Alison Moe

Person
Mentions
1004
Relationships
77
Events
194
Documents
495

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
77 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person MAURENE COMEY
Co counsel prosecution
15 Very Strong
13
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Business associate
14 Very Strong
22
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Adversarial
11 Very Strong
12
View
person Lara Pomerantz
Business associate
10 Very Strong
6
View
person DAMIAN WILLIAMS
Professional
10 Very Strong
17
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
7
View
person AUDREY STRAUSS
Professional
10 Very Strong
14
View
person ALEX ROSSMILLER
Business associate
9 Strong
5
View
location USA
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person DAMIAN WILLIAMS
Business associate
8 Strong
4
View
person Nicole Simmons
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person Nicole Simmons
Professional adversarial
8 Strong
4
View
location UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person Geoffrey S. Berman
Professional
7
3
View
person DAMIAN WILLIAMS
Subordinate superior
7
3
View
location USA
Employment representation
7
3
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
7
3
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Professional
7
3
View
person ALEX ROSSMILLER
Professional
7
3
View
person Appellant's counsel (filer)
Professional
6
1
View
person ANDREW ROHRBACH
Business associate
6
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Prosecutor defendant
6
2
View
person ANDREW ROHRBACH
Professional
6
1
View
person CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Professional
6
2
View
person Lara Pomerantz
Professional
6
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-02-11 Legal filing Filing of Document 598 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, stating no redactions are sought for juror ques... Southern District of New York View
2022-02-11 Legal document service A memorandum was served via ECF (Electronic Case Filing). N/A View
2022-02-09 Legal filing Electronic filing of "Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial". Court (SDNY) View
2022-02-02 Legal filing The United States Attorney's office submitted a document requesting the Court to deny a defendant... New York, New York View
2022-02-02 N/A Submission of Government's conclusion regarding defendant's motion for a new trial New York, New York View
2022-01-19 Legal filing Electronic filing of Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion for a New Trial. N/A View
2022-01-10 Court filing A document was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE stating the defense's agreement with the governmen... Southern District of New York View
2022-01-05 N/A Filing of Document 568 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Southern District of New York View
2021-12-29 Jury trial Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,... New York, N.Y. View
2021-12-28 Jury trial Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. United States District Cour... View
2021-12-27 Jury trial Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN). United States District Cour... View
2021-12-21 Court filing Document 558 was filed in case 20-cr-00602-ABN. Southern District of New York View
2021-12-21 Jury trial Jury trial proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-12-19 Legal filing The Government submitted a letter to the Court regarding the submission of exhibits GX 603-A and ... Southern District of New York View
2021-12-19 Court filing Document 558 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New York View
2021-12-18 N/A Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan Court View
2021-12-17 Legal stipulation The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... New York, New York View
2021-12-17 Legal agreement A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... New York, New York View
2021-12-17 Legal filing Signing of a legal document by the prosecution and defense attorneys in the case of Ghislaine Max... New York, New York View
2021-12-17 Legal filing Document 549 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New York View
2021-12-17 N/A Filing of Document 550 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Southern District of New York View
2021-12-15 Court filing Document 546 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New York View
2021-12-15 Court filing Document 545 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New York View
2021-12-12 N/A Filing of Document 539 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Southern District of New York View
2021-12-11 Court filing Document 538 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District of New York View

DOJ-OGR-00010365.jpg

This is page 2 of a legal document filed on April 25, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document, submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and his assistants for the Southern District of New York, states that the Probation Office has no objection to advancing a deadline to June 14, 2022, provided that the parties submit comments on the draft Presentence Investigation Report (PSR) by June 1, 2022. Defense Counsel was copied on the filing.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010323.jpg

This is the second page of a legal filing (Document 652) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 1, 2022. The document is an opposition by the US Government to a motion for a stay, arguing it is based only on the defendant's conjecture. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Legal filing (federal court document - opposition to motion)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010320.jpg

This is page 2 of a legal document filed on April 1, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. The filing, submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and his assistants, states that the Government has conferred with defense counsel, and that defense counsel consents to an unspecified request. A copy was sent to the defense counsel via the court's electronic filing system.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010306.jpg

This is the conclusion page (page 16 of 16) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated March 15, 2022. The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should be denied based on reasons in the Government's memorandum. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and four Assistant US Attorneys.

Legal filing (court document - conclusion page)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010291.jpg

This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on March 15, 2022, it is the government's memorandum opposing the defendant's motion for a new trial. The prosecution team is headed by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010217.jpg

This document is a transcript from a court hearing on March 11, 2022, regarding a motion for a new trial for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The hearing's purpose, as stated by the court, is to examine the responses of 'Juror 50' to a jury selection questionnaire, following a court order from February 24, 2022. The transcript begins with counsel for the government, the defense, and Juror 50 stating their appearances for the record.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010216.jpg

This document is an appearance list for a court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on March 8, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It details the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and lists all attorneys representing the United States, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and Juror 50. The document also includes the case number and the court reporting agency.

Legal document (court appearance list)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009901.jpg

This document is a Certificate of Service filed on March 11, 2022, for the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Signed by Nicole Simmons, it certifies that on February 9, 2022, "Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" was electronically filed with the court and served to the government's counsel at the U.S. Attorney's Office in New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009847.jpg

This is the signature page (Conclusion) of a legal document filed by the United States Attorney's Office in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The prosecution requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record and instead schedule a hearing to resolve the motion. It is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and four Assistant US Attorneys.

Legal filing (conclusion of government response/motion)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009799.jpg

This document is the cover page for the United States Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial. It was filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York under case number S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The filing lists United States Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach as counsel for the government.

Legal filing (memorandum in opposition)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009774.jpg

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, for case 20-cr-00330-ABN. The juror responds to a series of questions about their personal relationships with key case participants. The juror explicitly denies having any personal knowledge of or dealings with defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009758.jpg

This document is a Certificate of Service from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It certifies that on January 19, 2022, Nicole Simmons electronically filed 'Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion for a New Trial' and served it to the government's counsel: Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Andrew Rohrbach, and Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office in New York.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009676.jpg

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. The juror responds to a series of questions, denying any personal knowledge of or past/present dealings with the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The juror consistently answers "No" to all questions regarding personal relationships with case participants.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009637.jpg

This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 635) dated March 1, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains proposed questions for a juror regarding potential bias against Maxwell and their ability to be fair. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Legal filing (court document)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009613.jpg

This is the conclusion and signature page of a legal filing by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Government submits that the Court should grant the defendant's motion regarding 'Count One' but deny all other post-trial motions. The document is dated February 25, 2022, and signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and four Assistant US Attorneys.

Legal filing (court motion conclusion/signature page)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009563.jpg

This document is the cover page for the Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Omnibus Post-Trial Motions, filed on February 25, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney and Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach as Assistant U.S. Attorneys.

Legal filing (government memorandum)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Court filing (signature page / conclusion)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002935.jpg

This is the cover page for the Government's Omnibus Memorandum opposing the defendant's pre-trial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S1 20 Cr. 330). The document was filed on April 16, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, and lists the prosecution team led by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.

Legal filing / court memorandum (cover page)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004809.jpg

This legal document, filed on July 1, 2021, is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The government requests that the Court issue an order compelling Mr. Markus (presumably defense counsel) to comply with Local Rule 23.1 regarding trial publicity. The letter argues that an Op-Ed published by Mr. Markus and his continued comments violate a previous court order and are likely to interfere with the Court's ability to conduct a fair trial with an impartial jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004784.jpg

This legal document is a letter dated June 30, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter, submitted on behalf of both the prosecution and the defense in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, confirms that neither party requests any redactions to the Court's recent order denying Maxwell's suppression motion. Consequently, the parties have no objection to the public filing of the unredacted order and its accompanying exhibits.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004733.jpg

This document is the final page of a legal filing (Document 295 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated May 21, 2021, and filed on May 25, 2021. In it, the U.S. Attorney's office, led by Audrey Strauss, concludes its argument by asking the Court to deny the defendant's motions for immediate disclosure of impeachment material related to 'Minor Victim-4'. The prosecution asserts it will provide the material at least six weeks before trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014717.jpg

This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 28, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (led by US Attorney Damian Williams) and the defense team (including attorneys from Haddon Morgan and Foreman and Cohen & Gresser). Also noted as present are representatives from the FBI and NYPD.

Court transcript cover page
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014679.jpg

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 22, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, details the legal teams for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), and notes the presence of FBI agent Amanda Young and NYPD officer Paul Byrne. The document was filed on August 10, 2022, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00014679.

Court transcript cover page
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014659.jpg

Cover page for the official court transcript of the Jury Trial in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330) held on December 21, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists appearances by the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Bobbi Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

Court transcript (cover page)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002728.jpg

This legal document, filed by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, details the security and search procedures for a specific defendant at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). It outlines daily pat-down and cell searches, weekly body scans, and frequent nightly wellness checks, justifying them as necessary for the safety of the institution and the defendant. The document also notes a recent change to reduce searches by relocating the defendant's video conferences with her counsel to within her unit.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
0
Total
4

Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter

From: Alison Moe
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

No preview available

Letter
2020-07-27

Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense co...

From: Alison Moe
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Request for extension of time.

Letter
2020-07-27

Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter

From: Alison Moe
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter.

Letter
2020-07-27

Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter

From: Alison Moe
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Request for extension until 5 p.m. the following day.

Letter
2020-07-27

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity