Young
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
U.S.
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Crutchfield
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Young woman
|
Engaged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Byrne
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective Byrne
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Interviewer subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Young's Partner
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Supervisor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Crutchfield
|
Co authors researchers |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed partner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective Byrne
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Investigator subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | False rape report in Provincetown. | Provincetown, Massachusetts | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A recent trial prep session where the discussion about Ms. Farmer wearing the seized boots occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | An interview with Jane, attended by the witness (Young) and Jane's two attorneys. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cocktail party hosted by Maxwell | Unknown (likely Epstein's p... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cocktail party thrown by Maxwell | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Aseifa meetings (community meetings) where the narrator raised questions about worker compensation. | Mishmar Hasharon | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony | Southern District Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Direct examination | A direct examination of a witness named Young regarding the nature of interview summaries (302s) ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Interview | The witness, Young, interviewed another witness, Annie Farmer, on multiple occasions. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Young regarding the seizure of boots and a trial prep session. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A redirect examination of a witness named Young regarding FBI protocols for recording interviews. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | A direct examination of witness Young by Ms. Menninger took place as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing of transcript for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Young regarding the process of creating 302 documents from intervie... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceedings: Cross-examination of witness Young, followed by a request for a sidebar/approa... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court hearing/Cross-examination of witness Young | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Direct examination of witness Young. | Court | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Interview | An interview with the witness (Young) took place, which resulted in a typewritten report authored... | N/A | View |
| 2019-10-03 | N/A | Drafting of an interview report. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-19 | Note-taking | Handwritten notes were taken, which later formed the basis for a typewritten report. | N/A | View |
| 2019-09-19 | Note taking | The witness (Young) took a handwritten note. | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Interview | An interview with the witness (Young) took place, which was written up by Detective Byrne. | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Interviews | A series of interviews began in September 2019 and continued until days before a trial. | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Interview | An interview with a person named Jane was conducted, which was later documented in a report. | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Report preparation | A typewritten FBI 302 report was prepared from handwritten notes. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016800.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. The testimony features witness Young being questioned by Ms. Menninger regarding the timeline of drafting and filing a specific report in late 2019. The Judge intervenes to ensure a specific name is not mentioned in open court, instructing the attorney to use the pseudonym 'Jane' instead.
DOJ-OGR-00016799.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Young, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness confirms their involvement in creating an FBI 302 report based on handwritten notes from September 19th, with the final report being typed in December 2019. The witness reads a line from the report into the record: "GM walked by with dog. JE came up to meet her."
DOJ-OGR-00016798.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Young. The witness confirms participating in a series of interviews starting in September 2019, which were also attended by U.S. Attorneys and Detective Byrnes. The questioning focuses on the creation of handwritten and typewritten notes from these interviews, with the witness identifying a specific note they wrote on September 19, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00016797.jpg
This page contains court testimony from a witness named Young (likely law enforcement) during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The questioning focuses on previous testimony by Ms. Farmer regarding 'reclaiming' a pair of boots in 2006, and whether Young documented this specific detail in a report during trial prep interviews. The dialogue also establishes that Young conducted multiple interviews with a victim referred to as 'Jane' alongside a partner, Detective Byrnes, and prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00016796.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding the date some boots were obtained. The witness is unable to recall the specific date but confirms it happened sometime during that year, before the fall.
DOJ-OGR-00016795.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Young, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning establishes that interview records (302s) are summaries, not verbatim transcripts, and were not audio or video recorded. The focus then shifts to interviews the witness conducted with another witness, Annie Farmer, concerning her testimony about a pair of boots, and confirms that the defense had subpoenaed these boots earlier in the year.
DOJ-OGR-00016794.jpg
This court transcript page, dated August 10, 2022, details the direct examination of a witness named Young. Young explains the procedure for creating FBI Form 302s, stating that they and their partner, Detective Byrnes, take accurate notes during interviews and later compile them into a summary document. The witness confirms that a 302 is an accurate summary of an interview, not a verbatim transcript, and that both partners review the document before it is finalized.
DOJ-OGR-00002959.jpg
This document is page xxiv of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities, listing numerous legal case citations with corresponding page numbers where they are referenced within the larger document. The majority of the cases listed involve the United States as a party against various individuals and one corporation.
DOJ-OGR-00005814.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for the admissibility of expert testimony from Dr. Rocchio regarding delayed disclosure in sexual abuse cases. It cites several legal precedents (Raniere, Young, Betcher) to demonstrate that such testimony is helpful for juries to understand victim behavior. The document also addresses the defendant's specific challenge that Dr. Rocchio is not an expert on memory in general, with the Government conceding that point but affirming her expertise in the relevant field of trauma psychology.
DOJ-OGR-00005772.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Document 395) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. The text presents legal arguments citing various case precedents to contend that the prosecution and the Court should not refer to accusers as 'victims' or 'minor victims.' The filing argues that such terminology improperly influences the jury, implies guilt before a verdict, and specifically prejudices the charge regarding whether Maxwell knew the accusers were underage.
DOJ-OGR-00005771.jpg
This legal document, page 6 of a court filing from October 29, 2021, argues against the government's use of the term "victim" to refer to accusers in a trial. It cites numerous legal precedents from various state and federal courts to support the position that such language is improper and prejudicial, especially when the commission of a crime is in dispute. The document concludes by emphasizing the special role of a prosecutor to act impartially and seek justice, rather than simply to secure a conviction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031720.jpg
A document page, stamped with a House Oversight production number, containing a geopolitical analysis or draft op-ed. The text discusses the destabilizing influence of Iran's Revolutionary Guard and argues that the US should support a new generation of young leaders in the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia to foster stability and economic development similar to the Asian 'Tiger Economies'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017336.jpg
A page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text, written in the first person by an experienced defense attorney (likely Alan Dershowitz given the context of Tyson/DSK analysis), compares the evidence in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Mike Tyson cases, arguing the DSK case was stronger despite being dropped. The author then recounts a specific anecdote from early in their career in Provincetown, MA, where a man falsely accused a 'black man wearing a shark tooth' of rape to cover up a consensual homosexual encounter from his fiancé.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013747.jpg
This document is page 247 of a larger file (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013747), containing the text of a scientific paper regarding neuroscience, specifically focusing on dynamical entropy, EEG signals, and brain complexity. It discusses clinical implications for Alzheimer's and epilepsy, citing various researchers including Mandell, Russo, and Inouye. No direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or financial transactions appears on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013744.jpg
This document appears to be page 244 of a scientific paper or textbook included in a House Oversight document production (likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation). The text discusses technical definitions of 'algorithmic complexity' and 'lexical complexity' within the fields of neuroscience, psychotherapy, and computer algorithms, citing various researchers. There is no direct mention of Epstein, financial transactions, or flight logs on this specific page; it likely relates to scientific research Epstein may have funded or been interested in.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022378.jpg
This document provides a profile of the U.S. House of Representatives following the 2016 election. It discusses the Republican party's mandate after retaining control of the House and winning the White House, and outlines the upcoming internal party processes for selecting leadership and committee assignments. The brief specifically details the leadership and membership outlook for three key committees: Ways and Means, Energy & Commerce, and Education & the Workforce, noting retirements, open seats, and potential new chairs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022304.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) rules regarding an employer's failure to post employee rights notices. It discusses why this failure is an unfair labor practice and justifies the equitable tolling of the six-month statute of limitations for filing charges when required notices are not posted. Despite the prompt's framing, the document's content is entirely about U.S. labor law and has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein; the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022304' is a Bates number, likely indicating it was an exhibit in a congressional document production.
Reclaiming/Wearing boots
Discussion about wearing/reclaiming boots.
Investigation
Multiple interviews conducted.
Interview notes
A typewritten report prepared by the witness (Young) in December 2019, based on handwritten notes from an interview on September 19th.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity