Southern District of Florida
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00038158.pdf
This document is a chain of internal emails between the FBI and DOJ from September and October 2020. The correspondence concerns the review of a draft report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the Southern District of Florida's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation between 2006 and 2008. FBI officials, including a Unit Chief and Special Agent, are coordinating to review the report specifically to ensure its release does not compromise their '7A stance,' which refers to FOIA Exemption 7(A) protecting ongoing law enforcement proceedings.
EFTA00032969.pdf
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from August 2020. It details the distribution of a draft report by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008. The Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and their team are coordinating a review of this draft to identify any sensitive information that might impact ongoing investigations.
EFTA00031991.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 24, 2020, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at SDNY contacts OPR Counsel to discuss the 'universe of materials' OPR gathered during their review of the 2008 Non-prosecution Agreement between the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and Jeffrey Epstein. SDNY seeks this information to determine their discovery obligations in the recently filed case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00031694.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 3, 2021, among attorneys at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing a forwarded invitation from Marshall L. Miller (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) for a 'White Collar Crime Committee' meeting. The internal USANYS discussion links the committee's topic—Rule 17 subpoenas—to the Ghislaine Maxwell case, noting a recent 'strong opinion' from Judge Alison J. Nathan (AJN) regarding a motion to quash a Rule 17 subpoena in the Maxwell trial. The attached memo details the committee's agenda, including a talk by former FinCEN Director Ken Blanco and proposed revisions to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17.
EFTA00030997.pdf
This document is a printout of email metadata dated February 22, 2021. The subject line is 'FW: Question re SDFL Epstein file', referencing the Southern District of Florida's files on Jeffrey Epstein. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is listed as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The document appears to be an internal log or record of the email transmission.
EFTA00030569.pdf
This document is a formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 22 specific discovery requests made on October 13, 2020. The government addresses requests for Epstein's diary, the 'Billionaires Playboy Club' manuscript, flight logs (implied in broader requests but not itemized), and the identities of minor victims, often denying immediate production based on Rule 16 restrictions or asserting that materials have already been produced. The letter also discusses the handling of potential 'Brady' and 'Giglio' materials, stating that impeachment evidence will be produced closer to trial.
EFTA00030231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Gov't Says Epstein Victims Can't Scrap Nonprosecution Deal.' The article details the federal government's response to a lawsuit by Epstein's victims (Doe v. U.S.), where prosecutors argued that while the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) was violated by Alexander Acosta in 2008, the nonprosecution agreement cannot be undone. The government proposed a meeting and a public hearing for victims to be heard, a remedy the victims' lawyer Brad Edwards criticized as insufficient.
EFTA00029540.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations arguments, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges from the sex trafficking-related charges, ruling they must be tried separately to ensure a fair trial. The Court also orders the parties to negotiate a schedule for outstanding pretrial disclosures.
EFTA00028103.pdf
A formal 'Touhy request' letter dated August 30, 2021, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney Christian Everdell to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Polite. The letter requests the testimony of four redacted FBI/Task Force agents for Maxwell's upcoming trial. These agents were involved in two key investigations: the 2006-2008 Palm Beach FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and the subsequent New York FBI investigation that led to the 2019/2020 indictments of Epstein and Maxwell.
EFTA00027959.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at USANYS reached out to the Associate Deputy Attorney General to discuss document and discovery requests related to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically in light of the recent charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The ODAG official advised contacting SDFL directly as CVRA litigation had concluded and noted that the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had conducted a significant document collection the previous year.
EFTA00027809.pdf
This document is a 'Government's Notice of Proposed Procedures for the Determination of a Remedy' filed by the United States in the case of Jane Doe 1 & 2 v. United States. The government proposes a schedule where Petitioners must first submit their proposed remedies, followed by a 60-day period for the government to consult with victims before responding. The government argues this consultation is essential because potential remedies, such as rescinding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, could negatively impact other victims who have already received compensation or wish to avoid further trauma.
EFTA00027770.pdf
This document is an email from May 2019 forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Epstein Victims Demand Apology From Prosecutors'. The article details how two victims (Jane Does) requested a Florida federal court to nullify the 2008 non-prosecution agreement signed by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, arguing it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims sought nullification of the deal, a reopening of the criminal case, an apology, and a hearing with Acosta and Epstein present.
EFTA00027239.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated August 6-7, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein's historical state plea transcript. An Assistant U.S. Attorney highlights specific quotes from the plea hearing where the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida was detailed, explicitly noting that federal prosecutors agreed not to prosecute Epstein federally in SDFL if he completed probation. The email also notes that SDFL representatives were present in court during the plea.
EFTA00023499.pdf
This document is an email metadata record dated February 18, 2021. The subject line 'RE: Question re SDFL Epstein file' indicates internal government correspondence, likely involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), concerning files related to the Epstein case in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The sender and recipients are heavily redacted.
EFTA00023059.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via NPA and failing to ensure victims were notified, he did not commit professional misconduct as defined by clear and unambiguous standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the CVRA litigation by victims, and the subsequent fallout leading to Acosta's resignation and Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.
EFTA00022621.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) containing excerpts from court transcripts dated July 9 and July 15, 2019. The excerpts strongly assert that the SDNY investigation into Jeffrey Epstein was independent, initiated locally by SDNY, FBI, CBP, and NYPD, and was not coordinated with or transferred from the Department of Justice or the Southern District of Florida.
EFTA00022546.pdf
This document is a Reply Brief filed by victims Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's intervention brief regarding remedies for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims argue for the partial rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed in 2007, specifically the immunity provisions, on the grounds that the agreement was illegally concealed from victims in violation of the CVRA. The brief refutes Epstein's arguments regarding due process, contract law, estoppel, and separation of powers, asserting that the NPA is unenforceable due to its illegal formation and the government's failure to confer with victims.
EFTA00022533.pdf
An email dated July 23, 2019, from an Associate U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a redacted recipient. The email requests a call to discuss gathering information potentially relevant to the SDNY case against Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding an anticipated motion by Epstein to dismiss the case based on the 2008 Southern District of Florida (S.D.Fla.) non-prosecution agreement. The sender references attorneys in the Northern District of Georgia (N.D.Ga.) handling Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) litigation who suggested the contact.
EFTA00022091.pdf
This Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York addresses multiple pretrial motions filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies most of the motions, including those seeking dismissal based on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay, but grants the motion to sever the perjury counts for a separate trial.
EFTA00021983.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2020 regarding legal discovery tasks for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence discusses the production of documents from the 'Epstein Relativity Databases' and specifically requests the loading of scanned files from the USAO-SDFL (Southern District of Florida) into the database. The participants clarify whether to produce 'full families' of documents or only tagged items.
EFTA00020937.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 1, 2019, between attorney Martin Weinberg (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted government official (likely DOJ). Weinberg is coordinating the preservation of documents, specifically inquiring about notifying AUSAs in the Southern District of Florida (SD Fla) and other districts. He attaches a 'Supplemental Discovery Letter' and seeks confirmation on whether the recipient will handle the preservation requests or if Weinberg needs to contact the agents/AUSAs directly.
EFTA00020345.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 23, 2019, between an Associate U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and likely a former prosecutor or official involved with the Southern District of Florida (S.D.Fla.) cases. The SDNY team requests a call to gather information pertinent to an anticipated motion by Jeffrey Epstein to dismiss the 2019 charges based on his 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida. The recipient agrees to assist the trial team. The communication was cleared by an Associate Deputy Attorney General (ADAG).
EFTA00020261.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denied Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court granted Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges, ruling they will be tried separately from the sex trafficking-related counts to ensure a fair trial.
EFTA00020185.pdf
This document is a transcript of the initial court conference for United States v. Jeffrey Epstein held on July 8, 2019, before Judge Richard M. Berman. Key topics discussed include the scheduling of a bail hearing, the controversy surrounding the 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) which the defense argues bars this prosecution, and the government's stance that the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York. The court also addresses Epstein's sex offender status, the recent search of his Manhattan townhouse, and sets a schedule for bail submissions and the next hearing on July 15, 2019.
EFTA00019021.pdf
Internal USANYS email thread from March 2021 discussing the 'Maxwell Review.' The Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit updates colleagues on the status of the 'SDFL Epstein file,' noting that a vendor (PAE) was paid in October to scan 30,000 documents. The team is rushing to load these into Relativity and review them for pretrial disclosure deadlines by the end of April 2021, utilizing newly recruited paralegals.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity