a letter of recommendation included in her application, specifically inquiring about its content, the qualifications of the unnamed recommender who was on the board of the Palm Beach School of the Arts, and whether Jane solicited the letter. The Court oversees the exchange, which also references government exhibits.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Moe, regarding a witness's testimony. The discussion centers on clarifying the witness's past residences in Palm Beach as a teenager, specifically distinguishing between a 'first address' identified as a pool house and a 'second address'.
This legal document is a memorandum of law, likely from the prosecution, arguing for the admission of an exhibit (GX 52) into evidence. It counters a defense objection that the witness, Mr. Alessi, cannot authenticate the exhibit because he has no personal knowledge of its creation. The memorandum cites several legal precedents to support the argument that a document can be authenticated under Rule 901(b)(4) based on its distinctive characteristics or a witness's general familiarity, even without direct observation of its creation.
This legal document, filed on December 9, 2021, details the testimony of a witness, Mr. Alessi, regarding telephone directories belonging to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. Mr. Alessi describes the directories' physical characteristics, their contents (including contacts for friends, family, business, and massage therapists in Palm Beach), and how they were regularly updated. His testimony, which confirms the directories' appearance and purpose, is presented as being corroborated by other evidence, such as a 'Household Manual' (Government Exhibit 606).
This legal document is a court filing by the Government arguing for the admission of a contact book (Government Exhibit 52) as evidence. The argument relies on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Epstein, who identified the book as being from Epstein's Palm Beach house. Alessi confirmed the book's appearance and recognized names within it, establishing its authenticity and relevance to the case.
This document is page 8 of a defense filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated December 5, 2021. The defense argues against the admission of government evidence, specifically photos of vibrators, a stuffed tiger, and a stuffed dog, claiming 'Jane' did not identify these specific items in her testimony. The defense also challenges photos of the interior of Epstein's New York apartment, arguing they are unauthenticated and potentially misleading.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity