Congress
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
President Johnson
|
Political opposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
President Grant
|
Separation of powers |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Chinese government
|
Target of influence operation |
7
|
1 | |
|
location
Taiwan
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
US congressional delegations
|
Visitor host |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Lobbying |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jimmy Carter
|
Governmental executive legislative communication |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
|
Delegation of authority |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
President Obama
|
Political adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Administration
|
Political alignment on china policy |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Chinese government
|
Target of influence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Orrin G. Hatch
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John D. Rockefeller IV
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christine C. Quin
|
Guest of honor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Carter
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Wilson
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Eisenhower
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Institutional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Grant
|
Constitutional opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President (Executive Branch)
|
Constitutional separation of powers |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The 'Blueprint' for tax reform was released by House Republicans shortly before Congress left for... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US Election (Trump and Republican Congress win) | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The 'fiscal cliff', a pending crisis involving the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts and automatic ... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Passage of the Tenure of Office Act over President Johnson's veto. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Tenure of Office Act was passed over President Johnson's veto. This act placed restrictions o... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | The fiscal year for which the Trump administration's first budget proposal and congressional budg... | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | US Congress is in the midst of a major reevaluation of the American policy of 'engagement' with C... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Expected timeframe for a focus on tax reform. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Chinese government used various entities (CCP, CAIFU, CAIFC) and individuals (Jimmy Wong) to ... | China, United States | View |
| 2018-03-05 | N/A | Start of the Party Congress session to change the Constitution and lift term limits. | China | View |
| 2018-03-01 | N/A | Meeting of the National People's Congress | China | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | The House China Working Group remained active, while the House Congressional China Caucus and the... | United States | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | The US Congress unanimously passed the Taiwan Travel Act, which encourages the Trump administrati... | United States | View |
| 2017-01-01 | N/A | Year in which trade legislative issues were expected to figure prominently under the new administ... | United States | View |
| 2016-10-01 | N/A | Passage of the 9/11 Saudi bill | USA | View |
| 2016-09-01 | N/A | US Congress passed JASTA legislation overriding Presidential veto. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2016-02-01 | N/A | Congress approved a customs reauthorization measure that made the Internet Tax Freedom Act perman... | United States | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | 2016 lame-duck session of Congress, during which the fate of tax extenders would be decided. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Passage of the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) through Congress. | United States | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | A bipartisan vote in Congress extended the Community Health Center Fund for two additional years ... | United States | View |
| 2014-02-13 | N/A | Military Times reported that the NSA informed Congress that Snowden had copied a co-worker's pass... | N/A | View |
| 2013-01-02 | N/A | Enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA), which made permanent most of the tr... | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017715.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2005 law review article by Paul G. Cassell titled 'Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure'. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) of 2004 and proposes amendments to federal rules to better integrate victims into criminal proceedings. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' in the footer, suggesting it is part of a production related to congressional oversight, likely involving the Epstein case where the CVRA was a central legal issue.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017713.jpg
This document is the final page (78 of 78) of a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the legislative landscape of crime victims' rights, specifically mentioning Senator Kyl's bill and the potential need for a Constitutional amendment. It argues that Congress will likely intervene if the Advisory Committee fails to reform the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to protect victims. The document is stamped as a House Oversight exhibit (017713) and lists the name David Schoen at the bottom.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704.jpg
This document is page 69 of 78 from a House Oversight Committee file (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017704) associated with attorney David Schoen. It contains an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing 'Rule 60. Victim's Rights,' specifically regarding enforcement, limitations on relief, and the inability to request a new trial based on rights violations. The text includes a discussion section criticizing the Advisory Committee for deviating from the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in ways that reduce victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017703.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen, which cites a 2007 Utah Law Review article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues for a broad interpretation of a victim's right to be heard in court proceedings, citing legislative history from Senators Feinstein and Kyl. It proposes a new rule (Rule 60(b)) regarding the enforcement of victims' rights and preserving claimed error.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017698.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It argues for rules allowing closed-circuit transmission of proceedings for victims (citing the Oklahoma City bombing case) and mandating victim notification. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional inquiry, likely related to the handling of victims' rights in the Jeffrey Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 58 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the legal rights of crime victims, specifically the appointment of counsel and the right to be heard regarding a defendant's release. It cites the case *United States v. Stamper* and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The document bears the name David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence or background material in a congressional investigation, likely related to the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case given Schoen's involvement as Epstein's lawyer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017688.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 53 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims should have the right to be heard on disputed sentencing issues and criticizes the Advisory Committee for not explicitly granting this right. The document was likely submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee as part of an investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017687.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely submitted as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims should have independent access to presentence reports and criticizes the Advisory Committee's view that prosecutors should control the flow of information to victims. The document bears the name of David Schoen, a known attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting this legal argument was used to advocate for victims' rights or, paradoxically, was part of the defense's legal research files regarding CVRA interpretations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017685.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, signed or submitted by attorney David Schoen, which excerpts a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text argues that victims have a broad right to be heard during sentencing proceedings, including the right to review presentence reports and make sentencing recommendations regarding Federal Sentencing Guidelines. It cites legislative history from Senators Kyl and Feinstein to support the argument that victims should be able to provide information influencing the sentence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017680.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 45 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It details a disagreement between Judge Cassell and an Advisory Committee regarding whether victims should have the right to be heard during legal proceedings involving case transfers. The text argues that victims' views should be considered to satisfy the 'fairness' mandate of the CVRA. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017669.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 34 of 78 in the production) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Rule 17 subpoenas. The text argues that victim privacy and dignity interests should subordinate defense strategy interests, criticizing the Advisory Committee's notes on ex parte procedures. The document bears the name David Schoen (a known attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017649.jpg
This document is page 14 of a 78-page excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues for amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 1 and Rule 11) to align with the CVRA, quoting Senators Feinstein and Kyl on the Act's intent to reform the legal culture surrounding victims' rights. The document bears a footer for attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case (where the CVRA was a central legal issue).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017645.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 874) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critically analyzes the 'Advisory Committee's' narrow interpretation of the Act, contrasting it with the broad legislative intent expressed by Senators Kyl and Feinstein to ensure victims are treated with fairness and due process. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee from the files of David Schoen, a lawyer known for representing Jeffrey Epstein, likely relevant to arguments regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017644.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal text (excerpted from the 2007 Utah Law Review) arguing for the substantive rights of crime victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Advisory Committee for failing to fully implement congressional intent regarding fairness for victims and lists eight specific rights granted by the CVRA. The document bears a footer for 'David Schoen' and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence or background material in a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017643.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely written by Paul Cassell, though he is referred to in the third person in one section) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It critiques the Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules for acting 'timidly' by not expanding victim rights beyond the strict statutory language of the CVRA. The document contains a footer indicating it was produced by attorney David Schoen (who represented Jeffrey Epstein) to the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of an investigation into the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017642.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, likely authored by Paul Cassell, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to integrate victim rights. It details the author's submission of twenty-eight changes to the Advisory Committee in 2005 and the subsequent limited adoption of these changes by a subcommittee chaired by Judge James Jones. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) analyzing the history of federal victims' rights legislation. It details the failure of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act, attributing its ineffectiveness to poor codification (Title 42 vs Title 18) and its omission from West Publishing's legal guides, citing the Oklahoma City bombing case as a key example. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp and the name of David Schoen, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, suggesting it was part of a legal production regarding the CVRA, a statute central to the controversy surrounding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017636.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2007 Utah Law Review article by Paul G. Cassell regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are insufficient to protect victims. The document was likely produced by attorney David Schoen (whose name appears in the footer) to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017636'. This is relevant to the Epstein case as the CVRA was the central statute invoked regarding the failure to notify victims of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017633.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) arguing that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) applies to the pre-charging phase of criminal investigations. It criticizes the Department of Justice's restrictive interpretation of the law and cites various state statutes (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan) as evidence of a legal trend toward early victim notification. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as evidence or legal argument in a congressional investigation, likely regarding the handling of the Epstein case and the failure to notify victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017625.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (likely submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee) citing a law review article (104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology). It presents a legal argument regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victims' rights should 'attach' during the investigative phase before formal charges are filed. It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) opposition to this view and cites the case *United States v. Rubin* (2008) to define the logical limits of when these rights begin.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017622.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal text (likely a law review article or legal memorandum by David Schoen) produced to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memo, arguing that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before criminal charges are filed to prevent 'secondary victimization.' The text specifically cites the 'Epstein case' (Does v. United States, S.D. Fla. 2011) as a legal precedent where the court ruled that the CVRA contemplates pre-charge application.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017620.jpg
This document is a page from a legal journal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It critiques the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that the OLC ignored Senator Kyl's intent that victim rights apply before charges are filed. The text specifically cites the 'Epstein case' as a notable example where the OLC's interpretation allowed a non-prosecution agreement to nullify victims' rights to be heard.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017618.jpg
This document is a page from a legal article (104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology) submitted to the House Oversight Committee, likely by attorney David Schoen. It presents a legal argument criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) memorandum for interpreting the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) too narrowly, specifically arguing that victim rights should extend to the pre-charging phase. The text cites various statutes (VRRA) and case law to support the claim that victims have rights to protection and conference with the government before formal charges are filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017616.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing authored by David Schoen (likely representing victims in the Epstein case), produced to the House Oversight Committee. It presents a legal argument contrasting the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA) with the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), arguing that the Justice Department is obligated to recognize and inform victims as soon as an investigation opens, not just after formal charges are filed. It criticizes a 2011 Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum that attempted to limit these protections for victims of uncharged conduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017611.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal journal article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victim rights should apply before formal charges are filed. It uses the Jeffrey Epstein case as a primary example of failure in the system, noting that federal prosecutors negotiated a secret non-prosecution agreement with Epstein that barred federal charges for sex offenses against dozens of victims without informing them. The text highlights the outrage of victims 'Jane Doe Number One' and 'Jane Doe Number Two' upon discovering their rights to object had been bargained away secretly.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity