Trove
Sign In Sign Up

["Brune"]

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
0
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
11
Total
11

2010 suspension opinion related to Catherine M. Conrad

From: Theresa Trzaskoma
To: ["Brune"]

Theresa Trzaskoma is alleged to have told and shown the witness (Brune) an opinion about Catherine M. Conrad's 2010 suspension before the start of voir dire.

In-person communication
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Unknown
To: ["Brune"]

The witness, Brune, saw 'those emails' at some point before disagreeing that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements were incorrect.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Jury selection and knowledge of jurors

From: Unnamed Questioner
To: ["Brune"]

An unnamed questioner is conducting a direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their knowledge and recollections of events during jury selection, specifically concerning Juror No. 20 and a potential suspended lawyer.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

No Subject

From: Unknown
To: ["Brune"]

Emails seen by Ms. Brune that are related to the conference call.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Statement by Ms. Trzaskoma and a Westlaw report

From: Mr. Davis
To: ["Brune"]

A questioner is examining the witness, Brune, about a prior statement made by Ms. Trzaskoma to the court, where she offered to submit a letter about newly discovered facts. The questioning leads to whether a Westlaw report was one of those facts.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Jury selection and research on a potential juror

From: Unnamed Questioner
To: ["Brune"]

An unnamed questioner is conducting a direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her team's failure to conduct additional research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, whose name matched that in a New York court opinion.

Court testimony
2022-02-24
Communication Source

Jury selection responsibilities

From: Unnamed Questioner
To: ["Brune"]

An unnamed questioner is examining the witness, Brune, about the division of responsibilities for jury selection within their law firm. The questioning focuses on the role of Ms. Trzaskoma, a partner, who was deeply involved in the details and supervised other lawyers in gathering information on potential jurors.

Direct examination testimony
2022-02-24
Communication Source

Potential identification of a juror as a lawyer

From: Theresa Trzaskoma
To: ["Brune"]

On May 12, Theresa Trzaskoma discussed with Brune her thought that a juror who sent a note with legal terms might be the same lawyer she had previously found via a Google search.

Discussion
2011-05-12
Communication Source

Potential identification of a juror as a lawyer

From: Theresa Trzaskoma
To: ["Brune"]

On May 12, Theresa Trzaskoma discussed with Brune her thought that a juror who sent a note with legal terms might be the same lawyer she had previously found via a Google search.

Discussion
2011-05-12
Communication Source

Intention to lay out facts regarding waiver

From: Interviewer (to Brune)
To: ["Brune"]

The interviewer questions Brune about a call on July 22nd where Brune allegedly stated his intention to present facts related to a waiver only if asked by the government.

Phone call
0022-07-01
Communication Source

Intention to lay out facts related to waiver

From: Unnamed Questioner
To: ["Brune"]

The questioner references a July 22nd call where Brune stated an intention to present facts about a waiver if and when the government asked.

Phone call
0022-07-01
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search