Jane Doe No. 3
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Defendant
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Alleged abuser accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Florida Defamation Action | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 | Offices of Boies, Schiller ... | View |
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | Sexual trafficking of Jane Doe No. 3 | Unknown | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jane Doe No. 3 against Dershowitz and others. | Court | View |
| 2015-11-12 | N/A | Court Order granting in part Jane Doe No. 3's Motion to Quash Subpoena or for a Protective Order. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-11-02 | N/A | Cause came before the Court regarding motions to quash subpoenas | Broward County Circuit Court | View |
| 2015-04-09 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Quash Subpoena served on Jane Doe No. 3 | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-04-08 | N/A | Defendant confirms finding and serving Jane Doe No. 3 in Colorado. | Colorado | View |
| 2015-01-22 | N/A | Public attacks reported in Local 10 News calling Jane Doe No. 3 a 'prostitute' and 'bad mother'. | Media | View |
044.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, requesting the court to force Jeffrey Epstein to answer 23 specific requests for admission in a civil suit brought by Jane Doe No. 2. Epstein had previously asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to refuse answering questions regarding his net worth (alleged to be over $1 billion), his financial support of modeling agency MC2, his ownership of foreign property, and specific allegations of sexual assault, battery, and sex trafficking of minors. The plaintiff argues that the Fifth Amendment cannot be used as a blanket refusal in a civil case and demands Epstein answer or provide specific justification for his silence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018024.jpg
This document is a printout of a Law.com interview with Alan Dershowitz, filed as a court exhibit on April 16, 2019. In the interview, Dershowitz vigorously denies sexual allegations made by 'Jane Doe No. 3' (Virginia Giuffre), characterizing his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as strictly professional and academic. He admits to visiting Epstein's properties in New Mexico, Palm Beach, and the Caribbean island but claims this was 'lawyer profiling' used to target him to void Epstein's plea agreement. He also attacks the credibility of the accuser and the motivations of the opposing counsel, Paul Cassell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015657.jpg
A court order from the 17th Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida, dated November 2, 2015, in the case of Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. The court granted Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP's motion to quash a subpoena entirely. However, the court partially denied Jane Doe No. 3's motion to quash, ordering that her deposition proceed at the Boies, Schiller & Flexner offices, though limited to four hours.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015619.jpg
This is a Confidentiality Order from the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida, dated January 12, 2016, in the defamation case of Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. The order, signed by Judge Thomas Lynch, mandates that the deposition testimony and documents produced by non-party Virginia Giuffre remain confidential and filed under seal. This ruling follows a previous order from November 2015 regarding a motion by non-party Jane Doe No. 3.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015611.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 13) of a legal motion filed on April 9, 2015, by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP on behalf of non-party Jane Doe No. 3. The filing requests the Court to grant a Motion to Quash or limit the scope of document production and deposition. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015602.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal argument filed in a Florida court (evidenced by citations to Florida rules and case law) arguing to quash a subpoena. The filing argues that the Defendant's subpoena against 'Jane Doe No. 3' is abusive, oppressive, and unreasonable. It details that Jane Doe No. 3 was a minor victim of Jeffrey Epstein and that the Defendant is demanding sensitive materials such as her childhood diaries, photos of her as a minor, and cell phone records to further a campaign to jail the victim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015600.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing arguing to quash a subpoena issued by the Defendant to 'Jane Doe No. 3' (a non-party witness/victim). The text details a 'media blitz' by the Defendant in early 2015, citing interviews with CNN, ABC, Newsmax, and the NY Daily News where the Defendant threatened Jane Doe No. 3 with jail for perjury, called her names, and stated intentions to sue her for defamation. The filing argues these actions constitute abuse of subpoena power and intimidation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015599.jpg
This document is a Motion to Quash filed on April 9, 2015, in Broward County, Florida, on behalf of 'Jane Doe No. 3' in the defamation case of Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. Jane Doe No. 3 argues that the subpoena served by Alan Dershowitz is oppressive and intended to harass her. The motion cites a recent public statement by Dershowitz claiming he found her hiding in Colorado and intends to send her to jail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014091.jpg
A legal motion filed on March 24, 2015, in Broward County Circuit Court by plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs seek to compel Dershowitz to produce documents he claims to possess that prove he did not sexually abuse 'Jane Doe No. 3,' noting that he has refused a discovery request for over 45 days. The document is marked with a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014086.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) arguing that Alan Dershowitz has failed to produce exculpatory documentary evidence in court despite publicly claiming on Fox News that such evidence exists to disprove Jane Doe No. 3's sexual misconduct allegations. The filing references a parallel state defamation case (*Edwards v. Dershowitz*) where Dershowitz also allegedly refused discovery requests. It suggests the court should infer the evidence does not exist and that the accuser's allegations are true.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016432.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee file (016432) containing an excerpt, likely from a news article (possibly Miami Herald), describing Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. It features an aerial photo of his Palm Beach mansion and text outlining his history of luring teenage girls into a 'cult-like sex pyramid scheme' disguised as massage work, long before the #MeToo movement.
Request for diaries, photos, videos, and cell phone records
Demands for personal diary, photos/videos of her as a minor, and 3 years of cell phone records.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity