Trove
Sign In Sign Up

THE COURT

Person
Mentions
4828
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
2363
Also known as:
THE COURT, MR. DONALDSON
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00018225.jpg

This document is page 124 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey questions witness Mr. Parkinson about photographic exhibits (GX 264-267) depicting various angles of a kitchen containing an island with books and appliances. The defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, offers no objection to the exhibits, which are subsequently admitted by the Court.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018223.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson by Ms. Comey. Parkinson testifies about the conclusion of a search conducted on October 20, 2005, stating that he filmed the property to prove no damage was done by the police. He further testifies that all evidence seized by the Palm Beach Police Department was transported to their headquarters and subsequently transferred to the FBI.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018219.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The court admits Government Exhibits 201 through 222 into evidence, and Ms. Comey proceeds to question Mr. Parkinson about the contents of specific exhibits (202, 206, 209), which depict various parts of a property including a driveway, garage, patio, and garden room.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018214.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, Mr. Parkinson. Under questioning by Ms. Comey, Parkinson identifies Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph and recounts his personal observations of a residence at 358 El Brillo Way in 2003, suggesting a non-forced entry was made through an unlocked door.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018212.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Parkinson. He identifies Government Exhibit 721 as an aerial map of Palm Beach and West Palm Beach, specifically confirming it depicts the area around 358 El Brillo Way. After no objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, the court admits the map into evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018208.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of the direct examination of Gregory Parkinson, a retired police officer, who has been called as a witness by the Government. After being sworn in, Parkinson states his name and describes his current work mentoring individuals in crime scene investigation, under questioning from Ms. Comey.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018207.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines witness Mr. Alessi, who confirms he believed the people providing massages to Epstein were of age. Alessi also testifies that he saw 'hundreds of guests' at Epstein's house but does not recall a specific person named Carolyn. Following the cross-examination, Ms. Comey declines redirect, and Alessi is excused.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018206.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, regarding his time working for Mr. Epstein. The questioning focuses on the number and age of women present at a house, with the questioner suggesting they were hired for massages and the witness insisting they were guests. The witness confirms his belief that the women were over 20, and an objection is sustained regarding a question about their "proper age."

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018200.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript showing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies about his role working for Mr. Epstein, stating he was a driver and was not allowed in the room when Epstein conversed with guests. He confirms driving Ms. Maxwell to massage places and being at The Breakers to find a professional masseuse for Mr. Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018193.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies that his job was to make phone calls to arrange appointments for Mr. Epstein based on direct instructions from Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, or office secretaries, and that he never sought out massage therapists on his own. He also confirms that most of the massage therapists came from spas or clubs.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018192.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, regarding a statement Mr. Alessi made under oath in 2016. The questioning centers on whether Mr. Alessi had previously testified that friends of a Mr. Epstein would recommend women for massages and provide their contact information.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018191.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Alessi admits to having a list of massage therapists for Mr. Epstein but denies ever personally calling one to come to the house. The transcript also records procedural interactions between the attorneys (Pagliuca and Ms. Comey) and the judge.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018190.jpg

This page contains the cross-examination of Juan Alessi during the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Pagliuca asks Alessi if he ever called The Breakers, Mar-a-Lago, or Boca Raton resort to find massage therapists for Jeffrey Epstein, to which Alessi replies 'Never.' The rest of the page involves procedural discussions regarding the admissibility of prior deposition testimony for impeachment purposes.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018189.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The discussion involves procedural arguments with the judge and another attorney, Ms. Comey, about referencing prior testimony. The page ends with Mr. Pagliuca asking Mr. Alessi if he would call resorts like The Breakers or Mar-a-Lago to find someone to deliver a message to Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018188.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of witness Alessi (Juan Alessi). The testimony focuses on Alessi driving a woman (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) to exclusive spas and country clubs in Palm Beach, including The Breakers, allegedly for the purpose of 'recruiting.' Alessi admits to keeping a Rolodex containing the names of 'repeat woman' and 'massage therapists' who visited the house.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018187.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of John Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on Alessi's role in driving an English woman (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) to various spas and massage schools between Jupiter and Boca Raton, Florida, for the purpose of recruiting young women. Alessi confirms he made lists of locations and drove, but states he waited in the car while she did the recruiting and denies personal involvement in recruiting or seeing 'him' (implied Epstein) doing it.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018186.jpg

This document is a page from the cross-examination of Juan Alessi in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Attorney Pagliuca questions Alessi about previous deposition testimony regarding whether a specific woman was considered a massage therapist and whether Jeffrey Epstein instructed Alessi to hire licensed therapists from clubs and spas—an allegation Alessi denies. Prosecutor Ms. Comey intervenes to ensure the full context of the deposition questions is read into the record.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018183.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing a lawyer, Mr. Pagliuca, cross-examining a witness named Alessi. Mr. Pagliuca reads from a prior deposition where the witness was questioned by Mr. Edwards, Virginia Roberts' lawyer, about a trip to Mar-a-Lago. The testimony reveals the witness gave conflicting dates (2000 and summer 2002) for when they went to pick up Virginia Roberts from the location.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018182.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, questions Alessi about a meeting with a Ms. Roberts at Mar-a-Lago in 2001 or 2002. Another attorney, Ms. Comey, objects to the questioning method, leading to a procedural discussion before the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018181.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on Alessi confirming observing Ms. Maxwell engaging in conversation with Virginia Roberts after Maxwell received a 'treatment.' There is a brief legal dispute where Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca misreading a line from a prior deposition, which Pagliuca then corrects.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018178.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. The judge confirms with counsel, Ms. Comey for the government and Mr. Pagliuca, that there are no preliminary matters to discuss. The judge then instructs court staff, Ms. Williams, to bring the witness back to the stand and to bring in the jury to resume the proceedings.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018177.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the moment a recess is called. The judge dismisses the witness, Mr. Alessi, from the stand and addresses a logistical request from Ms. Williams for A/V personnel to meet with the government. After confirming with attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca that there are no other matters, the judge announces a ten-minute recess.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018176.jpg

Page 75 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) documenting the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi. Attorney Ms. Comey requests a full Q&A be read for the record, but cross-examining attorney Mr. Pagliuca realizes he is on the wrong page and requests a break, which the Court grants.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018175.jpg

In this transcript from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), witness Mr. Alessi is cross-examined by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. Alessi admits he did not follow the specific household manual or use its checkmarks, though he asserts he did his work. Pagliuca attempts to establish that a 'countess' was hired to write this manual, which Alessi claims not to know.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018174.jpg

In this court transcript page from the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi, the witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was considered 'the boss' and owner. The defense questions Alessi on whether Ghislaine Maxwell's instructions were understood to come directly from Epstein, to which Alessi replies he does not know. The testimony also discusses a 'household manual' and Epstein's hiring of a 'countess' to purportedly create it.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$162,555,000.00
16 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$162,555,000.00
16 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $9,500,000.00 Value of real property offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received security company THE COURT $1,000,000.00 Bond co-signed by a security company. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $550,000.00 Cash offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... THE COURT $28,500,000.00 Proposed total bond amount. View
2020-12-14 Received Sureties (Family/... THE COURT $0.00 Meaningful pledges of cash or property in amoun... View
2020-07-13 Received Unidentified co-s... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount by the defense, which the ... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure Maxwell's appear... View
2020-07-10 Received Defense/Co-signers THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom of... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure appearance. View
2020-07-10 Received Ms. Maxwell / Ass... THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom us... View
2020-01-01 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $22,500,000.00 Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... View
2019-07-18 Received MR. EPSTEIN THE COURT $0.00 Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... View
2019-07-11 Received Jeffrey Epstein THE COURT $77,000,000.00 Valuation of Manhattan residence to be mortgage... View
2010-07-01 Received Epstein's counsel THE COURT $5,000.00 Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. View
As Sender
409
As Recipient
1009
Total
1418

Status Updates

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Written status updates detailing any material changes to confinement conditions.

Report
N/A
Communication Source

Objection to Summary Witness

From: MR. PAGLIUCA
To: THE COURT

Pagliuca argues that Mr. Buscemi is not an appropriate summary witness under Rule 1006 because he may be analyzing complex records rather than summarizing admitted evidence.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Impact

From: Annie Farmer and 'Kate'
To: THE COURT

Written statements raising issues not disclosed during testimony.

Victim impact statements
N/A
Communication Source

Enforcement of trial subpoena

From: Defense counsel
To: THE COURT

Application seeking enforcement of a trial subpoena regarding a disclosed potential defense witness

Legal application
N/A
Communication Source

Inquiry/Confusion

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Note suggesting some confusion from the jury.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questions (47, 48, 50, 51)

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding ability to judge sex crime victims, personal history of sexual abuse, and impartiality.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Assurance of impartiality

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 assured the Court he could be fair and impartial.

Live questioning
N/A
Communication Source

Response to Jury Note

From: THE COURT
To: Jury

Supplemental charge/instruction tailored to the inquiry.

Court response
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Instructions

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding clarification of New York vs New Mexico law in jury charges.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Lists

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Joint submission of four lists regarding which jurors should proceed or be excused.

Legal submission
N/A
Communication Source

Letter of Support

From: Spouse
To: THE COURT

Expounds on the lives led before arrest, describing a 'quiet family life'.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Letters of Support (Exs. A-N, W-X)

From: Friends and Family mem...
To: THE COURT

Support claim of significant ties to US and attest to character.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Doc. 298

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Representations regarding US Marshal's Service and Jail capabilities.

Representation/filing
N/A
Communication Source

Transmittal letter

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Transmittal letter containing the five letters from victims

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

New Mexico

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

A note regarding New Mexico sent during deliberations.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification on charges/elements

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

A note regarding responsibility for aiding in transportation of a return flight versus a flight to New Mexico.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Requirement to state review status and submit materials

From: THE COURT
To: the government

Court directed Government to confirm review of transcripts and submission of indices/materials.

Legal directive
N/A
Communication Source

Reply Brief

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Contained information regarding the defendant's ability to live in hiding/purchase property under a fake name.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Request for Transcript

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

May we also have Parkinson's transcript.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Prior Note

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Request for supplies and Matt's transcript.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Question regarding deliberations

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

The Court confirms receipt and answers 'Yes, you may consider it.'

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Dismissal timing

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Regarding dismissal tonight at 5 p.m. and timing for tomorrow.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Mask Mandate

From: chief judge
To: THE COURT

Reminder to wear masks at all times given the variant.

Reminder
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing arguments

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Prosecution opening statement regarding sentencing recommendation for Ghislaine Maxwell.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: Jurors
To: THE COURT

"No, thank you." Asterisk, "Jurors have made plans for tomorrow."

Jury note/response
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search