Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002143.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Document 97-22) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, authored by French attorney William Julié. It provides a legal analysis of the Extradition Treaty between France and the USA, arguing that unlike other treaties (such as the European Convention on Extradition), the US-France treaty does not explicitly prohibit the extradition of French nationals. It contrasts this with treaties France holds with countries like Morocco and China, and compares it favorably to the treaty with Canada.
DOJ-OGR-00002132.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Authored by French attorney William Julié, it outlines the procedures of the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, specifically detailing the 60-day limit for formal extradition requests following an arrest and the 'Ministerial phase' of the application process. It explains that if documents are not received within 60 days, the detained person is discharged, though they may be re-arrested later.
DOJ-OGR-00002121.jpg
This document is Page 26 of a legal filing (Document 97-21) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It contains a table summarizing procedural timelines and statutory rules under the UK's Extradition Act 2003, specifically detailing scenarios where a person consents to extradition versus those requiring a hearing. The document outlines the roles of the Secretary of State and the Extradition Judge in extending deadlines and ordering removal.
DOJ-OGR-00002101.jpg
This document is page 6 of 29 from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 14, 2020. It outlines the legal framework and procedural hurdles for appealing extradition in the United Kingdom under the Extradition Act 2003, noting the specific roles of the Secretary of State, High Court, and Supreme Court. The text emphasizes the rarity of successful appeals to the Supreme Court or the European Court of Human Rights in extradition cases.
DOJ-OGR-00002088.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit T', filed on December 14, 2020, as part of legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It is marked with a Department of Justice document number (DOJ-OGR-00002088). The page itself contains no substantive information beyond identifying the exhibit.
DOJ-OGR-00002085.jpg
This document is a court declaration filed on December 14, 2020, by the head of Ghislaine Maxwell's security team detailing the events of the morning of her arrest on July 2, 2020, in Bradford, New Hampshire. The text describes how a security operative observed a helicopter at 6:30 AM and vehicles entering the driveway at 8:30 AM, mistaking the FBI raid for members of the press. The operative alerted Maxwell via radio to follow established security protocols, believing the intrusion to be media harassment.
DOJ-OGR-00002078.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cv-00330-AJN) dated December 14, 2020. It displays an exhibit titled 'Bounty On Ms. Maxwell,' which consists of a screenshot from The Sun newspaper dated November 19, 2019. The screenshot details a £10,000 reward offered by the newspaper for information regarding Ghislaine Maxwell and includes a well-known photograph of Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre, and Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002076.jpg
This document appears to be a cover page or title slide for an exhibit titled 'Ghislaine Maxwell Media Analysis'. It was filed on December 14, 2020, as part of the legal proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN and bears a DOJ bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00002046.jpg
This is a character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The redacted author expresses shock at Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest, claims never to have witnessed inappropriate behavior, and argues strongly for her release on bail so she can prepare her defense for a trial anticipated in July 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002044.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit H', which is part of Document 97-8 filed on December 14, 2020, in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The Bates number DOJ-OGR-00002044 suggests it is a document produced by the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002031.jpg
This document is a redacted character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The unnamed author argues that Maxwell has strong ties to the US, including her husband, and expresses distress over her incarceration conditions, specifically citing over 150 days of solitary confinement. The author pledges to stay in contact and provide support if Maxwell is granted bail to help her prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002020.jpg
This document is a page from a redacted declaration filed in December 2020 as part of the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The author, whose identity is redacted but appears to be a close associate or partner of Maxwell, describes the intense media harassment, stalking, and threats they have faced since Epstein's death and Maxwell's arrest. The author explicitly states they never met or communicated with Jeffrey Epstein and expresses fear of violence fueled by conspiracy theories like QAnon and Pizzagate, citing the attack on Judge Salas.
DOJ-OGR-00002013.jpg
This document is page 35 (filed as page 41 of 45) of a legal motion arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense argues that Maxwell is not a flight risk and that her current detention at the MDC amounts to 'de facto solitary confinement' under conditions more severe than supermax prisons or death row, which impedes her ability to prepare her defense. The text cites legal precedent regarding bail standards and claims wardens have never seen such restrictive regulations.
DOJ-OGR-00002005.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell should be granted bail conditions involving an extradition waiver, citing legal precedents (Salvagno, Karni, Chen, Khashoggi) where such waivers were accepted as assurances against flight. The document states Maxwell has obtained expert reports from French and UK experts (specifically David Perry regarding the UK) concluding that she would be unable to resist extradition back to the US if she fled to those countries after signing a waiver.
DOJ-OGR-00001999.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed Dec 14, 2020) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has been subjected to unprecedented pre-trial publicity. It includes a bar graph titled 'All U.S. Media Coverage Comparison' demonstrating that in the 90 days following her July 2020 arrest, Maxwell received more national media mentions (over 6,000 articles) than Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, El Chapo, and Keith Raniere combined. The top portion of the document contains redacted text referencing Ex. A.
DOJ-OGR-00001989.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell being a flight risk. It highlights a letter from her spouse (whose name is redacted) describing their domestic life in the US over the previous four years and asserting that the criminal charges do not resemble the person he knows. The filing also references Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death in 2019 as the catalyst for a 'media frenzy' affecting the family.
DOJ-OGR-00001984.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (dated Dec 14, 2020) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text argues that Maxwell has been subjected to unprecedented negative media coverage (more than Weinstein or El Chapo) but remains committed to fighting the charges in the US rather than fleeing. It emphasizes her strong ties to her spouse (whose name is redacted) and argues that continued detention under 'oppressive conditions' impairs her ability to prepare her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001983.jpg
This is page 5 (filed as page 11 of 45) of a defense motion arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on restrictive bail. The defense argues that the government lacks corroborating documentary evidence, relying instead on old witness testimony, and asserts that Maxwell is suffering under oppressive confinement conditions at the MDC, including isolation and COVID-19 risks. The document also references extradition laws in the UK and France and complaints about discovery failures.
DOJ-OGR-00001975.jpg
This document is page 'ii' (page 3 of 45 in the PDF) of a court filing dated December 14, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains the final entries of a Table of Contents, specifically referencing an argument regarding 'Oppressive Conditions' of confinement affecting Maxwell's health and legal defense, followed by the Conclusion section.
DOJ-OGR-00001960.jpg
This document is page 83 of a court transcript filed on December 10, 2020, regarding the bail determination for Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The court argues that Maxwell poses a significant flight risk due to her awareness of the strong case against her, her substantial international ties, her French citizenship (noting non-extradition policies), and her extraordinary financial resources. The court dismisses her defenses regarding the non-prosecution agreement at this stage of the bail hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00001959.jpg
This page is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, detailing a judge's conclusion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's detention. The court argues for detention based on the serious nature of the crimes involving minors, the flight risk incentivized by a potential 35-year sentence, and the strength of the government's evidence, which includes detailed accounts from multiple victims corroborated by documentary evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00001764.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 24, 2020, filed in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's characterization of Maxwell's actions as 'cherry-picking' and challenges the government's issuance of subpoenas as not being 'standard practice,' citing Second Circuit case law (Martindell) regarding protective orders and civil discovery. Large portions of the document are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00030597.jpg
This document, dated July 26, 2017, is a page from a Department of Justice public records release. It features a handwritten note stating that an individual, whose name is redacted, is unable to attend a scheduled meeting at 7 pm the following day due to a soccer commitment.
DOJ-OGR-00030591.jpg
This document appears to be the final page of a personal letter included in a Department of Justice public records release (FOIA request 17-295). The text captures the sender chiding the recipient for handling a situation in an 'impolite way' by sending a letter instead of a promised phone call, acknowledging the recipient's dislike of tension, and concluding with 'I remain your friend.' The specific identities of the sender and recipient are not visible on this page.
DOJ-OGR-00030581.jpg
A brief handwritten note on personalized stationery bearing the name 'Jeffrey E. Epstein'. The message conveys a short directive or advice: 'Larry recommends leaving'. The document is marked with a Department of Justice identification number DOJ-OGR-00030581.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity