Epstein's counsel
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
identified victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Notified |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Collusion misimpression |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Discussed state based resolution with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Communicated negotiated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Negotiating party |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal appeal | Epstein's counsel appealed to officials in Washington, D.C. to avoid enforcement of a requirement... | Washington, D.C. | View |
| N/A | Negotiation | Negotiations between the Government and Epstein's counsel regarding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | NPA negotiations and post-signing efforts by Epstein's counsel to challenge portions of the NPA. | N/A | View |
| 2018-12-20 | N/A | Epstein's lawyer states he needs to review the brief before taking a position. | N/A | View |
| 2009-11-13 | N/A | Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 made herself available for Defendant's exam | Not specified | View |
| 2009-09-17 | N/A | Attempted deposition of Epstein. Epstein and his driver, Igor Zinoviev, exited in a separate elev... | Deposition location | View |
| 2009-05-26 | N/A | Epstein's counsel filed a pleading in federal court arguing civil claims under 18 USC 2255 must b... | Federal Court | View |
| 2008-06-26 | N/A | Roth alerts Office of the Attorney General that Epstein's counsel might try to contact them for a... | N/A | View |
| 2008-05-19 | N/A | State discovery provisions revealed women on the 'victim list' testified they suffered no harm. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-02-20 | Legal proceeding | State deposition of a victim where defense counsel questioned her about potential financial gain. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and subsequent postponement of notifying victims. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-12-19 | Communication | Acosta sends a letter to Epstein's counsel advising USAO will defer notification of state plea to... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-21 | N/A | Negotiations regarding Sexual Offender Registration Requirement | Florida/West Palm Beach | View |
| 2007-09-21 | Negotiation | Negotiations and communications occurred regarding the terms of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution... | N/A | View |
| 2007-07-25 | Legal correspondence | Epstein's counsel submitted a letter to the USAO arguing against federal prosecution. | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Plea discussions attempting to find misdemeanors for Epstein. | Florida | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | U.S. Attorney's Office contacts Epstein's counsel to negotiate a resolution (nonprosecution agree... | Southern District of Florida | View |
EFTA00013656.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between likely federal prosecutors or FBI officials discussing the legal strategy regarding Jeffrey Epstein in March 2008. It details the conflict between state and federal indictments, Epstein's attempts to manipulate plea deals to avoid sex offender registration and jail time (seeking work release or home confinement instead), and specific evidence regarding a victim he abused just prior to her 18th birthday. The emails also highlight Epstein's legal team's tactics, such as subpoenaing victims not in the state indictment to gain intelligence on the federal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00000172.tif
This document outlines provisions of an agreement related to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal scheme, detailing protections for his employees and female assistants from future criminal charges and immigration proceedings. It also specifies conditions for the USAO to obtain Epstein's computers, ensuring they are safeguarded by Epstein's counsel until the agreement terms are fulfilled.
DOJ-OGR-00000098.tif
This document is page 35a of a legal file, specifically an Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the modification of Paragraph 7, establishing a process involving an independent third party to select an attorney representative for victims. It explicitly states Epstein's agreement to pay the customary hourly rates for this representative, while clarifying he is not obligated to pay for contested litigation filed against him.
DOJ-OGR-00000799.jpg
This court document, filed in July 2019, summarizes evidence of Jeffrey Epstein's obstruction of justice and witness tampering during the 2007 investigation. It details Police Incident Reports alleging Epstein's private investigators aggressively stalked victims' parents, including driving one off the road. The document also cites emails from 2007 showing prosecutors and Epstein's counsel negotiating a plea deal involving statutes related to witness tampering and privacy violations of child victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000300.jpg
This document is an addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement for Jeffrey Epstein, modifying paragraph 7. It clarifies the process for appointing an independent attorney representative for his victims and establishes Epstein's financial obligation to pay this representative's fees and hourly rate. However, it specifies that this obligation ceases if the representative chooses to file contested litigation against Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00021517.jpg
This document is an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, labeled Exhibit SA-341. It modifies the original agreement to establish a process where the United States appoints an independent third party to select an attorney representative for the victims, subject to the approval of Epstein's counsel. The addendum stipulates that Epstein will pay the customary hourly rates for this attorney representative, but his obligation to pay ceases if the representative files contested litigation against him.
DOJ-OGR-00021501.jpg
This legal document outlines several terms of an agreement with Epstein, stipulating that he must waive challenges to information from the State Attorney's Office, enter a guilty plea by September 28, 2007, and begin his sentence by October 15, 2007. In exchange, the United States will provide his attorneys with a list of up to forty victims and move for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. The document also details Epstein's waiver of his constitutional right to a speedy trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021488.jpg
This document is a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report reviewing the government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). OPR concludes that while the failure to notify victims about the NPA did not constitute professional misconduct (citing strategic concerns about impeachment evidence), the lack of transparency and inconsistent messaging mistreated victims and damaged public confidence. The report states that victims were not treated with the sensitivity expected by the Department of Justice, leading to perceptions of collusion between the government and Epstein's counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00004652.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal agreement (likely the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the process for identifying victims, establishing a representative for them (paid by Epstein), and handling civil restitution claims under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 without Epstein admitting criminal or civil liability. The document creates a framework where Epstein waives certain defenses against specific victims listed by the government while explicitly stating that signing the deal is not an admission of guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00004630.jpg
This legal document, page 4 of a larger agreement, details the terms between the United States and Epstein regarding potential civil lawsuits from identified victims. Epstein agrees not to contest jurisdiction in the Southern District of Florida for suits filed under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, waives his right to contest liability and some damages, and will pay for the victims' legal representative. The agreement explicitly states that Epstein's signature and waivers do not constitute an admission of civil or criminal liability, especially for any person not on the government-provided list.
DOJ-OGR-00004610.jpg
This document is a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, filed on May 25, 2021, analyzing the government's handling of the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). OPR concludes that while the decision to delay notifying victims about the NPA in 2008 was not professional misconduct, the government's lack of transparency and poor communication led victims to feel ignored and ill-treated. This conduct created a public misimpression of collusion with Epstein's counsel and undermined confidence in the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00005540.jpg
This document is a legal addendum, filed on August 28, 2015, to the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States. It clarifies the procedure for appointing an independent attorney representative for victims, detailing that the U.S. and Epstein will both have input on the selection. The addendum specifies that Epstein has agreed to pay this representative's fees, but this financial obligation will cease if the representative chooses to file contested litigation against him.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-07-01 | Paid | Epstein's counsel | THE COURT | $5,000.00 | Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. | View |
Plea and non-prosecution negotiations
The document discusses the discoverability of these communications but does not contain their text. They involve the non-prosecution agreement.
Legal communication
Contact through the attorney representative.
Unspecified
The document states that "Epstein's counsel may contact the identified individuals through that representative."
Plea negotiation correspondence
Subject of the protective order litigation; victims seek to use this to prove CVRA violations.
Contact via Representative
Counsel may contact victims through the appointed attorney representative.
Notice of IME
Notice served regarding Jane Doe No. 3's IME date and location.
Media Leaks
Complaint regarding leaks to the media.
NPA Deadline
Imposed a deadline of June 2, 2008 to comply with the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Deadline Imposition
Imposed June 2, 2008 deadline to comply with Non-Prosecution Agreement terms.
Media Leaks
Complaint regarding leaks to the media; Sloman denied specific leaks, claiming they were hypothetical/generic.
Notification deferral
Advising USAO will defer notification of state plea to state officials
NPA Terms
Epstein ready to agree to terms except sexual offender registration; proposed deferred registration.
No Subject
About Epstein pleading guilty to obstruction of justice for pressuring co-conspirators not to turn over evidence or comply with subpoena. Stated 'On an 'avoid the press' note, I believe that Mr. Epstein's airplane was in Miami on the day of the [co-conspirator] telephone call. If he was in Miami-Dade County at the time, then I can file the charge in the District Court in Miami, which will hopefully cut the press coverage significantly.' Also discussed Epstein pleading guilty to a second charge of assaulting a different co-conspirator.
No Subject
Indicated the Office didn't like the factual basis for proposed charges, stated Office was 'not investigating Mr. Epstein [for] abusing his girlfriend.' Recommended timing issues addressed in state agreement to avoid obvious federal jurisdiction for prison purposes. Stated intent to include standard language for resolving criminal liability and mentioning 'co-conspirators' but not highlighting other crimes/persons.
No Subject
Indicated effort to find a solution to concerns about Mr. Epstein's house jurisdiction, stated she was 'spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for misdemeanors,' asked for factual basis for plea regarding airplane activity.
Re: Plea discussions
Already thinking about the same statutes.
No Subject
Responded to line prosecutor's email, stated '[a]lready thinking about the same statutes'.
Federal prosecution of Epstein
Argued that the federal government should not prosecute Epstein at all.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity