| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
This document is a printout of a Myspace comment page from February 2005, showing four comments left for a user with friendID 172831. The comments discuss social plans, such as leaving campus for lunch, and a potential business arrangement where a user named Leah Jean has been made the 'official merch girl' by someone named Steve. The document captures casual online social interactions between several individuals.
This document is a screenshot of a Myspace.com comment section from February 13, 2005, showing a conversation between users 'preston77' and 'samatha'. The comments reference 'ninja cops', pictures, and a real-world interaction where one user parked their Neon car next to the other, indicating an offline acquaintance. The document also contains footer information from a public records request, including a Bates number (DOJ-OGR-00032820).
This document is a printout of a Myspace user's comment page from February 2005, produced as part of a public records request. It contains four comments from different users ('preston77', 'the tragic tale of you and me', '5|<y1£R', and 'Dorothy Mantooth') to the profile owner. The comments discuss the profile owner's online activity, wish them a happy Valentine's Day, and reference a new hairstyle that others have been talking about.
This document is a printout of page 3 of a MySpace user's comment section, showing five comments posted between February 22 and February 27, 2005. The comments are from three different users: 'preston77', 'Girl From Ipanema', and 'the tragic tale of you and me'. The document is part of a public records request (No. 17-295) and is marked with a DOJ-OGR identifier.
This document is a printout of a Myspace user's comment page from March 2005. It contains four comments from different users, including a cryptic message about having someone's 'heart', an invitation for everyone to participate in a 'red day', a simple greeting, and a nostalgic remembrance of past events. The document indicates social connections between the commenters, the profile owner, and a person named Ashley.
This document is a printout of a Myspace user's comment page, showing five comments posted on April 10 and 11, 2005. The comments are from various users ('Infelicitoes', '5l<y1ER', 'Virginia', etc.) and contain casual, friendly, and humorous messages directed at the profile owner. The footer indicates this document is part of a public records request (No. 17-295) and has a document control number from a government entity (DOJ-OGR).
This document is a forwarded email dated August 12, 2019, sent to Sonya Thompson. The email forwards a request from within the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to reconstruct '292 data' for Inmate Epstein (76318-054). The sender notes that they are arranging for someone to have 'full read access' to research Epstein's history, including SROs, and will provide the data shortly.
This document is page 13 of a juror questionnaire for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions for a prospective juror regarding their personal or their friends'/family's experiences with being subpoenaed, arrested, or charged with a crime. The purpose is to determine if these experiences would prevent them from acting as a fair and impartial juror.
This legal document is page 3 of a court filing from October 18, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details the court's reasoning for denying a defendant's request for attorney-conducted voir dire. The defendant argued for it based on significant pretrial publicity and the case's sensitive nature, but the court concluded that court-conducted voir dire is sufficient to ensure fairness and prevent potential prejudice, citing legal precedents.
This legal document, filed on October 13, 2021, argues for the necessity of individual, sequestered voir dire (jury questioning) for a high-publicity case involving a well-known defendant. The filing contends that the sensitive and inflammatory nature of the charges, specifically sexual abuse of minors, makes it unlikely for jurors to be candid in a group setting, thus hindering the ability of both the defense and prosecution to identify biases and ensure a fair trial.
This document is page 17 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated September 7, 2021, outlining the Claims Submission Process for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It details how victims—both those who have filed lawsuits and those who have not—can register for the program via www.EpsteinVCP.com or through their attorneys. It specifies that while litigation can continue concurrently with program participation, all lawsuits must be dismissed with prejudice before accepting a compensation offer.
This document is an envelope from a letter sent by 'Junn U-ues' from Justice, CA, to D.A. Lanna Belohlavek in West Palm Beach, FL. The envelope was postmarked in Oakland, CA on July 31, 2010, and bears a received stamp dated August 4, 2010. It also includes a 'Public Records Request No. 19-372' and a DOJ document identifier, suggesting it is part of an official record.
This document is a printout of a MySpace "Find a Friend" search results page, dated February 12, 2008, and marked as legal exhibit 033-001. The results show four profiles of females aged 15 to 19, located in Lox, West Palm Beach, and Schertz, with profile update dates from 2006. The page also contains sponsored links for various services, including one to locate an individual named Alexis Gonzalez.
This document is a printout of a MySpace page serving as a legal exhibit (Exhibit 019-007). It displays a photo comment section where a user with the display name '♥The Lucky One♥' commented '.... Get it girl ( : lol)' on June 11, 2006. The document bears Department of Justice stamps and an exhibit sticker dated February 20, 2008.
This document is page 145 of an index from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'lawyer' to 'lying' with corresponding page and line numbers from the transcript. It references individuals named Leopold, Lewis, and Licata, and locations including Loxahatchee.
This document is page 104 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. The deponent is questioned about associates named Duchesne and Rosella, a photo on their website captioned 'Can you say blazed' taken at a 16th birthday party, and an alleged drinking incident involving Nick Kowalski. The deponent denies alcohol use at the birthday party and clarifies the meaning of 'blazed' as 'messed up'.
This document is page 65 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about deleting their MySpace page just a few days prior to the deposition, and after having already been subpoenaed. The witness denies deleting the page to avoid a government subpoena, claiming they were simply 'sick and tired' of the platform and the 'drama' associated with it.
This document is a transcript of an interview between an investigator (MP) and a redacted female witness. The witness recounts a fight with a peer named Sheena, who accused her of sexual acts with an 'old man' for money, leading to a confrontation with her father who believed she was a prostitute. The investigator (MP) presses the witness, suggesting he believes she is withholding the full truth about the events.
This document is page 2 of a court filing from January 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the defense's position requesting a delay in sentencing due to a motion for a new trial based on misconduct by Juror #50. The defense argues that participating in a presentence investigation would violate Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights while the motion for a retrial is pending.
This document is page 67 of 83 from a court filing dated December 19, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It contains 'Instruction No. 47: Expert Testimony,' which instructs the jury on how to evaluate the credibility and weight of expert witness testimony, emphasizing that the jury remains the sole fact-finder.
This document is a jury instruction, specifically Instruction No. 45, from a legal case filed on December 19, 2021. It directs the jury on how to handle evidence of a witness's prior inconsistent statements, specifying that such evidence should only be used to assess the witness's credibility and not as direct evidence of Ms. Maxwell's guilt. The jury is tasked with determining the reason for any inconsistency and how much weight to give the testimony.
This document is a page from the jury instructions in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 19, 2021. It outlines 'Instruction No. 36' regarding the 'overt act' requirement for conspiracy charges. The text explicitly lists alleged overt acts involving Maxwell and Epstein, including group sexual encounters with a minor ('Jane'), enticing a minor to travel for sexual abuse, and an unsolicited massage given by Maxwell to 'Annie' in New Mexico.
This legal document, specifically a jury instruction from a case filed on December 18, 2021, directs the jury on how to handle 'uncalled witnesses'. The instruction states that since both parties had an equal opportunity to call these witnesses, the jury should not draw any inferences from their absence. It also reinforces the legal principle that the defendant in a criminal case has no obligation to call witnesses or produce evidence.
This document is page 146 of a legal filing (Document 563) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 18, 2021. The text contains a judicial instruction, likely to a jury, warning them that significant media attention on the case should not influence their evaluation of evidence or the credibility of witnesses.
This document is a jury instruction (No. 44) from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 18, 2021. It directs the jury on how to evaluate the credibility of witnesses by using their common sense, observing demeanor, considering potential biases or interests in the case's outcome, and handling inconsistencies or falsehoods in testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity