DOJ-OGR
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00020074.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on December 28, 2020. The text argues that government evidence, including documentary evidence and witness testimony, 'virtually indisputably' proves that the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein interacted with minor victims. The document addresses a defense complaint regarding the volume of evidence produced in discovery, though specific details of the defense's argument and specific evidence are heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00005639.jpg
This document is a legal filing, specifically page 15 of Document 386 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The author argues that the expert testimony of an individual named Rocchio regarding 'grooming' should be deemed inadmissible because it is not based on scientific studies, is too general, and will not help the jury understand the specific facts of the case. The argument relies on legal precedents from cases like Daubert, Raymond, and Gonyer to assert that Rocchio's opinions do not meet the standard for expert testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00005616.jpg
This is page 7 of a legal argument filed by the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell on October 29, 2021. The defense argues that the Government failed to comply with Rule 404(b) notice requirements regarding the admission of certain evidence and testimony from a redacted female witness. The document contends that because the Government did not specify the reasoning or purpose for this evidence, it should be precluded from the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00005569.jpg
This document is page 15 of a Government filing dated October 29, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It discusses the Government's proposal to protect the identities of Minor Victims 1, 3, 4, and 6 through the use of pseudonyms or first names only during testimony. The text explicitly links the 'intimate details of childhood sexual abuse' to both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00005568.jpg
This is page 14 of a court filing (Document 383) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text concerns a Government motion requesting that 'Minor Victim-4' be allowed to testify using only her first name to minimize loss of privacy and dignity, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). The document also introduces a section regarding 'Minor Victim-6', but the subsequent text is heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00005548.jpg
This document is a summary of an interview with an individual identified as 'AK' regarding a meeting held on February 29, 2016. The interview covers AK's recollections of discussions about potential charges, the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the extensive civil litigation involving Virginia Roberts and others. The notes mention Ghislaine Maxwell was described as a 'head recruiter' in written notes, though AK did not recall the specific attribution during the interview.
DOJ-OGR-00005544.jpg
This document is a signed legal affirmation dated December 7, 2007, faxed from the law firm Fowler-White Burnett. In the document, Jeffrey Epstein explicitly re-affirms the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and Addendum dated October 30, 2007. The document bears court filing stamps from 2010 and 2021, indicating it was used as an exhibit in later litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00005527.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for a legal filing, specifically 'Exhibit C' in case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It was filed on October 29, 2021, and is designated as 'Filed Under Seal', meaning its contents are confidential and not part of the public record. The page includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) document control number.
DOJ-OGR-00005517.jpg
This legal document is a filing by Ms. Maxwell's counsel arguing against the government's motion to limit the introduction of her statements at trial. The defense contends the motion is premature and improper because the government has not identified any specific hearsay statements it seeks to exclude. The filing asserts that the correct procedure is for the government to object to any potential hearsay testimony as it arises during the trial, allowing the Court to rule on admissibility in context.
DOJ-OGR-00005355.jpg
This document is page 33 of a 35-page legal filing (Document 367) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The page is a blank form with a field for 'Juror ID', suggesting it is part of jury selection materials. It also contains a Department of Justice (DOJ) document identifier.
DOJ-OGR-00005339.jpg
This document is Page 17 of a blank Juror Questionnaire filed on October 22, 2021, for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains questions 10 through 12, which ask potential jurors about their prior knowledge of Ms. Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and whether any information they have heard would prevent them from being fair and impartial jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00005299.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It aims to identify potential biases by asking jurors about their ability to remain impartial in a case involving sex crimes against minors. The questions specifically address the sexually explicit nature of the evidence, views on age of consent laws, and opinions on the enforcement of federal sex trafficking laws.
DOJ-OGR-00005296.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for a legal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire assesses potential jurors' prior knowledge and opinions regarding 'Ms. Maxwell', acknowledging the case has received significant media attention and asking about any preconceived notions of her guilt or innocence.
DOJ-OGR-00005247.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 354) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on October 15, 2021. The text argues that the Court has the authority to set an earlier deadline for the defense to file motions under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (the rape shield law), citing various precedents to support the Government's request for an earlier briefing schedule. The document references multiple other cases (Andrews, Rivera, Dupigny, Backman, Valenzuela) to demonstrate that courts frequently set Rule 412 deadlines more than 14 days prior to trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002893.jpg
This document is Page 4 of a legal filing (Document 195) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on April 5, 2021. The text argues that defense subpoenas asking for 'any and all' records are improper discovery requests and asserts that the Court should require the Defendant to notify the Government of any Rule 17(c) subpoena applications. It cites concerns regarding the harassment of witnesses and the protection of victim confidentiality.
DOJ-OGR-00031167.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page for user 'dixiedelight5' (associated with the Epstein investigation via the DOJ-OGR stamp). It contains comments from friends dated January 31 and February 1, 2006. One commenter mentions being sick with Strep Throat, seeing a person named Tory at the South Florida Fair, and asks about a rumor that the profile owner is engaged. Another user posts lyrics from the band Fall Out Boy.
DOJ-OGR-00031163.jpg
This document is a page from a MySpace profile for the user 'dixiedelight5', dated February 9, 2006. It displays photos of individuals named Kailey, Brinson, and Sarah, along with a section of 'Friends Comments'. The comments, from users Sarah, michael, and JOY BOY in early February 2006, consist of casual social interactions, including plans to meet up and friendly greetings between neighbors.
DOJ-OGR-00031145.jpg
This document is a transcript page from an interview between an investigator (MP) and a redacted witness. The witness describes a sexual encounter where a male subject (implied to be Epstein) paid her $300 while wearing a towel. The interview covers the possibility of hidden cameras in the room and concludes with the witness admitting that an associate named Haley instructed her to lie and claim she was 18 years old.
DOJ-OGR-00031144.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of an interview between an investigator identified as 'MP' and a redacted witness. They are conducting a physical reenactment of a massage encounter to establish the specific positioning of the suspect ('He') and the witness. The investigator mimics the suspect's position (hunched over, on knees) and hand placement (around the waist) to verify the witness's account.
DOJ-OGR-00031142.jpg
This document is a page from a legal interview transcript dated July 26, 2017. An interviewer, 'MP', questions a redacted individual about the details of a massage she gave to an unnamed man. The interviewee clarifies that she was in her underwear, not fully naked as she initially stated, and that she got on the man's back at his request to make him more comfortable.
DOJ-OGR-00031141.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted on July 26, 2017, where an interviewer, 'MP', questions an unnamed individual about the physical appearance of a man named 'Jeff'. The interviewee describes Jeff as having hair that was going gray, a 'reddish tannish' skin color, a long face, and very thick, bushy eyebrows. The interview concludes with the interviewee confirming that their interaction with Jeff was limited to providing a massage.
DOJ-OGR-00031138.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted on July 26, 2017. An interviewer, identified as 'MP', questions a witness about an incident where an unnamed male allegedly masturbated while she was giving him a massage. The witness confirms she saw the man 'whacking off' and provides details about his position on the table at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00031137.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of an interview between an investigator (MP) and a redacted female witness. The witness describes an encounter with 'Jeff' (described as a muscular 45-year-old) where she felt intimidated into taking her clothes off while alone with him upstairs, noting that another girl named Haley was downstairs. The witness states that 'Jeff' masturbated twice during a massage.
DOJ-OGR-00031132.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview dated July 26, 2017, where an interviewer, 'MP', questions an individual about a massage they administered. The interviewee describes the male client making strange, groaning noises, which MP suggests could be 'sex noises', and recounts how the client asked them to 'please massage my boobs'. The speaker repeatedly expresses how embarrassing the incident was to recall.
DOJ-OGR-00031130.jpg
This document is a page from an interview transcript dated July 26, 2017. An interviewer, identified as MP, questions an individual about their observation of an unnamed male's naked body. The interviewee describes the man as very hairy, which they found 'disgusting,' and speculates that he was on steroids because he was muscular but had a 'very tiny' penis.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity