| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
This document is page 49 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on October 29, 2021. It argues for the admissibility of 'Minor Victim-3's' testimony, stating it is necessary to counter expected defenses that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) played no role in procuring girls for Jeffrey Epstein. Footnote 11 provides extensive legal analysis distinguishing this case from precedents (Cummings, Townsend, Mahaffy, Nektalov) regarding 'other crimes' evidence and Rule 404(b), arguing that the abuse of Minor Victim-3 is direct proof of the conspiracy rather than a distinct, unrelated crime.
This document is page 14 of a defense filing (Document 148) in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 4, 2021. The defense argues that the government is using a specific diary as 'contemporaneous documentary corroboration' against Maxwell to oppose bail, yet refuses to provide the full diary or the author's name to the defense. The filing requests the Court order the government to either produce the complete diary or identify the author so the defense can issue a subpoena before trial.
The document is a printed page from a MySpace profile (user 'dixiedelight5') containing comments from friends dated February 2, 2006. The comments discuss personal relationships, gossip about friends (specifically mentioning Andrew Kelson and Kylee), and plans to hang out or party. The document is part of a larger DOJ public records release (17-295) with a Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00031164.
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile for the user 'dixiedelight5', accessed on February 9, 2006. The profile, titled 'The rumors are true', indicates the user has 126 friends and features a photo of a man with the caption 'He makes me so happy..'. It also includes results from a 'Quizilla' quiz identifying the user as a 'Betty Boop' type and several decorative quotes.
This document appears to be a page from a questionnaire or survey used to interview an individual. It contains a list of personal questions regarding behavior, including drug/alcohol use, sexual history ('called a Tease'), and risk-taking behavior ('Skinny Dipping', 'Stolen Anything'). The answers are fully redacted. The document was processed on July 26, 2017, as part of a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) by the DOJ.
This document contains a series of MySpace comments from March 2006, where several individuals (¿Merda?, kEtChUp/Chelsey, MeG-a-LyNn/Megan, and nic) are communicating with the profile owner. The messages express sentiments of missing the recipient, inquire about their current location (Ohio) and future plans (attending school, moving), and mention a mutual acquaintance named Amber.
This document is an email dated July 30, 2019, from a Unit Manager at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. The email is addressed to Shirley V. Skipper-Scott and concerns a Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) packet for inmate Jeffrey Epstein (76318-054), which was sent as an attachment. The sender also notes that a physical copy of the packet will be placed in the DHO mailbox.
This document is a cover page for a mail attachment, specifically a .docx file. The file is identified by the name and registration number of Jeffrey Edward Epstein (73618-054). The page also contains a document control number, 'DOJ-OGR-00025268', suggesting it is part of a file from a Department of Justice entity.
This document contains an email from a New York Post reporter sent on July 29, 2019, inquiring about the status of inmate Jeffrey Epstein at the New York MCC. The reporter specifically asks for an update on an investigation regarding neck injuries Epstein sustained the previous week and his current housing location.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness identified as 'Jane.' Jane discusses the psychological impact of her past trauma, stating it ruined her self-worth and ability to trust. She testifies that she moved from Palm Beach to New York City at age 17 and that Jeffrey Epstein paid for her tuition at the Professional Children's School for her senior year of high school.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) where attorney Mr. Pagliuca discusses the admissibility of evidence regarding communications between witnesses' lawyers and the government. Specifically, Pagliuca mentions an email from attorney Mr. Scarola to the government suggesting ten topics for an interview with a woman named Carolyn. The discussion centers on whether these communications (proffers and emails) are privileged and how they will be introduced without calling the lawyers as witnesses.
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, in which a judge explains the legal considerations for an upcoming sentencing. The judge states the guideline range is 188 to 235 months but clarifies that, due to the Supreme Court's 'Booker' decision, this is only one of many factors to be considered under federal statute 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). The judge outlines these factors, including the nature of the offense, deterrence, and public safety, before concluding that the sentence must be sufficient but not greater than necessary.
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, is a transcript of a judge's explanation for calculating sentencing guidelines in a criminal case involving five victims: Jane, Annie, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa. The judge uses the 2003 Guidelines manual to establish a base offense level and applies various enhancements based on the victims' ages and circumstances, resulting in a final offense level of 27 for Jane and Carolyn, and 25 for Annie, Virginia, and Melissa.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on July 22, 2022, detailing a legal argument between a government representative, Ms. Moe, and the Court. The discussion focuses on establishing the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, as an 'organizer or leader' for sentencing purposes by proving she exercised a supervisory role over at least one other criminally responsible participant. The government specifically identifies Sarah Kellen as the individual supervised by Ms. Maxwell, based on evidence from the trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity