THE COURT
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00018225.jpg
This document is page 124 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey questions witness Mr. Parkinson about photographic exhibits (GX 264-267) depicting various angles of a kitchen containing an island with books and appliances. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, offers no objection to the exhibits, which are subsequently admitted by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00018223.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson by Ms. Comey. Parkinson testifies about the conclusion of a search conducted on October 20, 2005, stating that he filmed the property to prove no damage was done by the police. He further testifies that all evidence seized by the Palm Beach Police Department was transported to their headquarters and subsequently transferred to the FBI.
DOJ-OGR-00018219.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The court admits Government Exhibits 201 through 222 into evidence, and Ms. Comey proceeds to question Mr. Parkinson about the contents of specific exhibits (202, 206, 209), which depict various parts of a property including a driveway, garage, patio, and garden room.
DOJ-OGR-00018214.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, Mr. Parkinson. Under questioning by Ms. Comey, Parkinson identifies Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph and recounts his personal observations of a residence at 358 El Brillo Way in 2003, suggesting a non-forced entry was made through an unlocked door.
DOJ-OGR-00018212.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Parkinson. He identifies Government Exhibit 721 as an aerial map of Palm Beach and West Palm Beach, specifically confirming it depicts the area around 358 El Brillo Way. After no objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, the court admits the map into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018208.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of the direct examination of Gregory Parkinson, a retired police officer, who has been called as a witness by the Government. After being sworn in, Parkinson states his name and describes his current work mentoring individuals in crime scene investigation, under questioning from Ms. Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00018207.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines witness Mr. Alessi, who confirms he believed the people providing massages to Epstein were of age. Alessi also testifies that he saw 'hundreds of guests' at Epstein's house but does not recall a specific person named Carolyn. Following the cross-examination, Ms. Comey declines redirect, and Alessi is excused.
DOJ-OGR-00018206.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, regarding his time working for Mr. Epstein. The questioning focuses on the number and age of women present at a house, with the questioner suggesting they were hired for massages and the witness insisting they were guests. The witness confirms his belief that the women were over 20, and an objection is sustained regarding a question about their "proper age."
DOJ-OGR-00018200.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies about his role working for Mr. Epstein, stating he was a driver and was not allowed in the room when Epstein conversed with guests. He confirms driving Ms. Maxwell to massage places and being at The Breakers to find a professional masseuse for Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018193.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies that his job was to make phone calls to arrange appointments for Mr. Epstein based on direct instructions from Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, or office secretaries, and that he never sought out massage therapists on his own. He also confirms that most of the massage therapists came from spas or clubs.
DOJ-OGR-00018192.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding a statement Mr. Alessi made under oath in 2016. The questioning centers on whether Mr. Alessi had previously testified that friends of a Mr. Epstein would recommend women for massages and provide their contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00018191.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Alessi admits to having a list of massage therapists for Mr. Epstein but denies ever personally calling one to come to the house. The transcript also records procedural interactions between the attorneys (Pagliuca and Ms. Comey) and the judge.
DOJ-OGR-00018190.jpg
This page contains the cross-examination of Juan Alessi during the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Pagliuca asks Alessi if he ever called The Breakers, Mar-a-Lago, or Boca Raton resort to find massage therapists for Jeffrey Epstein, to which Alessi replies 'Never.' The rest of the page involves procedural discussions regarding the admissibility of prior deposition testimony for impeachment purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00018189.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The discussion involves procedural arguments with the judge and another attorney, Ms. Comey, about referencing prior testimony. The page ends with Mr. Pagliuca asking Mr. Alessi if he would call resorts like The Breakers or Mar-a-Lago to find someone to deliver a message to Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018188.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness Alessi (Juan Alessi). The testimony focuses on Alessi driving a woman (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) to exclusive spas and country clubs in Palm Beach, including The Breakers, allegedly for the purpose of 'recruiting.' Alessi admits to keeping a Rolodex containing the names of 'repeat woman' and 'massage therapists' who visited the house.
DOJ-OGR-00018187.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of John Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on Alessi's role in driving an English woman (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) to various spas and massage schools between Jupiter and Boca Raton, Florida, for the purpose of recruiting young women. Alessi confirms he made lists of locations and drove, but states he waited in the car while she did the recruiting and denies personal involvement in recruiting or seeing 'him' (implied Epstein) doing it.
DOJ-OGR-00018186.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of Juan Alessi in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Attorney Pagliuca questions Alessi about previous deposition testimony regarding whether a specific woman was considered a massage therapist and whether Jeffrey Epstein instructed Alessi to hire licensed therapists from clubs and spas—an allegation Alessi denies. Prosecutor Ms. Comey intervenes to ensure the full context of the deposition questions is read into the record.
DOJ-OGR-00018183.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing a lawyer, Mr. Pagliuca, cross-examining a witness named Alessi. Mr. Pagliuca reads from a prior deposition where the witness was questioned by Mr. Edwards, Virginia Roberts' lawyer, about a trip to Mar-a-Lago. The testimony reveals the witness gave conflicting dates (2000 and summer 2002) for when they went to pick up Virginia Roberts from the location.
DOJ-OGR-00018182.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions Alessi about a meeting with a Ms. Roberts at Mar-a-Lago in 2001 or 2002. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, objects to the questioning method, leading to a procedural discussion before the court.
DOJ-OGR-00018181.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on Alessi confirming observing Ms. Maxwell engaging in conversation with Virginia Roberts after Maxwell received a 'treatment.' There is a brief legal dispute where Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca misreading a line from a prior deposition, which Pagliuca then corrects.
DOJ-OGR-00018178.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. The judge confirms with counsel, Ms. Comey for the government and Mr. Pagliuca, that there are no preliminary matters to discuss. The judge then instructs court staff, Ms. Williams, to bring the witness back to the stand and to bring in the jury to resume the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00018177.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the moment a recess is called. The judge dismisses the witness, Mr. Alessi, from the stand and addresses a logistical request from Ms. Williams for A/V personnel to meet with the government. After confirming with attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca that there are no other matters, the judge announces a ten-minute recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018176.jpg
Page 75 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) documenting the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi. Attorney Ms. Comey requests a full Q&A be read for the record, but cross-examining attorney Mr. Pagliuca realizes he is on the wrong page and requests a break, which the Court grants.
DOJ-OGR-00018175.jpg
In this transcript from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), witness Mr. Alessi is cross-examined by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. Alessi admits he did not follow the specific household manual or use its checkmarks, though he asserts he did his work. Pagliuca attempts to establish that a 'countess' was hired to write this manual, which Alessi claims not to know.
DOJ-OGR-00018174.jpg
In this court transcript page from the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi, the witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was considered 'the boss' and owner. The defense questions Alessi on whether Ghislaine Maxwell's instructions were understood to come directly from Epstein, to which Alessi replies he does not know. The testimony also discusses a 'household manual' and Epstein's hiring of a 'countess' to purportedly create it.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $9,500,000.00 | Value of real property offered as collateral. | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | security company | THE COURT | $1,000,000.00 | Bond co-signed by a security company. | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $550,000.00 | Cash offered as collateral. | View |
| 2021-03-23 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | THE COURT | $28,500,000.00 | Proposed total bond amount. | View |
| 2020-12-14 | Received | Sureties (Family/... | THE COURT | $0.00 | Meaningful pledges of cash or property in amoun... | View |
| 2020-07-13 | Received | Unidentified co-s... | THE COURT | $5,000,000.00 | Proposed bond amount by the defense, which the ... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Received | Co-signers (Sibli... | THE COURT | $5,000,000.00 | Proposed bond amount to secure Maxwell's appear... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Received | Defense/Co-signers | THE COURT | $3,750,000.00 | Value of real property in the United Kingdom of... | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Received | Co-signers (Sibli... | THE COURT | $5,000,000.00 | Proposed bond amount to secure appearance. | View |
| 2020-07-10 | Received | Ms. Maxwell / Ass... | THE COURT | $3,750,000.00 | Value of real property in the United Kingdom us... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | THE COURT | $22,500,000.00 | Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Received | MR. EPSTEIN | THE COURT | $0.00 | Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... | View |
| 2019-07-11 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | THE COURT | $77,000,000.00 | Valuation of Manhattan residence to be mortgage... | View |
| 2010-07-01 | Received | Epstein's counsel | THE COURT | $5,000.00 | Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. | View |
Support for David
A letter cited to show David understands that sports can teach valuable life lessons.
Support for David
A letter cited as an example of David supporting friends in their time of need, specifically during the author's pregnancy.
Ambiguous question regarding flights and sexual activity.
A note from the jury during trial that is described as 'entirely ambiguous'. The defendant argues it refers to a specific flight, but the document contends it is unclear which flight, where the sexual activity was to occur, or what question was being posed.
Adjournment of court
The judge asks counsel if there are any further matters to discuss. Both counsel respond in the negative. The judge then adjourns the court until the following day.
Scheduling of charging conference and conclusion of defen...
A verbal discussion in court between the judge and counsel for the government (Ms. Moe) and another party (Mr. Everdell) regarding the scheduling of a charging conference and estimating when the defense will rest its case.
Prohibition on Case Discussion and Media Consumption
Question 17 instructs the prospective juror to avoid all media coverage, internet searches, and discussions about the case with anyone (including family, friends, and colleagues) outside of the courtroom until their jury service is complete.
Evidence in a hearing
An affidavit from Susan Brune was put forth as evidence at a hearing.
No Subject
A note from Juror No. 1 was received, which caused Theresa Trzskoma to have doubts and start an investigation.
Ready to leave at 5:30
The judge acknowledges receiving a note from the jury stating they were ready to leave for the day at 5:30.
Adjournment of court proceedings
The document transcribes the final moments of a court session where the judge adjourns the hearing until the following morning, December 22, 2021.
Protective Order
The document references 'the Government's letter notes, see Dkt. No. 33 at 4,' which outlines the Government's position on the protective order.
Objection to recapitulation of charges
The Defendant objects to the detailed summary of the six counts, arguing it places unfair emphasis on the charges and requests that if summarized, each count be followed by a statement of Ms. Maxwell's denial and presumption of innocence.
Objection to 'Legal Principles' questions
The Government objects to the questions proposed by the defendant in the 'Legal Principles' section, claiming they are overly broad, argumentative, vague, confusing, and redundant.
Response to Government objections
The defense incorporates by reference their previous responses and objections to the Government's proposed Introduction and Charges section.
Confidentiality for Ms. Conrad's testimony
A letter submitted by Ms. Sternheim regarding Ms. Conrad's confidentiality, medical conditions, disciplinary proceedings, and intention to assert her Fifth Amendment right.
Ms. Maxwell's finances
A report by The Macalvins is mentioned as giving the Court a clear picture of Ms. Maxwell's finances.
Ms. Maxwell's finances
A redacted report is mentioned alongside the Macalvins' report as providing a clear picture of Ms. Maxwell's finances.
Unspecified question regarding the charge
A note from the jury that prompted legal arguments between the defense and the Court about proper jury instructions. The defendant argues the note shows the jury was mistaken about an element of the charge.
Basis for conviction on Count Four
Mr. Everdell refers to a note from the jury which he believes indicates they are considering convicting Ms. Maxwell based solely on travel to and from New Mexico.
Adjournment of proceedings
The court asks if counsel has any further matters. Both Ms. Moe (for the government) and Ms. Sternheim state they do not. The court then adjourns the session until the following morning.
Summary of Ms. Maxwell's conditions
An unsworn letter to the court summarizing information passed from prison guards to a prison lawyer to the prosecutor.
Schedule for sentencing and resolution of the severed per...
A joint letter from the prosecution and defense to the court regarding scheduling, referenced as Dkt. No. 574.
Limiting disclosure of identifying information
The Government filed motions (Gov't Mot. at 4-9) arguing for the protection of minor victims' identities.
Basis for a guilty verdict
The jurors sent a note asking if a defendant could be found guilty solely for aiding and abetting the flight from New Mexico, separate from the flight to New Mexico.
Request for transcripts and schedule clarification
A note from the jury requesting transcripts for five individuals (Shawn, Cimberly Espinosa, an unreadable name, Amanda Young, and Jason Richards) and asking for clarification on the deliberation schedule around the dates 12/31 and 1/1.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity