Palm Beach

Location
Mentions
1467
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
723
Also known as:
West-Palm Beach PALM BEACH NC Palm Beach Mall 358 EL BR LLO WAY, PALM BEACH FL 33480 US 515 N. Flagler Drive, #300-Pavilion, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Centurion Tower, Suite 1110, 1601 Forum Place, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 3400 S OCEAN BLVD, Palm Beach 126 S OCEAN BLVD, Palm Beach Palm Beach PD

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00030610.jpg

This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, sworn by Det. Joe Recarey on May 1, 2006, details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines evidence against Haley Robson for recruiting underage girls, including a recorded statement where she compares herself to 'Heidi Fleiss'. The document also describes interviews with two minors, JS and another unnamed girl, who were brought to Epstein's residence or another house by Robson.

Probable cause affidavit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030606.jpg

This document is a Probable Cause Affidavit filed by the Palm Beach Police Department charging Sarah Kellen with multiple counts related to unlawful sexual activity with a minor. It details an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's residence where minors, allegedly recruited by Haley Robson, were brought to perform massages that escalated into sexual acts. The affidavit specifically cites the testimony of a fourteen-year-old victim identified as "SG."

Probable cause affidavit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030604.jpg

This document is a 'Request for Warrant' from the Palm Beach Police Department regarding defendant Sarah Kellen, dated May 1, 2006. The lead officer is Detective Joe Recarey (ID #7915), investigating case number 05-368 (2). Handwritten notes indicate that the witness/evidence list, criminal history, and property receipt were previously given to Assistant State Attorney (ASA) Belohlavek.

Request for warrant / police form
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030543.jpg

This legal document describes a scheme allegedly orchestrated by Epstein to procure underage girls for sexual exploitation. It details the roles of his associates, Ms. Robson as a recruiter and Sarah Kellen as an assistant, in targeting economically disadvantaged girls. The document provides a specific account of a victim, Jane Doe, being brought to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion where she was instructed by Epstein to remove her clothes.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022309.jpg

This document is a page (labeled 24) from a redacted address book or contact list, released by the DOJ. It lists individuals alphabetically, predominantly with surnames starting with 'F', including members of the Ferragamo family, actor Ralph Fiennes, musician Brian Ferry, and Princess Firyal. All contact details (phone numbers/addresses) beneath the names have been redacted with black boxes. Faint index tabs at the top suggest sections for 'New York' and 'Palm Beach'.

Contact list / address book page
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00022052.jpg

A Washington Examiner article filed as a court document reporting Attorney General William Barr's announcement of a DOJ Inspector General investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The article details the timeline of Epstein being found unresponsive in the Manhattan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit on the morning of August 10, 2019, and notes an ongoing FBI inquiry. It also references the 14-page indictment regarding Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes between 2002 and 2005.

News article / court exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021901.jpg

This legal document, page 24 of a court filing dated December 2, 2024, discusses the legal standards for reviewing a court sentence for procedural and substantive reasonableness. It specifically addresses a finding by the District Court that Maxwell supervised her assistant, Sarah Kellen, which was based on testimony from two of Epstein's pilots. This testimony was deemed credible and corroborated by other testimony describing Maxwell as Epstein's 'number two and the lady of the house' in Palm Beach.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021871.jpg

This legal document, a page from a court filing, discusses the standards for reviewing a sentence for procedural and substantive reasonableness. It specifically addresses a sentencing enhancement for Maxwell, arguing that the District Court correctly found she had a leadership role based on testimony from two of Epstein's pilots. The pilots testified that Sarah Kellen was Maxwell's assistant, which was corroborated by other testimony describing Maxwell as Epstein's "number two and the lady of the house" in Palm Beach.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021737.jpg

This legal document, part of an appeal, outlines the court's findings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's supervisory role over Sarah Kellen. It cites testimony from Epstein's pilots and evidence from trial, such as flight logs and Kellen's scheduling of illicit massages under Maxwell's direction, to affirm that Maxwell led Kellen. The document dismisses Maxwell's argument that another person was her assistant, emphasizing that the key issue was Maxwell's exercise of authority over Kellen, not formal job titles.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021668.jpg

This page from a 2023 court filing details the sexual abuse of two victims, 'Kate' and Annie Farmer. It describes how Ghislaine Maxwell facilitated Epstein's abuse of Kate in Palm Beach by providing a schoolgirl outfit and normalizing the encounter, and how Epstein groomed Annie Farmer at his Manhattan townhouse before she was sent to his New Mexico ranch in 1996.

Court filing / appellate brief (case 22-1426)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021665.jpg

This legal document, dated June 29, 2023, outlines the methods used by Maxwell and Epstein to sexually abuse young girls in a conspiracy spanning from 1994 to 2004. The scheme is described in two phases: an early phase (1994-2001) focused on grooming and isolation, and a later phase (2001-2004) involving a recruitment stream of girls paid to visit Epstein's Palm Beach residence. The document also cites expert trial testimony from Dr. Lisa Rocchio, who characterized these actions as 'textbook methods of child predators.'

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021664.jpg

This legal document describes the close personal and financial relationship between Maxwell and Epstein over more than a decade, highlighting their shared lavish lifestyle across multiple properties. It details Maxwell's role as supervisor of Epstein's households, where she imposed strict rules on staff to create a 'culture of silence' to protect their criminal activities. A key example is her directive to a manager, Juan Alessi, on how to interact with Epstein, underscoring her authority and the secretive nature of the household operations.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021554.jpg

This legal document, dated June 29, 2023, details a court's decision to overrule objections in Case 22-1426. The objections concerned the defendant's identification and isolation of minor girls, and a scheme developed by the defendant and Epstein to recruit girls for sexualized massages. The court found that trial evidence and testimony from witnesses like Annie and Jane supported the existence of this recruitment scheme, which involved a chain of recruitment from the defendant to Virginia, then to Carolyn, and further to Carolyn's friends.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021491.jpg

This document is a page from a Department of Justice report detailing the sources of information for an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein case. OPR gathered records from U.S. Attorney's Offices in Florida and Georgia, as well as public records from Florida law enforcement agencies. The investigation also involved extensive interviews with subjects, and over 60 witnesses, including former high-ranking DOJ officials like Mark Filip and Alice Fisher, and communications with attorneys for Epstein's victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021490.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing detailing an investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) into a significant gap in the email records of an individual named Acosta, specifically from May 2007 to April 2008. The investigation, which was related to the Epstein case, involved questioning witnesses and analyzing data from multiple U.S. Attorney's Offices, the FBI, and other Justice Department divisions. OPR concluded that the email gap was most likely due to a technological error rather than an intentional act to conceal evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021417.jpg

This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing internal communications within the USAO and negotiations with Epstein's defense team in December 2007. It highlights the conflict regarding victim notification, with prosecutor Villafaña expressing frustration about a 'Catch 22' situation where she felt unable to notify victims or file federal charges. The text also details draft letters sent to US Attorney Acosta and State Attorney Krischer, and meetings with defense attorneys Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz attempting to limit federal involvement.

Doj office of professional responsibility (opr) report / legal filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021342.jpg

This page from a DOJ OPR report concludes that there was no evidence that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) or the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein was influenced by bribes, corruption, or his wealth and status. It notes that while Epstein was not initially well-known to the FBI agents or prosecutors in 2006, press coverage in July 2006 alerted them to his high-profile connections, including Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Kevin Spacey. An FBI agent is quoted acknowledging they knew who had been on Epstein's plane.

Department of justice opr report
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021303.jpg

This page from a DOJ OPR report details the internal Department review between February and June 2008 regarding the Epstein case. It highlights that while Epstein's defense sought a broad review of misconduct and NPA terms, the DOJ only reviewed federal jurisdiction issues. The document also records a 'stand down' order where Oosterbaan instructed a CEOS attorney to cease involvement, and details the formal notification sent by the USAO to the Civil Rights Division classifying the case as 'child prostitution' rather than a matter of 'national interest.'

Government report (department of justice/opr report)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021290.jpg

This document describes the conflicting accounts surrounding a breakfast meeting between prosecutor Acosta and Epstein's attorney, Lefkowitz. A letter from Lefkowitz claims Acosta promised the USAO would not interfere with Epstein's state-level plea deal, a claim Acosta's office refuted in an unsent draft letter calling it "inaccurate." The text also details Acosta's later, differing recollections of the meeting and contrasts them with media reports that a secret deal was struck at that time.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021269.jpg

This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the 2007 plea negotiations between the US Attorney's Office (Villafaña, Sloman) and Epstein's defense (Lefkowitz). It highlights a specific email from Villafaña suggesting a Miami venue to minimize press coverage, which was later scrutinized during CVRA litigation. Crucially, it details the defense's counter-proposal to include immunity for four female assistants who facilitated Epstein's crimes, protection from immigration proceedings for two of them, and the withdrawal of legal processes seeking Epstein's computers.

Government report (likely doj opr report) filed as court exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021245.jpg

This legal document details internal conflict within the U.S. Attorney's Office regarding the prosecution of Epstein. It describes prosecutor Villafaña's unsuccessful attempt to meet with her superior, Acosta, a contentious email exchange with her colleague Menchel that was later reviewed by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and her efforts to obtain computer evidence from Epstein's home. The document highlights disagreements on strategy and procedure among the prosecutors handling the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021217.jpg

This legal document details a May 2006 meeting where the lead Palm Beach Police Department detective presented the state's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein to FBI and USAO representatives. The detective expressed concerns that pressure from Epstein's attorneys was compromising the state case and that Epstein may have been tipped off about a search warrant. The group discussed potential federal charges based on Epstein's use of a private plane for interstate travel with suspected underage girls, though evidence was not yet firm.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021213.jpg

This document details allegations and police findings regarding Jeffrey Epstein's conduct, describing how he and his assistants recruited underage girls for massages that often escalated to sexual acts. It outlines the specific patterns of these encounters, the payment structure, the recruitment of other victims by the girls themselves, and the initiation of the PBPD investigation leading to a search warrant in October 2005.

Legal case document / investigative report
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021202.jpg

This document, a page from a legal filing, outlines the organizational structure of federal law enforcement in the Southern District of Florida during a specific period. It identifies key leadership at the Department of Justice, including Attorney General Michael Mukasey, and details the jurisdiction, staffing, and office locations of the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the region. The text also notes that the FBI's West Palm Beach office handled the 'Epstein investigation'.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00021177.jpg

This executive summary details an investigation by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case in 2007-2008. It outlines the initial investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, Epstein's indictment, the referral to the FBI, and the subsequent negotiation and signing of a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Epstein, which included conditions like pleading guilty to state charges and victim compensation. The OPR investigated whether prosecutors committed misconduct by failing to consult victims or misleading them.

Report - executive summary
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity