Defendant

Person

Mentions

Relationships

Events

Documents

Also known as:

Defendant (Defense) Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team) Defense Team / Defendant Defendant (legal team) Defendant (in cited case) Defendant (Defense Counsel) Unknown Defendant

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

5 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person Jane Doe No. 3	Legal representative	7	2	View
location Little Saint James Island	Visitor	5	1	View
person Alan M. Dershowitz	Witness declarant	5	1	View
person Doe	Legal representative	5	1	View
person Bradley J. Edwards	Legal representative	5	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	N/A	Defendant's visit to Little Saint James Island	Little Saint James Island	View
N/A	N/A	Service of process on Jane Doe 3	Colorado	View
2015-04-08	N/A	Defendant confirms finding and serving Jane Doe No. 3 in Colorado.	Colorado	View
2015-01-22	N/A	Public attacks reported in Local 10 News calling Jane Doe No. 3 a 'prostitute' and 'bad mother'.	Media	View
2010-04-05	N/A	Mediation attended by parties.	Unknown	View

EFTA00037152.pdf

This document is page 3 of a legal advisory letter from a law firm to its clients, discussing the implications of representing multiple clients in a lawsuit. It outlines the benefits, such as sharing costs and efficiency, and the risks, particularly conflicts of interest regarding settlement funds and confidentiality. The text references complaints about children being in danger, suggesting the context of the litigation involves abuse.

Legal correspondence / client advisory letter / conflict waiver explanation

2025-12-25

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00019461.jpg

This document is a page from a court docket report (SDNY) for Case 20-3061, dated September 2020. It lists numerous pending felony counts against a defendant, including conspiracy to entice minors, coercion/enticement of minors for illegal sex acts, transportation of minors for criminal sexual activity, and perjury (false declarations). The document contains a Department of Justice stamp (DOJ-OGR-00019461) and appears to be part of the legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell, given the specific nature of the charges and the case timeline.

Court docket report / case summary (sdny cm/ecf)

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015602.jpg

This document is page 4 of a legal argument filed in a Florida court (evidenced by citations to Florida rules and case law) arguing to quash a subpoena. The filing argues that the Defendant's subpoena against 'Jane Doe No. 3' is abusive, oppressive, and unreasonable. It details that Jane Doe No. 3 was a minor victim of Jeffrey Epstein and that the Defendant is demanding sensitive materials such as her childhood diaries, photos of her as a minor, and cell phone records to further a campaign to jail the victim.

Legal filing / motion (argument section)

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015600.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing arguing to quash a subpoena issued by the Defendant to 'Jane Doe No. 3' (a non-party witness/victim). The text details a 'media blitz' by the Defendant in early 2015, citing interviews with CNN, ABC, Newsmax, and the NY Daily News where the Defendant threatened Jane Doe No. 3 with jail for perjury, called her names, and stated intentions to sue her for defamation. The filing argues these actions constitute abuse of subpoena power and intimidation.

Legal pleading / motion to quash subpoena

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014107.jpg

This is page 24 of a legal filing from Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM, dated March 24, 2015. The Defendant is responding to document requests regarding Jane Doe #3's alleged history of prostitution and perjury, as well as requests for evidence supporting the Defendant's previous assertions that attorney Bradley J. Edwards is 'sleazy,' 'unethical,' and 'corrupt.' The Defendant objects to the prostitution request as unduly burdensome but agrees to produce documents regarding Jane Doe #3's alleged lying.

Legal filing (defendant's responses to document requests)

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014106.jpg

This document is page 23 of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) containing the Defendant's responses to specific document requests. The requests specifically seek evidence regarding allegations that Jane Doe #3 had sex with President Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein's Little Saint James Island. The Defendant agrees to produce non-privileged documents regarding the Clinton allegations but objects to producing copies of their passports.

Legal document (defendant's responses to document requests)

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014101.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) originating from the Southern District of Florida, dated March 24, 2015. It contains the Defendant's legal objections to document requests regarding IT systems and metadata. Crucially, it includes a response to a request for documents regarding visits to Little Saint James Island; the Defendant agrees to produce documents relating to the 'sole occasion' they were physically present on the island, a visit referenced in a sworn declaration by Alan Dershowitz.

Legal pleading (response to request for production of documents)

2025-11-19

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$1,000,525.00

4 transactions

Net Flow

-$1,000,525.00

4 total transactions

Date	Type	From	To	Amount	Description	Actions
N/A	Paid	Defendant	Town Council Members	$150.00	Administrative fee mentioned in past minutes.	View
2001-01-01	Paid	Defendant	Court/Government	$1,000,000.00	Forfeiture of assets mentioned in the cited leg...	View
0008-07-17	Paid	Defendant	Town Council Members	$250.00	Daily fine rate contended by Mr. Walton and Boa...	View
0008-07-17	Paid	Defendant	Town Council Members	$125.00	Daily fine rate contended by Mr. Hoffman and tr...	View

As Sender

As Recipient

Total

Unknown

From: Defendant

To: Public

One speech in United States

Speech

N/A

Communication Source

Request for diaries, photos, videos, and cell phone records

From: Defendant

To: Jane Doe No. 3

Demands for personal diary, photos/videos of her as a minor, and 3 years of cell phone records.

Subpoena / discovery request

N/A

Communication Source

Deadline for filing a motion under Federal Rule of Eviden...

From: Defendant

To: THE COURT

Request regarding deadline (Dkt. No. 345).

Letter

2021-10-14

Communication Source

Defense Letter

From: Defendant

To: Court

Requesting order permitting defendant to file under seal in certain civil cases discovery materials produced by the Government.

Letter

2020-08-17

Communication Source

Defense Letter

From: Defendant

To: Court

Requesting order permitting defendant to file under seal in certain civil cases discovery materials produced by Government.

Letter

2020-08-17

Communication Source

Protective Order regarding Discovery

From: THE COURT

To: Defendant

Rules prohibiting the dissemination of victim/witness identities found in discovery materials, with exceptions for trial preparation.

Court order

2020-07-28

Communication Source

Defamation lawsuit

From: Defendant

To: Public

Interview in Newsmax regarding suing Jane Doe No. 3 for defamation.

Interview

2015-04-08

Communication Source

Defamation lawsuit

From: Defendant

To: Public

Interview in Newsmax regarding suing Jane Doe No. 3 for defamation.

Interview

2015-04-08

Communication Source

Allegations of perjury against Jane Doe No. 3

From: Defendant

To: Public

Statement in NY Daily News claiming she will go to jail for perjury.

Media statement

2015-04-07

Communication Source

Allegations of perjury against Jane Doe No. 3

From: Defendant

To: Public

Statement in NY Daily News claiming she will go to jail for perjury.

Media statement

2015-04-07

Communication Source

Innocence claim and threat of jail for accuser

From: Defendant

To: Public

Interview on CNN International 'New Day'.

Tv interview

2015-01-06

Communication Source

Goal to bring charges

From: Defendant

To: Public

Interview on ABC (Australian Broadcasting System).

Tv interview

2015-01-06

Communication Source

Innocence claim and threat of jail for accuser

From: Defendant

To: Public

Interview on CNN International 'New Day'.

Tv interview

2015-01-06

Communication Source

Goal to bring charges

From: Defendant

To: Public

Interview on ABC (Australian Broadcasting System).

Tv interview

2015-01-06

Communication Source

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search