DOJ-OGR
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00025391.jpg
This document is an emergency medical care review for inmate Jeffery Edward Epstein, detailing the events of August 10, 2019. It outlines the timeline from when he was found unresponsive in his cell at 6:33 a.m., through the on-site medical response including CPR, to his transport by EMS and eventual pronouncement of death at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital at 7:36 a.m. The summary also notes key events in the preceding weeks, including his removal from suicide watch and a psychological evaluation where he denied suicidal ideation.
DOJ-OGR-00025332.jpg
This document is a placeholder page indicating a mail attachment. The attachment is a PDF file named 'Epstein[Redacted]76318-054_SRO_20190710-20190723.pdf'. The filename includes Jeffrey Epstein's BOP Register Number (76318-054) and a date range from July 10, 2019, to July 23, 2019. The 'SRO' likely refers to Suicide Risk Observation or similar logs from his incarceration.
DOJ-OGR-00025306.jpg
This document is an email sent on August 12, 2019, by Lamine N'Diaye to Ray Ormond containing a chronological log regarding Jeffrey Epstein's status in late July 2019. It details that an inmate (I/M) companion took over suicide watch duties from staff on July 23, and notes Epstein's transfer to 'psych observation' from July 24 to July 30, during which an inmate companion was utilized.
DOJ-OGR-00014647.jpg
This document is page 247 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, containing the judge's concluding instructions (Charge) to the jury in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text outlines protocols for juror notes, requesting transcripts, and the jury's duty to determine if the government has proven Ms. Maxwell's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00014628.jpg
This legal document is a jury charge from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It instructs the jury on the concept of "conscious avoidance" or "willful blindness," explaining that if a defendant deliberately avoids confirming a high probability of criminal activity, this avoidance can be legally considered the equivalent of actual knowledge. This instruction is provided to guide the jury's deliberations, particularly concerning conspiracy counts against the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00014626.jpg
This document is a jury instruction (Instruction No. 38) from a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It instructs the jury on the legal principles of conspiracy, explaining that even a lawful act can be part of a conspiracy and that all members are liable for the foreseeable acts of their coconspirators done in furtherance of the scheme. The instruction clarifies that if the defendant is found to be a member of the conspiracy, the actions of other members can be used as evidence against them.
DOJ-OGR-00005864.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) outlines the Government's argument for admitting evidence of rape. The prosecution rebuts defense claims that such evidence is irrelevant or overly inflammatory (Rule 403), asserting that the victims' testimony is necessary to explain the complex, multi-year relationships between the defendant, Epstein, and the victims. The text clarifies that the Indictment charges conspiracies for 'sexual activity' and 'commercial sex acts,' not merely 'sexualized massages' as the defense suggested.
DOJ-OGR-00005787.jpg
This document is a Preliminary Statement from a Government memorandum filed on October 29, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues against thirteen motions in limine filed by the defense, asserting the admissibility of expert testimony, evidence regarding Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, co-conspirator statements, and the use of the terms 'victim' and 'rape' during trial. The Government also notes it will not introduce evidence of the defendant's flight or false statements in its case-in-chief unless the defense opens the door.
DOJ-OGR-00002768.jpg
This is page 2 of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the defendant's third motion for release on bail, rejecting new proposals such as renouncing her French and British citizenship and placing spousal assets under the monitoring of a retired judge. The document reiterates that the defendant remains a flight risk and that government evidence remains strong.
DOJ-OGR-00025245.jpg
This document is a cover page for an email attachment, a Microsoft Word file named 'Epstein Reconstruction 76318-054 draft7 OGC Comments.docx'. The filename indicates it is a draft document concerning an 'Epstein Reconstruction' that has been reviewed and commented on by the OGC (likely Office of General Counsel), presumably within the Department of Justice (DOJ).
DOJ-OGR-00025234.jpg
This document is an email header dated July 24, 2019, with the subject line referencing 'Epstein #76318-054' (Epstein's BOP Register Number). The sender and recipient names are redacted. The document contains no body text, only the header information and an attachment notification ('TEXT.htm').
DOJ-OGR-00025232.jpg
This document is a list of materials examined as part of an investigation, likely into an inmate's death by suicide. The evidence includes a wide range of items such as incident reports, communication logs (phone, email, visits), financial data, staff records, psychological and medical files, and official forms related to the deceased's custody. The list provides a comprehensive overview of the sources of information reviewed for the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00025231.jpg
This document appears to be page 14 of an internal review regarding MCC New York, likely concerning the custody of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights a deficiency in staff understanding of sex offender risk factors, noting this knowledge was vital for the inmate's safety. It also references a separate 'After Action Review' regarding staffing in the Correctional Services department and includes a redaction under the 'Sex Offense Risk Factors' section.
DOJ-OGR-00025229.jpg
This document details an investigation into inmate housing records concerning Jeffrey Epstein at MCC New York around the time of his death on August 10, 2019. It reveals significant discrepancies between the SENTRY database, other official documents like locator forms and log books, and physical observations of cell assignments. Specifically, records show Epstein's double-occupancy cell was assigned to three inmates at his time of death, and his location was inconsistently recorded across different systems, including his placement in suicide watch cells.
DOJ-OGR-00025213.jpg
This document is an email dated July 25, 2019, with the subject line 'Re: Epstein'. The sender and recipient information is redacted. The email includes three attachments: 'TEXT.htm', 'EPphotos.pdf', and 'EP.staffmemos.pdf', suggesting the communication involved sharing text, photos, and staff memos related to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00025212.jpg
This document page contains the contact information/signature block for a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The individual's name and phone extension are redacted. The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice release (DOJ-OGR).
DOJ-OGR-00025209.jpg
This document is a heavily redacted email dated January 23, 2019, from a representative of the Washington Post to an unknown individual. The sender requests information and comment on an unspecified topic and provides a partial contact phone number. The identities of the sender and recipient, as well as the specific subject of the inquiry, are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00025207.jpg
This document is the header of a forwarded email dated August 7, 2019. The subject line is "Fwd: Client Jeffrey Epstein", indicating the communication is about Jeffrey Epstein in a professional client capacity. The sender and recipient of the email are redacted, and the email includes an attachment named 'TEXT.htm'.
DOJ-OGR-00025200.jpg
This document is an email dated October 2, 2019, from a redacted sender to Charisma Edge, James Petrucci, and Shirley V. Skipper-Scott. The email schedules a follow-up meeting for October 16, 2019, to review the 'Psychological Reconstruction' of inmate Epstein (#76318-054). The meeting is scheduled to be held in the Warden's conference room.
DOJ-OGR-00025195.jpg
This document is a cover page for a mail attachment. The attachment is identified as a DOCX file named after Jeffrey Edward Epstein, including his registration number 73618-054. The page also contains a Department of Justice document identifier, DOJ-OGR-00025195.
DOJ-OGR-00025194.jpg
This document is an internal email dated August 12, 2019 (two days after Epstein's death), sent to Ray Ormond and Lamine N'Diaye (NERO Regional Director). The email transmits an attached document containing a 'time line of events' regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Reg. No. 73618-054).
DOJ-OGR-00025187.jpg
This is an email dated August 23, 2019, from a Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center to a Lieutenant. The attorney is following up on the Lieutenant's prior agreement to be interviewed by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) about inmate Epstein (#76318-054). The email provides the phone number of an OIG agent and requests that the Lieutenant call to schedule the interview.
DOJ-OGR-00020094.jpg
This document is a page from a Government court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely USA v. Maxwell) dated December 18, 2020. It addresses defense complaints regarding discovery access, noting that one hard drive malfunctioned because the defendant dropped it, and details her special confinement conditions at the MDC, which include 13 hours out of cell, private shower, computers, phone, and TV. A footnote highlights a contradiction in the defense's arguments regarding the value of discovery versus the prejudice caused by delays.
DOJ-OGR-00020093.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government, refutes the defense's claim that the defendant cannot adequately prepare for trial while detained at the MDC. The Government outlines the measures taken to ensure access to discovery materials and legal counsel, including providing hard drives, a dedicated laptop, and arranging for daily video calls with her lawyer. The document argues that these provisions, despite pandemic-related restrictions, are sufficient for trial preparation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity