Palm Beach
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000805.jpg
This document is page 22 of a court filing (Document 32) from July 18, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. The text details the Court's finding that Epstein is a 'flight risk' based on a Pretrial Services Report citing his extensive foreign travel, international ties, unexplained assets, and criminal history. It also outlines the seriousness of the charges against him, specifically the alleged sexual abuse of minors in New York and Palm Beach involving the facilitation by employees and associates.
DOJ-OGR-00000803.jpg
This legal document details Jeffrey Epstein's alleged failure to comply with New York sex offender registration requirements, citing a New York Post report. It also references allegations from an attorney, Brad Edwards, that Epstein continued to engage in sexual misconduct with female visitors while on work release from a Florida jail. The document notes that the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office disputes these claims about his conduct during work release.
DOJ-OGR-00000799.jpg
This court document, filed in July 2019, summarizes evidence of Jeffrey Epstein's obstruction of justice and witness tampering during the 2007 investigation. It details Police Incident Reports alleging Epstein's private investigators aggressively stalked victims' parents, including driving one off the road. The document also cites emails from 2007 showing prosecutors and Epstein's counsel negotiating a plea deal involving statutes related to witness tampering and privacy violations of child victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000798.jpg
This document is page 15 of a July 2019 court filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) arguing for Jeffrey Epstein's detention. It highlights the severity of the charges (involving minors) and cites research suggesting sex offender recidivism is underreported. Crucially, it details evidence of witness tampering, including 2007 emails regarding a potential guilty plea for obstruction of justice and a 2006 Palm Beach police report where an Epstein representative allegedly threatened a victim, promising compensation for help and retribution for harm.
DOJ-OGR-00000551.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. In it, a lawyer named Mr. Weinberg argues that his client, a tier 3 registrant, has a long history of compliance with daily monitoring and has been careful to avoid any violations. Mr. Weinberg explains that his client was advised he did not need to physically appear in New York and details how his client's travel, monitored from the Virgin Islands, is carefully reported.
DOJ-OGR-00000493.jpg
This document is page 22 of a court order filed on July 18, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The court finds Epstein to be a flight risk based on factors including extensive foreign travel, international financial ties, unexplained assets, and his criminal history. The text also outlines the severity of the charges against him, specifically the sexual abuse of minors in New York and Palm Beach, allegedly facilitated by employees and associates.
DOJ-OGR-00000487.jpg
This page from a court filing details allegations that Jeffrey Epstein's associates used intimidation tactics, such as aggressive driving, against victims' parents to silence them. It also outlines 2007 plea discussions where federal prosecutors and Epstein's counsel considered charges of witness tampering and obstruction of justice, specifically referencing statutes 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d) and 18 U.S.C. § 403.
DOJ-OGR-00000486.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the severity of the crimes Mr. Epstein is charged with, citing their heinous nature involving minors. It presents evidence that Mr. Epstein or his representatives engaged in witness intimidation, threats, and made payments to potential witnesses, referencing Florida police reports from 2006 and emails from his former counsel to federal prosecutors in 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00000380.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing dated July 15, 2019. An unnamed speaker, likely counsel for Mr. Epstein, argues that a prior case in Palm Beach, Florida was not prosecuted because the lead prosecutor found the complainants and the police report to be not credible. The speaker further claims that in subsequent civil litigation, the complainants provided sworn testimony disclaiming much of what was in the police report.
DOJ-OGR-00000339.jpg
This document is a legal filing arguing that Jeffrey Epstein poses a danger of obstructing justice. It cites past incidents of intimidation, including a private investigator driving a victim's parent off the road and threats that those who hurt Epstein 'will be dealt with.' It further highlights suspicious financial activity in late 2018, specifically wire transfers totaling $350,000 to possible co-conspirators immediately following the publication of investigative articles by the Miami Herald.
DOJ-OGR-00000330.jpg
This legal document is a filing arguing against granting bail to a defendant accused of a years-long scheme of sexually abusing dozens of underage girls. The prosecution contends that the defendant's proposed bail package is inadequate, he is a flight risk due to his wealth and private jet, and he poses a danger to the community. The document details the allegations, including that the defendant paid victims and victim-recruiters in cash in locations like New York and Palm Beach, and urges the Court to order him detained pending trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000259.jpg
This legal document, page 2 of a court filing dated July 2, 2019, outlines allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. It states that he created a network to sexually exploit underage victims, some as young as 14, in locations including New York and Palm Beach. The document further alleges that Epstein conspired with employees and associates who facilitated the abuse by contacting victims and scheduling encounters at his residences, with these activities beginning in at least 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00000025.jpg
This legal document, page 24 of a court filing dated September 17, 2024, discusses the sentencing of an individual named Maxwell. It affirms the District Court's application of a 'four-level leadership enhancement' based on testimony from two of Epstein's pilots. The pilots testified that Maxwell supervised her assistant, Sarah Kellen, and other testimony corroborated Maxwell's high-level role as Epstein's 'number two and the lady of the house' in Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00021027.jpg
This document is page 44 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on April 29, 2022, denying the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) Rule 29 motion to vacate convictions. The court rejects arguments regarding prejudice due to absent deceased witnesses (including Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Detective Joseph Recarey) and claims of pre-indictment delay. The text references evidence establishing the Defendant's close work with an individual named Markham on a manual and checklists.
DOJ-OGR-00021001.jpg
This legal document is a court's conclusion that sufficient evidence exists for a jury to find the Defendant guilty on counts of transporting a minor and sex trafficking. The conclusion is based on the testimony of a victim, "Jane," who stated the Defendant facilitated her travel with Jeffrey Epstein from Palm Beach to New York, assisted her in boarding flights, and was present during Epstein's sexual abuse of her when she was a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00020872.jpg
This legal document excerpt details a juror's, named David, perspective on the acquittal of Maxwell on a specific charge ('count two') involving an accuser named Jane. David explains that while Jane's story was corroborated by flight logs and Epstein's 'little black book', the jury ultimately found insufficient direct evidence to prove Maxwell had 'enticed' Jane to travel, which was required for a conviction on that charge. The decision was based on a lack of evidence for that specific action, not on a disbelief of the victim.
DOJ-OGR-00020777.jpg
This document is page 18 of a court order (filed April 16, 2021) denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss her indictment. The Court rejects arguments regarding missing witnesses, specifically noting that potential testimony from the Palm Beach investigation or Epstein himself would likely not have been credible or exculpatory. The Court also rules that pretrial publicity and delays in prosecution have not caused substantial prejudice to Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00019000.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony covers standard procedures involving an employee named Mr. Alessi in Palm Beach and specifically details a flight (Flight 979) on May 9, 1997. The flight traveled from Teterboro, NJ, to Santa Fe, NM, carrying Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a passenger identified as 'Jane' to Epstein's Zorro Ranch.
DOJ-OGR-00018926.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. A witness, identified as Hesse, testifies about being employed around 2003 at the Palm Beach residence of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness states they were hired directly by Ghislaine Maxwell to maintain the home when the owners were not present.
DOJ-OGR-00018920.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the testimony of a witness named Shawn. Under questioning by Ms. Comey, Shawn denies discussing Jeffrey Epstein or his testimony with his ex-partner, Carolyn, with whom he shares a child. Following this, Mr. Pagliuca begins cross-examination, establishing that Shawn visited a house in Palm Beach in 2002 and shared a phone with Carolyn.
DOJ-OGR-00018907.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies about multiple occasions where he accompanied a woman named Carolyn to Jeffrey Epstein's house, waiting outside for over an hour while she went inside and came out with hundred-dollar bills. Shawn also recounts his single, brief meeting with Epstein in the driveway of the house.
DOJ-OGR-00018904.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Shawn, filed on August 10, 2022. Shawn testifies about his past relationship with a woman named Carolyn, stating they visited Jeffrey Epstein's house in Palm Beach about every two weeks. He indicates that Carolyn stopped visiting when they moved to Georgia, at which time she was sixteen, and that their relationship ended in 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00018903.jpg
This document is page 41 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies about accompanying Virginia and Carolyn to Jeffrey Epstein's home in Palm Beach, describing the house as originally pink and later white. The witness states they waited outside while Virginia and Carolyn went inside for over an hour, emerging with money in hundred dollar bills.
DOJ-OGR-00018902.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. The witness identifies the location of Jeffrey Epstein's house as El Brillo Way on Palm Beach Island and contrasts the affluence of Palm Beach with West Palm Beach, where they lived. The witness explains they rarely visited Palm Beach because they lacked money.
DOJ-OGR-00018901.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies that he was present when a woman named Virginia recruited another woman, Carolyn, to perform massages for Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach for 'a couple hundred dollars'. Shawn confirms that Carolyn accepted and that he, Carolyn, Virginia, and a man named Tony all went to Jeffrey Epstein's house together.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity