Southern District of Florida
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00013855.pdf
A letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis to the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) dated June 19, 2009. The letter seeks to clarify ambiguous provisions within Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically Paragraph 8 regarding waivers of liability and potential civil claims. Lefkowitz argues that the waiver applies to single violations rather than multiple asserted violations and reserves the right to use statute of limitations defenses.
EFTA00013781.pdf
This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated March 27-28, 2008. The correspondence discusses the timing of a Grand Jury indictment regarding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically noting that a lack of a quorum on April 8th necessitates indicting on April 1st or waiting until April 15th. The emails also contain personal pleasantries regarding a colleague's recovery from knee surgery.
EFTA00013745.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Lilly Ann Sanchez, dated October 9, 2007. Acosta rejects a proposal regarding the resolution of victim claims under the Non-Prosecution Agreement and instead proposes using Judge Davis to select attorneys for the victims and potentially serve as a mediator for out-of-court settlements paid for by Epstein. Acosta also mentions attempting to coordinate with other defense team members Jay Lefkowitz and Guy Lewis.
EFTA00013739.pdf
This document is the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States Government (represented by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta). The agreement stipulates that federal prosecution will be deferred and eventually dismissed if Epstein pleads guilty to specific state charges (lewd battery, solicitation, sexual activity with minors) and serves a recommended 30-month sentence (minimum 18-20 months in prison). It also notably limits the identification of victims to a list not exceeding forty people and requires Epstein to register as a sex offender.
EFTA00013695.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated October 15, 2007. It involves Alex Acosta and redacted Assistant U.S. Attorneys discussing a draft letter to Judge Davis regarding the Epstein case. Specifically, the correspondence focuses on confirming the 'final number of victims' to be included in a 'Special Master Letter.'
EFTA00013680.pdf
This is the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States (represented by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein. In exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to state charges of solicitation of prostitution and serving a 30-month sentence (including jail and community control), the federal government agreed not to prosecute him for federal sex trafficking crimes. Crucially, the agreement also granted immunity to any potential co-conspirators (names redacted) and stipulated that the agreement would not be made part of the public record.
EFTA00013570.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by victims of Jeffrey Epstein (Jane Doe #1 and #2) against the United States Government. The victims allege violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically that the government entered into a secret Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein in September 2007 without conferring with them and actively misled them into believing a federal investigation was ongoing. The filing requests the court to order the production of the NPA and an FBI interview report, and to schedule a hearing to determine remedies for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00013553.pdf
An email from the First Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to Mr. Lefkowitz (Epstein's attorney) dated May 28, 2008. The email informs Lefkowitz that the compliance deadline for Epstein's plea deal (global resolution) is being postponed because the Deputy Attorney General's office is reviewing the investigation into Epstein's sexual conduct with minors at Lefkowitz's request.
EFTA00013538.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida), signed on behalf of Alexander Acosta, to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz. The letter aggressively rebuts Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically denying a conflict of interest regarding the potential appointment of Bert Ocariz and defending the office's handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and victim notifications. The author expresses surprise at the attacks given previous cooperation and asserts that the office made significant concessions to Epstein during negotiations.
EFTA00013359.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised "poor judgment" in resolving the case via the NPA and failing to ensure victims were properly notified, he and his staff did not commit professional misconduct as defined by DOJ standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the secret negotiations, the subsequent violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), and the eventual fallout leading to Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019.
EFTA00011475.pdf
This document is an Executive Summary of a November 2020 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility report investigating the 2006-2008 federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. It details the negotiation of the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) approved by then-US Attorney Alexander Acosta, which allowed Epstein to plead to lesser state charges, and examines the failure of the government to consult with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The report concludes that while Acosta and other attorneys did not commit professional misconduct by definition, Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via the NPA and the government failed to treat victims with necessary forthrightness.
EFTA00011386.pdf
This document is the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and subsequent Addendum between the United States (represented by US Attorney R. Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein. In the agreement, Epstein agrees to plead guilty to state solicitation charges and serve a recommended 30-month sentence (18 months in jail plus probation) in exchange for federal non-prosecution. Crucially, the agreement also grants immunity from federal prosecution to any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, with specific names redacted in the text.
EFTA00011096.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on October 13, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues for individual sequestered voir dire (jury selection questioning) and permission for attorneys to conduct limited questioning of jurors, citing 'tsunami' levels of negative pretrial publicity and the inflammatory nature of the sexual abuse charges. The motion lists numerous documentaries, podcasts, and books as evidence of prejudicial media coverage that allegedly demonizes Maxwell and links her inextricably to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
EFTA00010542.pdf
This document is the United States Government's legal response to proposed remedies by victims (Petitioners) of Jeffrey Epstein following a court finding that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with them before entering a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The government admits its communication with victims was insufficient but argues against the Petitioners' request to partially rescind the NPA, citing contract law, potential harm to other victims relying on the agreement, and separation of powers. Instead, the government proposes holding a public hearing for victim impact statements, arranging meetings between victims and DOJ representatives, and mandating additional training for prosecutors.
EFTA00009937.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2020, within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). OPR sent a draft report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the USAO in the Southern District of Florida (2006-2008) to the Acting US Attorney for SDNY. USANYS officials then discussed and approved sharing this report with their internal 'Epstein team' to evaluate its facts and potential implications for the pending case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00009229.pdf
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility with R. Alexander Acosta on October 18, 2019. The interview focuses on Acosta's tenure as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and his office's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the decision to enter into a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. The transcript details discussions regarding the intake of the case, the assessment of evidence and legal issues including the petite policy, management decisions, and interactions with defense counsel.
EFTA00007091.pdf
This document packet contains legal correspondence from May 2007 regarding subpoenas issued to Epstein-affiliated companies JEGE, Inc. and Hyperion Air, Inc. Attorney Jack Goldberger confirms a deadline extension and clarifies that he, Lilly Ann Sanchez, and Gerald Lefcourt are representing the corporations. The packet also includes an inventory of audiotapes (likely wiretaps or controlled calls) with quality notes, and a handwritten breakdown of phone records analyzing calls to and from the 'Epstein Residence' and other redacted parties.
DOJ-OGR-00000248.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing criticizing the Second Circuit's decision regarding the scope of the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It argues that the government's promise not to prosecute Epstein's co-conspirators, including four unnamed individuals, was unqualified and should be upheld, citing a Supreme Court precedent (Santobello v. New York).
DOJ-OGR-00000232.tif
This document is a legal analysis discussing the scope of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein, particularly concerning its geographical limitations and its application to both Epstein and his coconspirators. It argues against a broad interpretation of the NPA's terms, emphasizing that the agreement's protection from federal prosecution was specifically limited to the Southern District of Florida, and that it would be illogical for the NPA to protect coconspirators while leaving Epstein vulnerable in other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00000231.tif
This document discusses the interpretation and scope of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein, emphasizing that it covers potential co-conspirators and assistants. It clarifies that the agreement was made with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, under the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, and not the entire Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00000121.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal ruling or report, discussing the scope and binding nature of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein. It addresses the argument that the NPA might bind other judicial districts and concludes that it only binds the U.S. Attorney's office where it was signed, specifically stating it does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00000118.tif
This document details aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) in Florida, where he pleaded guilty to soliciting minors for prostitution and served 18 months in jail. The NPA included a controversial provision where the U.S. Attorney's Office agreed not to charge Epstein federally or his 'potential co-conspirators,' a point criticized by the OPR as 'poor judgment.' The document also discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's contention that the NPA bars her prosecution as Epstein's co-conspirator, a claim the Court rejects based on Second Circuit precedent and the scope of the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00000095.tif
This document is a legal agreement where Epstein requests deferral of prosecution from the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. He agrees that any delay in prosecution is at his own request, waives his right to a speedy trial, and consents to prosecution by Information rather than Grand Jury indictment for offenses under investigation. Epstein acknowledges understanding and agreeing to the terms of this Non-Prosecution Agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000091.tif
This document outlines terms of an agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein, detailing his obligations to waive challenges and appeal rights, provide agreements to the U.S. Attorney's Office, and cooperate regarding victims. It states that the United States will provide victim lists, facilitate the appointment of an attorney representative paid by Epstein, and Epstein will not contest jurisdiction for victim lawsuits in the Southern District of Florida. This appears to be part of a plea agreement or similar legal settlement.
DOJ-OGR-00000089.tif
This document outlines the terms of an agreement concerning Jeffrey Epstein's prosecution. It states that the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, R. Alexander Acosta, will defer federal prosecution in favor of the State of Florida, provided Epstein adheres to the agreement's conditions. If Epstein violates the agreement, the US Attorney may initiate prosecution, but if he fulfills all conditions, all charges against him in the Southern District of Florida will be dismissed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity