| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
President Johnson
|
Political opposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
President Grant
|
Separation of powers |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Chinese government
|
Target of influence operation |
7
|
1 | |
|
location
Taiwan
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
US congressional delegations
|
Visitor host |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
MIT
|
Lobbying |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jimmy Carter
|
Governmental executive legislative communication |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
|
Delegation of authority |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
President Obama
|
Political adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Administration
|
Political alignment on china policy |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Chinese government
|
Target of influence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Senator Orrin G. Hatch
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John D. Rockefeller IV
|
Correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Justice (DOJ)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christine C. Quin
|
Guest of honor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Carter
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Wilson
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Eisenhower
|
Executive legislative conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Institutional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Grant
|
Constitutional opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President (Executive Branch)
|
Constitutional separation of powers |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The 'Blueprint' for tax reform was released by House Republicans shortly before Congress left for... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US Election (Trump and Republican Congress win) | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's formal opposition to Sections 234 and 236 of a piece of proposed legi... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned discussions between the Administration (DHS, DOJ, HHS) and Congress regarding policies fo... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The 'fiscal cliff', a pending crisis involving the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts and automatic ... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ objection to Section 107(a) of an Act, which would limit a country's time on the Tier II Watc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Passage of the Tenure of Office Act over President Johnson's veto. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Tenure of Office Act was passed over President Johnson's veto. This act placed restrictions o... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | The fiscal year for which the Trump administration's first budget proposal and congressional budg... | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | US Congress is in the midst of a major reevaluation of the American policy of 'engagement' with C... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Expected timeframe for a focus on tax reform. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Chinese government used various entities (CCP, CAIFU, CAIFC) and individuals (Jimmy Wong) to ... | China, United States | View |
| 2018-03-05 | N/A | Start of the Party Congress session to change the Constitution and lift term limits. | China | View |
| 2018-03-01 | N/A | Meeting of the National People's Congress | China | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | The House China Working Group remained active, while the House Congressional China Caucus and the... | United States | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | The US Congress unanimously passed the Taiwan Travel Act, which encourages the Trump administrati... | United States | View |
| 2017-01-01 | N/A | Year in which trade legislative issues were expected to figure prominently under the new administ... | United States | View |
| 2016-10-01 | N/A | Passage of the 9/11 Saudi bill | USA | View |
| 2016-09-01 | N/A | US Congress passed JASTA legislation overriding Presidential veto. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2016-02-01 | N/A | Congress approved a customs reauthorization measure that made the Internet Tax Freedom Act perman... | United States | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | 2016 lame-duck session of Congress, during which the fate of tax extenders would be decided. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Passage of the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) through Congress. | United States | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | A bipartisan vote in Congress extended the Community Health Center Fund for two additional years ... | United States | View |
| 2014-02-13 | N/A | Military Times reported that the NSA informed Congress that Snowden had copied a co-worker's pass... | N/A | View |
| 2013-01-02 | N/A | Enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA), which made permanent most of the tr... | United States | View |
An email thread from May 30, 2019, between 'J' (Jeffrey Epstein) and author Michael Wolff. Epstein connects a Russian oligarch (implied Rybolovlev) who bought a Palm Beach property to the sale of a $450 million painting to MBS, suggesting the painting was actually worth only $1.5 million and referencing Trump's actions regarding Yemen as part of a broader conspiracy or payoff scheme.
An email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein (J) and journalist Michael Wolff from May 30, 2019. The conversation speculates on a conspiracy involving the sale of the 'Salvator Mundi' painting, linking Russian oligarch Rybolovlev (who bought Trump's Palm Beach house) to a $450 million sale to MBS. The thread implies these transactions might be connected to Trump's veto regarding Yemen.
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from the law firm Covington to Senators Richard Burr and Mark Warner regarding General Michael Flynn. It argues that General Flynn is exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege to decline a Congressional subpoena for documents, citing that the act of production is testimonial in nature and could be used against him in ongoing investigations, including one by a newly appointed special counsel. The document cites legal precedents including *Watkins v. United States* and *United States v. Hubbell* to support the refusal.
An email chain from October 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein and Landon Thomas Jr. (likely a journalist). They discuss Saudi Arabian financial movements, specifically the withdrawal of billions (potentially $200B by SAMA) from US funds and BlackRock. Epstein provides geopolitical analysis, discussing the fragmentation of power in the US and Saudi Arabia, the impact of social media on class inequality, and asserts that Donald Trump has 'tapped in' to public anger. The final email in the chain sends a link to a Guardian article about Trump sexual assault lawsuits.
An email thread from October 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist Landon Thomas Jr. (likely NYT). Thomas seeks Epstein's insight for an investigation into the Saudi Royal Family's finances affected by low oil prices and potential withdrawals of funds (specifically mentioning $200 billion from SAMA and BlackRock). Epstein provides geopolitical analysis regarding US power structures, the 9/11 bill, and the Saudi leadership, while claiming most Saudi money is locked in private equity funds.
An email chain from October 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist Landon Thomas Jr. regarding a New York Times investigation into the finances of the Saudi Royal family amidst falling oil prices. Epstein provides a geopolitical analysis of US power structures and Saudi internal dynamics, mentions Donald Trump, and discusses the liquidity of Saudi investments in private equity. Notably, Thomas concludes his initial inquiry by asking Epstein if a previous story he wrote could facilitate a meeting with Bill Gates.
An email exchange from October 2016 between NYT reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein. Thomas seeks Epstein's help with an investigation into Saudi Royal Family finances and liquidations. Epstein provides geopolitical analysis regarding the US government and the Saudi monarchy. Notably, Thomas concludes his initial email by asking Epstein if a previous story he wrote could secure him a meeting with Bill Gates.
This document appears to be a page from a political analysis or news article discussing Narendra Modi's rise to power in India, comparing India's aspirations to China, Europe, and America. It details the demographic shifts in the Indian electorate, the defeat of the Congress party, and Modi's record in Gujarat. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document analyzes the results of an Indian election, highlighting the BJP's efficient conversion of votes into seats and superior campaign strategy compared to the Congress party's Rahul Gandhi. It discusses the resignation of Bihar's Chief Minister Nitish Kumar following the BJP's dominance and examines the role of caste and religious politics in the election, despite Mr. Modi's claims of transcending them.
This document contains an article from The Economist discussing the historic 2014 Indian general election results, highlighting Narendra Modi's landslide victory and the significant defeat of the Congress party. It analyzes the political landscape shift, referring to the event as the beginning of "The Modi era," and touches on voter dissatisfaction with the previous leadership.
An email chain from May 30, 2019, between Michael Wolff and 'J' (likely Jeffrey Epstein via jeevacation@gmail.com). They discuss a theory connecting a Russian individual who bought a Palm Beach property (presumably from Trump) to the sale of a painting to MBS for $450 million. The conversation speculates on whether these transactions represent a payoff, linking it to Trump overruling Congress on Yemen.
An email thread from October 2016 between Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein discussing Saudi Arabian financial movements (specifically SAMA withdrawals and BlackRock). Thomas asks for Epstein's take on a rumored $200 billion withdrawal. Epstein offers vague geopolitical commentary on the fragmentation of US power and the Saudi Royal family. Thomas also recommends an academic contact who is critical of Bill Clinton's NATO expansion, suggesting Epstein's 'Russian friends' would like him.
An email chain from October 2016 between journalist Landon Thomas Jr. (working on a NYT investigation) and Jeffrey Epstein. They discuss Saudi Arabian financial withdrawals (specifically SAMA withdrawing $200 billion), the structure of Saudi investments in private equity versus money markets (mentioning BlackRock), and the impact of low oil prices. Epstein provides a lengthy geopolitical analysis touching on the fragmentation of US power, the Saudi Royal Family structure, wealth inequality fueling Donald Trump's rise, and the US '9/11 Saudi bill'.
An email chain from October 2016 between New York Times reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein regarding a NYT investigation into the finances of the Saudi Royal family amidst falling oil prices. Thomas asks Epstein for insights on Saudi liquidity, specifically regarding withdrawals from firms like BlackRock and a rumored $200 billion withdrawal by SAMA. Epstein provides geopolitical analysis, discussing the fragmentation of US political power, the structure of the Saudi Royal family, and the role of social media and the 9/11 bill in fueling discontent.
An email thread from October 2016 between NYT reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein. Thomas is seeking Epstein's insights for an investigation into the personal finances of the Saudi Royal family and the withdrawal of Saudi assets (specifically mentioning $200 billion). Epstein provides a geopolitical analysis involving the Saudi family structure, US politics, and social unrest. Notably, Thomas ends his initial email by asking Epstein if a previous story he wrote will earn him a meeting with Bill Gates.
An email thread between NYT reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein regarding a story on Saudi Royal family finances. Thomas asks for contacts and insights, specifically mentioning a rumor about a $200 billion withdrawal by SAMA. Epstein responds with political commentary on the US and Saudi Arabia. Notably, Thomas explicitly asks Epstein in a postscript if his previous reporting can secure him a meeting with Bill Gates.
An email exchange from October 2016 between NYT reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein. Thomas seeks Epstein's insight for an investigation into Saudi Royal family finances and specifically asks if Epstein can facilitate a meeting with Bill Gates. Epstein responds with a broad commentary on US politics, the definition of the Saudi 'Royal Family,' and the impact of wealth inequality and social media.
This document is a printout of a news article (likely from the Miami Herald) discussing legal maneuvers to reopen the criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and throw out his 2008 plea agreement. It covers the involvement of victims' attorneys requesting a review by a new jurisdiction (Pak's office), a DOJ probe into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta's conduct during the original case, and an upcoming hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents requested by the Miami Herald. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number.
In this 2009 email exchange, Jeffrey Epstein replies to Sultan Bin Sulayem, who had forwarded an article titled 'Dubai, Not Obama, is the Mideast's Best Peace Hope' by Jim Krane. Epstein asserts that he is Dubai's 'first' biggest fan and actively promotes the city-state to its detractors. The forwarded article analyzes Dubai's economic model, its pragmatic relationship with Israel and Iran, and its social freedoms compared to neighboring Arab states.
This document appears to be the conclusion of an email sent by attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It quotes a response to a newspaper editorial regarding the Epstein case and Alexander Acosta, asserting there was no evidence of federal sex trafficking offenses. The document includes a strict legal disclaimer noting the content is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs error reports to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document appears to be the footer and signature block of an email from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It contains an excerpt discussing a response by Epstein's legal team (Starr, Goldberger, Sanchez, and Weinberg) to a 'Times editorial' regarding Alexander Acosta and federal sex trafficking allegations. The document includes a link to a Miami Herald article and a strict confidentiality disclaimer noting the information is the 'property of JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and referencing the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article discussing the legal fallout and investigations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It details a DOJ investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's role in the plea deal, initiated by members of Congress including Ben Sasse and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The article also mentions a letter to the New York Times from Epstein's legal team (including Kenneth Starr) defending the original deal, and an upcoming court hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents related to Epstein's crimes.
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol 103) discussing the complexities of federal versus state jurisdiction in cases of police violence and 'excessive use of force.' It analyzes the high 'mens rea' standard required for federal prosecution and compares the US system to those of Germany, Canada, and Australia. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional inquiry, possibly related to arguments about federal jurisdiction or deaths in custody.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes the lack of federal jurisdiction overlap in sexual assault cases compared to public corruption, noting that federal law usually only applies in specific instances like human trafficking or crimes on federal property. The footnotes extensively cite the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)) and various state constitutions regarding a victim's right to confer with the prosecution, a legal issue relevant to the handling of the Epstein case.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity