Southern District of Florida
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00018568.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 discussing technical difficulties with a large PDF file received by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The file is a draft report from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008. SDNY staff were attempting to make the 380+ page report text-searchable.
EFTA00018566.pdf
This document contains an email chain from August 2020 involving the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). OPR Counsel Laura Ingersoll transmitted a draft report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the Southern District of Florida (2006-2008) to the Acting US Attorney for SDNY. Subsequent internal USANYS emails discuss sharing this draft report with the 'Maxwell team' for their review and comments.
EFTA00018186.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2021 between an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) and a FedEx Senior Paralegal. The AUSA is seeking a records custodian to authenticate FedEx shipping records originally subpoenaed in 2008 by the Southern District of Florida for use in the upcoming trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The FedEx paralegal asks if the records relate to Jeffrey Epstein, and subsequently agrees to testify if necessary.
EFTA00017797.pdf
This document is an email from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) on August 6, 2020, attaching a draft report concerning the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida between 2006 and 2008 for review. The email includes names of redacted individuals from both organizations and mentions an AUSA in the CC.
EFTA00016962.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2019 discussing a call from the Crim Chief in SDNY about an open criminal matter involving Jeff Epstein. The emails detail the SDNY's efforts to obtain evidence from the FBI in SDFL related to the Epstein investigation, and the Miami FBI's reluctance to share '6e materials' without a formal '6e letter' due to recusal. The sender seeks contact information for the new USAO/AUSA handling their old criminal case to facilitate communication with SDNY.
EFTA00016136.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY. The letter requests extensive discovery materials including the specific identities of 'dozens of minor girls' and 'employees' mentioned in the indictment, flight logs ('use of Mr. Epstein's planes'), massage schedules, and visitor logs. The defense also requests 'Brady material' (exculpatory evidence), specifically seeking evidence to support defenses that Epstein believed victims were over 18, that victims deceived him about their age, and that payments were gifts rather than for sex acts.
EFTA00015719.pdf
This document is an email dated February 6, 2019, circulating a Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown. The article reports that the DOJ, specifically the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), opened an investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's role in the 2008 plea deal granted to Jeffrey Epstein. This investigation was initiated in response to a request by Senator Ben Sasse following the Herald's 'Perversion of Justice' series.
EFTA00015560.pdf
In this July 14, 2019 email, attorney Paul Cassell contacts a redacted recipient (likely a prosecutor) regarding the legal representation of Jane Doe 1 and 2. Cassell discusses a forthcoming brief responding to Jeffrey Epstein's claims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically arguing that the NPA is limited to the Southern District of Florida. He offers to share the draft with the recipient's office prior to filing to ensure coordination and avoid interference.
EFTA00014576.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, Michael Miller) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It supplements a previous discovery request, specifically demanding the preservation and production of documents from the lead prosecutor (name redacted) who investigated Epstein in 2006-2008 in the Southern District of Florida. The request focuses on communications regarding investigations in New York in 2008, a March 2008 trip to New York by said prosecutor, and communications with victim witnesses regarding their rights.
EFTA00014454.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article dated May 2, 2019. The article details Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's testimony before a House Committee, where he defended his previous actions as a U.S. Attorney regarding the lenient non-prosecution agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein. The article notes that Judge Kenneth Marra recently ruled that Acosta violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act, though Acosta claimed he followed DOJ protocol. The report also covers Acosta's comments on labor regulations, including overtime rules and the minimum wage.
EFTA00014146.pdf
This document is a declaration by an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of Florida responding to a victim's emergency petition regarding the Epstein case. It details the timeline of the federal investigation, the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the government's efforts (and limitations) in notifying victims. The declaration notably reveals that attorney James Eisenberg, who represented a victim, was paid by Epstein, and explains why certain victims were not included in the federal indictment list due to credibility concerns.
EFTA00014104.pdf
This document contains an email thread between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida regarding the specific wording of Epstein's plea agreement. The discussion focuses on ensuring the state plea agreement complies with the September 2007 federal non-prosecution agreement (NPA), specifically requesting the insertion of the word 'imprisoned' to describe Epstein's six-month sentence. Goldberger confirms the change is acceptable.
EFTA00014102.pdf
This document is an email thread between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) from June 27-28, 2008. The correspondence concerns a 'Notice of Non-Compliance' and negotiations regarding the wording of Epstein's plea agreement, specifically the insertion of the word 'imprisoned' regarding his six-month sentence. The emails confirm a telephone conference where it was agreed that the state plea agreement complied with the federal non-prosecution agreement.
EFTA00014100.pdf
This document is an email thread from June 2008 between Assistant U.S. Attorneys and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Jack Goldberger and Roy Black). The correspondence concerns the finalization of Epstein's plea agreement, specifically clarifying language about his 'imprisonment' versus 'community control' and confirming where he would serve his time (PBC Detention Center/Jail vs. Stockade). The emails reveal that prosecutors were working with '5 girls' for a Grand Jury, that there was surprise regarding a lack of press coverage, and that law enforcement officials ('The Chief') were contacting victims regarding the upcoming plea hearing.
EFTA00014092.pdf
This document outlines the confidential terms of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. It details his agreement to plead guilty to state charges including lewd battery on a child and solicitation of minors, in exchange for a recommended two-year prison sentence. Crucially, the agreement stipulates that once the state plea is entered, the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office will close their federal investigations.
EFTA00014077.pdf
This document is the Government's response to a victim's emergency petition under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The Government argues that because no federal charges were filed against Epstein (no 'court proceeding'), the CVRA rights did not fully attach in the way the petitioner claims. The document details the timeline of the 2006-2008 investigation, the negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the Government's 'best efforts' to notify victims' counsel (Brad Edwards) of the state plea hearing on June 27, 2008. It defends the secrecy of the negotiations as necessary to prevent Epstein from impeaching victim witnesses and to secure a provision allowing victims to sue under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
EFTA00014063.pdf
A legal motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 08-8068-LRJ) requesting to seal a search warrant application. The motion, submitted under U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, cites an ongoing grand jury investigation and the risk that public disclosure would jeopardize the case or notify targets. The specific Assistant U.S. Attorney's identity and contact details are redacted.
EFTA00014062.pdf
This document is a Sealed Document Tracking Form filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on August 31, 2007. It relates to a motion by the United States to file documents under seal concerning Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY-64 (Case Number FGJ 07-103). The filing requests that the documents remain sealed until case closing and subsequently be returned to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
EFTA00014046.pdf
This document is the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein, dated September 24, 2007, along with an Addendum dated October 29, 2007. In exchange for pleading guilty to state prostitution charges and serving a recommended 18-month county jail sentence (plus probation), the federal government agreed not to prosecute Epstein for federal crimes. Crucially, the agreement grants immunity to 'potential co-conspirators' (names redacted) and stipulates that the agreement would not be made part of the public record.
EFTA00014022.pdf
This document is a template letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta's office (Southern District of Florida) notifying a victim's attorney of the plea agreement involving a defendant (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein based on the June 30, 2008 plea date). The letter details that the defendant will pay for a Special Master-selected attorney, Robert Josefsberg, to represent the victim in civil claims, and that the defendant waives the right to contest liability in such suits. It also references the court case 'In re Jane Does 1 and 2'.
EFTA00014011.pdf
This document is a letter from Gail E. Ferguson, Assistant Ethics Counsel for The Florida Bar, to an Assistant United States Attorney (name redacted) in the Southern District of Florida, dated November 4, 2008. The letter denies a request for an advisory ethics opinion regarding whether the AUSA violated solicitation rules by contacting victims to offer free legal services as required by statute and court order, stating that the Bar cannot opine on past conduct or legal questions. Ferguson discusses relevant rules regarding solicitation (Rule 4-7.4), communication with represented persons (Rule 4-4.2), and compliance with court orders (Rule 4-3.4).
EFTA00013989.pdf
This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.
EFTA00013976.pdf
This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.
EFTA00013926.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by attorneys for victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) in the Jeffrey Epstein case, arguing that the U.S. Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The filing details how the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI secretly entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein in September 2007 while misleading victims for months that the investigation was ongoing and that federal charges were still possible. The motion requests the court to order the government to produce the full Non-Prosecution Agreement and FBI interview reports, and to schedule a hearing to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00013878.pdf
A legal notification from the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) to Jeffrey Epstein following his June 30, 2008 guilty plea. The document lists 30 'Jane Doe' victims whom the government was prepared to indict Epstein for federal crimes against. It establishes that these individuals have the right to seek damages (deemed no less than $150,000) and that Epstein waives evidentiary challenges to this document being used in civil suits by these victims. It is signed by Epstein and his lawyer Roy Black.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity