| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Emmy
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Contradictory testimony |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Co participants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Co participants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Obama
|
Spouse |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Co present |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Emmy
|
Social |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
CBS
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
President (implied)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual orgies | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Michelle testified from the stand, identifying herself as the Michelle who was friends with Emmy. | Court | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal activity | Alleged 'group sexualized massages' occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged abuse | A 'group scenario' involving 'abuse', 'sexual contact', and 'group sexualized massages'. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Witness testimony | The defense brought two women, one named Michelle and one named Ava, to testify in an attempt to ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Crime | Group sexualized encounters. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal activity | Alleged involvement in "group sexualized massages." | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Group sexualized encounters | Unspecified room | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Trial | A summation is being given in a criminal trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where the defense has att... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2003-04-10 | N/A | Flight 193 from CYQX to PBI | CYQX to PBI | View |
This document contains case notes and a log of Public Records Requests (PRRs) related to two cases (06CF009454AMB and 08CF009381AMB) involving Jeffrey Epstein. It lists requests from various attorneys (including Jack Goldberger and Laura Menninger) and media outlets (CBS News, Miami Herald/Julie Brown) seeking case files, search warrant photos from 2005, and investigation records. The log spans from 2006 to 2018, documenting the sustained media and legal interest in the Epstein files.
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Jane. She clarifies that she knew individuals named Emmy and Michelle in New York, not Florida. Jane confirms that as a 14-year-old, she stayed at Mr. Epstein's staffed, eight-story mansion in New York and that Epstein gave her "hundreds of dollars at a time" on a regular basis.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The witness denies being shown photographs of several women (Sophie, Emmy, Michelle, Eva, Kelly) by the government. However, the witness confirms remembering being on flights with Prince Andrew and Mark Epstein, who is identified as Jeffrey's brother.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner confirms Jane's previous statements about the involvement of three other women—Sophie, Emmy, and Michelle—in events described as a 'group scenario,' 'abuse,' and 'group sexualized massages.' Jane affirms that these women were present and participated in the events.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Healy by attorney Ms. Comey. The questioning establishes that the witness worked in Jeffrey Epstein's office, but not his homes, and probes her knowledge of his associates and other potential employees from the late 1990s.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Healy. The witness denies knowing another 'Michelle' in the office, denies involvement in 'group sexualized massages' with 'Jane' or Jeffrey Epstein, and confirms having been contacted by the FBI regarding the case.
This document is a flight log page (No. 101) signed by pilot David Rodgers covering flights from April 10 to May 12, 2003. It details travel on aircraft N908JE and N909JE, as well as helicopter training in Hurst, TX. The log lists numerous passengers accompanying Jeffrey Epstein (JE) and Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), including Chauntae Davies, Kelly Bovino, Svetlana Griaznova, and others.
This document contains four telephone message slips from January and February 2003. Two messages are addressed to 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein), one to 'Mr Epstein', and one to 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell). Notable content includes a request from a female caller asking if she should bring a redacted friend 'tonight', and a message marked 'very important' from a caller with a 310 area code. Staff members Evelyn, Michelle, and GM signed the messages.
This document is page 154 of a court transcript from the closing summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Menninger attacks the credibility of witnesses Carolyn and Jane, arguing that financial motivation and the passage of time have flawed their memories. She specifically highlights that witnesses Eva and Michelle contradicted Jane's testimony regarding participation in sexual orgies, and notes that Epstein's death prevents him from confronting these accusers.
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues against the government's attempt to identify her client, Michelle, as a random person from an address book, asserting she is a specific individual who was friends with another woman, Emmy. She attacks the credibility of a key witness, Jane, accusing her of a pattern of fabricating accusations by picking names of people she knew from "Epstein's world."
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is attempting to undermine the credibility of a witness referred to as 'Jane'. Menninger highlights inconsistencies in the witness's statements, such as failing to identify Ghislaine and others in a sworn interrogatory, and contrasts her claims of extreme poverty with evidence that she and her brothers applied to an expensive arts camp costing $12,000 per year.
This document is a court transcript from a summation given by Ms. Moe on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues to the jury that the defense's attempt to discredit a witness named Jane by calling other women named Michelle and Ava to testify is a meaningless distraction. She emphasizes that Jane never identified the specific individuals Michelle Healey or Eva Dubin, and points out that Epstein and Maxwell's contact book contained multiple people with those common first names.
This document is a page from a court transcript of summations delivered by Ms. Moe on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe discusses the testimony of a witness named Jane, who recalled five names (Emmy, Kelly, Sophie, Eva, and Michelle) of people present during group sexualized encounters. Ms. Moe defends the credibility of Jane's memory, arguing that as a child being sexually assaulted, her ability to recall only these names is understandable.
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument by Mr. Rohrbach to the court. He refutes a point made by opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, regarding the defense's ability to challenge an investigation's thoroughness. Mr. Rohrbach argues that while the defense can cross-examine witnesses like 'Jane' about events, they are prohibited from calling a case agent during their direct case simply to highlight investigative steps that were not taken, referencing the Watson and Brady cases as precedent.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney argues that the government's investigation was not thorough. The attorney uses the example of a witness, Jane, who testified about her involvement in 'sexualized massages' and named other participants, including a 'Michelle'. The attorney claims that despite this information, the government failed to follow up and interview Michelle and others, arguing this lack of diligence is significant to the case.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Menninger, filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that the jury should doubt the credibility of witnesses Carolyn and Jane, citing their changed stories, the passage of time, and potential financial motivation. She contrasts their testimony with that of witnesses Eva and Michelle, who she claims directly contradicted Jane's allegations of sexual orgies.
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues that the defense's attempt to discredit a witness named Jane by presenting other women named Michelle and Ava is a deliberate and meaningless distraction. She emphasizes that Jane never identified the specific women brought to court (Michelle Healey and Eva Dubin) and points out that Epstein and Maxwell's contact book contained multiple individuals with those common first names, suggesting the defense's tactic was intentionally vague and misleading.
This document is a page from the closing summations of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by prosecutor Ms. Moe. She argues that the testimony of a victim identified as 'Jane' is credible despite her being a 'kid' at the time of the abuse. The text highlights that Jane recalled specific first names of individuals present during 'group sexualized encounters': Emmy, Kelly, Sophie, Eva, and Michelle.
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues against the government's claim that a woman named Michelle is a random person, citing testimony from witnesses Jane and Michelle herself to establish that she is a specific individual who was friends with another person named Emmy. The summation aims to prove that Jane is not fabricating connections but identifying real people she encountered in 'Epstein's world'.
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is challenging the credibility of a witness named 'Jane'. Menninger points out that Jane failed to identify Ghislaine and other women in a sworn pleading, despite allegedly being with them. She also contrasts Jane's claims of extreme poverty and homelessness with evidence that she and her two brothers applied for an expensive arts camp costing $12,000 per year for three years.
This document appears to be page 4 of a larger production from the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp 029451). The text contains a personal anecdote or transcript where the speaker recounts a joke they made during a campaign. The joke centers on feigned jealousy towards a Presidential candidate (implied to be Barack Obama) for getting to be President and also having 'Michelle' (implied to be Michelle Obama) as a partner.
This document is a screenshot of a Facebook mobile timeline post containing a fictional or humorous dialogue between a bank cashier and President Obama. The text centers on the cashier enforcing banking regulations (Dodd/Frank, 9/11 protocols) regarding ID verification despite knowing the President's identity. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as part of a congressional investigation.
This document contains four phone message slips from a spiral-bound logbook addressed to 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and 'Gh' (Ghislaine Maxwell) dating from early 2003. Notable communications include a message from 'Amanda' asking if she can bring her friend 'Holly' over that night, and a message from 'Banu' marked as 'very important'. Ghislaine Maxwell appears to be acting in a secretarial capacity, signing off on a message for Epstein with her initials 'GM'.
Request for copy of the file by CBS News.
Michelle left a message for Tosh to call rlardo on Epstein. The message is related to a public record.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity